How Should Video Management Software be Evaluated?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 27, 2009

In this report, we propose criteria to evaluate Video Management Software (VMS). Those selecting VMS software may find this useful. Moreover we plan to use this criteria for our upcoming testing series on VMS software (expands our ongoing IP Video Surveillance product testing program) .

We encourage comments, feedback and discussion on these criteria.

Goals of Our Evaluation

We believe VMS software evaluations should:

  • Focus on users rather than features: The criteria should examine how well the VMS software meets the goals of real users (conduct an investigation, review an alert) rather than simply list technical features.
  • Educate rather than rank: The evaluation should help users better understand how the software works rather than simply providing scores that obscure details and differences.
  • Show Usability: What is most hard to judge about VMS software from marketing material is their usability (see the widespread unhappiness in our recent discussion on VMS usability). All VMS software have dozens of features (or more) but which are the most complete, are the easiest to use, etc.
  • General rather than specific to an application: Since our results will be read by thousands of people around the world, we need to make it general enough so that many readers can make use of it. For a specific deployment, we would certainly supplement this with specific questions for the user's application.

The common 'trick' in evaluations designed by vendors is to take their data sheet and create a checklist that matches the VMS's proprietary implementation and to judge other systems by that criteria. By contrast it is critical that our evaluation is independent and user focused.

Criteria/Questions

We propose the following questions be used (with some notes on issues involved):

Basic Use (Live and Recorded Video)
  • How do I watch live video? (There are surprising variances in the complexity and options even in watching 1 or a few cameras)
  • What ways can I monitor many video feeds simultaneously?
  • How can I be notified and review alarms?
  • How do I search for recorded video? (The variances are tremendous amongst systems)
  • What ways can I search multiple video feeds?
  • How do you share images from video?
  • How do you share video clips from recorded video? 
  • How do I know if I am in live or recorded video mode? (This is often difficult to do in VMS software which is both sad and confusing)
  • How do you switch between live video, investigations and configuration? (Some systems require multiple applications, others are integrated into a single client, etc.)

Administration
  • How do I add/setup a camera?
  • How do you set up alarms to be displayed? (Some systems are very complex in setting up alarms)
  • How do you restrict access to the system? 
  • How do you restrict access to certain features or functionalities?
  • How can you setup the VMS to handle failures to servers/appliances?
  • How can you access reports or alerts on the health status of the servers/appliances/applications?
  • How can you upgrade the VMS software?

Usability
  • How does the VMS handle the higher resolution of megapixel cameras?
  • How does the VMS perform with low bandwidth connection (256 kb/s)? (Many VMS users are remote)
  • What, if any, VMS functionalities regulary take more than 10 seconds to load? (When software is unresponsive, users are less likely to use it and be more unsatisfied)
  • What happens when the VMS client cannot connect to a camera? (Since IP cameras can drop frequently, this can become a major source of frustration depending on how the VMS system handles it)
  • What options does the VMS provide to reduce storage consumption?
  • What help functionality does the VMS provide while using the client?
  • How similiar is the use of the VMS client to a DVR? (This is important to most security operators and guards who have limited technical training and prefer simple systems)
  • How similar is the configuration of the VMS server to a DVR? (This is important to traditional security integrators who often have limited IT expertise)
  • How simple is it for an untrained operator? (Many systems have impressive feature offerings but are extremely difficult for untrained operators to understand without formal training)
  • How powerful is it for the expert operator? (Some systems are quite limited in advanced functionality)

Scalability
  • What ways can I add/setup many cameras at the same time?
  • How do you do restrict access when using multiple servers/appliances? (This is a major differentiator amongst systems and a core requirement for larger, multi-site deployments)
  • How can I watch live video feeds from different appliances/servers?
  • How can I conduct searches from video feeds stored in different appliances/servers?

In this criteria, we omitted 3rd party support for cameras, security, business and storage systems. As a practical matter, we will unlikely be able to test these comprehensively. However, we will factor all of those into the overall report. Finally, pricing will certainly be included, allowing us to evaluate overall value comparing performance to price.

Our Tests vs Your Own Tests

We expect our tests to provide a low cost way to understand key comparative strengths and benefits of various VMS systems. Testing numerous VMS systems oneself is impractical for most, simply because of the cost and time involved (which can easily be thousands of dollars). We can provide this for a fraction of the cost. Moreover, because we focus solely on video surveillance, we can identify key issues and comparative concerns easily.

We do recommend that end users and integrators tests the systems themselves that they plan to roll out. Our tests can help you determine what the 'short list' of vendors should be and provide basis for your own testing for your finalists. 

Feedback

We are happy to elaborate on proposed criteria, add additional criteria or simply discuss the key issues involved in evaluating VMS software.

1 report cite this report:

Readers Respond: 134 Votes, 25 Comments Examined on Feb 14, 2010
Over 100 people voted and more than 25 left detailed comments to our recent question/discussion. In this post, we review and respond to the...

Related Reports on VMS

Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
CyberExtruder Face Recognition Profile on Jan 04, 2019
CyberExtruder offers 3D modeling face recognition software that they say provides quicker and more accurate matches than other 2D face recognition...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Intersec 2019 Live Day 1 - Massive China Presence on Jan 21, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact