Retail Surveillance Bandwidth Solution?

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 20, 2014

Watching video surveillance from retail stores remotely is both essential and problematic.

Bandwidth is frequently limited and prioritized for transactions, not surveillance. But investigations and remote live viewing can be crippled by this.

One company, USS is claiming its solution is 'the next big thing in physical security' that solves this problem. However, do they truly have a good solution, or is it just marketing bravado?

We take a closer look at the features, pricing, advantages and weaknesses inside.

******** ***** ************ **** retail ****** ******** ** both ********* *** ***********.

********* ** ********** ******* and *********** *** ************, not ************. *** ************** *** remote **** ******* *** be ******** ** ****.

*** *******, *** ** claiming *** ******** ** '*** **** *** ***** in ******** ********' **** ****** **** problem. *******, ** **** truly **** * **** solution, ** ** ** just ********* *******?

** **** * ****** look ** *** ********, pricing, ********** *** ********** inside.

[***************]

Classic Bandwidth *******

***'* '******* ******** ********' ******** **  ** ******** ******* ************ *** ********* ********** locations, ************ ***** ** the ****** ** ********** *********. Because ***** ********** *** prone ** **** *************** ***********, *** ********* ** ******** services **** ***** ************, EAS **********, *** ****** control ** ***** *******.

*** ********* ***** *** be * ********* ***** of ***** ************, ***** restricting ****** ********** *** recording ** **** ********** ****** or **** ***** *****. The **** ** ********* bandwidth ** ***** ** high, ** ** * ****** ** selecting '****** ***' *******  of ** ****** ******* connected ** ***** *** recorders ** ****** ** retail, ******* *** ************ of ** ******* ** other *******.

****** ****** ***** ***** where ******* ********* ** easier ** ******* ****** many *****, ********** *** bandwidth ******** ** ***** locations, ** **** ******, is ***** *********:

  • ***** ******** ***********: **** ***** ********* means many ********* ****. ******** many ********* **** ******** cost, *** **** ********* the **** **** *********** will **** ********* ******* *** cracks ** ** ****** for ****** ********..
  • ************** *******: ****** ********* *** cost ********* ** ******* costs *** ******* ******* contracts *** **** **** adding ***** ******* ** *****. 

Dynamic ******** ********

*** ** ******** **** product ** * ***** alone service ************ *** ******** security ******* **** ***** surveillance, ******, ** **** remote ***** ******** *******. The ******* *** ** purchased *** *** ** pre-packaged ******** ********* ******** ** ********** inside ** ***'* **** of**** *** *** ******** servers.  

*******

***'* **** ******** ** a ***/***** **** **** costs ~$**, *** ****** based ** ********* ****. For *******, * ****/***** for * ****** ***** location *** ** ~$***/*****. Compared **** ***** ********, this ** *******% - **% ********** ********** ******** **** direct.

*** **** ******** * minimum ******* ********, **** pricing ***** ** ******** length. ****** **** ******** requiring * ******* * year ********, *** ******* with '******* ******** ********' is 12 ******. 

Biggest **********

***** ***** ** **** backhaul *** ******** ******* could ** ** **** fix *** ******* ******** connections, ** ** *** difficult ** *** *** integrate ******* ** ***'* offering. ******* **** *** higher **** **** ****** from ***, ** ***** the ******* "*** *** **** **** USS *** *** * 'traditional' **** *******?"  **** ***** *** reasons:

******* *******: *** ******* **** buying **** *** ***** you *** * ******* network **** ********* *********** ** *** *******, and ** *** **** of *** '*******' ******* carrying ****** **** *******. They ****:

"**** ***** *** ******** more ****** , ******, and **** ********. *** secure ******* **** *** traverse *** ****** ********, in ******** ** *** carriers ****** *********; **** device ** *** ** *** same ******* ** ******** else. [*** * ****** **** network] ** **** ****** use *** ******* ******** is **********. [*** **** Dynamic ******** ********], ** enough ******* ** *** private ******** ****** **, we **** ********** ******* network.  *** ********* **** **** their *** ******* *** their ******** *******."

******** *** ******* *******: *** ******* ****** one ** *** ******* benefits ** *** *********, but **************. **** ****** the **** ******* *** local ********, *** ******* the '*** ****** ** choke' *** ********* **** addressing ******:

** *** **** ** provide *** ***** ******* for *** ***** ******** paired **** *** ***** hardware *** ******* ************. To ** **** ** get *** **** ******* on *** ********* **** they ***** **** ** have * ************ **** each ******* *** ****** the ******* *** ******** independently ** **** ******** service ** *** ********* overhead ********** ****** *******.

**** ***'* ********, * retailer **** *** ******* fees *** *** *********** ** one *******, ********** ** which ***** ******* ** used.

Killed ** ****?

**************, *** ******* ******** ** the **** ****. ***** the '*** ****** ** choke' *********** ** **** product ***** ** ***** for ****, ****-********* ********* are ****** ** ******* an ***** $** - $140/month *** * ******** specific *******.

********** ***** **** **** scales ***** ** ********* used, *********** ** *** ******** configured ** ******** ********* or ** * **** accidentally ******* ****** ** using *** **********, * huge **** *** ** run **.

****, * *** ********** Dynamic ******** ******** ***** is **** ********** ** service ** **** ********* by *** ******* ** the ********** ********. ***** the ******** **** ** 4G ******* *** ***** to ***** **** ***** metro ***** (***** ****** retail ******** ***** **** locations), ***** ** ***** the **** **** ******* simply **** *** ****.

 

 

Comments (3)

While 4G (that I have used) has much faster upload speeds than traditional broadband services, being that it is symetrical, I don't think it is as reliable, unless the facility is very close to a tower. This might be viable for some, but why not just get a second broadband connection dedicated to the security services? I think for $75 you could get an unlimited total bandwidth connection, even if the upload speed is only 1Mbps vs the 6Mbps or more that 4G offers.

Brian, thanks for the review. The quality of internet at retail sites varies depending on the retailer. Some (especially smaller companies) will use for example a SOHO class DSL connection supplied directly by their local ISP. Others (especially larger companies) may have a more systematic approach to networking and will provision whatever resources are necessary to supply their stores with what they need to operate. Retailers in both classes are being pushed into greater bandwidth requirements due to trends like cloud-based POS, digital signage, and remote monitoring/auditing. Not to mention video applications.

We do see retailers with very modest upload speeds typical of SOHO class DSL. 200-400K is not uncommon. Until we're all hooked up with fiber, we're going to have to live with those sorts of speeds with a large percentage of the retail segment. A good solution (for video) is to record on-site, then transcode for ad-hoc remote streaming as well as support export via file transfers for full bit-rate retrieval. Streaming needs to honor bandwidth shaping at the site to avoid pushing aside critical transactions like POS. We find that HD recorded video can be transcoded to lower resolutions at H264 High Profile and a decent framerate to produce surprisingly good video at bit rates on the order of 200K. Video quality can only get better from there as the customer's willing to pay for bandwidth to improve it. The gist is, a well architected solution is a good way to work through low bit rates at the retail site.

As far as wireless is concerned, we all know best case wireless bit rates have improved dramatically in the last couple of years. Unfortunately applications of video can be very demanding at critical times (such as when actually attempting to stream video). So there's a big difference between peak bit rates and sustainable, reliable service. Wireless still suffers from high(er) packet loss, higher latency, and unpredictible bit rates due to congestion in the local area or simply due to location. I'm with Jon when he says why not just do another broadband connection if you need to allocate bandwidth specifically for video.

(full disclosure, I work for Schneider Electric)

Jon Dillabaugh posted that

While 4G (that I have used) has much faster upload speeds than traditional broadband services, being that it is symetrical,

While that may be Jon's experience, most users find that upload speeds are considerably slower than download speeds, usually by 2X. It is not a symmetrical service. See for example:

http://www.speedtest.net/isp/att-wireless

Moving on to the substantive posting, USS claims private trunking. This is unlikely. The congested part of cellular service is the radio access network, not their backhaul. Private backhaul from cellular carriers makes about as much sense as seat belts on motorcycles.

Picking the best carrier for an individual location is, however, a value-add service. Because not all carriers co-locate, it is possible for this to make a huge difference. And it is likely not a trivial exercise to find the best service in a fringe area. It is also possible to use an external antenna to improve performance. Assuming that is part of the service, that could be a real win. Still, I like the idea of DSL better. It seems like a better deal than paying a continued monthly rate for what amounts to a one-time service.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Aug 28, 2019
Register now for the Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Australia Security Full Show Report on Jul 25, 2019
IPVM went to Australia attending the 3 days of the Australia Security Exhibition: This was held at the ICC Sydney, as shown below: In this...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Show Report Final on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. Inside we...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Hanwha Announces 32MP Camera + AI Line on Sep 10, 2019
In the first rise in maximum megapixel resolution in 5 years, Hanwha has announced a 32MP / 8K camera directly competing with Avigilon's H4 30MP /...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact