WDR Shootout 2017: Low vs High Cost Cameras

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 24, 2017

Multi-exposure WDR was once only available in expensive cameras but in the past few years, this capability has become available even in sub $200 cameras.

But is the multi-exposure WDR in low cost cameras just as good as more expensive ones or is there any deficiencies?

To see low-cost models stack up against expensive models 2 - 4x the price, we tested high and low end WDR cameras of 3 manufacturers: Axis, Hikvision, and Samsung/Hanwha:

We shot out these cameras in two common WDR scenarios to see how performance differs and whether low cost models can truly compare with their more expensive counterparts. First, a door with the subject exiting from a much brighter exterior with the door closing behind him, to see how cameras adjust to large changes in dynamic range. And second, a warehouse scene with open overhead door to show how cameras perform in more constant, though still wide dynamic scenes (typical of warehouses, garages, and lobbies)

See our results and recommendations inside.

Readers should also see our WDR Tutorial for more information on the basics of WDR, as well as WDR Camera Shootout 2015, which tests 10 of the latest WDR cameras head to head to see whose WDR model is best.

*****-******** *** *** **** only ********* ** ********* cameras *** ** *** past *** *****, **** capability *** ****** ********* even ** *** $*** cameras.

*** ** *** *****-******** WDR ** *** **** cameras **** ** **** as **** ********* **** or ** ***** *** deficiencies?

** *** ***-**** ****** ***** up ******* ********* ****** * - ** *** *****, we ****** **** *** low *** *** ******* of * *************: ****, *********, and *******/******:

** **** *** ***** cameras ** *** ****** WDR ********* ** *** how *********** ******* *** whether *** **** ****** can ***** ******* **** their **** ********* ************. *****, a **** **** *** subject ******* **** * much ******** ******** **** *** door ******* ****** ***, to *** *** ******* adjust ** ***** ******* ** dynamic *****. *** ******, a ********* ***** **** open ******** **** ** show *** ******* ******* in **** ********, ****** still **** ******* ****** (typical ** **********, *******, and *******)

*** *** ******* *** recommendations ******.

******* ****** **** *** our *** ******** *** **** *********** ** the ****** ** ***, as **** ** *** ****** ******** ****, ***** ***** ** of *** ****** *** cameras **** ** **** to *** ***** *** model ** ****.

[***************]

Recommendation: ******** ***** **********, **** ********* ******

** *** *******, **** difficult *****/**** **** ****, both **** *** *******'* expensive models ************* ************ ***** end ************, ** **** took **** **** ** react ** *** *******/******* of *** **** *** simply ****** **** **********, **** better ******** ****** ***** and **** ***** ******.

****, *********'* **** *** low *** ****** ********* much **** ********* ** this *****, **** **** the (****) ********* **** ********* **** time ** ****** ** light ******* **** **** and *******. ******* ** this, *** ***** **** ********* ***** will ******* ****** ** this *****.

Recommendation: ******** *** ******, *********** *** *******

** *** "******" ********* WDR *****, *** **** cameras ********* **** ********* to ***** **** ********* ************, especially ******* ****** *********. In ****** ***** ***** levels **** *************, *** are ****** **** ** the *** (******* ***** opening/closing), ***** **** ******* are ****** ** ******* better *** ********* ****** **** difficult ** ***** *******.

** ****** **** ** lobbies, ***** ***** ******, warehouses, *******, ***., **** more ******** *** ****** (as ******* ** *******/******* doors), ** ********* ******* low *** ******, ** they *** **** *********** cost ******** ** ********* *** cameras.

Individual ************ *** **. *********

** *** *****, *********** between *************' *** **** and ********* *** ****** ****** significantly:

  • *** **** ***** *********** outperformed *** *** **** M3045 ** **** ****** scenes, **** **** ****** of *** ******* *** background *** **** **** to ****** ** *** strong ********* ********** ** opening *** **** ****, while *** ***** ********* poorly **** ****** ****** of *** *******. 
  • ******'* *********** *** **** similar. *** ***-**** ******** better ******* **** *** QND-6010R ** *** *****/**** door *****, *** **** slight advantages ** ******* ** *** overhead **** ********* *****.
  • *******, *** *** **** Hikvision **** ********* ********* to ***** *** *** WDR *****, *** ****, in *** *****/**** **** scene. *******, *** **** produced ****** ******* ******* both ****** ********* *** darker ***** ** *** scene ** *** ********* test.

Price ***********

********* *** **** *** expensive ****** **** **** manufacturer, *** ********* ****** ******* 2-4x *** ***** ** the *** ***. 

******* ***** ******* ** the **** ********** ****:

Test ******

** ****** ******* ** two ****** *** *** cases ** **** *** differences:

*****, * *****-****** **** door, **** *** ******* entering, ** **** *** cameras ******** ** ******** sunlight ** * ********** much ****** ******** *** whether ****/*********** *** ******* on *** ****** *******.

******, * ******** *********/****** with **** ******** **** with * ********** *******, seen ****:

Entry/Exit **** **********

*****, ** ****** ** an *****/**** **** *****, with *** ******* ******* the ****, ********, *** the **** ******* ****** him, ********* *** ******* to ****** ** *** sudden ******** ** *********, and ******** **** ******.

*** **********, *** ***** below **** *** **** end ****** ** *** upper ***, *** ***** cost ** *** ******:

***** *** **** **** image

*** *** ******* *** two ****** / ******* Techwin ****** *** **** significant, **** **** ********* providing ***** ******* ** the ******* ** ** opens *** ****. *******, the ******* * ***** longer ** ****** ** the ********* **** ******* and ********** **** ** the *******, ********* **** detail.

*** *********** *** ******* the **** ***** *** M3045-V *** ********, *** the *****-* ************* ******** the ******* *********** ***** entering *** ****, ********* details.

 

*******, *** *** ********* models ********* **** *********, with **** ******** ** about *** **** **** and ******* ******* ******* of *** *******.

Warehouse ******** **** **********

****, ******* ** *** warehouse *****, *********** ******* Axis *** **** ********** again, **** *** *****-* showing **** ****** ** the ******* ** *** darker **** ** *** scene. *** ********* ****** performs ***** **** *** 4025 ** *** **** area ** *** *****, as ****, ****** **** subject ******* *** ***** clear. *** ****** ******* perform **** ********* ****, with ******* ******* ******** by ****.

Test **********

******* **** ********* ***** to *******, **** *** following ******** *******:

  • **** ***** *** *****-*: WDR "**"
  • ********* **-**********-*: *** "**"
  • ********* **-**********-**: *** "**", Level **
  • ******* ***-**** *** ***-*****: Backlight *** ** "***", level "****"; **** *** to ***** **

*** ********* ******** ******** were ****: 

  • **** *****: *.**.*.*
  • **** *****-*: *.**.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-*: *.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-**: *.*.*
  • ******* ***-****: *.*********
  • ******* ***-*****: *.*********

Comments (9)

Avatar

Rich Moore

01/24/17 05:13pm

Personally, I think this would have been better with more manufacturers involved.

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Rich Moore | 01/24/17 05:53pm

Rich, who were you hoping to see? We were specifically aiming to show the differences (or lack thereof) between top performers and low cost cameras here, and kept it limited to three common examples.

We have a WDR shootout between 10 manufacturers' top performers, as well, if that's more your speed. That will be updated later this year, most likely, or early 2018, as many models haven't changed since it was done.

Avatar

Rich Moore

In reply to Ethan Ace | 01/24/17 06:17pm

You just answered my response Ethan.  I look forward to the WDR shootout between manufacturers...updated.  For this shootout, I was hoping to see Dahua and Bosch to show another lower cost and another higher cost for more contrast. 

Itamar Kerbel

01/25/17 07:49am

Its nice you to see that the more you pay the better are the results :)

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Itamar Kerbel | 01/25/17 04:35pm

I think that that's true, but it's a question of how much better for the increase in price. For many, I expect that a $200 true WDR camera will suit their scene just fine. For the harshest scenes, though, the higher end models do perform better.

Igor Averchenko

01/25/17 04:33pm

It could be also noticed in this test: total absence of overexposure in Q1615 compare to others for both scenes.

Jason Brown

06/21/17 03:05pm

First of all, thanks for the test. However, at the risk of sounding ungrateful, the SNB-6004 is old. Would have been nice to see the XNB-6000 and its supposed 150dB WDR.

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Jason Brown | 06/21/17 03:13pm

Wisenet X wasn't released when we did this test. This was published on 1/24 which means it was probably done in the beginning of January.

Wisenet X wasn't announced til the 20th, and didn't start shipping until February. At the time the SNB-6004 was still the top performing WDR camera. 

We have tests of the Wisenet X series, though:

Jason Brown

In reply to Ethan Ace | 06/21/17 04:51pm

Sorry, I missed the date. Thanks for the reply.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,438 reports, 865 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Tiandy Super Starlight Cameras Tested on Apr 30, 2020
Tiandy is taking aim at China competitors Dahua and Hikvision, with a new...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...
Hikvision and Uniview Entry Level Thermal Handheld Cameras Tested on Jun 05, 2020
While most screening systems cost $10,000 or more, manufacturers such as...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the...
Camera Resolution Usage Statistics 2020 on Mar 12, 2020
The average resolution used, for new cameras, is now 4MP, according to new...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan / US startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to...
The Next Hot Fever Detection Trend - $100 Wall-Mounted Units on Jul 06, 2020
The first wave of the booming fever detecting market was $10,000+ cameras,...
Mobotix 7 Line Camera Tested on Mar 12, 2020
Mobotix is attempting a turn-around, struggling for years, then releasing the...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel...
Mobotix Thermal Detection Camera Tested on Jun 09, 2020
For years Mobotix has struggled but now sales are surging driven by Mobotix's...
Dahua Temperature Measurement Station Tested on Jun 17, 2020
Dahua hit the market hard with its original 'fever' camera (tested here)....
Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception...
Sunell "Panda Cam" Thermal Body Temperature System Examined on Apr 09, 2020
Sunell's Panda Cam is the most visually recognizable coronavirus camera, sold...
TVT Temperature Measurement Terminal Tested on Jul 23, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision get the most attention for China temp products,...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...