Why Megapixel Mis-Marketing Works

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jun 08, 2013

Both megapixel and video analytic manufacturers routinely mis-market their products, vastly overstating their capabilities. One market, analytics, has suffered greatly while the other one, megapixel, has thrived and, perhaps even, gained from the misleading marketing. Both can be outrageous. Indeed, megapixel can be even be worse, with claims of replacing dozens of cameras. Why has one created such ill will for vendors and the other has not?

The key difference is the frame of reference.

Analytics *********

***** ******* ***** ******** *********** ** ***** ****** ** ***** intrusion ********* ******. ******* ** ****, **** **** ****** **** standards *** **** ** ******* ********. ******* **** ** ************ ***** ****** ******* ** *******, **********, ****, ***. *************, most ***** ********* **. *** **** ***** ** *** ****** and ** ******* *** ********* ** *** *** '******' *** analytics ***. **** ************** *** **********, "*** *** **** '***********' video' *** ******* **** **** ****** ** *** * ******?"

********* ********** **** ****** ***** **** **** **** *** ****** buying ****, ***** ***** ** ********** ********* ** *******.

Megapixel *********

** ********, ***** ********* ******* ***** ********* ******* ** **** they ********* **** - ****** - ***** ** ***** ********* at *** **** ***, *****, ********, *******. **** ** *** megapixel ****** **** *** '*******' ** '*****' * ***** ** their ******** *******, **** *** ****** *** **** *** *** cameras *** ************* ****** **** ***** *** *******.

***** **** *** ** ******** ************ **** ** **** *** deliver ********** *** ****** ********* *******, ********* ********* ***** ****** better **** **** **** *** ******, ***** ***** ** **** to ******* / ******.

Winners *** ****** ** ********* ***-*********

*** ********* *************, ****, ** ******* **** ** ********** *** performance ** ***** ********. ****** ***** ** * **** ** their **********, *** ******* ***** ******* ** ********. **********, *** loses ** *** ************* *** *** *** *********** ** ************ to *** ***** *******.

**** **** ** * ****** ** ** ************'* ******* ***** ***** ********* *** ****** ******* *********. ********* ***** ********* ******** *** ***** ***** ** ******** vendors.

Comments (13)

Bosch Rep - we fight this battle EVERY day. Add to this list the underestimation of storage requirements. End users and integrators can avoid falling into these traps by demanding demonstrations of the technology in real-life environments. Ask for an outdoor demo, ask for a night demo, ask to view the actual bit rate to create the image. Do the math on the storage required to capture these images for 30 days or more. Aside from seeing the reality of the technology proposed, you'll also see who is willing to support you with technical advice and local support before and after the sale.

"Underestimation of storage requirements".

Matt, you said a mouthfull. I finally wound up telling our prospective Integrators exactly how much storage we wanted so there would be no doubt. Even the term "net storage" had to be specifically defined so that they wouldn't include parity drives, hot spare drives and Windows overhead in the total.

Add bitrate to that list. Integrators have tried to convince me of misjudgement of my specific bitrate requests, claiming they used lower bitrates on other jobs and the end users were perfectly happy. After seeing the video quality at some of those properties, I have to wonder what they were comparing the quality to?

Carl, I suspect you, in a casino, need to identify finer details than the typical surveillance user. That's probably why they can get away with lower bit rates (at modestly higher compression levels) than you can. Yes/no?

Maybe, except the other properties we visited were also casinos ;>)

I did a full sequence of bitrate tests on both encoders and IP cameras during Phase 1 and Phase 2 evaluations over the last year.

For analog cameras, I varied encoder bitrates from 1.5Mbps to 5Mbps. I noted substantial increases in picture quality in the first steps, followed by lesser and lesser improvements at the upper range. The image quality increase from 1.5Mbps to 2Mbps was immense and the improvement by going from there to 2.5Mbps was very apparent, even to untrained eyes. The improvement was much more subtle when going from 2.5Mbps to 3.0Mbps - it consisted mostly of a reduction in I-frame "pulsing" and edge noise. Above 3.0Mbps, improvements were not apparent.

The same was true of 720p IP cameras. Although many would consider 3Mbps "suitable", I noted a substantial reduction in compression noise going from 3.0Mbps to 3.5Mbps; less noticeable but still apparent noise reduction going from 3.5Mbps to 4.0Mbps and much more subtle improvements thereafter.

The thing is, we could live with somewhat lower bitrates for recording, since those are viewed far less often than "live" monitoring in our application but, as I mentioned in another discussion, maintaining 30fps while dual streaming can be hit or miss. I absolutely refuse to provide what I consider to be substandard image quality to our users. They are used to analog via matrix and although IP cameras will provide better resolution, low noise is not typically their strong suit.

One of the weirdest issues I encountered was GOP size, aka GOV length. Manufacturers' defaults varied from one I-frame per second to one I-frame per every four seconds (assuming 30fps). In some ways, I can understand the argument because the less often the I frames, the less apparent I-frame "pulsing" is. Still, increasing GOP size/length had readily apparent downsides, including a substantial increase in motion artifacts, to the extent of causing extreme problems during PTZ motion, and an increase in the actual magnitude of pulse noise on each I-frame.

I specifically called for a GOP size of 15 (500ms) for all sources and an increase in bitrate from 2.5Mbps to 3.0Mbps on encoders and from 4.0Mbps to 5.0Mbps on IP cameras. This cut the pulsing substantially, which allowed the lower GOP size (circular logic be damned).

Carl, have you tried to analyze what the quantization level of each stream was? For any given scene, if all one changes is the bitrate, the camera will adjust the quantization level 'behind the scenes'. If you knew what the quantization level of each stream / camera was, it could help normalize the comparisons (i.e., this camera/stream was at q=27 but the other one was q=32, etc.).

No. I didn't have the tools or the time. The systems weren't here long enough.

Being a sales engineer, I often annoy our salespeople by pushing better sensor and low light performing 1MP cameras (that cost less), vs a 5MP to a customer. Its my opinion that with the right customer if you're explaining to them "why" youre doing this, they will appreciate that you're the expert and not just pushing boxes; and they'll actually trust you more in the future when you have a situation that would benefit from 5MP.

I think in many cases its manufacturers using marketing tactics to excite sales "opportunities" with salespeople who have enough technical ability to know that 1MP < 5MP (... therefore 5MP is better), and salespeople being programmed to just push the next thing, bigger number, higher margin box.

Yeah but then I need 5 of those 1MP cameras to equal a 5MP one!!!

OMG, thanks to IPVM, I learnt a lot in several days. I have handheld HD Sony camcorder at same resolution of most CCTV camera manufacturers. I am not worrying about the storage nor data transfer. I want to have a camera which can record the same quality like my handheld camcorder. CCTV cameras are not cheaper than camcorders but they providing much lesser quality than camcorders. Manufacturer says 30fps @ 1920*1080 or whatever. I am looking at the recorded footage, its skipping! One of the IPVM article measured 60fps camera which was recording max 30fps and 30 fps camera was recording at max 15fps, what a joke!

Should we start using camcorders instead of CCTV cameras??? What makes cctv cameras so special against camcorders? (I am well aware of differences) but just my body not accepting that misleading ads. That has to stop I believe.

Undisclosed, it's a good question that is raised every so often. I started a new discussion to address this: Why are IP Cameras Much More Expensive Than Camcorders?

When I click the above link (Why are IP...), it goes to the GoPro website...is that on purpose?

That's an error. Sorry about that. Fixed and discussion is here.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Marketing

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
The Embarrassing Story of ISC West's Best New IP Camera on Apr 24, 2019
A sad but simple situation: Only 2 companies paid SIA the thousands of dollars required to compete for the best new 'cameras IP' The judges...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
UK Installer CCTV Aware - Flat Pricing, No Salespeople on Apr 10, 2019
This is a different kind of company. They do flat pricing, they do not have any salespeople and 50% of their sales are sold and booked...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact