How Upskirt Surveillance Videos Can Be Legal

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 01, 2014

After a man was caught taking upskirt videos of women on a Boston metro route the state supreme court dismissed the case.

In this note, we review the ruling and the potential for this to be an issue in other jurisdictions. The case led to a new state law closing a loophole that allowed the practice.

Background
Michael Robertson was arrested in 2010 for using a cell phone camera to take pictures up women’s dresses on the subway. He was charged, under a peeping tom law, with two counts of photographing an unsuspecting nude or partially nude person. He filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it was denied. He appealed.

***** * *** *** ****** ****** ******* ****** ** ***** on * ****** ***** ***** *** ***** ******* ***** ********* the ****.

** **** ****, ** ********* ********* *** ********* *** **** ** ** ** ***** ** other *************. *** **** *** ** * *** ***** *** closing * ******** **** ******* *** ********.

**********
******* ********* *** ******** ** **** *** ***** * **** phone ****** ** **** ******** ** *****’* ******* ** *** subway. ** *** *******, ***** ******** *** ***, **** *** ****** ** ************* ** ************ **** ** partially **** ******. ** ***** * ****** ** ******* *** case, *** ** *** ******. ** ********.

[***************]

*******, *** ******, ******** ******,********** ** * ******* ******’* ****** ******* * **** **** in ******, ******* *********** ** *************, **** ***’* ****** *******. She **** *** *** ******** ****** **** ***** ******** ** private ****** **** ******** ***** *** *********, *** *** ****** places.

*** **** ****** **** ***** *** ******* ******* *** ********* had ** ** ********* ** ** *******. *** **** *** client *** *** *** *** **** ************* **** *** ***** in ***** ** ***.

*** ***** ****** **** ****** **** ** *********** *** ** be ************ ** **** *** ** **** ********* *** **** a ****** *** ** *********** ** ******* ** ***** ******* parts ** * ****** ****.

Appeals *******

******* ***** ******** ***** **** ********** **** ***** **** ** be *** *** *** ******* ****** ** ** * *****:

  • *** ********* *** ********* *********
  • *** ******* *** ********* ****
  • *** ********* *** ****** ** ****** ********
  • *** ********* ******** ** * ***** ***** *** ****** *** a ********** *********** ** *******
  • *** ********* *** ** ******* *** ***** ****** ********

*** ******* ***** ********** ****** *********’* ****** ** ******* ******* the ****** ************** ** *** *** “******.” *** ***** **** act *** *** ******* *** ** *** ************. *** ******* were *** ********* **** *** **** *** ** * ***** where **** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

“** *** **** ** *** ************'* ******** ** *** ******** is *** *********** **** * *****, *** ** ********** * woman ****** ** * ****** *******, *** * ********** *********** of ******* ** *** ****** * ******** ******** **** *********** up *** *****. *** *********** ** ********* **********, *** [*** law] ** *** ******* **** **** *** ******* **,” ****** said.

*****************

********* ** ***** **** **** **** “***********” ******* ** ******** Massachusetts ******** ** ******* ******** **********. **** **** ******* ********* Clark********** * ****** ** *** ************ ********* **** ** *** “***** ********, ********, ***** ****, or ****** ****** ***** * ***** *********** ***** *** *** of *** ******, ******* ***** ** ******* ** *************.” *** bill ** **** **** ***** ****** * *** **** *********** bans ***** ********* ** ****** ** ******. ** ****'* ****.

** *** *** ***** ***** ********* *********** *** ********* ******* a ****** **** *** ****** *******.

*** **** ***** *** ****,*** *********** ****** *** ***.

"***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** '*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.' The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * '********** ******' would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******,"******.**********.

*** ******* ** ** ** ** ** ** ****** ** jail *** * $**,*** ****.

Other ******

**** ****** ******* ************ *************** ************ *** **********, *** **** ***** **** **** *** loophole ************* ***, ** **** *********** ** ****** ** ***** other ****** ** ****** ***** ****.

*** ******* ** **********, **'* ******* ** ******** **** "*** *** ******* ** ******* *** **** **, ** *** undergarments ****," *** **** ** ****** ***** * ****** *** * reasonable *********** ** *******. *** **** ******* *** ** ***** in **** ****** ****** ** *******-*** ******* ****: *** ********* has ** ** ****** *** *** ** ** ** * place ***** * ****** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

**********, *******, **** **** * "******* ****" *** **** ************ distribution ** *** ****** ** ******. ***** ****** *** ******* to ***** ******* **** (******* ***** ********* ********).

*******, ***** ***** ** ********* ******** ** ****** ** *** route ** *********** ********* ** ******* ***** "******* ***** ** covered ** *************."

 

***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****
***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****

Comments (8)

Besides the outrage we all normally feel at seeing the puported peeping perpetrator skirt the law, does anyone else feel a contempt for the standard practice of retaining counsel which demographically resembles the victim in as many ways possible? It seems almost automatic these days, harass a woman, hire a female lawyer, assault an african american, hire one as a lawyer. Same goes if the victim is a latino or a senior citizen.

All based on "innocence by association" as well as the crude logical fallacy of "Here is someone just like the victim who likes the accused, maybe the victim is the problem..." I feel (on an emotional level only) like it shouldn't even be allowed as it is a brutal mock of the crime itself.

Of course we can't say absolutely whether that was the case or not here, but on the other hand I can't help wonder if she is wearing pants...

Rukmini, that may be a nobley intended thought, but still flawed for a number of reasons. A defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel. Counsel should be allowed to work for whomever they want. If you're a defendant, you'd want any advantage within reason. Prosecution will try to paint a bad picture of you. You will want to paint the best picture of yourself as possible. Unlike many parts of the world, here you are innocent until proven guilty, and that's the way it should be.

As for the main subject of the article, I think they still could have gotten him on disorderly conduct, though that carries a pretty light penalty. Unfortunately these days you have to have laws spelled out in superfluous detail because common sense is given so little credit or weight when a law is challenged on intent.

Rest assured I agree that "a defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel", that is what I was trying say with my parenthetical stipulation "(on an emotional level only)". Since the profession is notoriously white (90%) and male (70%), this practice results in an added boost for the minorities and is welcome in that respect.

I wonder when we might see a court case about a retail store using cameras in the floor to look clothing on the grounds shoplifters hiding merchandise underneath.

I wonder what this means for the paparazzi on celebrities.

Probably nothing. It's not considered in the same category and paparazzi are typically in places where people don't have an expectation of privacy anyway. If anyone knows laws on recording people it's the paparazzi and they'll push right up to the line without doing something illegal. Because of that, some states, California for example, already have specific laws aimed at paparazzi.

If it's coming more to light and the states close loopholes, then the paparazzi might not get too far.

However, with bathroom cams already being justified in some cases, how soon until we see the new:

FLOOR CAM!

"See what shoplifters are UP too"

Carlton, what about the laws regarding thru-skirt technologies, do they exist? We are on the cusp of the launch of the Flir One which will no doubt lead to new and innovative privacy invasions...

Maybe an oppurtunity for garments with embedded infra-red countermeasures ??

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
Door Hinges Guide on Oct 10, 2018
Some of the trickiest access control problems are caused by bad door hinges. From doors not closing right, to locks not locking, worn or warped...
Default Passwords Outlawed in California, US To Follow on Oct 09, 2018
UPDATES A new California bill aimed at improving security for connected devices has been signed into law. The law takes aim especially at...
IP Camera Installability Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Oct 08, 2018
What are the best and worst cameras from an installation standpoint? Which manufacturers make it harder or easier to install their cameras? We...
Network Cable Testing Guide on Oct 02, 2018
Proper cable installation is key to trouble-free surveillance systems. However, testing is often an afterthought, with problems only discovered...
Access Control Lock Guide on Sep 26, 2018
In this guide, we examine locks; critical elements of any security system and fundamental parts of every access control system. Two fundamental...
Ladders For Installers Guide on Sep 25, 2018
Ladders are one of the most important pieces of worksite equipment for the surveillance technician. Too often, however, even highly experienced...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Ascent / MONI Faces Lender Lawsuit and Debt Crisis on Sep 13, 2018
ASCMA, aka Ascent, aka Brinks Home Security, aka MONI, aka Monitronics is being sued by a group of their lenders who allege: As of June 30,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ADI's Financials Revealed + W-Box Growth Priority on Oct 15, 2018
  ADI is one of the most powerful distributors in the security industry but how big are they? How much profit do they make? How much do they sell...
Dahua Face Recognition Camera Tested on Oct 15, 2018
Dahua has been one of the industry's most vocal proponents of the value that AI creates: As part of this, Dahua has released a facial...
Amazon Touts Home Security Market Disruption on Oct 15, 2018
Amazon is coming for ADT and all of home security. Indeed, Amazon is advertising this as, in their own words, calling home security a: Inside...
Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
"New Zealand Govt Uses Chinese Cameras Banned In US", Considers Security Audit on Oct 12, 2018
Newsroom NZ has issued a report: "NZ Govt uses Chinese cameras banned in US": This comes after the US federal government banned purchases of...
Mysterious Patent Troll 'Secure Cam' Targets Industry, Sues Hanwha, Hikvison, JCI, Panasonic, More on Oct 11, 2018
A company named "Secure Cam," who is actively hiding their ownership, has acquired a slew of video patents and is systematically suing video...
Unfixed Critical Vulnerability In Millions of XiongMai Devices Disclosed on Oct 10, 2018
XiongMai, one of the biggest OEMs alongside Dahua and Hikvision, has suffered a critical vulnerability impacting millions of their devices. This...
Honeywell Hides Selling US Gov Banned Chinese Video Surveillance on Oct 10, 2018
Honeywell hides selling US government banned Chinese video surveillance as their own 'Honeywell' products, deceiving buyers and putting US security...
Door Hinges Guide on Oct 10, 2018
Some of the trickiest access control problems are caused by bad door hinges. From doors not closing right, to locks not locking, worn or warped...
Default Passwords Outlawed in California, US To Follow on Oct 09, 2018
UPDATES A new California bill aimed at improving security for connected devices has been signed into law. The law takes aim especially at...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact