This one surprised me, given the security risks, but perhaps this is more typical than I think.
******** **** ** ** * ************ newsletter***** ******* *****:
* **** ******* **** ******* **** the ******** ** *** ******** ** to **** *** ********** ******* ***** its ******** **** **** *** ********'* system ** **** **** *********** ***** to ** ****, *** ******** ** not ********. ** ******** ***, "**** the ******** **** ****?" *** ****** was *** ***** ******* ** **** question. *** ** ** ****** ** ask ********** ** ******** ***** ****?
** *** *** ****, **'* *** unreasonable ** ***** **** ******** ****** provider **** **** ********, ** **********. On *** *****, ** ***** **** an *********** **** ** **** * company **** ********* ****** ** ***'* house, ****, *******, ***. ****, ********, it ***'* ** ****** *** ** could ** *** ** **** *** seem **** *** ***** *********** ********* of *** ****** ** *** *** security ********** ** ** ***** *** risk ** ******* ******** **.
** *** *****, ***** ****, ** least ******'* **** ******:
********* ** * **** ****** ** the ******** *********** ** ********®, **% of ********** **** ***** * *** to ***** ***** ** * ********. This ********** *** ******** ********** ********** over *** **** *** *****.
* ***** *** **** * ******** for **** *** ***** ** **** precedent ** **** ****** ****** *** access ******* ******.
** ** ****** ********** **********, ** was ****** ***% ** *** **** there **** ****** ***** ** **** specifically ******* *** **** ** *** integrator (**) *** ******* ***** *** maintenance ****.
*******, ** *** ***** * *** recall, *** ******** **** *** ******* these *********** **** ********** **** ** a ******/******/**** *** ** *** ** ask *** *** **** **** ******** onsite *** **** **** **** ** when *******.