Converged vs. Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 11, 2015

Use the existing network or deploy a new one?

This is a critical choice in deploying video surveillance systems.

Though 'convergence' was a big theme of the past decade, deciding what to do has been much harder in practice.

In this guide, we break down the key factors in this decision, pro and cons, including:

  • IT vs Security Ownership
  • Existing Networks
  • Bandwidth
  • Network Quality
  • Technical Expertise
  • IT vs Security Ownership 
  • Politics: Budget / Control / Avoiding Blame
  • Network Size
  • Expansion Difficulty
  • IP Address Conflict / IP Address Pool / Network Class
  • Security Concerns
  • Ongoing Maintenance Costs

*** *** ******** ******* or ****** * *** one?

**** ** * ******** choice ** ********* ***** surveillance *******.

****** '***********' *** * big ***** ** *** past ******, ******** **** to ** *** **** much ****** ** ********.

** **** *****, ** break **** *** *** factors ** **** ********, pro *** ****, *********:

  • ** ** ******** *********
  • ******** ********
  • *********
  • ******* *******
  • ********* *********
  • ** ** ******** ********* 
  • ********: ****** / ******* / ******** *****
  • ******* ****
  • ********* **********
  • ** ******* ******** / IP ******* **** / Network *****
  • ******** ********
  • ******* *********** *****

[***************]

Selection ********

** *** *******,*********** **** * ****** preference *** ********* ********* surveillance ********, **** **** * converged ****** ** ********.

IT ** ******** *********

*** ** *** ******* factors *** ****** ** do **** ****** ****** or ********, *** ********.

** ** *** ******** are *** ******** ***********, which ** ******, ****** can *****, ********** ** the *** ****** ** not ***** **** *****.

*** '***** ****' *** unfairly ****** ******* ** surveillance **** ** ******** for ***** ******.  ********** when ** **** *** have * *** **** in ****** ****** *** selection ** ******* ******** equipment, *** ***** ****** can ** ******* ** the **** ***** ** many ********.

**** * ******** *******, the *********** ** ********* is ********. ********* *********** problems *** ******* *** physically ********, ** *** 'blame ****' ** ***** system ** ******* ******** can ** *******.

Existing ********

**** ******** **** *** designed ** ****** *** demands ** ********** ***** surveillance *********. **** ** a ****** ********* ** surveillance ***********.

******* ** ****, ****** in ************ *** ***** significant *********** ********, *** most ******* ***** *********.

*********

****** * *** ******* to ** ******** ****** may **** ****** ****** on ***** ************ ** the *******, **** ** email ** ****, ***** total ***** ********** ** only * ******** ** typical ******* ********. *******, dozens ** ******** ** cameras ****** ********** * facility ** ****** *** overload ******* ************** ***** average ******* ** **** and ******** ***** ******* run ************.

** *** ***** ****, the *** ************ ** a ********* ******** ******* is *** **** ** building * ********* *******. Not **** *** *** hardware ******* ******, *** additional *** *********** ****** need ** ** ***, with **** ********* ******* maintenance ********.

*** ******* ********* ** a ********* ******* **** not **** ** ***** bandwidth. **** * ****** built **** **** **** Ethernet ****** *** ****** support ** *****-********* *******, and *** **** ********** to ********* ** ******* speeds ** ****** *** continues ** ****. ******** a ********* ******* *** surveillance ****** ******* *** impact ** ********* ********* by ****** **** ********. The ******** *********** ***** down ** **** ** purchasing, **********, *** *********** a *** *****-**** *******.

Quality ** *******

** ********* ** *******, concerns ***** **** ***** dropped ** ******** ******** unavailable ****** ** *****. Overloaded ******** *** ****** a ********* *** *** kinds ** *********** ******, both ****, ********, ** unfairly *******.

*** ***** ************* / complexity ** ******** ******* of ******* *** ********* networks ***** ** *** expense ** **** **** hardware *** ************** ***** to ******* **.  ** a ******** ***** ******, the ****** ** ***** surveillance ** ***** ******* may ** ******** *** troubling.

**** * ********* *******, only ***** ** *******, and ***** ** ** fighting **** ***** ******** for *********. *******, **** again ******** *** ********.

Technical *********

** **********, ******** *** range **** ****** ** very ******* **** ** outward *****.  *** **** that ********** *** ********* plays ** ******** * surveillance ******* ** ********* different.

***** * ****** ******* to ****** *** **** traffic ***** ***** ** they *** **** ** leverage **** ******** ** managed ******** *** *** network ************* ****-***. *********** 'Quality ** ******* *** VLANs *** ** * practical *** ********* ****, but **** **** ********** by ******* ***********.  ******* this ***** ** ************* is ****** ******** *****, and ****** ****** ******* the ****** ********** ** network **************.

** *** *** *******, a ********** ******* ** generally ******* ** ****** and ******** ******* ** handles **** *** *** system ****. *** **** is *** ***** ** configuration ****, *** *** actual ******** ****** ** simpler *** ******* ****** a ****** ******* ******.  'Plug *** ****' ******** with ******* ************** *** commonplace ** ********* ***** networks, **** **** ****** ** techs ** ****** *********** can ****** **** *** maintain **** **** ****** difficulty.

Expansion ********** & ****** ****

** *******, *** ***** and **** ** *** network ** * *** consideration. *** ******** ******** multiple ********* ** ******** sites, *** ************** ********** tying **** ******** *** be * **** ******* and ******** *********** ******* to ******** ***** ** cable ***********.

**** ************* **** ******* invested ** ******** ********** multiple ********* *** ******** together, *** ********* ***** or ******** ***** ******* are ** **********. ********, those ***** *** ***** planned **** **** *********** of ****** ********* ** mind. *** *********** **** of ****** ***** *** be ********** ***********.

*******, *** ********* ********, this ***** ******* *** cables ******* *********, ***** can ** ********* ********* or *********. ** **** cases, ********* ******** **** a ******** *********.

Security ********

*** *** *** ***** or ********* ***** ********* network ******* **** ** a ****** *******.

** ********** ********** ************ traffic ** *** *** network ***** ** ****** to **** ****** **. Moreover, ******* ****** ** video ***** ********** ******** access ** *** ******* and ******* **** ******* secure ** ******. ** casinos, **** ** * priority ** **** ********* want ** ****** ** one ****, **** **, can *** ***** ******* or ****** ***** ***********.

*** ********* ******** ** that ******** ******* *** go ********* ** ********* for ******* ** ****, simply *** ** *** 'low-risk ******' ******** ***** by ************** ** ******** staff.

Ongoing *********** *****

*** ******* ** *********** either ****** *** **** as ****, *** ****** a *** ******.

*******, *** ******* ******* of * ********* ******* is * ******** ** programmed **** ******* *********** and ****** ** *** users. ******* *** ******* operational ** * ******** for ** ***********, *** having ***** *** * converged ******* ********* ********** the ******* ** ******* maintenance.

*******, *** ********** *********** of ******* ******* ** grudgingly ******** ** ******** ignored.  ***** ***** *********** and ******** ****** *** be ********* ** ********* a ********** *******, ******* it *********** ** ******* responding ** ****** *** be * **** ******* area.

*** ******* **** ** a ********* ******* ** that ****** *********** *** upkeep *** ** ******* or  **** ** ***** addressed.  ********* ** *********** at **** **** *************** problems ** ****** ********* outside ** '***** *******' is * ****, ** well ** * ********** to **** *** ******** vendor *** ******* ** 'minor ******' ** **** might **** ******** ******** once ** ***** *** year.

Comments (11)

I think you need to add in the maturity of the customer, their infrastructure and the efficiences they may/may not have with respect to managing thereof.

A few years ago this would be more relevant than it could (or should) be today. So-called "convergence" isn't an event but an evolution. In many environments IT will continue to absorb the responsibility for providing the physical security as infrastructure and the security personnel are another end-user.

Casinos might be a special case in that cameras are a mission critical asset and the risk of getting ripped off is both external and internal.

But in most (modern) environments core switches should be gigabit with high capacity interconnects. VLAN tagging is a convenient way to logically isolate IP video traffic.

POE port density can be a problem towards the edge--in which case it might make sense for new/dedicated equipment. But even at that the proliferation of POE for (say) IP phones is becoming common and so is POE.

My point being, a professionally managed, modern network should be able to support IP video. If it's not, maybe IP video is a good reason to modernize. There exists value in using the same infrastructure for IP video and other networking needs. The dedication of a distinct network for IP video is leaving some of that value on the floor.

You are mixing could with should, with what happens with what you think should happen.

The reality is that this is still a significant issue and the political / territorial / fingerpointing aspect has not gone away for the large portion of users where IT and security remains separate.

I don't doubt that political / territorial is still a big deal and relevant. But, hey, so is analog. What I'm saying is the excuses are falling away. Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more. I don't doubt that they're still the argument, but they won't be forever in many environments. When the argument becomes clearly political, it's increasingly difficult to justify if the infrastructure--itself designed to service the business as a whole as efficiently as possible--is able to do the job for both and makes sense to be managed singularly.

An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store designed to (logically) segment wifi to customers, POS, digital signage, and IP video. And, no, the LP guy can't really argue duplicate hardware and infrastructure just because he doesn't get along with Joe over in IT..

As long as IP video is managed like analog but with RJ45 instead of BNC connectors, the customer is leaving a lot of 'internet protocol' opportunity on the floor.

"Where the security guy used to be able to say "bandwidth" or "security" he can't necessarily do so any more."

Actually I am saying the IT guys often say this. Not every IT department wants to have video surveillance dumped on then, the increased risk / troubleshooting.

As for retail:

"An example from retail, Yum! Brand's 'future store network' would set minimum bandwidth connections to stores, standardize network hardware in-store "

Retailers have been using converged networks for 10+ years because they have to. When you have stores / branches / sites scattered around the world, it is not that feasible to have multiple independent WAN connections for each service. And for retailers, they have to see the video remotely so the shared WAN becomes a necessity.

Retailers and anyone who runs credit card transactions have PCI-DSS compliance concerns which generally means that if they are a big box store they already have network infrastructure to support VLANs. Otherwise every device, including the surveillance servers gets added to their PCI audit scope of it's on the same VLAN. Even in some small Restaurant chains have some level of VLANs setup. I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence. I have only done project on one campus but higher education seems to be fairly comfortable with convergence as well. They all already have so much junk riding on their network to begin with - AV control systems, teleconferencing, VOIP, etc. In my opinion big box retailers DEFINE converged IT.

It's places like factories and automotive corporations that I have seen the most push back. Anything that has even the most remote chance of impacting production for even a second starts a fire under IT and the production representatives will back them. Security is just a minor department.

i am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown. Just like every field there are people who are good at their job and some that you have to question who they are related to.

"I feel that restaurants, retail, hospitality, and healthcare facilities (due to HIPAA in the US) are the easiest to push for convergence"

Are you sure about that? We did a hospital that was very glad we to hear we were building a physically seperate network for the cameras. The only part of the system connecting to their network being the NVR, which made it easier for them to control.

As for retailers, it depends on the size of the retailer. Do not assume because the retailer or resturant chain is a big one, that they invest a lot in "compliance". The problem is the smaller, franchise owner who has to squeeze what they can from very small margins, like a sharecropper. So many times I have seen them install free, public wireless systems to attract patrons which are also connected to the same network as their old used, Windows based POS systems that didn't even have antivirus protection on them. When you talk to them about segregating the networks so patrons don't see the POS systems, they're like "Sure, as long as it doesn't cost me a dime. Otherwise... uh, yeah, I'll get to it maybe next month."

"I am willing to bet the vast majority of the time the biggest pushback from IT is sheer laziness or fear of the unknown."

Unfortunately, yes, very true. Not all the time, but more often than non-IT people probably realize. That's why is you don't have staff that are very IT proficient, you'll probably never recognize it.

We don't have a single client using more than 3-5 cameras on their network. I could never put our company's name behind infrastructure that we don't know front to back. If it is impossible to put in our own lines then fine but "convergence" is nice in theory, in practice its a hot mess. Think about it, one day some IT admin screws with the network and blocks port traffic within the network.. Cameras go down and the customer is upset... You consult with IT and they say "we didn't do anything" and you're left with trying to figure out their mess. To the customer it doesn't matter that IT did it, the blame game gets you no where. So I say NEVER piggy back on their network unless absolutely nessesary.

IPVM, this is a good thread, can you update it with a Cyber Security category. If the integrator favorites providing a private flat network, do they also provide remote monitoring and administration of that infrastructure?

We don't have a breakdown of that but we do have remote access stats. See: DDNS vs P2P vs VPN Usage Statistics

Thanks JH, will take a look.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Aug 28, 2019
Register now for the Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
Critical Vulnerability Across 18+ Network Switch Vendors: Cisco, Netgear, More on Aug 26, 2019
Cisco, Netgear and more than a dozen other brands, including small Asian ones, have been found to share the same critical vulnerability, discovered...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Suspends Huawei on Sep 20, 2019
Huawei has been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF so long as US sanctions remain on the mega Chinese manufacturer. Inside this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...