Converged vs. Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 11, 2015

Use the existing network or deploy a new one?

This is a critical choice in deploying video surveillance systems.

Though 'convergence' was a big theme of the past decade, deciding what to do has been much harder in practice.

In this guide, we break down the key factors in this decision, pro and cons, including:

  • IT vs Security Ownership
  • Existing Networks
  • Bandwidth
  • Network Quality
  • Technical Expertise
  • IT vs Security Ownership
  • Politics: Budget / Control / Avoiding Blame
  • Network Size
  • Expansion Difficulty
  • IP Address Conflict / IP Address Pool / Network Class
  • Security Concerns
  • Ongoing Maintenance Costs

*** *** ******** ******* or ****** * *** one?

**** ** * ******** choice ** ********* ***** surveillance *******.

****** '***********' *** * big ***** ** *** past ******, ******** **** to ** *** **** much ****** ** ********.

** **** *****, ** break **** *** *** factors ** **** ********, pro *** ****, *********:

  • ** ** ******** *********
  • ******** ********
  • *********
  • ******* *******
  • ********* *********
  • ** ** ******** *********
  • ********: ****** / ******* / ******** *****
  • ******* ****
  • ********* **********
  • ** ******* ******** / IP ******* **** / Network *****
  • ******** ********
  • ******* *********** *****

[***************]

Selection ********

** *** *******,*********** **** * ****** preference *** ********* ********* surveillance ********, **** **** * converged ****** ** ********.

IT ** ******** *********

*** ** *** ******* factors *** ****** ** do **** ****** ****** or ********, *** ********.

** ** *** ******** are *** ******** ***********, which ** ******, ****** can *****, ********** ** the *** ****** ** not ***** **** *****.

*** '***** ****' *** unfairly ****** ******* ** surveillance **** ** ******** for ***** ******. ********** when ** **** *** have * *** **** in ****** ****** *** selection ** ******* ******** equipment, *** ***** ****** can ** ******* ** the **** ***** ** many ********.

**** * ******** *******, the *********** ** ********* is ********. ********* *********** problems *** ******* *** physically ********, ** *** 'blame ****' ** ***** system ** ******* ******** can ** *******.

Existing ********

**** ******** **** *** designed ** ****** *** demands ** ********** ***** surveillance *********. **** ** a ****** ********* ** surveillance ***********.

******* ** ****, ****** in ************ *** ***** significant *********** ********, *** most ******* ***** *********.

*********

****** * *** ******* to ** ******** ****** may **** ****** ****** on ***** ************ ** the *******, **** ** email ** ****, ***** total ***** ********** ** only * ******** ** typical ******* ********. *******, dozens ** ******** ** cameras ****** ********** * facility ** ****** *** overload ******* ************** ***** average ******* ** **** and ******** ***** ******* run ************.

** *** ***** ****, the *** ************ ** a ********* ******** ******* is *** **** ** building * ********* *******. Not **** *** *** hardware ******* ******, *** additional *** *********** ****** need ** ** ***, with **** ********* ******* maintenance ********.

*** ******* ********* ** a ********* ******* **** not **** ** ***** bandwidth. **** * ****** built **** **** **** Ethernet ****** *** ****** support ** *****-********* *******, and *** **** ********** to ********* ** ******* speeds ** ****** *** continues ** ****. ******** a ********* ******* *** surveillance ****** ******* *** impact ** ********* ********* by ****** **** ********. The ******** *********** ***** down ** **** ** purchasing, **********, *** *********** a *** *****-**** *******.

Quality ** *******

** ********* ** *******, concerns ***** **** ***** dropped ** ******** ******** unavailable ****** ** *****. Overloaded ******** *** ****** a ********* *** *** kinds ** *********** ******, both ****, ********, ** unfairly *******.

*** ***** ************* / complexity ** ******** ******* of ******* *** ********* networks ***** ** *** expense ** **** **** hardware *** ************** ***** to ******* **. ** a ******** ***** ******, the ****** ** ***** surveillance ** ***** ******* may ** ******** *** troubling.

**** * ********* *******, only ***** ** *******, and ***** ** ** fighting **** ***** ******** for *********. *******, **** again ******** *** ********.

Technical *********

** **********, ******** *** range **** ****** ** very ******* **** ** outward *****. *** **** that ********** *** ********* plays ** ******** * surveillance ******* ** ********* different.

***** * ****** ******* to ****** *** **** traffic ***** ***** ** they *** **** ** leverage **** ******** ** managed ******** *** *** network ************* ****-***. *********** 'Quality ** ******* *** VLANs *** ** * practical *** ********* ****, but **** **** ********** by ******* ***********. ******* this ***** ** ************* is ****** ******** *****, and ****** ****** ******* the ****** ********** ** network **************.

** *** *** *******, a ********** ******* ** generally ******* ** ****** and ******** ******* ** handles **** *** *** system ****. *** **** is *** ***** ** configuration ****, *** *** actual ******** ****** ** simpler *** ******* ****** a ****** ******* ******. 'Plug *** ****' ******** with ******* ************** *** commonplace ** ********* ***** networks, **** **** ****** IT ***** ** ****** integrators *** ****** **** and ******** **** **** little **********.

Expansion ********** & ****** ****

** *******, *** ***** and **** ** *** network ** * *** consideration. *** ******** ******** multiple ********* ** ******** sites, *** ************** ********** tying **** ******** *** be * **** ******* and ******** *********** ******* to ******** ***** ** cable ***********.

**** ************* **** ******* invested ** ******** ********** multiple ********* *** ******** together, *** ********* ***** or ******** ***** ******* are ** **********. ********, those ***** *** ***** planned **** **** *********** of ****** ********* ** mind. *** *********** **** of ****** ***** *** be ********** ***********.

*******, *** ********* ********, this ***** ******* *** cables ******* *********, ***** can ** ********* ********* or *********. ** **** cases, ********* ******** **** a ******** *********.

Security ********

*** *** *** ***** or ********* ***** ********* network ******* **** ** a ****** *******.

** ********** ********** ************ traffic ** *** *** network ***** ** ****** to **** ****** **. Moreover, ******* ****** ** video ***** ********** ******** access ** *** ******* and ******* **** ******* secure ** ******. ** casinos, **** ** * priority ** **** ********* want ** ****** ** one ****, **** **, can *** ***** ******* or ****** ***** ***********.

*** ********* ******** ** that ******** ******* *** go ********* ** ********* for ******* ** ****, simply *** ** *** 'low-risk ******' ******** ***** by ************** ** ******** staff.

Ongoing *********** *****

*** ******* ** *********** either ****** *** **** as ****, *** ****** a *** ******.

*******, *** ******* ******* of * ********* ******* is * ******** ** programmed **** ******* *********** and ****** ** *** users. ******* *** ******* operational ** * ******** for ** ***********, *** having ***** *** * converged ******* ********* ********** the ******* ** ******* maintenance.

*******, *** ********** *********** of ******* ******* ** grudgingly ******** ** ******** ignored. ***** ***** *********** and ******** ****** *** be ********* ** ********* a ********** *******, ******* it *********** ** ******* responding ** ****** *** be * **** ******* area.

*** ******* **** ** a ********* ******* ** that ****** *********** *** upkeep *** ** ******* or **** ** ***** addressed. ********* ** *********** at **** **** *************** problems ** ****** ********* outside ** '***** *******' is * ****, ** well ** * ********** to **** *** ******** vendor *** ******* ** 'minor ******' ** **** might **** ******** ******** once ** ***** *** year.

Comments (11)

I think you need to add in the maturity of the customer, their infrastructure and the efficiences they may/may not have with respect to managing thereof.

A few years ago this would be more relevant than it could (or should) be today. So-called "convergence" isn't an event but an evolution. In many environments IT will continue to absorb the responsibility for providing the physical security as infrastructure and the security personnel are another end-user.

Casinos might be a special case in that cameras are a mission critical asset and the risk of getting ripped off is both external and internal.

But in most (modern) environments core switches should be gigabit with high capacity interconnects. VLAN tagging is a convenient way to logically isolate IP video traffic.

POE port density can be a problem towards the edge--in which case it might make sense for new/dedicated equipment. But even at that the proliferation of POE for (say) IP phones is becoming common and so is POE.

My point being, a professionally managed, modern network should be able to support IP video. If it's not, maybe IP video is a good reason to modernize. There exists value in using the same infrastructure for IP video and other networking needs. The dedication of a distinct network for IP video is leaving some of that value on the floor.

You are mixing could with should, with what happens with what you think should happen.

The reality is that this is still a significant issue and the political / territorial / fingerpointing aspect has not gone away for the large portion of users where IT and security remains separate.

I don't doubt that political / territorial is still a big deal and relevant. But, hey, so is analog. What I'm saying is the excuses are falling away. Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more. I don't doubt that they're still the argument, but they won't be forever in many environments. When the argument becomes clearly political, it's increasingly difficult to justify if the infrastructure--itself designed to service the business as a whole as efficiently as possible--is able to do the job for both and makes sense to be managed singularly.

An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store designed to (logically) segment wifi to customers, POS, digital signage, and IP video. And, no, the LP guy can't really argue duplicate hardware and infrastructure just because he doesn't get along with Joe over in IT..

As long as IP video is managed like analog but with RJ45 instead of BNC connectors, the customer is leaving a lot of 'internet protocol' opportunity on the floor.

"Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more."

Actually I am saying the IT guys often say this. Not every IT department wants to have video surveillance dumped on then, the increased risk / troubleshooting.

As for retail:

"An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store "

Retailers have been using converged networks for 10+ years because they have to. When you have stores / branches / sites scattered around the world, it is not that feasible to have multiple independent WAN connections for each service. And for retailers, they have to see the video remotely so the shared WAN becomes a necessity.

Retailers and anyone who runs credit card transactions have PCI-DSS compliance concerns which generally means that if they are a big box store they already have network infrastructure to support VLANs. Otherwise every device, including the surveillance servers gets added to their PCI audit scope of it's on the same VLAN. Even in some small Restaurant chains have some level of VLANs setup. I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence. I have only done project on one campus but higher education seems to be fairly comfortable with convergence as well. They all already have so much junk riding on their network to begin with - AV control systems, teleconferencing, VOIP, etc. In my opinion big box retailers DEFINE converged IT.

It's places like factories and automotive corporations that I have seen the most push back. Anything that has even the most remote chance of impacting production for even a second starts a fire under IT and the production representatives will back them. Security is just a minor department.

i am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown. Just like every field there are people who are good at their job and some that you have to question who they are related to.

"I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence"

Are you sure about that? We did a hospital that was very glad we to hear we were building a physically seperate network for the cameras. The only part of the system connecting to their network being the NVR, which made it easier for them to control.

As for retailers, it depends on the size of the retailer. Do not assume because the retailer or resturant chain is a big one, that they invest a lot in "compliance". The problem is the smaller, franchise owner who has to squeeze what they can from very small margins, like a sharecropper. So many times I have seen them install free, public wireless systems to attract patrons which are also connected to the same network as their old used, Windows based POS systems that didn't even have antivirus protection on them. When you talk to them about segregating the networks so patrons don't see the POS systems, they're like "Sure, as long as it doesn't cost me a dime. Otherwise... uh, yeah, I'll get to it maybe next month."

"I am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown."

Unfortunately, yes, very true. Not all the time, but more often than non-IT people probably realize. That's why is you don't have staff that are very IT proficient, you'll probably never recognize it.

We don't have a single client using more than 3-5 cameras on their network. I could never put our company's name behind infrastructure that we don't know front to back. If it is impossible to put in our own lines then fine but "convergence" is nice in theory, in practice its a hot mess. Think about it, one day some IT admin screws with the network and blocks port traffic within the network.. Cameras go down and the customer is upset... You consult with IT and they say "we didn't do anything" and you're left with trying to figure out their mess. To the customer it doesn't matter that IT did it, the blame game gets you no where. So I say NEVER piggy back on their network unless absolutely nessesary.

IPVM, this is a good thread, can you update it with a Cyber Security category. If the integrator favorites providing a private flat network, do they also provide remote monitoring and administration of that infrastructure?

We don't have a breakdown of that but we do have remote access stats. See: DDNS vs P2P vs VPN Usage Statistics

Thanks JH, will take a look.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Directory of 59 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact