For background, see:

In an attempt to solve a cold case from 1990, California police used a DNA-sequenced phenotype image from Parabon NanoLabs, according to The Wired:

*** ***** ******* ******** ********, ****** a ******** ********* ******, ****’* * photograph. ** *** * ** ********* that ******* *** ******* ****** ******* reality *** ******* *******; * ************** of *** *** *******’* ********* ********* a ****** ***** **** ***** ******* attributes ***** ** *** *** ******.

*** "******** ********* ******" *** ********* in ******* *** *****, *** *** ********* ******** ***** the *******'* *** ** *****:

IPVM Image

***** *** ****** *** *********, *** police **** ********* *** ********* ** be *** ******* ****** *********** ********, a ********* ** ******* ******** ***** of *******, ********* ***** *****:

“***** *** ***** ** *** ***** scene, ******* **** ************* * ******** suspect’s ****** ********,” *** ********* ********* in * ******* *** “********** *******” sent ** *** ******** ********** ******** Intelligence ******, * **-****** ****** ****** that *********** ************* ***** *******, *****, and ***** ****** ***********. “* **** a ***** ** *** ******** ******* and ***** **** ** *** ****** recognition ********** ** ******** * *******/****.”

******* ******** ******** ************* ** *** ************ ***** *******:

****** ******** ** ******* ********** **** made ** ********* *** ********** ** read *** ******** ** ******** ** pieces ** *** **** * ***** quantity ** ******. **** **** ******** a ***** ********** ** *** ******* variation ******* ****** *** **** ******** much ** *** ******* ********* **** differentiates ******'* **********. ***** *************** **** ** ****** ****************** ********* ** ******** ** ****** a ********-***-********* (***) ******* *** ********.

**** ** *** *** **** ******** of **-********* ***** ** ******** **** in * ****** *************. ********* ******, *********** ****** ** ******* ********* * 3D-rendered ***** ** * *******, **** from ******* ********. *******, **** *** ********* ** "a **** ******" *** ***** *******:

** *** *******, ** *** *** to ******* *** ******** *** ****** of *** ********* ** **** ****. We **** ** **** ***** ** its *****. ** ********* ** *** it ** * **** ******. *** we ***** *** ***** *** ******** our ******** *** ********* ******* *** balanced ******* **** ********* ***** *** intent ** **** **** *** *** very **** ********** **** **** ** be **********.

***** *** ** ********** **** ****** recognition *** **** ** **** *****.

***** **** ********** *** ** **** to ****** ************* **** ******** ** limited ** ***,*********** ***** **** ***** *** *********** in *********** ********** **** ******* ******** alone, *** ** ******** *******, ********* interactions ******* ***** *** ************* **********:

*** ****** *** *** ******* ** a ********** ******** *** **** ****** individuals ** ********* ** ******* ************ between *********. *** ********** ******* ** genetic *********** ******** ** ***** ********* is ********* ***** ******** **** *** mutations ******** *** ** ******* ** the *********** ** ************* ******* ** predict *********.

******* ************** ***************** ********* *** ********** ** "*************" to ****

*** **** ***'** ***** ** **** to *** * ****** *********** ****** against * ********* ***** *** **** anything *********** ******** ******* ** ** is **** * ********** *****, ** just ***** *************.

*** ** *** **** **** ***'** gonna ** **** ** ****** ********* with *** ***** ** *********** *** fidelity, ****'* ********* ** *** * face ***** ****** ** **, ****'* preposterous, **** ** *************.

***** *** *********** ** ******** ** phenotype **********, *** *** ***** ****** and ****** **** ****** ***********, * can't ******* **** ******* * ********* image ******* ****** *********** **** ******* meaningful, ******** *******.

** *** ***** **** ********** **** be ******** ** *** ********** ******? Do *** ***** ***-********* ****** *** be **** ********** ****** ** ******* meaningful ******* **** ****** *********** *******? Do *** ***** *** *********** ****** be **** ** *** **** ********** in **************?