Subscriber Discussion

Microsoft Hires Eric Holder To Audit Anyvision Over Use Of Facial Recognition On Palestinians

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
•Nov 18, 2019

Microsoft hires Eric Holder to audit AnyVision over use of facial recognition on Palestinians

While we're talking about HIKVISION...

(1)
(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Nov 18, 2019
IPVM

*********'* *** ********. *******:********* *** ********** ** *** *** News *** **** **** ********* *** The “**** ******* ******* ***** ** Man"

(1)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #2
•Nov 18, 2019

* ****** ** *** **** ** aware ** *** ******** ********* **** are ***** *********. * ****** ** those ********* *** ***** ** *** Anyvision ******** ****** ****** *** *****.

(1)
JH
John Honovich
•Mar 27, 2020
IPVM

******:

********* *** **** ** *********** ************* led ** ****** ** ******** ******* Eric ****** *** *** **** ** international *** **** ********* & ******* found **** “*********’* ********** *** *** previously *** **** *** ********* ***** a **** ************ ******* ** *** West **** **** *** **** ******* in ***** *******.” *** ** **** so, ********* **** ** ***** **** constituted * ****** ** *** ******* portfolio’s ****** ** ******* ****** *********** use.

**********, ********* **** ** **divesting **** ********* and will no longer make minority investments in any facial recognition firms. [emphasis added]

(1)
(2)
IG
Israel Gogol
•Mar 29, 2020
In reply to John Honovich

* ******* ********* *** ***** *** facial *********** *** *****, *** **** stopping ** ***?

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #3
•Mar 29, 2020

** ***** *** ****** **** *** to ** **** *** ******* *** COVID *** ** **** *** ** mask ****?

(2)
JH
John Honovich
•Mar 29, 2020
IPVM
In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #3

****'* ** *********** ********. ***, **** is *** ******** ********* -*** **** | ********* & *********'* Venture **** *******, *********:

********* *** ********* **** ****** **** it ** ** *** **** ******** of **** *********** *** ********* ** divest *** ************ ** *********.

** ** *** ***** *** ********* is ******* *** ****** **. *** it's ********* ******* ** ** *** far **** **** **** **** (*********** + ************* *********** = ******* *********). There's **** ******** ***** ** **** but ***** **** ***** ********* *********** "not ******", **'* *** *** ***** outcome.

** *** **** ** *** ****** thing ** **** **** **** ****** way *********** ****** *** *********** ** going ** **** ** **** ****** to **** **** *** ********** *****.

(4)
New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions