How Upskirt Surveillance Videos Can Be Legal

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 01, 2014

After a man was caught taking upskirt videos of women on a Boston metro route the state supreme court dismissed the case.

In this note, we review the ruling and the potential for this to be an issue in other jurisdictions. The case led to a new state law closing a loophole that allowed the practice.

Background
Michael Robertson was arrested in 2010 for using a cell phone camera to take pictures up women’s dresses on the subway. He was charged, under a peeping tom law, with two counts of photographing an unsuspecting nude or partially nude person. He filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it was denied. He appealed.

***** * *** *** caught ****** ******* ****** of ***** ** * Boston ***** ***** *** state ******* ***** ********* the ****.

** **** ****, ** review*** ********* *** ********* *** this ** ** ** issue ** ***** *************. The **** *** ** a *** ***** *** closing * ******** **** allowed *** ********.

**********
******* ********* *** ******** in **** *** ***** a **** ***** ****** to **** ******** ** women’s ******* ** *** subway. ** *** *******, under ******** *** ***, **** *** ****** of ************* ** ************ nude ** ********* **** person. ** ***** * motion ** ******* *** case, *** ** *** denied. ** ********.

[***************]

*******, *** ******, ******** Menken,********** ** * ******* person’s ****** ******* * body **** ** ******, whether *********** ** *************, they ***’* ****** *******. She **** *** *** protects ****** **** ***** recorded ** ******* ****** like ******** ***** *** bathrooms, *** *** ****** places.

*** **** ****** **** under *** ******* ******* the ********* *** ** be ********* ** ** illegal. *** **** *** client *** *** *** was **** ************* **** was ***** ** ***** of ***.

*** ***** ****** **** people **** ** *********** not ** ** ************ in **** *** ** that ********* *** **** a ****** *** ** expectation ** ******* ** their ******* ***** ** a ****** ****.

Appeals *******

******* ***** ******** ***** five ********** **** ***** have ** ** *** for *** ******* ****** to ** * *****:

  • *** ********* *** ********* recording
  • *** ******* *** ********* nude
  • *** ********* *** ****** to ****** ********
  • *** ********* ******** ** a ***** ***** *** person *** * ********** expectation ** *******
  • *** ********* *** ** without *** ***** ****** noticing

*** ******* ***** ********** upheld *********’* ****** ** dismiss ******* *** ****** interpretation ** *** *** “flawed.” *** ***** **** act *** *** ******* all ** *** ************. The ******* **** *** partially **** *** **** not ** * ***** where **** *** * reasonable *********** ** *******.

“** *** **** ** the ************'* ******** ** the ******** ** *** proposition **** * *****, and ** ********** * woman ****** ** * public *******, *** * reasonable *********** ** ******* in *** ****** * stranger ******** **** *********** up *** *****. *** proposition ** ********* **********, but [*** ***] ** its ******* **** **** not ******* **,” ****** said.

*****************

********* ** ***** **** they **** “***********” ******* on ******** ************* ******** to ******* ******** **********. Last **** ******* ********* Clark********** * ****** ** the ************ ********* **** ** any “***** ********, ********, pubic ****, ** ****** breast ***** * ***** immediately ***** *** *** of *** ******, ******* naked ** ******* ** undergarments.” *** **** ** this **** ***** ****** a *** **** *********** bans ***** ********* ** anyone ** ******. ** didn't ****.

** *** *** ***** media ********* *********** *** Robertson ******* * ****** bill *** ****** *******.

*** **** ***** *** case,*** *********** ****** *** law.

"***** *** ****, ** would ** * *********** to **** ****** ****** and ****** ** '*** sexual ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** under ** ****** *** person’s ********.' *** *** would ***** ** ***** when * '********** ******' would ******* ***** ***** of ***** **** ***** not ** ******** *******,"******.**********.

*** ******* ** ** to ** ** ** months ** **** *** a $**,*** ****.

Other ******

**** ****** ******* ************ *************** ************ *** **********, but **** ***** **** have *** ******** ************* did, ** **** *********** is ****** ** ***** other ****** ** ****** their ****.

*** ******* ** **********, it's ******* ** ******** film "*** *** ******* ** viewing *** **** **, or *** ************* ****," *** **** ** places ***** * ****** has * ********** *********** of *******. *** **** wording *** ** ***** in **** ****** ****** or *******-*** ******* ****: The ********* *** ** be ****** *** *** to ** ** * place ***** * ****** has * ********** *********** of *******.

**********, *******, **** **** a "******* ****" *** that ************ ************ ** the ****** ** ******. Other ****** *** ******* to ***** ******* **** (******* ***** ********* ********).

*******, ***** ***** ** potential ******** ** ****** go *** ***** ** prohibiting ********* ** ******* areas "******* ***** ** covered ** *************."

 

***** *** ****, ** would ** * *********** to **** ****** ****** and ****** ** “*** sexual ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** under ** ****** *** person’s ********.” *** *** would ***** ** ***** when * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** of ***** **** ***** not ** ******** *******. - *** **** **: http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2014/03/06/after-high-court-ruling-upskirting-legislative-leaders-pledge-quick-action/P1bp7k0AnT0UC6X8JsNjnJ/story.html#sthash.rlXuw2nH.dpuf
***** *** ****, ** would ** * *********** to **** ****** ****** and ****** ** “*** sexual ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** under ** ****** *** person’s ********.” *** *** would ***** ** ***** when * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** of ***** **** ***** not ** ******** *******. - *** **** **: http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2014/03/06/after-high-court-ruling-upskirting-legislative-leaders-pledge-quick-action/P1bp7k0AnT0UC6X8JsNjnJ/story.html#sthash.rlXuw2nH.dpuf

Comments (8)

Besides the outrage we all normally feel at seeing the puported peeping perpetrator skirt the law, does anyone else feel a contempt for the standard practice of retaining counsel which demographically resembles the victim in as many ways possible? It seems almost automatic these days, harass a woman, hire a female lawyer, assault an african american, hire one as a lawyer. Same goes if the victim is a latino or a senior citizen.

All based on "innocence by association" as well as the crude logical fallacy of "Here is someone just like the victim who likes the accused, maybe the victim is the problem..." I feel (on an emotional level only) like it shouldn't even be allowed as it is a brutal mock of the crime itself.

Of course we can't say absolutely whether that was the case or not here, but on the other hand I can't help wonder if she is wearing pants...

Rukmini, that may be a nobley intended thought, but still flawed for a number of reasons. A defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel. Counsel should be allowed to work for whomever they want. If you're a defendant, you'd want any advantage within reason. Prosecution will try to paint a bad picture of you. You will want to paint the best picture of yourself as possible. Unlike many parts of the world, here you are innocent until proven guilty, and that's the way it should be.

As for the main subject of the article, I think they still could have gotten him on disorderly conduct, though that carries a pretty light penalty. Unfortunately these days you have to have laws spelled out in superfluous detail because common sense is given so little credit or weight when a law is challenged on intent.

Rest assured I agree that "a defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel", that is what I was trying say with my parenthetical stipulation "(on an emotional level only)". Since the profession is notoriously white (90%) and male (70%), this practice results in an added boost for the minorities and is welcome in that respect.

I wonder when we might see a court case about a retail store using cameras in the floor to look clothing on the grounds shoplifters hiding merchandise underneath.

I wonder what this means for the paparazzi on celebrities.

Probably nothing. It's not considered in the same category and paparazzi are typically in places where people don't have an expectation of privacy anyway. If anyone knows laws on recording people it's the paparazzi and they'll push right up to the line without doing something illegal. Because of that, some states, California for example, already have specific laws aimed at paparazzi.

If it's coming more to light and the states close loopholes, then the paparazzi might not get too far.

However, with bathroom cams already being justified in some cases, how soon until we see the new:

FLOOR CAM!

"See what shoplifters are UP too"

Carlton, what about the laws regarding thru-skirt technologies, do they exist? We are on the cusp of the launch of the Flir One which will no doubt lead to new and innovative privacy invasions...

Maybe an oppurtunity for garments with embedded infra-red countermeasures ??

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
OSDP Access Control Guide on Jun 04, 2019
Access control readers and controllers need to communicate. While Wiegand has been the de facto standard for decades, OSDP aims to solve major...
IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
China Jaywalking Facial Recognition Guide on May 27, 2019
News reports touting the PRC's AI prowess often showcase facial recognition cameras being used to automatically catch and fine jaywalkers.  In...
NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference [Canceled] on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact