Wyze Fires Back at JCI - Your Patents Are Invalid, Pay All Of Our Costs
Goliath JCI targeted startup Wyze this summer alleging the fast-growing consumer startup was violating a slew of JCI's patents.
Now, Wyze has fired back at JCI, not only refusing to pay up but counter alleging that JCI's patents are invalid and that JCI should pay Wyze.
****** **** ****, ** ******* ****'* answer ** ***'* *********, *** ****-****** law **** **** **** ******** *** the ***** ** **** *****.
Wyze ******
** ******** *, ****,**** ******* *********** *** (*** ***** *********** ********'*) complaint:
*** ***** ******** ****** ****** ********** and ****** ** *** ** ******** that ***'* ******* *** *******:
****** ********** ** *** **** ****** way ** ***** ****. *** *******, this ** ******* **** ********** ***** ***** ******** ****** *******. And, ***** **** ** ******* *** approved *** **** ***** *********** **** a **** ******** ****** ** ******* is **** ****** **** ********, **** is * **** **** *** ***. Invalidating *******, ******, ** *********, *** most ****** ********* * **** ****** than ** ******* **** ***** ** costs.
******, **** *** **** **** *** patent ***********, **** **** *** ** pay *** ***** ***** ******* **** case ** ** '***********':
Hired ****-*** *********
********, **** ***** ****-*** ********** ********* to ** ** ******* ***:
**** ************* ****** ** ******* ** * ********** ** ************ Property *** **** ** ******* *** and****** **** ** ************* ************ ******** ********** *** **** to ******** ***. ******,******** * *** ******* ******-***** *** firm.
Outlook - *********** *** ***
**** **** *******, *** ******** *** on ****, ***** ***'* **** *********. The ******** ******* **** **** ** will **** *** **** *** **** Wyze *** ***** *** **** ******* and *** ********* ****** ** ***'* complaint. ** **** ******** **** ** are **** ******* ** ***** *** money ** (*** **) ********** ***'* patents?
Vote / ****
* ******* **** *** ***** ** IPVM, **** *** *** ** ****. I ***'* ***** ***** **** ** any "*******" ** **** *********. ** matter *** **** **** *** *** either *******, *** ********* *** ******* of ***** ******** *** ******** **** ultimately ** *** ****** ** ****, as **** **** *** *** ***** of **** ******** ** **** ******** and ******** **** **** ** *** result ** *** **** ** *** court *******.
**** ****** **** ** ******** ** an ******* *******. **** **** ** mind **** ******, ******* ** *** lose *** ****** *** **** *** revealed * ***** ******. ** ***** $50,000/yr *** ******** ** ****** * patent **** ***** *** ***** ** us. ** ******** ********** *** ***** to **** *************, ******* *********** *******, and ** ********* ****** ******** *** following **** *******.
** *** **** *** ****** *** have *** ******** * ***** ******.
*****'* *** ****** ********* ****** ******* reveal **** ***** ******?
***** **** ****** *** ****'* **** based ** *** ******* *** *** amount ** *********** *****.
"********, **** ***** ****-*** ********** ********* to ** ** ******* ***"
** ****** ** ******* ***** $*** capital ** ****. **** *** ****** choice ***** *** **** ****.
*** **** ******** ** *** '**** louder' ******** ********* **** ** ******* dogs *** **** **** **** ****** at ** * ****** ***... ******** to **** *** *** *** ***** twice ***** ***** ***** ****.
*'* ******* **** *** *** ***'* lawyers ********* **** *** **** ** is.... *** **** ****** **** *** little *** *****'* **** *** ******** to *** * **** ** *** fight.
******:* ********** ***** *** **** ***** by *** ************ * ********* ***** **** *** October ****:
** *** **** ****, **** ** being ******** ************** ******* **********.
******* **** ******** ** ** * trial ** ** ****** ******* ** be **** ** ***** ** ****** of **** ** ********* *** ******** in *** ********.
* ***’* ***** ** **** ****** information ** **** **** ***. ***’* wait ***** ***** *** ********* *******.