What you think about Videio IQ Video Analytics ??
I Have concern about missing suspects & false alarms.
What you think about Videio IQ Video Analytics ??
I Have concern about missing suspects & false alarms.
Where are you using VideoIQ analytics? What's the scene? What's the camera? What subjects are you missing?
Overall, and relative to other video analytics, VideoIQ does well. See: 2014 Video Analytics favorites and Testing VideoIQ Rialto
That's not to say it won't have issues. If you can share where you are having problems, we can help provide feedback.
Karim, when you lower the sensitivity just enough to reduce false positives(alerts without sufficient cause) to an acceptable level, are the false negatives (sufficient cause without alert) all of a similar type, e.g., small person in driveway, or does the system appear to 'break' everywhere at the same time? Is it related to particular time of day or camera? Have you optimized the camera settings themselves? How much is cost a concern? Is external lighting a possibility? As for being tired right after eating, this is not unusual, I recommend a short but brisk walk.;)
Here is a link to another discussion exploring a wide-range (maybe too wide) of perimeter protection/intrusion detection options. And here's a document you may have seen already, its VIQ's perimeter protection for small sites pdf.
And are PIR and beams going to be immune from the animals on site?
The issue seems to be that you have a very complex scene which will be challenging for most analytic systems. I am not sure there is an easy solution.
This sounds like the eternal complaint about video Analytics. Dissecting the complaint without seeing the sight would make me question....
How far from the camera are objects supposed to be detected?
How close can objects like cats get to the camera?
Is there EVEN and ADEQUATE lighting?
IF you used other types of detection would you be covering the same area, expect better results?
I've seen good results from the VideoIQ product but managing expectations and proper design saves time and heartache. Just my 2 cents worth having been in the video analytic industry.
Managing the relationship between PD / FAR is always a challenge. Where VIQ excels is the time spent doing initial tuning and seasonal changes.
This is the site, as you can see it is quite huge and located in an open area. Videio IQ are remotly checking the configuration settings. but if we had to connect remotly the systems with a control room it had been a different story, i beleive that we can improve the system by making sure we have sufficiant lighting during night time and also close more the field of view.
what is the max field of view you recomend ?
thanks
VideoIQ has FOV recommendations in their design docs. I would personally say you probably don't want anything over 200' wide in this case.
If you've adjusted sensitivity and can't find a sweet spot that reliably detects humans while not detecting dogs, you likely do need more lighting, or more pixels, or both.
Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.