How Apple Impacts Video SurveillanceAuthor: John Honovich, Published on Sep 03, 2008
Apple's interest in video surveillance is generating significant interest. This report examines the key areas where Apple will (and will not) impact the video surveillance industry.
Key Impact - iPhone/iPod touch
The Apple iPhone (and iPod touch) will finally make mobile video surveillance a major element of video surveillance, improving security operations and helping to reduce crime. For a number of years, video surveillance vendors have touted mobile video despite minimal practical applications. The Apple iPhone will overcome the technical and logistical problems that undermined earlier efforts of video surveillance companies to deploy mobile monitoring.
[Update Jan 2011 - We have tested the iPhone and iPad using video surveillance application.]
Apple and videoNEXT co-hosted a panel at ASIS driving speculation on Apple's involvement in video surveillance has become intense.
Disclaimer: this report is my personal observations based on no private knowledge of Apple's plan.
Overview of Apple's Benefits
The Xserve is Apple's high end server that can be used for running IP video surveillance software (for instance, VideoNext has announced support for the Xserve). However, Apple's servers do not offer breakthrough benefits for video surveillance plus most video surveillance software is not developed to run on the Apple OS. Nonetheless, for those software providers that do run on the Apple OS, expect this to be a key benefit in growing segments such as the education market.
The iPhone is essentially a phone/portable PC that can run 3rd party applications like video surveillance client software (the iPhone touch is fundamentally the iPhone without phone/3G service). For instance, videoNEXT will be announcing their iPhone application in the coming weeks.
That being said, I see no reason why Apple would buy video surveillance companies. Unlike Cisco, Apple has not historically bought companies to build broad product portfolios. Apple generally develops internally while acquiring strategic technologies to support their products.
Apple looks to benefit from video surveillance by driving adoption of their core products (such as Xserve and the iPhone) through the use of video surveillance applictions that are processor and bandwidth intensive.
Traditional Mobile Video Surveillance
Mobile video surveillance offers significant value for security operations:
- Being at a PC is not ideal for general monitoring: Most security monitors (despite stereotypes) have many responsibilities that require them to multi-task and frequently be away from a desk/PC.
- Responding requires security to be away from a PC: Intercepting real-time threats requires security operators to be moving towards the suspect.
Both of these points are well understood and have been the motivation for years to make surveillance more mobile.
Nonetheless, mobile video surveillance for PDAs and phones have been quite limited. In fact, relative to the amount of vendor promotion, it always surprises me how little use there actually is.
In my experience and that of other integrators, it has been the practical issues involved that have undermined the use of mobile video surveillance. Issues such as:
- Difficulties in determining what devices to run the software on
- Difficulties in loading/updating software on the PDA/phone
- Difficulties in using software on the PDA/phone
- Problems in providing bandwidth coverage
- Need to have a phone and a secondary device dedicated to mobile surveillance
Apple iPhone Advantages for Mobile Surveillance
The iPhone offers 2 fundamental advantages over traditional devices for mobile video surveillance:
- A vastly easier to use and more powerful phone
- Their AppStore makes adding and updating third party applications easy
The general benefits of the iPhone are well discussed. Specific elements that are critical to video surveillance are 3G wireless (for receiving video streams without depending on wifi) and the iPhone's superior abilities to display video and 3d graphics. A potentially lesser appreciated feature is the built-in GPS locator that could provide significant benefits in helping responders locate where they are relative to the video they are viewing.
The AppStore is particularly important. AppStore makes it simple for users to simply access, install and upgrade new applications. This is especially valuable when contrasted to the traditional business model of mobile phone providers. In the traditional model, providers sought to limit and lock down what applications could be loaded on their phones. This made distributing and using 3rd party applications (like video monitoring client software) especially tricky.
The AppStore looks to make installing video surveillance clients as simply as downloading a song from iTunes. This will make a major difference in the uptake of mobile surveillance.
Technicals Challenges for iPhone Development
A number of meaninful challenges exist for iPhone development. (This section is technical, skip to the conclusion if you prefer).
The fundamental issues are:
- Most video surveillance software development is done using Microsoft's .NET framework, essentially incompatible with MAC OS X (this impact is quite significant on the server side but is only mildly problematic when developing client apps for the iPhone)
- iPhone deveopment requires the use of a language Objective C and development environment different from 'normal' video surveillance tools (C#/Visual Studio or Java/Eclipse).
- Many video surveillance companies use ActiveX controls to stream/display video in client software. iPhones do not support them.
- You can only develop for iPhone apps on Macs (a problem if you are using Visual Studio running on a PC for .NET development)
None of these are truly deal-breakers for a moden video surveillance software company. However, it will take time and a commitment of resources for many to make this happen. Some companies will move quicker (for instance VideoNext does significant programming in C so this makes the transition easier).
By the end of the year, more than 10 million iPhones are projected to be sold, an increasing number for enterprise users. As such, the features, functionalities and mass of users are growing to make iPhone an ideal choice to make mobile video surveillance a reality.
Other Reports on Video Surveillance
License Plate Capture 4K Test on Jan 11, 2016
License plate capture is one of the most popular surveillance applications. IPVM has done extensi...
33 New Products Directory - Fall 2015 on Sep 28, 2015
New products or major tech isssues that IPVM has reported on this summer / fall: Axis Release...
HD Analog vs IP Guide 2015 on Sep 21, 2015
In the past, the only way to get megapixel / HD was to use IP. Now, a crop of alternatives are em...
Axis Digital Autotracking Tested on Sep 16, 2015
As camera resolutions continues to climb, the likelihood that you will ever display any camera at...
Vote Results - Next Big Thing 2020 on Sep 14, 2015
Over 230 integrators and manufacturers told us what they believe will be the next big thing in vi...
5 Low Cost IR Illuminators Tested on Sep 03, 2015
IR illumination has increased in popularity, with built in IR becoming a common feature in low-co...
HD Analog Four Way Cameras Tested on Aug 28, 2015
One camera that delivers AHD, HDCVI, HDTVI and 960H, all for as little as $15 a camera. Both on ...
Vehicle Entrance Camera Selection Guide on Jul 21, 2015
When it comes to vehicle surveillance, the conversation regularly turns to license plate capture....
Ethernet over Coax (EoC) Shootout on Jul 16, 2015
Reusing existing coax for IP cameras can cut installation costs dramatically. However, there are ...
Super Low Light HD Lens Tested on Jun 26, 2015
A smaller F-number can make a big difference in how much light reaches an imager. For example, t...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Mega Chinese Electronics Manufactuer Xiaomi Yi Camera Tested on Feb 05, 2016
Xiaomi's revenue is 4 to 5 times larger than Hikvision's. Only in business for 5 years, Xiaomi ha...
Trade Mag Admits 84% Prefer Online Over Print on Feb 05, 2016
Some say the industry is so old and conservative that print is still important. Well, even a pri...
Hikvision Video Analytics Tested on Feb 04, 2016
We tested Hikvision's video analytics on six Hikvision models, ranging from entry level to high e...
Last Chance - IP Networking Course on Feb 04, 2016
Our most popular course starts next week (February 9th), with all new training of network securit...
Add Your Preferred Camera Manufacturer to the Calculator on Feb 03, 2016
One of the most popular features of our Camera Calculator is choosing specific models. Indeed, me...
Axis vs Avigilon vs FLIR vs Hikvision vs Samsung Camera Pricing on Feb 03, 2016
The 'race to the bottom' is a big issue, with average prices dropping sharply over the past few y...
Network Security for IP Video Surveillance Guide 2016 on Feb 03, 2016
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that c...
Resolution Usage Statistics 2016 on Feb 02, 2016
In the past few years, 4MP, 6MP, 4k (8.3MP) and 12MP cameras have become increasingly commonplace...
Avigilon H4 HD Cameras Released on Feb 01, 2016
Avigilon has announced a new generation of cameras, the H4. In this note, based on speaking with...
Honeywell Pro-Watch Access Control Profile on Feb 01, 2016
Inside we examine Honeywell Pro-Watch access control line: Comparing Honeywell to their compet...