"We Are Low-Voltage Contractors. Why Would We Encourage Wireless Solutions?", Thoughts?

*** **** **** ****** ***** ******** wireless ********* *******? ********?

***** ** * ******* ** *** BICSI ****** ***** **** ** ********** this ************. *** **** *** ************ further *** **** *** ***-******* *******, etc. *** *** ***** **** ******** displaces ****, *******, ***** *** ** many ****** **** *** ******* ** to *** **** *******. ***** ** they ***** ******** ******* ******* **? More ******** *******, *** ****** ******* network *** ****. **** ** **** to ******** ** **-**, ** ***** tech. *** **** ** **** ** these *****, *** **** ************, ****** throughput, *** **** ****** ** ******. True ** *** *** ** ********** desktop *** ** *********** **** *** cables *******, *** ********* ***** ** service *** ******/****** ********** ** *** smart ******* *** **** *******, ***. If ** **********/**** *********** **** ** going **, **** **** *** ************* to ******* ***** ******* ******** ** 2.5 ** ******, *** ****** *** standards, ******* ******** ********, ***** **-** standards, ** *****, ***** ********, ***** EV ********, ***... ** *** **** up **** ** **** *******.

**** **** *** *** * ********* business?

*’* **** ***** *** ******* ******* to ******** ******** ************** ****** **** wireless *******.

** ***** ** ******** ************** ***** is ** ******* ***** ***** ********, right ******* *** *** ***** ********, if ***’** * ***** ******** **** one ** *** ******.. *** ******** might ** *** ** **** ********.

** ***’** * ****** ******** **********, then **; ***’** *** (*****) ***-******* contractor *******.

****** ******** ******** ******* ******* ******* network **************, ********* ******** ********* ** some ****.

******** *********** *** ***;

- ******* *********

- ********** ******** *** ********

- ***** ******** *************

- ******** *** ****************** *********

- ********** ********

- ***********

- *** **** ****!

**** ** ***’** * ***** ******** with **** ******** *** * *** or **** ** *****, ** **** alluded ***; *** ***** ***** ** the *****. ************** ******** ** * smart *** ** ****** * *******.

******** *** ***** ******* *** *********, wired > ******** ******* ****** ** exception. ** *** **** *****, ******** has **'* ***** (***'* *** *******, budgets, "*** **** ****, **'* **** enough," ***..).

*******'* ********:

*** ******* ***'** ********* ** * common *********** ** *** ***** ** physical *********** ********, *********** *** *********** and ******** ** ***** *********** **** wireless ****. ***'* ***** ** **** and ******* ** **'* *****, *** how ** ***** ** ******** ** nuanced:

1. Security *** ***********: Wired connections are generally considered more secure and reliable than wireless. This is because wired networks are less susceptible to interference and have lower latency. They are also less prone to eavesdropping and hacking, as intercepting physical cables is more challenging than intercepting wireless signals.

2. Wireless ************: However, advancements in wireless technology have significantly improved its security and reliability. Technologies like WPA3 for WiFi and various encryption methods have made wireless networks much more secure. Additionally, with the advent of 5G and improved WiFi standards, the reliability and speed of wireless connections are continually increasing.

3. Installation *** ***********: Wireless systems are often easier and less expensive to install, especially in locations where running cables is impractical or impossible. This makes wireless an attractive option for many scenarios, balancing the trade-off between the highest security and practical constraints.

4. Scalability *** ***********: Wired systems can be more challenging to scale and maintain, especially in large or complex environments. Wireless systems offer greater flexibility in this regard.

5. Use **** **********: The choice between wired and wireless should also consider the specific use case. For instance, in highly sensitive environments (like government facilities), wired connections might be non-negotiable. Conversely, in a home security setup, wireless might be more than adequate.

********* *** *******:

• Contextualize ******** *****: Rather than stating "wired > wireless without exception," it would be more accurate to say, "Wired connections typically offer superior security and reliability, but advancements in wireless technology have made it a viable and sometimes preferable option in many scenarios."
• Emphasize *** **** ***********: Highlight that the decision should be based on the specific security needs, environmental constraints, and the risk profile of the installation site.
• Consider ************* ************: Acknowledge the rapid advancements in wireless technology that are closing the gap in security and reliability between wired and wireless systems.

** *******, ***** *** ******* ******* that ***** ******* *** **** ****** and ******** **** ******** **** ***** in **** *****, **'* ********* ** consider *** ******** *******, *** ****, and ******* ************ ** ******** ********** that *** *********** ********* *** ********* of ******** ********** ********.

* ***** *** **** ***** *** best ******** *** *** ******** ** it ***** ** ******** ******* *** want ** **** **** ******** *** sell *** *** *********, ** ******, high ***** ***** *****, ******* *******, access *******, *****, *******, ***** ******** and ** *****.