Retail Surveillance Bandwidth Solution?

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 20, 2014

Watching video surveillance from retail stores remotely is both essential and problematic.

Bandwidth is frequently limited and prioritized for transactions, not surveillance. But investigations and remote live viewing can be crippled by this.

One company, USS is claiming its solution is 'the next big thing in physical security [link no longer available]' that solves this problem. However, do they truly have a good solution, or is it just marketing bravado?

We take a closer look at the features, pricing, advantages and weaknesses inside.

******** ***** ************ **** retail ****** ******** ** both ********* *** ***********.

********* ** ********** ******* and *********** *** ************, not ************. *** ************** *** remote **** ******* *** be ******** ** ****.

*** *******, *** ** claiming *** ******** ** 'the **** *** ***** in ******** ******** [**** no ****** *********]' **** solves **** *******. *******, do **** ***** **** a **** ********, ** is ** **** ********* bravado?

** **** * ****** look ** *** ********, pricing, ********** *** ********** inside.

[***************]

Classic Bandwidth *******

***'* '******* ******** ********' ******** [link ** ****** *********] **  ** ******** ******* ************ *** ********* ********** locations, ************ ***** ** the ****** ** ********** *********. Because ***** ********** *** prone ** **** *************** ***********, *** ********* ** ******** services **** ***** ************, EAS **********, *** ****** control ** ***** *******.

*** ********* ***** *** be * ********* ***** of ***** ************, ***** restricting ****** ********** *** recording ** **** ********** ****** or **** ***** *****. The **** ** ********* bandwidth ** ***** ** high, ** ** * ****** ** selecting '****** ***' *******  of ** ****** ******* connected ** ***** *** recorders ** ****** ** retail, ******* *** ************ of ** ******* ** other *******.

****** ****** ***** ***** where ******* ********* ** easier ** ******* ****** many *****, ********** *** bandwidth ******** ** ***** locations, ** **** ******, is ***** *********:

  • ***** ******** ***********: **** ***** ********* means many ********* ****. ******** many ********* **** ******** cost, *** **** ********* the **** **** *********** will **** ********* ******* *** cracks ** ** ****** for ****** ********..
  • ************** *******: ****** ********* *** cost ********* ** ******* costs *** ******* ******* contracts *** **** **** adding ***** ******* ** *****. 

Dynamic ******** ********

*** ** ******** **** product ** * ***** alone service ************ *** ******** security ******* **** ***** surveillance, ******, ** **** remote ***** ******** *******. The ******* *** ** purchased *** *** ** pre-packaged ******** ********* ******** ** ********** inside ** ***'* **** of **** *** *** platform ******* [**** ** longer *********].  

*******

***'* **** ******** ** a ***/***** **** **** costs ~$**, *** ****** based ** ********* ****. For *******, * ****/***** for * ****** ***** location *** ** ~$***/*****. Compared **** ***** ********, this ** *******% - **% ********** ********** ******** **** direct.

*** **** ******** * minimum ******* ********, **** pricing ***** ** ******** length. ****** **** ******** requiring * ******* * year ********, *** ******* with '******* ******** ********' is 12 ******. 

Biggest **********

***** ***** ** **** backhaul *** ******** ******* could ** ** **** fix *** ******* ******** connections, ** ** *** difficult ** *** *** integrate ******* ** ***'* offering. ******* **** *** higher **** **** ****** from ***, ** ***** the ******* "*** *** **** **** USS *** *** * 'traditional' **** *******?"  **** ***** *** reasons:

******* *******: *** ******* **** buying **** *** ***** you *** * ******* network **** ********* *********** ** *** *******, and ** *** **** of *** '*******' ******* carrying ****** **** *******. They ****:

"**** ***** *** ******** more ****** , ******, and **** ********. *** secure ******* **** *** traverse *** ****** ********, in ******** ** *** carriers ****** *********; **** device ** *** ** *** same ******* ** ******** else. [*** * ****** **** network] ** **** ****** use *** ******* ******** is **********. [*** **** Dynamic ******** ********], ** enough ******* ** *** private ******** ****** **, we **** ********** ******* network.  *** ********* **** **** their *** ******* *** their ******** *******."

******** *** ******* *******: *** ******* ****** one ** *** ******* benefits ** *** *********, but **************. **** ****** the **** ******* *** local ********, *** ******* the '*** ****** ** choke' *** ********* **** addressing ******:

** *** **** ** provide *** ***** ******* for *** ***** ******** paired **** *** ***** hardware *** ******* ************. To ** **** ** get *** **** ******* on *** ********* **** they ***** **** ** have * ************ **** each ******* *** ****** the ******* *** ******** independently ** **** ******** service ** *** ********* overhead ********** ****** *******.

**** ***'* ********, * retailer **** *** ******* fees *** *** *********** ** one *******, ********** ** which ***** ******* ** used.

Killed ** ****?

**************, *** ******* ******** ** the **** ****. ***** the '*** ****** ** choke' *********** ** **** product ***** ** ***** for ****, ****-********* ********* are ****** ** ******* an ***** $** - $140/month *** * ******** specific *******.

********** ***** **** **** scales ***** ** ********* used, *********** ** *** ******** configured ** ******** ********* or ** * **** accidentally ******* ****** ** using *** **********, * huge **** *** ** run **.

****, * *** ********** Dynamic ******** ******** ***** is **** ********** ** service ** **** ********* by *** ******* ** the ********** ********. ***** the ******** **** ** 4G ******* *** ***** to ***** **** ***** metro ***** (***** ****** retail ******** ***** **** locations), ***** ** ***** the **** **** ******* simply **** *** ****.

 

 

Comments (3)

While 4G (that I have used) has much faster upload speeds than traditional broadband services, being that it is symetrical, I don't think it is as reliable, unless the facility is very close to a tower. This might be viable for some, but why not just get a second broadband connection dedicated to the security services? I think for $75 you could get an unlimited total bandwidth connection, even if the upload speed is only 1Mbps vs the 6Mbps or more that 4G offers.

Brian, thanks for the review. The quality of internet at retail sites varies depending on the retailer. Some (especially smaller companies) will use for example a SOHO class DSL connection supplied directly by their local ISP. Others (especially larger companies) may have a more systematic approach to networking and will provision whatever resources are necessary to supply their stores with what they need to operate. Retailers in both classes are being pushed into greater bandwidth requirements due to trends like cloud-based POS, digital signage, and remote monitoring/auditing. Not to mention video applications.

We do see retailers with very modest upload speeds typical of SOHO class DSL. 200-400K is not uncommon. Until we're all hooked up with fiber, we're going to have to live with those sorts of speeds with a large percentage of the retail segment. A good solution (for video) is to record on-site, then transcode for ad-hoc remote streaming as well as support export via file transfers for full bit-rate retrieval. Streaming needs to honor bandwidth shaping at the site to avoid pushing aside critical transactions like POS. We find that HD recorded video can be transcoded to lower resolutions at H264 High Profile and a decent framerate to produce surprisingly good video at bit rates on the order of 200K. Video quality can only get better from there as the customer's willing to pay for bandwidth to improve it. The gist is, a well architected solution is a good way to work through low bit rates at the retail site.

As far as wireless is concerned, we all know best case wireless bit rates have improved dramatically in the last couple of years. Unfortunately applications of video can be very demanding at critical times (such as when actually attempting to stream video). So there's a big difference between peak bit rates and sustainable, reliable service. Wireless still suffers from high(er) packet loss, higher latency, and unpredictible bit rates due to congestion in the local area or simply due to location. I'm with Jon when he says why not just do another broadband connection if you need to allocate bandwidth specifically for video.

(full disclosure, I work for Schneider Electric)

Jon Dillabaugh posted that

While 4G (that I have used) has much faster upload speeds than traditional broadband services, being that it is symetrical,

While that may be Jon's experience, most users find that upload speeds are considerably slower than download speeds, usually by 2X. It is not a symmetrical service. See for example:

http://www.speedtest.net/isp/att-wireless

Moving on to the substantive posting, USS claims private trunking. This is unlikely. The congested part of cellular service is the radio access network, not their backhaul. Private backhaul from cellular carriers makes about as much sense as seat belts on motorcycles.

Picking the best carrier for an individual location is, however, a value-add service. Because not all carriers co-locate, it is possible for this to make a huge difference. And it is likely not a trivial exercise to find the best service in a fringe area. It is also possible to use an external antenna to improve performance. Assuming that is part of the service, that could be a real win. Still, I like the idea of DSL better. It seems like a better deal than paying a continued monthly rate for what amounts to a one-time service.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis "Best Of The Best" 4K Camera Tested (Q1798-LE) on Nov 21, 2019
Axis has released their "best of the best" Q1798-LE bullet camera, touting "4K without compromise" with a large Micro 4/3" image sensor, custom...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
Last Chance - Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Oct 10, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. The course starts next week. This is the only networking course designed...
'Bunker Busting' Wireless Access Startup: Sure-Fi Profile on Oct 03, 2019
An access startup is claiming its 'bunker busting' wireless Wiegand radios can punch through 'any obstruction'. We examine their offering,...
Vivotek 4K S-Series Camera Tested on Sep 30, 2019
Vivotek's highest-end S-series camera claims "Supreme Night Visibility", "Smart IR II", "Smart Stream II", "WDR Pro for unparalleled visibility in...
Directory of 70 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis "Best Of The Best" 4K Camera Tested (Q1798-LE) on Nov 21, 2019
Axis has released their "best of the best" Q1798-LE bullet camera, touting "4K without compromise" with a large Micro 4/3" image sensor, custom...
Glass Doors and Access Control Tutorial on Nov 21, 2019
One of the biggest access challenges are locking and securing glass doors. Unlike wood or steel doors that can be modified to work with...
Avigilon H4 Intercom Tested on Nov 20, 2019
Avigilon is well-known for video surveillance and access, but how well does the company's intercom work? We purchased and tested Avigilon's H4...
The Cowardly, Greedy "Leaders" of Video Surveillance - SIA on Nov 19, 2019
The video surveillance industry suffers from cowardly, greedy 'leaders' focused on maximizing easy money while undermining public trust. The...
Hikvision Dual Lens Face Recognition Camera Tested on Nov 19, 2019
Hikvision's Dual Lens Facial Recognition camera, claims that it "adopts advanced deep learning algorithm and powerful GPU to realize instant face...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2019 on Nov 18, 2019
2019 has been an explosive year for video surveillance, with the world's two largest manufacturers, Dahua and Hikvision, being sanctioned for human...
Hidden Camera Detectors Tested on Nov 18, 2019
Hidden cameras are a growing problem as cameras become smaller, cheaper and easier to access. However, some companies claim to be able to detect...
Wyze Fires Back at JCI - Your Patents Are Invalid, Pay All Of Our Costs on Nov 18, 2019
Goliath JCI targeted startup Wyze this summer alleging the fast-growing consumer startup was violating a slew of JCI's patents. Now, Wyze has...
ADT Stock Surges - "Leading The Commercial Space" on Nov 15, 2019
Don't call it comeback... but maybe call it a commercial provider. ADT, whose stock dropped by as much as 2/3rds since IPOing in 2018, has now...