IP Vs 'Regular' Electronic Access Control

I'm struggling a little with the difference between an IP-based access system and a "regular" system. I assume that an IP system connects more so via local network connections while the "regular" system has the component cables homerun to the controller even though it is software driven via network.

If this is not correct, will someone set me straight?

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

** **** ********* ******** **** ** ******* **** **** ** Access ******* ******* (*** **** ***, **** **** ********** ***** be ******** ** ****), ** **** ** ******* ** ******* "panel" ************ ******* **** **** *-* **** ********** ******* **** have * ******* *********** *** * ***** ** *-* **** controllers **** *** ********* ********** **** ****** ***********.

****** ******* ***'* ** "*****", *** **** **** * ******, your ********** ** *******.

**********, **** ******-******* ******* ************ **** * **-*** ** ******* bus. **-***** ****** ******* ******* ********** **** ** ******** *******, allowing *** ** **** ******* *********** ** *******, *** ********* parts (********, ***.), *** ** ****/***/****** ***** **** ***********.

****** *******, ***** ** ******* *** ****** *********** **** ******, I ***'* ***** *** ******* ****** ******* ****** ******* **** a **** ** ********* **********, *** * ** ***** *** RS-485 ******* ******* *** **** * ****** ***** *** ****** to ************ ** * ****** ******.

**, (*** *****, *'* *** ** ****** ******* ***), * don't ***** **-***** ****** ******* ******* **** ** ** **** new ********* ** **-***** ******* ******* ***, **'* * ****** more ** * ************/*************** ****.

***** ****** ***** ******** **** * **** ****** ***********.