Why Megapixel Mis-Marketing Works

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jun 08, 2013

Both megapixel and video analytic manufacturers routinely mis-market their products, vastly overstating their capabilities. One market, analytics, has suffered greatly while the other one, megapixel, has thrived and, perhaps even, gained from the misleading marketing. Both can be outrageous. Indeed, megapixel can be even be worse, with claims of replacing dozens of cameras. Why has one created such ill will for vendors and the other has not?

The key difference is the frame of reference.

Analytics *********

***** ******* ***** ******** *********** ** ***** ****** ** ***** intrusion ********* ******. ******* ** ****, **** **** ****** **** standards *** **** ** ******* ********. ******* **** ** ************ ***** ****** ******* ** *******, **********, ****, ***. *************, most ***** ********* **. *** **** ***** ** *** ****** and ** ******* *** ********* ** *** *** '******' *** analytics ***. **** ************** *** **********, "*** *** **** '***********' video' *** ******* **** **** ****** ** *** * ******?"

********* ********** **** ****** ***** **** **** **** *** ****** buying ****, ***** ***** ** ********** ********* ** *******.

Megapixel *********

** ********, ***** ********* ******* ***** ********* ******* ** **** they ********* **** - ****** - ***** ** ***** ********* at *** **** ***, *****, ********, *******. **** ** *** megapixel ****** **** *** '*******' ** '*****' * ***** ** their ******** *******, **** *** ****** *** **** *** *** cameras *** ************* ****** **** ***** *** *******.

***** **** *** ** ******** ************ **** ** **** *** deliver ********** *** ****** ********* *******, ********* ********* ***** ****** better **** **** **** *** ******, ***** ***** ** **** to ******* / ******.

Winners *** ****** ** ********* ***-*********

*** ********* *************, ****, ** ******* **** ** ********** *** performance ** ***** ********. ****** ***** ** * **** ** their **********, *** ******* ***** ******* ** ********. **********, *** loses ** *** ************* *** *** *** *********** ** ************ to *** ***** *******.

**** **** ** * ****** ** ** ************'* ******* ***** ***** ********* *** ****** ******* *********. ********* ***** ********* ******** *** ***** ***** ** ******** vendors.

Comments (13)

Bosch Rep - we fight this battle EVERY day. Add to this list the underestimation of storage requirements. End users and integrators can avoid falling into these traps by demanding demonstrations of the technology in real-life environments. Ask for an outdoor demo, ask for a night demo, ask to view the actual bit rate to create the image. Do the math on the storage required to capture these images for 30 days or more. Aside from seeing the reality of the technology proposed, you'll also see who is willing to support you with technical advice and local support before and after the sale.

"Underestimation of storage requirements".

Matt, you said a mouthfull. I finally wound up telling our prospective Integrators exactly how much storage we wanted so there would be no doubt. Even the term "net storage" had to be specifically defined so that they wouldn't include parity drives, hot spare drives and Windows overhead in the total.

Add bitrate to that list. Integrators have tried to convince me of misjudgement of my specific bitrate requests, claiming they used lower bitrates on other jobs and the end users were perfectly happy. After seeing the video quality at some of those properties, I have to wonder what they were comparing the quality to?

Carl, I suspect you, in a casino, need to identify finer details than the typical surveillance user. That's probably why they can get away with lower bit rates (at modestly higher compression levels) than you can. Yes/no?

Maybe, except the other properties we visited were also casinos ;>)

I did a full sequence of bitrate tests on both encoders and IP cameras during Phase 1 and Phase 2 evaluations over the last year.

For analog cameras, I varied encoder bitrates from 1.5Mbps to 5Mbps. I noted substantial increases in picture quality in the first steps, followed by lesser and lesser improvements at the upper range. The image quality increase from 1.5Mbps to 2Mbps was immense and the improvement by going from there to 2.5Mbps was very apparent, even to untrained eyes. The improvement was much more subtle when going from 2.5Mbps to 3.0Mbps - it consisted mostly of a reduction in I-frame "pulsing" and edge noise. Above 3.0Mbps, improvements were not apparent.

The same was true of 720p IP cameras. Although many would consider 3Mbps "suitable", I noted a substantial reduction in compression noise going from 3.0Mbps to 3.5Mbps; less noticeable but still apparent noise reduction going from 3.5Mbps to 4.0Mbps and much more subtle improvements thereafter.

The thing is, we could live with somewhat lower bitrates for recording, since those are viewed far less often than "live" monitoring in our application but, as I mentioned in another discussion, maintaining 30fps while dual streaming can be hit or miss. I absolutely refuse to provide what I consider to be substandard image quality to our users. They are used to analog via matrix and although IP cameras will provide better resolution, low noise is not typically their strong suit.

One of the weirdest issues I encountered was GOP size, aka GOV length. Manufacturers' defaults varied from one I-frame per second to one I-frame per every four seconds (assuming 30fps). In some ways, I can understand the argument because the less often the I frames, the less apparent I-frame "pulsing" is. Still, increasing GOP size/length had readily apparent downsides, including a substantial increase in motion artifacts, to the extent of causing extreme problems during PTZ motion, and an increase in the actual magnitude of pulse noise on each I-frame.

I specifically called for a GOP size of 15 (500ms) for all sources and an increase in bitrate from 2.5Mbps to 3.0Mbps on encoders and from 4.0Mbps to 5.0Mbps on IP cameras. This cut the pulsing substantially, which allowed the lower GOP size (circular logic be damned).

Carl, have you tried to analyze what the quantization level of each stream was? For any given scene, if all one changes is the bitrate, the camera will adjust the quantization level 'behind the scenes'. If you knew what the quantization level of each stream / camera was, it could help normalize the comparisons (i.e., this camera/stream was at q=27 but the other one was q=32, etc.).

No. I didn't have the tools or the time. The systems weren't here long enough.

Being a sales engineer, I often annoy our salespeople by pushing better sensor and low light performing 1MP cameras (that cost less), vs a 5MP to a customer. Its my opinion that with the right customer if you're explaining to them "why" youre doing this, they will appreciate that you're the expert and not just pushing boxes; and they'll actually trust you more in the future when you have a situation that would benefit from 5MP.

I think in many cases its manufacturers using marketing tactics to excite sales "opportunities" with salespeople who have enough technical ability to know that 1MP < 5MP (... therefore 5MP is better), and salespeople being programmed to just push the next thing, bigger number, higher margin box.

Yeah but then I need 5 of those 1MP cameras to equal a 5MP one!!!

OMG, thanks to IPVM, I learnt a lot in several days. I have handheld HD Sony camcorder at same resolution of most CCTV camera manufacturers. I am not worrying about the storage nor data transfer. I want to have a camera which can record the same quality like my handheld camcorder. CCTV cameras are not cheaper than camcorders but they providing much lesser quality than camcorders. Manufacturer says 30fps @ 1920*1080 or whatever. I am looking at the recorded footage, its skipping! One of the IPVM article measured 60fps camera which was recording max 30fps and 30 fps camera was recording at max 15fps, what a joke!

Should we start using camcorders instead of CCTV cameras??? What makes cctv cameras so special against camcorders? (I am well aware of differences) but just my body not accepting that misleading ads. That has to stop I believe.

Undisclosed, it's a good question that is raised every so often. I started a new discussion to address this: Why are IP Cameras Much More Expensive Than Camcorders?

When I click the above link (Why are IP...), it goes to the GoPro website...is that on purpose?

That's an error. Sorry about that. Fixed and discussion is here.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Marketing

BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Solink Raises $12 Million - Company Profile on Feb 12, 2019
Most industry professionals have never heard of Solink, a company whose tagline is: It's time to revolutionize the way business uses...
Milestone Drops Hikvision From Elite Partners on Feb 11, 2019
Milestone has quietly dropped Hikvision from their 'Elite Partners', less than 3 years after adding the Chinese government-owned...
ADT And SimpliSafe Super Bowl LIII Ads Criticized on Feb 04, 2019
Super Bowl ads are incredibly expensive, running $5+ million this year, but two of the security industry's most controversial companies ran ads...
Surging Wyze Raises $20 Million, Threat To Chinese Brands on Feb 01, 2019
The Seattle Startup that is disrupting consumer IP cameras with $20 pricing has just raised $20 million dollars (SEC Filing and company press...
PlateSmart LPR Profile on Jan 31, 2019
PlateSmart Technologies claims to "turn any conventional surveillance camera into a license plate recognition camera" We spoke with PlateSmart to...
Vivotek Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 29, 2019
Taiwanese video surveillance manufacturers, even relatively large ones like Vivotek, have lost ground in the PRC-China-driven race to the bottom....
Avigilon Hires Hikvision NA Head of Marketing As VP of Global Marketing on Jan 25, 2019
Avigilon has hired Alex Asnovich, who left Hikvision as Head of Marketing North America, to becomes Avigilon's Vice President of Global Marketing...
Turnover at Arcules on Jan 24, 2019
Canon / Milestone are putting tens of millions into Arcules - their bet on the future of the VMS market (see IPVM's Arcules test report). But over...
Intersec 2019 Show Report on Jan 23, 2019
The 2019 Intersec show, held annually in Dubai, is now complete. IPVM attended for 3 days, interviewing numerous Chinese and Western video...

Most Recent Industry Reports

From The Basement To Buried Behind Chinatown: ISC West Emerging Technology Zone on Feb 22, 2019
What does ISC West think about 'Emerging Technology'? Well, last year, they put those companies in the basement. This year, they moved them up to...
Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
ADI 'SAVE BIG' On FLIR And Hikvision Examined on Feb 20, 2019
One is a major US defense supplier. The other is owned by the Chinese government. But you can "SAVE BIG" on both at ADI. In this note, we...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact