New *** **:* ***********
** ******* **** ****** releases, ******** ************* **** as****,*****, *** ********* *** use **:* *** ********** (3072x1728) ******* ** *:* 2592x1944, ** ***** ** the ********* ** ******* **********:

************, ***** ** * second, ********* *** **:* resolution, *********, **** ** Hikvision ** **** ******:

** ** ***** ****** here **** **** ** Hikvision's ****** ***** **** "5MP" ********, ****** ** using ********* (*:*) ** their *****, **** ******** increased ********* ********** ** 6MP (*:* ****** *****) in ****** ******** *.*.*:

New *** **:*: *********
************, ****** **** ******, several *** ****** *** have * *** ********** of ********* (**:*) ******* of *** ************ ****** 2048x1536 (*:*). *** *******, *** Honeywell *** ***** (***** ***) *****, ** **** as *********** ********* *** **** **** ********* **********. However, **** **** ******* Hikvision *** ***** **** any ******* ***** **** resolution ** ***** ******** currently.

Resolution *********
***** ****** ** ***** these ********** *********** ** they ****** *** ** well ** ******** ******** of ***** *******.
*** *******, *** ** this **:* ****** ***** produces *** ********** ********** pixels **** *:*, ** increase ** ****** **%. Across * **' ***** of ****, **** ********* PPF ** *.*, ***** may ** * ********** difference ** ******.

*******, *********** *** **** even ** *** *******, closer ** ***** ****/****** in **** ********* ********* on ***** ****** ***** is ****.

Impact ** ****** ********
***** ****** ** ***** of **** **** ********* cameras, ** *:* ***** provides ******** ** ********** parts ** * ***** which **:* ****** ****** do ***.
*** *******, ** **** building *****, *** ****** of *** ***** ** cut *** **** ***** 16:9, ********* ********** ******** beneath *** ****** *** potentially ******* ********* ** travel ** **** ********.

** ** ******* ******* lot, **** ***** **:* parking ****** **** *** camera *** **** ******* or ******* ******, ***** may ******* ********** ****** coverage ** ******* ** angle.

*** **** ******** *** detail, *** *** ****: ****** ***** **:* ** 4:3 ********.
IPVM ********** ********
**** *** ***** **:* 3MP *** *** ****** at ***** ****** *********** to *** **********, ******** users ** ****** *** these *********** *** *** them ** ***** ******** ***** our******** ****** *******.

** ** **** ****** any **:* ******, *** us **** ** *** comments ***** ****** ** ** *****.
Comments (10)
Ross Vander Klok
Finally! I have hated not being able to do 16:9 ever since every single monitor available was that format.
Create New Topic
James Talmage
Is this move driven by parts availability, or marketing hype? I'm willing to trade a smidge of horizontal resolution for additional vertical coverage in almost every situation. With few exceptions, the only time I opt for 16:9 is cameras in corridor mode. It's rare that I don't care to see what's happening below the camera
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #1
Is the PPF really any different here though?
In non-cropped cases, assuming the same HAOV, wouldn’t the PPF actually stay the same unless the pixel size (in nm) decreased?
Since we are comparing two different imagers, (in non-cropped cases), I’m not sure that such an assumption is valid.
Only in cases where a hypothetical imager had the same width (in mm) but with more total horizontal pixels (making smaller pixels) would that be the case, IMHO.
Create New Topic
Lasse Sørensen
I'm doing a lot of retail installations and to make a proper view I need to see what happens on the store shelves right beneath the cam and the upper view to make a generel view of the store. I was very glad to use the Axis M3006 with the 90degree vertikal view and 136degree Horisontal coverage, it was great. But 90degree vertical view is very importen to me, dont care if it is labeled 3,4 or 5MP
/Lasse
Create New Topic