Member Discussion
Looking For Solutions In Latin America
Good morning. I recently travelled to a Latin American country and encountered a Wi-Fi nightmare. Because the majority of the construction is masonry (concrete/block), I found that getting a solid (no pun intended) signal throughout a residence was almost impossible with standard OTS equipment.
Does anyone have suggestions for equipment (short of running APs all over an entire building) that is capable of solving this issue?
Thanks.
Login to read this IPVM discussion.
**** ********.
********* ************'* **** ********.
****-******* ****** ****** ***** transmitting ******* ************. * don't **** ********** ** I ****** *******.
***** ****,
* **** * **** system ** *********** ******** that ** ***** ******* yearly ***** ****. ** started *** ********* **** to * ****** ****’ away. *** ********* ******** is ******** ****** & Unifi. * **** ** for ****** **********, ** choices, *** *********.
************ ** *** ********* and *** *******.*** *** *** **** run ** *** ***** switch. * **** ***** UAP-AC-M-US *** **** ******* them **** ***-**-****.*** ****** ****** ** the ** **** *** made ******* *** ****** was ******* *** ****** indicating * ******* ****.********** ** **** ***** and **** *** ** I **** ** ****** for **** *********.* ******* ******* **** would “****” ** *********** and ***** * ****, even ****** *** **** feature *** ****** ***.** ******* **** *** update ** *** *** was *********.
*** ************* ***** ** one ** **** ****** (USW-16-POE) ** *** ***** where *** ***** ***** is, **** * ***, NanoBeam *** * ****.******* ** **** ****** at *** ******/****** **** 7 ***.
*** ****** ** ************* 40’ * **” **** three ******. **** ***** on *** ***** *****, five ***** ** *** second *****, *** *** open ** *** ***** floor.* **** **** * NVR **** * *******.
** ******* ***** ** the ****** **** ** offline ******** ********** *** day *** ******* ** a ****.* **** ** **** on *** ****** ** work ******* **** *****.* ** *** ***** Spanish.* ******* ** ** the ***** *****, ** the ***** *******’* ******.**** *** ******* ** mid **** (***********) *** suspect ****** ************ *** residents ** **** *** required ** **** ****, and *** ***** *** internet ****, *** *** Zoom *** ******.* **** ******* *** there *** **** *** ”Neighboring ****** ******” ** take **** *************.
****
Newest Discussions
| Discussion | Posts | Latest |
|---|---|---|
|
Started by
Marcelo Mota de Azevedo Jr
|
8
|
4 minutes by Undisclosed Integrator #1 |
|
Started by
Undisclosed Integrator #1
|
8
|
less than a minute by Clayton Burnett |
|
Started by
Drew Weston
|
2
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
|
Started by
Undisclosed Integrator #1
|
8
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
|
Started by
Mike Matta
|
9
|
less than a minute by Mike Matta |
********, *****-********** ** ***, is *** ***** ** work **** ****** ** send *** **** ******* it. *.**** ******* **** operate ****** ******* *** attenuation **** ** **** lower, *** ***** *** significantly ********. ********* ** that, ** *** ***** build * ****** (** whichever **** ** ********* in **** *******) **** network ****** *** ***** to ****** **** ******** access ****** (***) **, that ***** ****, *** I ***'* ***** *** resulting *********** ***** ** good.
** ****, ** *** look ** ** **** another *****, *** **** of ****** ******* ***** your *** *** ****** interference **** ** *******, and **** ****** ******* more ***********. **** *** once ********** * ******* installing **** ** *** buildings (**********, ************) *** with ***** ********* ** device ***** *** *** need *** ****** ** density, ** *** ******* to ****** ****-******* ****** much ******. **** ********* results ** ****** ** counts.