How Upskirt Surveillance Videos Can Be Legal

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 01, 2014

After a man was caught taking upskirt videos of women on a Boston metro route the state supreme court dismissed the case.

In this note, we review the ruling and the potential for this to be an issue in other jurisdictions. The case led to a new state law closing a loophole that allowed the practice.

Background
Michael Robertson was arrested in 2010 for using a cell phone camera to take pictures up women’s dresses on the subway. He was charged, under a peeping tom law, with two counts of photographing an unsuspecting nude or partially nude person. He filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it was denied. He appealed.

***** * *** *** ****** ****** ******* ****** ** ***** on * ****** ***** ***** *** ***** ******* ***** ********* the ****.

** **** ****, ** ********* ********* *** ********* *** **** ** ** ** ***** ** other *************. *** **** *** ** * *** ***** *** closing * ******** **** ******* *** ********.

**********
******* ********* *** ******** ** **** *** ***** * **** phone ****** ** **** ******** ** *****’* ******* ** *** subway. ** *** *******, ***** ******** *** ***, **** *** ****** ** ************* ** ************ **** ** partially **** ******. ** ***** * ****** ** ******* *** case, *** ** *** ******. ** ********.

[***************]

*******, *** ******, ******** ******,********** ** * ******* ******’* ****** ******* * **** **** in ******, ******* *********** ** *************, **** ***’* ****** *******. She **** *** *** ******** ****** **** ***** ******** ** private ****** **** ******** ***** *** *********, *** *** ****** places.

*** **** ****** **** ***** *** ******* ******* *** ********* had ** ** ********* ** ** *******. *** **** *** client *** *** *** *** **** ************* **** *** ***** in ***** ** ***.

*** ***** ****** **** ****** **** ** *********** *** ** be ************ ** **** *** ** **** ********* *** **** a ****** *** ** *********** ** ******* ** ***** ******* parts ** * ****** ****.

Appeals *******

******* ***** ******** ***** **** ********** **** ***** **** ** be *** *** *** ******* ****** ** ** * *****:

  • *** ********* *** ********* *********
  • *** ******* *** ********* ****
  • *** ********* *** ****** ** ****** ********
  • *** ********* ******** ** * ***** ***** *** ****** *** a ********** *********** ** *******
  • *** ********* *** ** ******* *** ***** ****** ********

*** ******* ***** ********** ****** *********’* ****** ** ******* ******* the ****** ************** ** *** *** “******.” *** ***** **** act *** *** ******* *** ** *** ************. *** ******* were *** ********* **** *** **** *** ** * ***** where **** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

“** *** **** ** *** ************'* ******** ** *** ******** is *** *********** **** * *****, *** ** ********** * woman ****** ** * ****** *******, *** * ********** *********** of ******* ** *** ****** * ******** ******** **** *********** up *** *****. *** *********** ** ********* **********, *** [*** law] ** *** ******* **** **** *** ******* **,” ****** said.

*****************

********* ** ***** **** **** **** “***********” ******* ** ******** Massachusetts ******** ** ******* ******** **********. **** **** ******* ********* Clark********** * ****** ** *** ************ ********* **** ** *** “***** ********, ********, ***** ****, or ****** ****** ***** * ***** *********** ***** *** *** of *** ******, ******* ***** ** ******* ** *************.” *** bill ** **** **** ***** ****** * *** **** *********** bans ***** ********* ** ****** ** ******. ** ****'* ****.

** *** *** ***** ***** ********* *********** *** ********* ******* a ****** **** *** ****** *******.

*** **** ***** *** ****,*** *********** ****** *** ***.

"***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** '*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.' The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * '********** ******' would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******,"******.**********.

*** ******* ** ** ** ** ** ** ****** ** jail *** * $**,*** ****.

Other ******

**** ****** ******* ************ *************** ************ *** **********, *** **** ***** **** **** *** loophole ************* ***, ** **** *********** ** ****** ** ***** other ****** ** ****** ***** ****.

*** ******* ** **********, **'* ******* ** ******** **** "*** *** ******* ** ******* *** **** **, ** *** undergarments ****," *** **** ** ****** ***** * ****** *** * reasonable *********** ** *******. *** **** ******* *** ** ***** in **** ****** ****** ** *******-*** ******* ****: *** ********* has ** ** ****** *** *** ** ** ** * place ***** * ****** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

**********, *******, **** **** * "******* ****" *** **** ************ distribution ** *** ****** ** ******. ***** ****** *** ******* to ***** ******* **** (******* ***** ********* ********).

*******, ***** ***** ** ********* ******** ** ****** ** *** route ** *********** ********* ** ******* ***** "******* ***** ** covered ** *************."

 

***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****
***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****

Comments (8)

Besides the outrage we all normally feel at seeing the puported peeping perpetrator skirt the law, does anyone else feel a contempt for the standard practice of retaining counsel which demographically resembles the victim in as many ways possible? It seems almost automatic these days, harass a woman, hire a female lawyer, assault an african american, hire one as a lawyer. Same goes if the victim is a latino or a senior citizen.

All based on "innocence by association" as well as the crude logical fallacy of "Here is someone just like the victim who likes the accused, maybe the victim is the problem..." I feel (on an emotional level only) like it shouldn't even be allowed as it is a brutal mock of the crime itself.

Of course we can't say absolutely whether that was the case or not here, but on the other hand I can't help wonder if she is wearing pants...

Rukmini, that may be a nobley intended thought, but still flawed for a number of reasons. A defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel. Counsel should be allowed to work for whomever they want. If you're a defendant, you'd want any advantage within reason. Prosecution will try to paint a bad picture of you. You will want to paint the best picture of yourself as possible. Unlike many parts of the world, here you are innocent until proven guilty, and that's the way it should be.

As for the main subject of the article, I think they still could have gotten him on disorderly conduct, though that carries a pretty light penalty. Unfortunately these days you have to have laws spelled out in superfluous detail because common sense is given so little credit or weight when a law is challenged on intent.

Rest assured I agree that "a defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel", that is what I was trying say with my parenthetical stipulation "(on an emotional level only)". Since the profession is notoriously white (90%) and male (70%), this practice results in an added boost for the minorities and is welcome in that respect.

I wonder when we might see a court case about a retail store using cameras in the floor to look clothing on the grounds shoplifters hiding merchandise underneath.

I wonder what this means for the paparazzi on celebrities.

Probably nothing. It's not considered in the same category and paparazzi are typically in places where people don't have an expectation of privacy anyway. If anyone knows laws on recording people it's the paparazzi and they'll push right up to the line without doing something illegal. Because of that, some states, California for example, already have specific laws aimed at paparazzi.

If it's coming more to light and the states close loopholes, then the paparazzi might not get too far.

However, with bathroom cams already being justified in some cases, how soon until we see the new:

FLOOR CAM!

"See what shoplifters are UP too"

Carlton, what about the laws regarding thru-skirt technologies, do they exist? We are on the cusp of the launch of the Flir One which will no doubt lead to new and innovative privacy invasions...

Maybe an oppurtunity for garments with embedded infra-red countermeasures ??

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 22, 2018
  This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals. Register now. Lots of network training exists...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...
Four Major Outdoor Camera Install Problems on Jun 14, 2018
Over 140 integrators told us the top four camera installation mistakes that lead to unexpected problems and failures. Their comments often...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...
Access Control - Time & Attendance, Mustering and Mantraps Guide on Jun 13, 2018
Electronic access offers features that traditional mechanical locks cannot. While these features may not be as fundamental as keeping doors secure,...
Powerline Networking For Video Surveillance Advocated By Comtrend on Jun 08, 2018
Powerline networking, using existing electrical wiring, has been around for many years. Indeed, over the years, some video surveillance providers...
Remove Dahua and Hikvision Gov Installs Required By US House Bill Ban on Jun 06, 2018
The final released US House Bill HR 5515 verifies that it not only prohibits the purchasing of Dahua and Hikvision products, it requires removing...
Panasonic Sells Security Camera Patents To Troll on Jun 04, 2018
In a highly atypical move, Panasonic has sold off nearly 100 security camera patents to one of the most well-known patent trolls. This comes just...
Dahua Products Are Not GDPR Compliant, No Products Can Be on May 29, 2018
Dahua products are neither GDPR-compliant nor certified, contrary to their marketing. The reason is that no products can be, as the EU does not...
VMS Server Sizing on May 25, 2018
Specifying the right sized PC/server for VMS software is one of the most important yet difficult decisions in IP video surveillance. In the past...

Most Recent Industry Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 22, 2018
  This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals. Register now. Lots of network training exists...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
Hikvision ColorVu Integrated Visible Light Cameras Examined on Jun 22, 2018
When it comes to low light, infrared light has become the defacto standard in surveillance. But IR is limited to monochrome images, making colors...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Mobotix Releases 'Move' Into 21st Century on Jun 20, 2018
For years, Mobotix stood resolutely against, well, every other manufacturer, selling it as a virtue: MOBOTIX equipment is designed with no...
Cybersecurity Startup VDOO Disclosing 10 Manufacturer Vulnerabilities Starting With Axis And Foscam on Jun 20, 2018
Cybersecurity startup VDOO has uncovered significant vulnerabilities in Axis cameras along with many others not yet disclosed. In this report, we...
Axis Guardian - Cloud VMS And Alarm Monitoring - Released on Jun 19, 2018
Axis has struggled to deliver a cloud-based managed service video platform. Video service providers have utilized AVHS for over a decade, and have...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact