Last month, SecurityInfoWatch.com (SIW) emailed me an "article" encouraging me to download "exclusive research" on the topic of "balancing transparency" in "advanced weapons screening."
******* ** *** ***** *** *** "exclusive ********" *** *** *********** *********, but *** ******** ** "********* ************" and ******* ***** ** ********* **-**** "********* ********"**** *********** ** *****, **** ** advocating *** **** *** ******* "*********** metal *********" ****** "******** ******* *******."
*** ***** *** * ******* **** undisclosed ***********, ** **** *** **** report:****'* ******** ****-***, *********** ******** *******
** ****** ******* ** *** ******* mentioned "********* *******" *** *** **** whom.
*******, *** **** **** *** *** research ***** ********* "*****":
********* ****** *** ** **** ** anonymously ******* ******** **** **** ******** sponsored ** *******.
* ******* *** ** *** ****** for ************* ** ** ******* ***** sponsored *** *******. *** ******* **** they "****** ****** ** *** *** disclosure" *** ***** ****** **.
****** *** ******* **** **.It ***** *** **** ******* ** *** ********* ******* **** ****** ****** ** *** *** ********** ***** *** ****. As you can imagine, this goes against standard practice. The proper verbiage has now been added (screenshot below), and it will also be added to the form itself within 24 hours. [emphasis added]
***'* **** *** ******* ****** *** research ** **** *****.
*******, *** ******** ***** ****** *** not **** *******, ***** **** ** mention ** ***** *** ***********.