Using Video Surveillance to Fight Terrorism

By: John Honovich, Published on Dec 03, 2008

The Mumbai attacks raise questions about security enhancements. What can CCTV or video surveillance do to address terrorist attacks such as Mumbai?  While the immediate reaction is always to spend money on new security systems, what is the best way to invest in security?

Here are the central claims this report examines:

  • Video surveillance can be a key tool in allowing responders to intercept and stop terrorist attacks
  • Video surveillance was not optimally used in Mumbai (from what I have read in the New York Times)
  • Video surveillance (specifically video analytics) will generally be a poor tool at detecting terrorist events because of the nature of terrorist events such as in Mumbai

Overview

Video surveillance should be viewed as one element in an overall security plan.  At a higher level, there are a number of key factors for ensuring security:

  • Political/Cultural Tension: The more hatred and tension, the more motivated people are to commit terrorist attacks
  • Public Policy/Police: The more powerful the police and the more controlling the laws are, the less likely terrorists will be successful in attacks or choose to attack (deterence)
  • Barriers/Access Control: The more walls and more checkpoints used, the more difficult it is for terrorists to successfully execute.
  • Detection: The more people and systems (burglar alarms, video analytics, etc) used, the more likely and sooner terrorists will be detected and stopped.
  • Response: Better responders and richer information (like real time video surveillance) improves the probability of terrorists being stopped quickly and without losses.

Of these five, only the last two factors can be impacted by video surveillance. 

The first two factors (culture and policy) are probably the most important long term factors.  These are obviously outside what an individual security manager can do.

The third factor (barriers/access control) are critical and can be impacted by individual organizations and security managers.  Indeed, a huge part of the problem in Mumbai was the incredible lack of barriers and access control (contrast this to the Marriott in Pakinstan - where barricades prevented the bombing from having far more deadly of an impact).  If you don't stop people or check people as they move throughout a facility, terrorist attacks will cause severe losses - there is basically no way around this.

Video Surveillance to Detect

You can use video surveillance to help detect terrorist activities by (1) having people watch the video in real time or (2) by having computers analyze the video for you and sending alerts (i.e., video analytics).

Watching the video in real time is not feasible for any large facility. Unless you want to employ dozens of people to watch monitors - and the economics probably does not support this.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

You can use video analytics and this will eliminate the problem of having people to watch.  However, video analytics (for security) are only feasible today in areas where no person should be standing or moving.  If you have other people moving, you are likely to have numerous nuisance alerts (e.g., abandoned object detection sounds good in theory but is generally infeasible to use in production) This is why video analytics are almost always used in conjunction with barriers (like fences) or during times when an area is vacant (like an industrial facility after business hours).

Production video analytics are not sophisticated enough to determine who the terrorist is out of a group of people.  Unfortunately, the problem is Mumbai is that, because of the lack of barriers and access control, terrorists can walk right up to victims without any checks or constraints.

While video analytics can solve security problems (such as theft or intrusions), they do not address the core problems in terrorists attacks like that in Mumbai.

Video Surveillance for Response

One of the shocking problems in Mumbai was how long it took to end the attacks and how uninformed it appeared the responders were to the location and activities of the terrorists.

Video surveillance can play a crucial role to help responders quickly and precisely identify terrorists and to marshal responders to the right location and actions. Cameras can be widely distributed and accessed remotely, providing an excellent tool to see where terrorists are and where they are moving. This information can help quickly end attacks.

Unfortunately, in Mumbai, it appears that responders did not have access to those cameras during the fight with the terrorists. The NYTimes claims that the terrorists had much more information on the Taj Hotel and that responders had difficulties determining where to go inside the Hotel.

Access to Surveillance Video

If this is true, this problem must be addressed immediately.  It is a very solvable problem to share video and it does not require massive investments nor science fiction technology.

There is a key challenge - no standards between video management systems (and even with IP camera standards in development, this will not resolve the problem with video management systems). These can be overcome, at least temporarily, by using PSIM systems to facilitate cross vendor video surveillance integration.

 

Related Reports

Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going...
AI/Smart Camera Tutorial on Feb 20, 2020
Cameras with video analytics, sometimes called 'Smart' camera or 'AI'...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of...
Mobotix Thermal Detection Camera Tested on Jun 09, 2020
For years Mobotix has struggled but now sales are surging driven by Mobotix's...
Integrated IR Camera Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 30, 2020
The best and worst cameras tested in this IPVM shootout showed major...
Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to...
Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception...
Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
Directory of 95 Video Surveillance Startups on May 20, 2020
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select...
Video Surveillance 101 Book Released on Jul 07, 2020
IPVM's unique introduction to video surveillance series is now available as a...

Recent Reports

VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...