In April, Dahua sent the FCC a confidential compliance plan so it could authorize new equipment as long as it is not for 'prohibited purposes'. IPVM filed a reply opposing this, noting that making the plan public is in the public interest.
Now, in a June 23 FCC submission, Motorola Solutions (MSI) also argues Dahua's compliance plan should not be confidential for multiple reasons. MSI did not cite IPVM's reply, instead making detailed legal arguments.
*******, *** ****** *** ***** *** "blanket *** ********* ****** ** ***************" and **** ***** *** **** "****** more" **** ********* *** ***'* ******** confidentiality ********. ******** **** ***** ** is "** *** ****** ********" *** Dahua's **** ** ** ******, ***** echoes ****'* ********:
*****’* ******* **** *** ********** **** be ******** ** *** ******** **** public ********** ****** ** ****** ******* it **** ***** ** ********** *****, whichprohibit **** ******* *** ********* ****** ** ***************. In addition, Dahua *** *** **** *** *********** ************* for confidential treatment as required by the Commission’s rules, doing little **** **** ********* *** ******** *** ************ ********* under those rules. Dahua’s confidentiality request also ignores that the Commission generally hasnot ******** ************ ********* ** ******** ********* ** ***********. Furthermore, even assuming Dahua were able to make the required confidentiality showing, which is not the case, the Commission nonetheless should make Dahua’s compliance plan available for public inspection because doing ** ***** ** ** *** ****** ********. [emphasis added]
****, **** ***** ***** ********** ****** ** ************* ******** **** **** **** *** received ******** **** *** *** ** their ********** **** ***:***** ********* ** ***: "** ****** Whatsoever" ** ********** ****.
***** ** ***** ** **** ** feedback **** *** *** ** **** front; **** **** ****** **** **** happens.
***** ** *** **** **** **** actions **** *** *** ****** - you ***'* *** ** **** **** confidentiality.