X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo 8fbbe83a6ce128d4940dbb3787cc2aeaf3d9938b15d0b711b17d116501531882
2016 book promo

Options and Challenge for Video Surveillance Integration

Author: John Honovich, Published on Aug 26, 2008

It's tough and getting tougher to figure out the best approach to integrate video surveillance with other security systems. While the industry conversation centers on the value of integration, the real challenge is how to make this happen, effectively, cost-efficiently and simply.

This challenge is growing and is not simply the standard issues in technology selection and design. A few years ago, the options were fairly clear (if exceedingly limited). Or speaking more precisely, the option was fairly clear: The access control system functioned as the command center and the other systems, such as video feed into the access control's platform.

Today, we have three categories, contenders if you will, for the role of master application in security systems:

  1. The Access Control System: the classic approach
  2. The PSIM system: the emerging trend of deploying a dedicated application managing traditional security systems
  3. The Video Surveillance System: a growing movement by video vendors to manage other systems

Which one do you choose? Which one is best? Which one will win?

Access Control

Access control is the most well developed of the options available, having been fostered over the last decade. Most access control systems can interface with a variety of video management systems. Key advantages include the fact that almost everyone has access control and adding in the interfaces is fairly inexpensive. The main customer drawback of access control systems as the central platform is that they tend to limit 3rd party support to products that most help their immediate sales. The larges incumbents such as GE, Tyco (Software House) and Honeywell have all been cited on these issues. Also, access control systems almost never support other access control system so if you need to support multiple access control systems, this generally will not work.

PSIM System

While PSIM stands for the concept of managing physical security information, it also covers a group of companies that are building dedicated applications whose sole purpose is to manage security systems such as access control and video management systems. Notable vendors include Orsus, Proximex and Vidsys. Because they are not owned or controlled by access control or video vendors, they can and do offer a wide variety of support for different manufacturers. They also are optimizing their solution for large-scale security management rather than extending an existing access control system. The downside is that you have to buy a new product that is neither cheap nor trivial to implement ($100,000 USD - $1,000,000+ USD).

Video Management

More and more, video management vendors are adding in PSIM functionalities into their system. For instance, VideoNEXT, traditionally a video management vendor, is now marketing a video + PSIM solutuion. Verint's Nextiva and OnSSI's Ocularis are bringing in PSIM features such as mapping, third party system integration, workflow management, etc. A key advantage is that it can be cheap and easy to add functionalities into a User Interface that a customer may already be using. However, limited or no support of other video systems is an important downside. To make it even more confusing, two of the PSIM vendors, Orsus and Proximex, offer powerful video monitoring solutions that provide better large scale camera monitoring than many video management vendors.

What to Do?

At a high level, I do not see one clearly winning approach nor an approach that is destined to win. The segment that has the best chance to win is the PSIM companies however they are clearly a niche player until they can bring the cost and complexity of implementation down so that it can be rapidly deployed at cost minimally higher than today's video and access systems. Until that time, it will make sense for most users to strongly consider expanding the functionality of their video and acccess systems (even if it constrains the functions and systems they can support).

That being said, I find this to be a disappointing state of affairs. While the benefits of integration are so frequently cited, until integration can be done broadly and inexpensively, most users will opt for low levels of integration.


Other Reports on Video Surveillance

License Plate Capture 4K Test on Jan 11, 2016
License plate capture is one of the most popular surveillance applications. IPVM has done extensi...

33 New Products Directory - Fall 2015 on Sep 28, 2015
New products or major tech isssues that IPVM has reported on this summer / fall: Axis Release...

HD Analog vs IP Guide 2015 on Sep 21, 2015
In the past, the only way to get megapixel / HD was to use IP. Now, a crop of alternatives are em...

Axis Digital Autotracking Tested on Sep 16, 2015
As camera resolutions continues to climb, the likelihood that you will ever display any camera at...

Vote Results - Next Big Thing 2020 on Sep 14, 2015
Over 230 integrators and manufacturers told us what they believe will be the next big thing in vi...

5 Low Cost IR Illuminators Tested on Sep 03, 2015
IR illumination has increased in popularity, with built in IR becoming a common feature in low-co...

HD Analog Four Way Cameras Tested on Aug 28, 2015
One camera that delivers AHD, HDCVI, HDTVI and 960H, all for as little as $15 a camera. Both on ...

Vehicle Entrance Camera Selection Guide on Jul 21, 2015
When it comes to vehicle surveillance, the conversation regularly turns to license plate capture....

Ethernet over Coax (EoC) Shootout on Jul 16, 2015
Reusing existing coax for IP cameras can cut installation costs dramatically. However, there are ...

Super Low Light HD Lens Tested on Jun 26, 2015
A smaller F-number can make a big difference in how much light reaches an imager. For example, t...


Most Recent Industry Reports

Blink Totally Wireless Camera Tested on Feb 12, 2016
Wireless cameras almost always still need a wire for power. Given that, many argue to just used w...

Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2016 on Feb 11, 2016
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? Historically, 30fps has been...

Goodbye Dropcam, the $50 Home Security Camera Era Is Here on Feb 10, 2016
Remember those days not too long ago where a $200 home security camera with a $100 per year for s...

Hikvision H.264+ Tested on Feb 10, 2016
Is 'regular' H.264 soon to be a thing of the past? Last year, Axis started the 'smart' H.264 tre...

Camera Coverage Areas on Feb 10, 2016
How wide and far on an area can a camera cover? A fundamental metric in analyzing this is pixel...

US Capital Paying for Homes and Business to Get Security Cameras on Feb 09, 2016
Since 9/11, US cities have spent hundreds of millions collectively on city-wide video surveillanc...

Brivo Access Control Company Profile on Feb 09, 2016
This is our 9th in a series of access control company profiles. In this entry, we cover Brivo. P...

Axis Is In Denial About HD Analog on Feb 08, 2016
For more than a decade, Axis' #1 argument against analog has been no HD. This, of course, is no...

Surveillance Commissioning / Install Checklist on Feb 08, 2016
This 60+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that installation is...

Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2016 on Feb 08, 2016
The market has changed significantly since 2014, where our previous Favorite Camera Manufacturer ...