Access Control Records Maintenance Guide

Published Jan 16, 2019 17:22 PM
PUBLIC - This article does not require an IPVM subscription. Feel free to share.

Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as keeping equipment operational.

Failing to do so can be as dangerous as leaving a door wide open. Unfortunately, this often gets overlooked as busy work and sometimes to disastrous consequences.

Best practices for Cardholder Management

Steps needed to keep the database trim and current are not difficult but their importance can not be understated:

  • Involve Human Resources: With Electronic Access Control, a formal line of communication between HR and Security must exist. As soon as employment status changes (ie: terminations, relocation, promotions) feedback needs to be channeled to those responsible for access control. Just as IT Departments terminate/change network access or emails, Security must respond accordingly with Access Control changes.
  • Formal Reporting Out: Similar communication initiated by Security groups should notify HR, Department Heads, and perhaps even employees / their direct supervisors when any configuration change to credentials occur. This helps close the loop of communication, but also reaffirms the importance to all why communicating these changes to Security is important.
  • Collect & Invalidate Credentials: Aside from just software configuration changes, write policy to include physically taking possession of credentials during an employee termination or transfer situation. Even if the credential cannot be reissued, ensuring it is properly disposed of will mitigate the potential for misuse.
  • Make Responsive Changes: Finally, do not delay in making configuration changes to the card holder database. Even if seemingly inconsequential (ie: inter-department transfer, shift change, name change) the opportunity to keep records up to date may be lost or create operational issues if delayed. Many times, managers do not consider the impact of employee changes on subsystems like Access Control, acting immediately on changes can reveal operational questions that can be asked before becoming an issue.

Access Cardholder Maintenance

While specific screens vary, all access control systems include a management tool to administer user information, similar to the image below:

During normal operation, this management screen is not often used, and once a credential is provisioned it may not be looked at again. However, knowing the value of the data it contains should not be underestimated.

Automated Database Maintenance Tools

Most databases include a light maintenance application that should be periodically run to 'tidy up' data tables and repair broken elements before causing access failures. For example, the Microsoft SQL Server Agent performs the following tasks:

  1. Reorganize/rebuild scatter index or data tables
  2. Shrink data and log files by removing empty entries
  3. Backup database and transaction log
  4. Perform internal consistency checks

Maintenance applications often also perform Date/Time Syncs between applications and edge controller devices, so that congruity in logging is kept.

Access Database Maintenance Matters

The benefit of keeping records current range from Life/Safety benefits, to keeping IT systems responsive:

  • Quicker Operational Response: Understanding the actual effect of a 'lock down' situation relies on assuming the user database has impacted all potential card holders. For example, when using Access Control for mustering, each identity listed in the database must be accurate. Non-maintained databases will not be useful for that application, simply due to neglect.
  • Better Performance: From a functional standpoint, bloated databases increase the potential of error and time needed to process through them. The inefficiency built into operation from unkempt databases can range between increase 'wait' times to read a card, to undetected corruption/unauthorized duplication of card holder records.
  • Needs Change Over Time: Even if a feature or piece of data is not currently 'used' to identify users or grant access, remember that system use parameters change over time, and once a database is 'ruined' with bad or lost information, it is costly to recover. In many cases, keeping fields accurate and updated can provide a critical, defining key to handling card holder data that may result in a costly manual effort otherwise.

Do Not Reuse Credentials

Not all end users choose to personalize credentials as ID Badges, and as a cost-saving step repeatedly reissue credentials. Once cards are turned in, they are thrown into a drawer until they are again issued. In this situation, turning in a card is not enough, the credential must also be removed from the system.

It is also common to destroy or dispose of the credential at this stage too, to mitigate the risk of illicit use or uncontrolled examples to circulate for 'reverse engineering' in potential duplication.

If user accounts are not kept current, a credential may be handed out with the previous identity. Uncovering these discrepancies can be time-consuming and frustratingly costly.

Another Name for "Key Control"

In similar fashion, pulling a usage report quarterly or twice yearly to see which cards have been used, and which ones have not, will help identify old credentials that should be turned off or help uncover those who might be using a mechanical key to gain access instead of their authorized credential.

Comments are shown for subscribers only. Login or Join