VMS Labor Standards

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 11, 2014

We continue our industry first installation labor standards result with a look at Video Management System setup, adding to the camera installation and cabling installation entries.

These standards help integrators improve the accuracy and efficiency of their installations, reducing risks and cost.

Global Survey

We developed these standards based on a global survey of integrators who provided in-depth responses on how much time and what factors impact their installs.

Questions / Scenarios Asked

Two scenarios were presented:

  • VMS Installation: "How many manhours would you estimate to install and configure a VMS Server? Why? Which VMS? What impacts this?"
  • VMS Commissioning: "How many manhours would you estimate to add 10 cameras to a new VMS? Assume cameras already are installed and have IP addresses preconfigured. The effort includes fine tuning 10 cameras for production recording and live viewing in the VMS."

Averages 

The overall averages were:

** ******** *** ******** ***** installation ***** ********* ****** with * **** ** Video ********** ****** *****, adding ** ********* ********************** *******************.

***** ********* **** *********** improve *** ******** *** efficiency ** ***** *************, reducing ***** *** ****.

Global ******

** ********* ***** ********* based ** * ****** survey ** *********** *** provided **-***** ********* ** how **** **** *** what ******* ****** ***** installs.

Questions / ********* *****

*** ********* **** *********:

  • *** ************: "*** **** ******** ***** *** ******** ** install *** ********* * VMS ******? ***? ***** VMS? **** ******* ****?"
  • *** *************: "*** **** manhours ***** *** ******** to *** ** ******* to * *** ***? Assume ******* ******* *** installed *** **** ** addresses *************. *** ****** includes **** ****** ** cameras *** ********** ********* and **** ******* ** the ***."

******** 

*** ******* ******** ****:

[***************]

  • *** ************: *.* ******** *** ******
  • *** ************* (****** ** cameras): *.* *********** ** *******, ** ~ 30 ******* *** ******

VMS ************

*** ****** ******** *****: "*** ***************** *** ******** ** install *** ********* * VMS ******? ***? ***** VMS? **** ******* ****?"

*******: **** **% ** *** ********* fell ******* *.* ** 5.0 ********. *** **** ****** is ***** *****:

***** ********

**** ********* ********* ********* VMS ****** **** ******* ****** for ****. *******, ***** was ** ****** ***** of *** ********************** ****** **** ****** across *** *****. ******, the ***** ** ***** was **** ******* ** how ******** *** ********* was **** * ***** platform, **** **** **** needed *** **** ******** offerings.

  • "* ***** ***** ** *******."
  • "* *** *******. *****'* a *** ** ** front ************* ** **** everything **** ** **** during *** **** **************."
  • "* ***** *** *********, 4 ***** *** ***** But ** ********** *****."
  • "******** *** ****** *'* say **** ****** *** would **** **** *** unless **** ** ** windows ******* *** ******* is **** ***** *** an **** ******* ********."
  • "*****/*********/***** * ***** *** updating *** ******* ** the ** *** ******* the ****** **** ********, documentation."
  • "* - * ***** depending ** *** ******** we *** **** **. Exacq ** *******."

**** *** ***** ** responses, ** ** ***** than **** ********** ********* sell * ****** ** VMS ******* ***** ** customer ***.

** *********** *******

*** ******* ********* ** the ************ ******* *** servers *******, *** ******** and ********** *** ********'* IT ********* ***, *** how ******* *********** *** VMS ****** **** ***** systems ***** ** **:

  • "*-* ***** - ******* on *** ********* ** dept **. ** ** have *********** ********** *** it's ***** ** ** an **** *** ***** 2-3 *****. ******** **** IT ****'* *** **** up ***** ** ******."
  • "* ***. **** ** provided ** ** ********* and *** ******* *** complete. **** **** **** subject ** ******* ******* configuration- *** ****** **** installed, ******* *********, *** so **."
  • "**** ******* ** *** many ******* ** **** a *** ******. ** the *** *********? **** is *** ********* *******? Analytic *********? ******? *********** depth ******* *** ****** and *** *******? *** many *******? ********** ******? Video ****? ********* *******? Active *********? *** ********* schedules?
  • "*** ***** ** **** to **** ********* ** 1 **** *** * preloaded ****** **** ** frills ** ******** *** 5 ******* ******** ** it. *** **** *'** seen ********* **** *** one ****** ** ** hours *** * ****** that *** ** ** tied **** ****** *********, cameras **** ****'* ****-********, and ***** ***** ********* schedules."
  • "************ * ******** ******** server. ******* **** *** impact **** **** *** include ******** ********** *****,** **** ********, ********* server ************** **** *** or ********, *********** *** installer, *** ***-********** **** have ** ** *********. This ** **** ** what ** **, ** we **** ********** ******* written ** ****** * tremendous ****** ** *** configuration. ***** *** ****** tricks **** *** ** done ** ********** ********. From *** ** *** box ** ** *** box ** *** **** a ****** ***** ** go ** ** ******* or ****."

