Converged vs. Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 11, 2015

Use the existing network or deploy a new one?

This is a critical choice in deploying video surveillance systems.

Though 'convergence' was a big theme of the past decade, deciding what to do has been much harder in practice.

In this guide, we break down the key factors in this decision, pro and cons, including:

  • IT vs Security Ownership
  • Existing Networks
  • Bandwidth
  • Network Quality
  • Technical Expertise
  • IT vs Security Ownership 
  • Politics: Budget / Control / Avoiding Blame
  • Network Size
  • Expansion Difficulty
  • IP Address Conflict / IP Address Pool / Network Class
  • Security Concerns
  • Ongoing Maintenance Costs

*** *** ******** ******* or ****** * *** one?

**** ** * ******** choice ** ********* ***** surveillance *******.

****** '***********' *** * big ***** ** *** past ******, ******** **** to ** *** **** much ****** ** ********.

** **** *****, ** break **** *** *** factors ** **** ********, pro *** ****, *********:

  • ** ** ******** *********
  • ******** ********
  • *********
  • ******* *******
  • ********* *********
  • ** ** ******** ********* 
  • ********: ****** / ******* / ******** *****
  • ******* ****
  • ********* **********
  • ** ******* ******** / IP ******* **** / Network *****
  • ******** ********
  • ******* *********** *****

[***************]

Selection ********

** *** *******,*********** **** * ****** preference *** ********* ********* surveillance ********, **** **** * converged ****** ** ********.

IT ** ******** *********

*** ** *** ******* factors *** ****** ** do **** ****** ****** or ********, *** ********.

** ** *** ******** are *** ******** ***********, which ** ******, ****** can *****, ********** ** the *** ****** ** not ***** **** *****.

*** '***** ****' *** unfairly ****** ******* ** surveillance **** ** ******** for ***** ******.  ********** when ** **** *** have * *** **** in ****** ****** *** selection ** ******* ******** equipment, *** ***** ****** can ** ******* ** the **** ***** ** many ********.

**** * ******** *******, the *********** ** ********* is ********. ********* *********** problems *** ******* *** physically ********, ** *** 'blame ****' ** ***** system ** ******* ******** can ** *******.

Existing ********

**** ******** **** *** designed ** ****** *** demands ** ********** ***** surveillance *********. **** ** a ****** ********* ** surveillance ***********.

******* ** ****, ****** in ************ *** ***** significant *********** ********, *** most ******* ***** *********.

*********

****** * *** ******* to ** ******** ****** may **** ****** ****** on ***** ************ ** the *******, **** ** email ** ****, ***** total ***** ********** ** only * ******** ** typical ******* ********. *******, dozens ** ******** ** cameras ****** ********** * facility ** ****** *** overload ******* ************** ***** average ******* ** **** and ******** ***** ******* run ************.

** *** ***** ****, the *** ************ ** a ********* ******** ******* is *** **** ** building * ********* *******. Not **** *** *** hardware ******* ******, *** additional *** *********** ****** need ** ** ***, with **** ********* ******* maintenance ********.

*** ******* ********* ** a ********* ******* **** not **** ** ***** bandwidth. **** * ****** built **** **** **** Ethernet ****** *** ****** support ** *****-********* *******, and *** **** ********** to ********* ** ******* speeds ** ****** *** continues ** ****. ******** a ********* ******* *** surveillance ****** ******* *** impact ** ********* ********* by ****** **** ********. The ******** *********** ***** down ** **** ** purchasing, **********, *** *********** a *** *****-**** *******.

Quality ** *******

** ********* ** *******, concerns ***** **** ***** dropped ** ******** ******** unavailable ****** ** *****. Overloaded ******** *** ****** a ********* *** *** kinds ** *********** ******, both ****, ********, ** unfairly *******.

*** ***** ************* / complexity ** ******** ******* of ******* *** ********* networks ***** ** *** expense ** **** **** hardware *** ************** ***** to ******* **.  ** a ******** ***** ******, the ****** ** ***** surveillance ** ***** ******* may ** ******** *** troubling.

**** * ********* *******, only ***** ** *******, and ***** ** ** fighting **** ***** ******** for *********. *******, **** again ******** *** ********.

Technical *********

** **********, ******** *** range **** ****** ** very ******* **** ** outward *****.  *** **** that ********** *** ********* plays ** ******** * surveillance ******* ** ********* different.

***** * ****** ******* to ****** *** **** traffic ***** ***** ** they *** **** ** leverage **** ******** ** managed ******** *** *** network ************* ****-***. *********** 'Quality ** ******* *** VLANs *** ** * practical *** ********* ****, but **** **** ********** by ******* ***********.  ******* this ***** ** ************* is ****** ******** *****, and ****** ****** ******* the ****** ********** ** network **************.

** *** *** *******, a ********** ******* ** generally ******* ** ****** and ******** ******* ** handles **** *** *** system ****. *** **** is *** ***** ** configuration ****, *** *** actual ******** ****** ** simpler *** ******* ****** a ****** ******* ******.  'Plug *** ****' ******** with ******* ************** *** commonplace ** ********* ***** networks, **** **** ****** ** techs ** ****** *********** can ****** **** *** maintain **** **** ****** difficulty.

Expansion ********** & ****** ****

** *******, *** ***** and **** ** *** network ** * *** consideration. *** ******** ******** multiple ********* ** ******** sites, *** ************** ********** tying **** ******** *** be * **** ******* and ******** *********** ******* to ******** ***** ** cable ***********.

**** ************* **** ******* invested ** ******** ********** multiple ********* *** ******** together, *** ********* ***** or ******** ***** ******* are ** **********. ********, those ***** *** ***** planned **** **** *********** of ****** ********* ** mind. *** *********** **** of ****** ***** *** be ********** ***********.

*******, *** ********* ********, this ***** ******* *** cables ******* *********, ***** can ** ********* ********* or *********. ** **** cases, ********* ******** **** a ******** *********.

Security ********

*** *** *** ***** or ********* ***** ********* network ******* **** ** a ****** *******.

** ********** ********** ************ traffic ** *** *** network ***** ** ****** to **** ****** **. Moreover, ******* ****** ** video ***** ********** ******** access ** *** ******* and ******* **** ******* secure ** ******. ** casinos, **** ** * priority ** **** ********* want ** ****** ** one ****, **** **, can *** ***** ******* or ****** ***** ***********.

*** ********* ******** ** that ******** ******* *** go ********* ** ********* for ******* ** ****, simply *** ** *** 'low-risk ******' ******** ***** by ************** ** ******** staff.

Ongoing *********** *****

*** ******* ** *********** either ****** *** **** as ****, *** ****** a *** ******.

*******, *** ******* ******* of * ********* ******* is * ******** ** programmed **** ******* *********** and ****** ** *** users. ******* *** ******* operational ** * ******** for ** ***********, *** having ***** *** * converged ******* ********* ********** the ******* ** ******* maintenance.

*******, *** ********** *********** of ******* ******* ** grudgingly ******** ** ******** ignored.  ***** ***** *********** and ******** ****** *** be ********* ** ********* a ********** *******, ******* it *********** ** ******* responding ** ****** *** be * **** ******* area.

*** ******* **** ** a ********* ******* ** that ****** *********** *** upkeep *** ** ******* or  **** ** ***** addressed.  ********* ** *********** at **** **** *************** problems ** ****** ********* outside ** '***** *******' is * ****, ** well ** * ********** to **** *** ******** vendor *** ******* ** 'minor ******' ** **** might **** ******** ******** once ** ***** *** year.

Comments (11)

I think you need to add in the maturity of the customer, their infrastructure and the efficiences they may/may not have with respect to managing thereof.

A few years ago this would be more relevant than it could (or should) be today. So-called "convergence" isn't an event but an evolution. In many environments IT will continue to absorb the responsibility for providing the physical security as infrastructure and the security personnel are another end-user.

Casinos might be a special case in that cameras are a mission critical asset and the risk of getting ripped off is both external and internal.

But in most (modern) environments core switches should be gigabit with high capacity interconnects. VLAN tagging is a convenient way to logically isolate IP video traffic.

POE port density can be a problem towards the edge--in which case it might make sense for new/dedicated equipment. But even at that the proliferation of POE for (say) IP phones is becoming common and so is POE.

My point being, a professionally managed, modern network should be able to support IP video. If it's not, maybe IP video is a good reason to modernize. There exists value in using the same infrastructure for IP video and other networking needs. The dedication of a distinct network for IP video is leaving some of that value on the floor.

You are mixing could with should, with what happens with what you think should happen.

The reality is that this is still a significant issue and the political / territorial / fingerpointing aspect has not gone away for the large portion of users where IT and security remains separate.

I don't doubt that political / territorial is still a big deal and relevant. But, hey, so is analog. What I'm saying is the excuses are falling away. Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more. I don't doubt that they're still the argument, but they won't be forever in many environments. When the argument becomes clearly political, it's increasingly difficult to justify if the infrastructure--itself designed to service the business as a whole as efficiently as possible--is able to do the job for both and makes sense to be managed singularly.

An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store designed to (logically) segment wifi to customers, POS, digital signage, and IP video. And, no, the LP guy can't really argue duplicate hardware and infrastructure just because he doesn't get along with Joe over in IT..

As long as IP video is managed like analog but with RJ45 instead of BNC connectors, the customer is leaving a lot of 'internet protocol' opportunity on the floor.

"Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more."

Actually I am saying the IT guys often say this. Not every IT department wants to have video surveillance dumped on then, the increased risk / troubleshooting.

As for retail:

"An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store "

Retailers have been using converged networks for 10+ years because they have to. When you have stores / branches / sites scattered around the world, it is not that feasible to have multiple independent WAN connections for each service. And for retailers, they have to see the video remotely so the shared WAN becomes a necessity.

Retailers and anyone who runs credit card transactions have PCI-DSS compliance concerns which generally means that if they are a big box store they already have network infrastructure to support VLANs. Otherwise every device, including the surveillance servers gets added to their PCI audit scope of it's on the same VLAN. Even in some small Restaurant chains have some level of VLANs setup. I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence. I have only done project on one campus but higher education seems to be fairly comfortable with convergence as well. They all already have so much junk riding on their network to begin with - AV control systems, teleconferencing, VOIP, etc. In my opinion big box retailers DEFINE converged IT.

It's places like factories and automotive corporations that I have seen the most push back. Anything that has even the most remote chance of impacting production for even a second starts a fire under IT and the production representatives will back them. Security is just a minor department.

i am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown. Just like every field there are people who are good at their job and some that you have to question who they are related to.

"I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence"

Are you sure about that? We did a hospital that was very glad we to hear we were building a physically seperate network for the cameras. The only part of the system connecting to their network being the NVR, which made it easier for them to control.

As for retailers, it depends on the size of the retailer. Do not assume because the retailer or resturant chain is a big one, that they invest a lot in "compliance". The problem is the smaller, franchise owner who has to squeeze what they can from very small margins, like a sharecropper. So many times I have seen them install free, public wireless systems to attract patrons which are also connected to the same network as their old used, Windows based POS systems that didn't even have antivirus protection on them. When you talk to them about segregating the networks so patrons don't see the POS systems, they're like "Sure, as long as it doesn't cost me a dime. Otherwise... uh, yeah, I'll get to it maybe next month."

"I am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown."

Unfortunately, yes, very true. Not all the time, but more often than non-IT people probably realize. That's why is you don't have staff that are very IT proficient, you'll probably never recognize it.

We don't have a single client using more than 3-5 cameras on their network. I could never put our company's name behind infrastructure that we don't know front to back. If it is impossible to put in our own lines then fine but "convergence" is nice in theory, in practice its a hot mess. Think about it, one day some IT admin screws with the network and blocks port traffic within the network.. Cameras go down and the customer is upset... You consult with IT and they say "we didn't do anything" and you're left with trying to figure out their mess. To the customer it doesn't matter that IT did it, the blame game gets you no where. So I say NEVER piggy back on their network unless absolutely nessesary.

IPVM, this is a good thread, can you update it with a Cyber Security category. If the integrator favorites providing a private flat network, do they also provide remote monitoring and administration of that infrastructure?

We don't have a breakdown of that but we do have remote access stats. See: DDNS vs P2P vs VPN Usage Statistics

Thanks JH, will take a look.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Viisights Raises $10 Million, Behavior Analytics Company Profile on Dec 09, 2019
Viisights, an Israeli AI analytics startup marketing "Behavioral Understanding Systems", announced $10 million Series A funding. We spoke to...
Bosch Budget 3000i Cameras Tested on Dec 05, 2019
Bosch has long had a hole in its lineup for, as it describes, "competitively-priced cameras". Now, Bosch has released its 3000i series cameras...
Security Sales Course 2020 on Dec 05, 2019
This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to professionals selling video surveillance and access control...
Vunetrix Health Monitoring Company Profile on Nov 26, 2019
Vunetrix boasts that they make the integrators the 'HERO' by using Vunetrix's monitoring. We spoke to Vunetrix to better understand their...
Top 2020 Trend - AI Analytics on Nov 22, 2019
170+ Integrators answered: What do you think will be the top industry trend in 2020? Why? For the 4th year in a row, AI/video analytics was...
Axis "Best Of The Best" 4K Camera Tested (Q1798-LE) on Nov 21, 2019
Axis has released their "best of the best" Q1798-LE bullet camera, touting "4K without compromise" with a large Micro 4/3" image sensor, custom...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2019 on Nov 18, 2019
2019 has been an explosive year for video surveillance, with the world's two largest manufacturers, Dahua and Hikvision, being sanctioned for human...
ADT Stock Surges - "Leading The Commercial Space" on Nov 15, 2019
Don't call it comeback... but maybe call it a commercial provider. ADT, whose stock dropped by as much as 2/3rds since IPOing in 2018, has now...
Camera Field of View (FoV) Guide on Nov 13, 2019
Field of View (FoV) and Angle of View (AoV), are deceptively complex. At their most basic, they simply describe what the camera can "see" and seem...
Open vs End-to-End Systems: Integrator Statistics 2019 on Nov 11, 2019
Preference for open systems is on the decline, according to new IPVM statistics. We asked integrators: For video surveillance systems, do you...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Video Surveillance 101 Course Opened on Dec 12, 2019
IPVM is adding a Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important terms,...
Verkada Notification Outage on Dec 12, 2019
Verkada is suffering an event notification outage and analytic search failures. Inside, we examine what the issues are, what Verkada told IPVM...
Hikvision DS 2nd Gen Intercom Tested on Dec 12, 2019
With its newest IP intercom, Hikvision proclaims users can 'get full control over an entrance' regardless of where it is installed, home or office...
Honeywell 30 Series Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 11, 2019
Honeywell has infamously OEMed Dahua and Hikvision for years, but now they have introduced an NDAA-compliant line, the 30 Series, claiming "lower...
"Good Market, Bad Business Models" - Residential Security on Dec 11, 2019
Industry banker John Mack, at his company's annual event, took aim squarely at the problems in the residential security...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
Acquisitions - Winners and Losers on Dec 10, 2019
Most major manufacturers have been acquired over the last decade. But which have been good deals or not? In this report, we analyze the...
IP Camera Installability Shootout 2019 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Dec 09, 2019
What are the best and worst cameras to install? Which manufacturers make it the hardest or easiest to install their cameras? We tested 35 total...
Viisights Raises $10 Million, Behavior Analytics Company Profile on Dec 09, 2019
Viisights, an Israeli AI analytics startup marketing "Behavioral Understanding Systems", announced $10 million Series A funding. We spoke to...
Disruptor Wyze Releases Undisruptive Smartlock on Dec 06, 2019
While Wyze has disrupted the consumer IP camera market with ~$20 cameras, its entrance into smart locks is entirely undisruptive. We have...