Opinions On Kantech Vs Other Access Control Systems?

I have a client that i inherited and has a Kantech system. A mix of the KT-1 and KT400. It is not a system our company would install by preference and Kantech is not a familiar system. With that I have no problem learning what is needed to provide service the client deserves. However they question the current system they have will deliver the security needs they are looking for. So I am inquiring opinions of the Kantech system as a whole compared to others and who suggest their preference.

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

* ***'* **** *** ** **********. **'* ******** ** **** to **** ****. * ****'* ********* **** **** *******. **** version *** **********. **'* *** ** ** ******. **'* ***** on ** ***** **********.

* **** ****** ****** ********* **** **** ******. ***** ******* its ******* ** ** *** ****** ** ***** *** *** software *** ******** ******** ***** **** ********* **** ** ****** be. *** ****** ** ***** **** **** **** **** ** install ********* ****** **** ****. ** *** ********* *** *** as * ********** * ****** ** ***** ****** ********* **** selling ******* * ******. ** ** * *** **** **** work *** **** **** ** **** **** **** * **** way ******* ************* **** *** ******. **** ******* *** **** input ** *** ******* ** *** ***** ** *** *** long ****. ****** **

*** *** ******** * ******* ******** ******? **** *** **** completed *** ****** *** *** ******* ** *** ****** ******* systems *** *** **** ** *** **** * ****** *******. i ********* *** ****** ******* ******* *** **** ** * functional ******* ****** ** ***.

***** ******, ***** *** *** *****/********* ************. **** **** **** for **** ** *** **********, **********, ****** *** *-** ***-*****.

*********:

******* *** *** ** *** ****** **** ****** ********** *** for ****** ** *** ***** *****. ***** *** *** ***** (available **** *** **** ******* *** ** * *****) *** mobile *** ** * ***** ********** *** *** *********. **** a **** ******* ********** **** **** *** **** ***** **** fewer *** **** ***** ** *** ** ** ******. ******** we **** *** ** *** ******** ****** **** *** ********. Their **** ******* ** ********* ********* / ***** *******.

**** ******* ********* ******** *** ************* *** ******* *** *** top *** "******" ** *** ******** *** ***** *** ***** starter ******* ****. *** ** * **** *** ** **** help ******* ***** *******/*******.

*********:

*** ** *** **** * *********/***** ***-** **** * *** of *** ************* *** **** ** ** *** ***** ******, which ** *** **** ** ** ** **** *****. **** of *** ******* ***-** *** ******* ************* ****** ** *** thick ****** ** ****. ***** **** ******* **** ***** *** higher *** ***** ** * ******** ******** **** ****.

******* ** **** ** ********** ************ ** *** ***** ** for **** ** *** *******. *** ********* *** *** ** the **** ****. **** ** *** ******** ********** ** ******** which ** **** ** **** ** **. *** ***** *** deal **** *** **** ***** ****** *** ***** *** ******** to *** *** ***** *******. ** **** ** **** **** with ***** *** ** **** ** ** **** ****-**.

***** *** *** **** *****. **** *****. * ******* *********** the **** ******* ******** *** **** *** ****. ****** *** tech **** *** ******. * ** ******* **** ** ******** sales *** ** **** ****** **** ****** **** *** ** was **** *** ** ** *******. ******** **** *** **** level ********. **** *** *** *********** ********, ** ** **** stand ***** ****** *******. ** ****** ** **** *** *** long ****.