*** ************

*** **** ****** ******** *****: "How **** ******** ***** you ******** ** *** 10 ******* ** * new ***? ****** ******* already *** ********* *** have ** ********* *************. The ****** ******** **** tuning ** ******* *** production ********* *** **** viewing ** *** ***."

*******:** *** ** ***** questions we *****, **** *** had *** ******** ***** of *******. **** **** ******* *.* to *.* ********, **** *** average ***** *.** ****** all ** ****. *** full ****** ** ***** below:

******* *********

*** ***** ******** *********** time ********* ** *** familiar *** ********* ** with *** ******** *** how **** *** ********** cameras *** *********/********** **** the ***. ** **** case, *** ******* ****** suggested ****** ****** ******* rather **** ***** *******:

  • "******** ***** ** ******* per ****** ********* ** customer ************ *** *** type ** ***."
  • "***. * ***** ** it ** *** ** known **** ** *** with **** *******."
  • "** *** ** * 10 ****** ****** ** a *** ** * ***** with ********."
  • "** *** **** ***** on ******* *** ********* cameras.
  • "* ** ***** *** 10 ****. ** ***** be ******** *** ******* issues, ** ********* *** settings. **** ***** ** Spectrum, ** **** ***** us ** *** *** isn't ********* ** ***********."
  • "***** **** ** *** higher *** *** **** wizards *** *********** ******* or ***** * ***** include * ******* *** camera *** **** ****** to ***** ********** ** ensue ** ** ********* to *** ****** ********, named *************, ***.***** **** ** *** more ********** *** * might ****** ****."
  • "*-* ***** (** *** a *** ** **** and ***) *** ** could ** ****** *** no **** ***** *******."

****** **** ******

*******, *** ****** * single ***** ******** *** common, **** **** *********** instead ******* * ***** and ** '** *******' condition. **** ********* *** variability ********** ** *** demands ** ********* ** individual ******* *** *** equipment ****:

  • "******* ** *** **** interface ** *** *** really, **** *** ** done ** * ******* flat *** *** **. Some ****** *** **** one ****."
  • "* - ** *****. *** standard ** * **** per ****** ** *** to * ******. *** systems **** ** ******* from ******* ** *** usually *** ** **** 1/2 ****."
  • "* ***** ...** * perfect *****."
  • "** *** *** * hours, *** **** ** up ** * *****."
  • "*-****, ******** *** ******* up *** ******* ** record ** *****, *** the **** ****** ** the ****** *** **** will **** ******, **** if **** **** ** be ******** *** ****."

Comments (6)

I'd like to know what people think on estimating the install per camera on a 10K SF office space and a 30K SF warehouse for: Indoor camera: Outdoor camera: This is more in tune with how I quo jobs. Ex. 3hrs per interior camera counting bringing into a server on office and 4 in whse. 4 on outdoor office and 6 on warehouse. This wouldn't include any out of norm requests or factors. Then I add 4 hrs for NVR on average.

A, see our camera installation and cabling installation labor standard posts for that.

Brian, quick question. Is installing the VMS, connecting the cameras, troubleshooting, etc. usually considered a one man job, or are there other techs on site to provide other means of support? If so, how does that impact the overall amount of man hours?

We asked 'manhours' so whether someone uses one person or five, the answer is all the same denomination.

With that said, in my experience most jobs use one person to connect the cameras and configure VMSes, but troubleshooting (beyond the scope of this estimate) often uses two or three - one person at the server, one at the camera talking over phones/radios, and maybe even another trying to trigger motion recording or acting as a test subject.

Imagine camera firmware with onboard analytics that can auto configure and adjust the camera. The analytics engine would scale all parameters per application day, night, parking lot and office views. A camera capable of enhancing the stream based on user demand and priority. So much time and money is invested in static code residing in the centralized VMS that the edge is neglected.

If all of our cell phones worked best with a centrilezed design then all of us would be back on analog lines at our homes. Mobility and the edge need to rise up as the dominant application, VMS software is bank vault holding Software SUPs, SSAs and modular licensing fees for dangled carrots.

Last but not least, my forecast on how much time to configure a VMS with or without customer IT preparation, access and development. Training and commissioning views, clients both web and mobile, storage allocation types NAS, Nimble, Cloud....honestly I feel it comes down to competition as we all know on any design margins are dropped, swapped and cropped in order to win the bid. This is why the applications should reside in the camera itself and rid the industry of the THICK VMS that resides on physical and virtual servers everywhere. Amen!

I find this discussion very useful from the end-user perspective. Provides at least some starting benchmarks for Project Management activity resource planning.

great topic.. thank you.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Network Optix / Hanwha Cloud Access Tested on Jul 02, 2019
Remote cloud access is becoming a bigger differentiator, as cybersecurity issues underscore the problems of port forwarding and many integrators...
Maglocks Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 01, 2019
Maglocks divide access control specifiers perhaps more than any other component. Many are concerned about life safety codes, but others cite...
Verkada Attacks ONVIF on Jun 27, 2019
Verkada has now gone after ONVIF, expanding its attacks against the 'dinosaurs' of the 'ancient' video surveillance industry. In a recent...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Wyze Disruptive AI Analytics Tested on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact