How Upskirt Surveillance Videos Can Be Legal

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 01, 2014

After a man was caught taking upskirt videos of women on a Boston metro route the state supreme court dismissed the case.

In this note, we review the ruling and the potential for this to be an issue in other jurisdictions. The case led to a new state law closing a loophole that allowed the practice.

Background
Michael Robertson was arrested in 2010 for using a cell phone camera to take pictures up women’s dresses on the subway. He was charged, under a peeping tom law, with two counts of photographing an unsuspecting nude or partially nude person. He filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it was denied. He appealed.

***** * *** *** ****** ****** ******* ****** ** ***** on * ****** ***** ***** *** ***** ******* ***** ********* the ****.

** **** ****, ** ********* ********* *** ********* *** **** ** ** ** ***** ** other *************. *** **** *** ** * *** ***** *** closing * ******** **** ******* *** ********.

**********
******* ********* *** ******** ** **** *** ***** * **** phone ****** ** **** ******** ** *****’* ******* ** *** subway. ** *** *******, ***** ******** *** ***, **** *** ****** ** ************* ** ************ **** ** partially **** ******. ** ***** * ****** ** ******* *** case, *** ** *** ******. ** ********.

[***************]

*******, *** ******, ******** ******,********** ** * ******* ******’* ****** ******* * **** **** in ******, ******* *********** ** *************, **** ***’* ****** *******. She **** *** *** ******** ****** **** ***** ******** ** private ****** **** ******** ***** *** *********, *** *** ****** places.

*** **** ****** **** ***** *** ******* ******* *** ********* had ** ** ********* ** ** *******. *** **** *** client *** *** *** *** **** ************* **** *** ***** in ***** ** ***.

*** ***** ****** **** ****** **** ** *********** *** ** be ************ ** **** *** ** **** ********* *** **** a ****** *** ** *********** ** ******* ** ***** ******* parts ** * ****** ****.

Appeals *******

******* ***** ******** ***** **** ********** **** ***** **** ** be *** *** *** ******* ****** ** ** * *****:

  • *** ********* *** ********* *********
  • *** ******* *** ********* ****
  • *** ********* *** ****** ** ****** ********
  • *** ********* ******** ** * ***** ***** *** ****** *** a ********** *********** ** *******
  • *** ********* *** ** ******* *** ***** ****** ********

*** ******* ***** ********** ****** *********’* ****** ** ******* ******* the ****** ************** ** *** *** “******.” *** ***** **** act *** *** ******* *** ** *** ************. *** ******* were *** ********* **** *** **** *** ** * ***** where **** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

“** *** **** ** *** ************'* ******** ** *** ******** is *** *********** **** * *****, *** ** ********** * woman ****** ** * ****** *******, *** * ********** *********** of ******* ** *** ****** * ******** ******** **** *********** up *** *****. *** *********** ** ********* **********, *** [*** law] ** *** ******* **** **** *** ******* **,” ****** said.

*****************

********* ** ***** **** **** **** “***********” ******* ** ******** Massachusetts ******** ** ******* ******** **********. **** **** ******* ********* Clark********** * ****** ** *** ************ ********* **** ** *** “***** ********, ********, ***** ****, or ****** ****** ***** * ***** *********** ***** *** *** of *** ******, ******* ***** ** ******* ** *************.” *** bill ** **** **** ***** ****** * *** **** *********** bans ***** ********* ** ****** ** ******. ** ****'* ****.

** *** *** ***** ***** ********* *********** *** ********* ******* a ****** **** *** ****** *******.

*** **** ***** *** ****,*** *********** ****** *** ***.

"***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** '*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.' The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * '********** ******' would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******,"******.**********.

*** ******* ** ** ** ** ** ** ****** ** jail *** * $**,*** ****.

Other ******

**** ****** ******* ************ *************** ************ *** **********, *** **** ***** **** **** *** loophole ************* ***, ** **** *********** ** ****** ** ***** other ****** ** ****** ***** ****.

*** ******* ** **********, **'* ******* ** ******** **** "*** *** ******* ** ******* *** **** **, ** *** undergarments ****," *** **** ** ****** ***** * ****** *** * reasonable *********** ** *******. *** **** ******* *** ** ***** in **** ****** ****** ** *******-*** ******* ****: *** ********* has ** ** ****** *** *** ** ** ** * place ***** * ****** *** * ********** *********** ** *******.

**********, *******, **** **** * "******* ****" *** **** ************ distribution ** *** ****** ** ******. ***** ****** *** ******* to ***** ******* **** (******* ***** ********* ********).

*******, ***** ***** ** ********* ******** ** ****** ** *** route ** *********** ********* ** ******* ***** "******* ***** ** covered ** *************."

 

***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****
***** *** ****, ** ***** ** * *********** ** **** secret ****** *** ****** ** “*** ****** ** ***** ******** parts ** * ****** ***** ** ****** *** ******’* ********.” The *** ***** ***** ** ***** **** * “********** ******” would ******* ***** ***** ** ***** **** ***** *** ** publicly *******. - *** **** **: ****://***.******.***/*********************/****/**/**/*****-****-*****-******-**********-***********-*******-******-*****-******/**********************/*****.****#******.********.****

Comments (8)

Besides the outrage we all normally feel at seeing the puported peeping perpetrator skirt the law, does anyone else feel a contempt for the standard practice of retaining counsel which demographically resembles the victim in as many ways possible? It seems almost automatic these days, harass a woman, hire a female lawyer, assault an african american, hire one as a lawyer. Same goes if the victim is a latino or a senior citizen.

All based on "innocence by association" as well as the crude logical fallacy of "Here is someone just like the victim who likes the accused, maybe the victim is the problem..." I feel (on an emotional level only) like it shouldn't even be allowed as it is a brutal mock of the crime itself.

Of course we can't say absolutely whether that was the case or not here, but on the other hand I can't help wonder if she is wearing pants...

Rukmini, that may be a nobley intended thought, but still flawed for a number of reasons. A defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel. Counsel should be allowed to work for whomever they want. If you're a defendant, you'd want any advantage within reason. Prosecution will try to paint a bad picture of you. You will want to paint the best picture of yourself as possible. Unlike many parts of the world, here you are innocent until proven guilty, and that's the way it should be.

As for the main subject of the article, I think they still could have gotten him on disorderly conduct, though that carries a pretty light penalty. Unfortunately these days you have to have laws spelled out in superfluous detail because common sense is given so little credit or weight when a law is challenged on intent.

Rest assured I agree that "a defendant should be allowed to hire whomever they want as counsel", that is what I was trying say with my parenthetical stipulation "(on an emotional level only)". Since the profession is notoriously white (90%) and male (70%), this practice results in an added boost for the minorities and is welcome in that respect.

I wonder when we might see a court case about a retail store using cameras in the floor to look clothing on the grounds shoplifters hiding merchandise underneath.

I wonder what this means for the paparazzi on celebrities.

Probably nothing. It's not considered in the same category and paparazzi are typically in places where people don't have an expectation of privacy anyway. If anyone knows laws on recording people it's the paparazzi and they'll push right up to the line without doing something illegal. Because of that, some states, California for example, already have specific laws aimed at paparazzi.

If it's coming more to light and the states close loopholes, then the paparazzi might not get too far.

However, with bathroom cams already being justified in some cases, how soon until we see the new:

FLOOR CAM!

"See what shoplifters are UP too"

Carlton, what about the laws regarding thru-skirt technologies, do they exist? We are on the cusp of the launch of the Flir One which will no doubt lead to new and innovative privacy invasions...

Maybe an oppurtunity for garments with embedded infra-red countermeasures ??

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...
Spring 2019 IP Networking Course- Register Now on Apr 04, 2019
Register now for the Spring 2019 IP Networking course here. Just $299 for the course. This is the only networking course designed specifically...
How China's Pay By Facial Recognition Works on Apr 02, 2019
Many social media posts have variously celebrated or warned about the growing use of facial recognition for payments in China. An example of one...
Bezos-Funded Deep Sentinel Tested on Mar 28, 2019
Backed by Jeff Bezos, the Silicon Valley startup, Deep Sentinel, has declared: No One Does Home Security Like We Do Our Surveillance Team has...
Outdoor Camera Installation Guide on Mar 25, 2019
Outdoor camera installation can be fraught with problems. Creating a sturdy and weather tight mount is key for camera performance and longevity,...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Installation Course - REGISTRATION CLOSED on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. CLOSED This is a unique installation course in a market where little...

Most Recent Industry Reports

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact