How Upskirt Surveillance Videos Can Be Legal

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 01, 2014

After a man was caught taking upskirt videos of women on a Boston metro route the state supreme court dismissed the case.

In this note, we review the ruling and the potential for this to be an issue in other jurisdictions. The case led to a new state law closing a loophole that allowed the practice.

Background
Michael Robertson was arrested in 2010 for using a cell phone camera to take pictures up women’s dresses on the subway. He was charged, under a peeping tom law, with two counts of photographing an unsuspecting nude or partially nude person. He filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it was denied. He appealed.

***** * *** *** ****** ****** ******* ****** ** ***** on * ****** ***** ***** *** ***** ******* ***** ********* the ****.

** **** ****, ** ********* ********* *** ********* *** **** ** ** ** ***** ** other *************. *** **** *** ** * *** ***** *** closing * ******** **** ******* *** ********.

**********
******* ********* *** ******** ** **** *** ***** * **** phone ****** ** **** ******** ** *****’* ******* ** *** subway. ** *** *******, ***** ******** *** ***, **** *** ****** ** ************* ** ************ **** ** partially **** ******. ** ***** * ****** ** ******* *** case, *** ** *** ******. ** ********.

[***************]

*******, *** ******, ******** ******,********** ** * ******* ******’* ****** ******* * **** **** in ******, ******* *********** ** *************, **** ***’* ****** *******. She **** *** *** ******** ****** **** ***** ******** ** private ****** **** ******** ***** *** *********, *** *** ****** places.

*** **** ****** **** ***** *** ******* ******* *** ********* had ** ** ********* ** ** *******. *** **** *** client *** *** *** *** **** ************* **** *** ***** in ***** ** ***.

*** ***** ****** **** ****** **** ** *********** *** ** be ************ ** **** *** ** **** ********* *** **** a ****** *** ** *********** ** ******* ** ***** ******* parts ** * ****** ****.

Appeals *******

******* ***** ******** ***** **** ********** **** ***** **** ** be *** *** *** ******* ****** ** ** * *****:

  • *** ********* *** ********* *********
  • *** ******* *** ********* ****
  • *** ********* *** ****** ** ****** ********
  • *** ********* ******** ** * ***** ***** *** ****** *** a ********** *********** ** *******
  • *** ********* *** ** ******* *** ***** ****** ********

*** ******* ***** ********** ****** *********’* ****** ** ******* ******* the ****** ************** ** *** *** “******.” *** ***** **** act *** *** ******* *** ** *** ************. *** ******* were *** ********* **** *** **** *** ** * ***** where **** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

“** *** **** ** *** ************'* ******** ** *** ******** is *** *********** **** * *****, *** ** ********** * woman ****** ** * ****** *******, *** * ********** *********** of ******* ** *** ****** * ******** ******** **** *********** up *** *****. *** *********** ** ********* **********, *** [*** law] ** *** ******* **** **** *** ******* **,” ****** said.

*****************

********* ** ***** **** **** **** “***********” ******* ** ******** Massachusetts ******** ** ******* ******** **********. **** **** ******* ********* Clark********** * ****** ** *** ************ ********* **** ** *** “***** ********, ********, ***** ****, or ****** ****** ***** * ***** *********** ***** *** *** of *** ******, ******* ***** ** ******* ** *************.” *** bill ** **** **** ***** ****** * *** **** *********** bans ***** ********* ** ****** ** ******. ** ****'* ****.

** *** *** ***** ***** ********* *********** *** ********* ******* a ****** **** *** ****** *******.

*** **** ***** *** ****,*** *********** ****** *** ***.

"***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** '*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.' The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * '********** ******' would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******,"******.**********.

*** ******* ** ** ** ** ** ** ****** ** jail *** * $**,*** ****.

Other ******

**** ****** ******* ************ *************** ************ *** **********, *** **** ***** **** **** *** loophole ************* ***, ** **** *********** ** ****** ** ***** other ****** ** ****** ***** ****.

*** ******* ** **********, **'* ******* ** ******** **** "*** *** ******* ** ******* *** **** **, ** *** undergarments ****," *** **** ** ****** ***** * ****** *** * reasonable *********** ** *******. *** **** ******* *** ** ***** in **** ****** ****** ** *******-*** ******* ****: *** ********* has ** ** ****** *** *** ** ** ** * place ***** * ****** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

**********, *******, **** **** * "******* ****" *** **** ************ distribution ** *** ****** ** ******. ***** ****** *** ******* to ***** ******* **** (******* ***** ********* ********).

*******, ***** ***** ** ********* ******** ** ****** ** *** route ** *********** ********* ** ******* ***** "******* ***** ** covered ** *************."

 

***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****
***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****

Comments (8)

Besides the outrage we all normally feel at seeing the puported peeping perpetrator skirt the law, does anyone else feel a contempt for the standard practice of retaining counsel which demographically resembles the victim in as many ways possible? It seems almost automatic these days, harass a woman, hire a female lawyer, assault an african american, hire one as a lawyer. Same goes if the victim is a latino or a senior citizen.

All based on "innocence by association" as well as the crude logical fallacy of "Here is someone just like the victim who likes the accused, maybe the victim is the problem..." I feel (on an emotional level only) like it shouldn't even be allowed as it is a brutal mock of the crime itself.

Of course we can't say absolutely whether that was the case or not here, but on the other hand I can't help wonder if she is wearing pants...

Rukmini, that may be a nobley intended thought, but still flawed for a number of reasons. A defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel. Counsel should be allowed to work for whomever they want. If you're a defendant, you'd want any advantage within reason. Prosecution will try to paint a bad picture of you. You will want to paint the best picture of yourself as possible. Unlike many parts of the world, here you are innocent until proven guilty, and that's the way it should be.

As for the main subject of the article, I think they still could have gotten him on disorderly conduct, though that carries a pretty light penalty. Unfortunately these days you have to have laws spelled out in superfluous detail because common sense is given so little credit or weight when a law is challenged on intent.

Rest assured I agree that "a defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel", that is what I was trying say with my parenthetical stipulation "(on an emotional level only)". Since the profession is notoriously white (90%) and male (70%), this practice results in an added boost for the minorities and is welcome in that respect.

I wonder when we might see a court case about a retail store using cameras in the floor to look clothing on the grounds shoplifters hiding merchandise underneath.

I wonder what this means for the paparazzi on celebrities.

Probably nothing. It's not considered in the same category and paparazzi are typically in places where people don't have an expectation of privacy anyway. If anyone knows laws on recording people it's the paparazzi and they'll push right up to the line without doing something illegal. Because of that, some states, California for example, already have specific laws aimed at paparazzi.

If it's coming more to light and the states close loopholes, then the paparazzi might not get too far.

However, with bathroom cams already being justified in some cases, how soon until we see the new:

FLOOR CAM!

"See what shoplifters are UP too"

Carlton, what about the laws regarding thru-skirt technologies, do they exist? We are on the cusp of the launch of the Flir One which will no doubt lead to new and innovative privacy invasions...

Maybe an oppurtunity for garments with embedded infra-red countermeasures ??

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Casino Surveillance Pro Interview: James Lathrop on Feb 15, 2019
James Lathrop has been working in casinos for almost 25 years. During that time, he says he has held "just about every job you can do in the...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
Designing Access Control Guide on Jan 30, 2019
Designing an access control solution requires decisions on 8 fundamental questions. This in-depth guide helps you understand the options and...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
Access Control Turnstiles Guide on Jan 28, 2019
Turnstiles control pedestrian access to secured areas, essentially becoming moving portions of fences, walls, or barricades for physically stop...
Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....

Most Recent Industry Reports

From The Basement To Buried Behind Chinatown: ISC West Emerging Technology Zone on Feb 22, 2019
What does ISC West think about 'Emerging Technology'? Well, last year, they put those companies in the basement. This year, they moved them up to...
Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
ADI 'SAVE BIG' On FLIR And Hikvision Examined on Feb 20, 2019
One is a major US defense supplier. The other is owned by the Chinese government. But you can "SAVE BIG" on both at ADI. In this note, we...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact