Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet Test

By: John Honovich, Published on Nov 19, 2011

Can a $100 HD network camera change the surveillance industry? We are about to find out as Ubiquiti, a company whose massive growth has disrupted the wireless network industry commences its attack on the video surveillance market.

What makes Ubiquiti really interesting is that its market approach fundamentally opposes all industry norms. An American company, they focus on making very low cost products without any real spending on sales, marketing or PR. They leverage forums and Internet 'word of mouth' to build their customer base. They already have a huge customer base in the wireless market. Despite selling primarily $100 radios, the company did a whooping ~$200 Million in revenue in the last year.

Ubiquiti's Surveillance Product Line

In the past few months, Ubiquiti has started to roll out their own IP cameras and VMS software. They are taking the same approach in surveillance as they did in wireless, releasing very low cost cameras and free VMS (for details, see our Ubiquiti surveillance  product line overview).

The Test

While the price is outstanding, we wanted to see how well Ubiquti's surveillance cameras really performed head to head against reputable incumbents. To do so, we did a series of shootouts between Ubiquiti's Aircam Bullet, an Axis SD camera (the M1011), an Axis HD camera (the M114) and an IQ 4 series 2MP camera. While all the cameras are color only entry level models, the competitive offerings represent higher quality professional options.

We did a series of tests:

  • Low Light Testing: At 1 lux, 2 lux and 6 lux to see differences in low light performance
  • Day Time Tests: At 16 lux and 250 lux to see differences in 'regular' indoor lighting scenes
  • Long Range Tests: At wide FoVs of 40 to 80 feet to see how much difference in image capturing occur in larger scenes
  • From our hands on testing, here are the most notable findings:

    • Low Light - At normalized exposure settings, the Ubiquiti Aircam had significantly worse low light performance than the Axis M1114, roughly equal to the IQ 4 series and superior to the Axis M1011. However, Ubiquiti does not yet support a slow shutter mode (max shutter is 1/30th) which gives an advantage to other cameras though at the risk of motion blur.
    • Wide Range - At 40 - 80 foot wide FoV, the Ubiquiti Aircam delivered slightly less details than the 720p Axis M114 but far more details than the SD Axis M1011
    • Narrow Range - At under 20 feet wide FoV, Ubiquiti Aircam delivers the same details as the 720p Axis M114. Ubiquit's rendering of subject's skin color and facial details was superior to Axis's but rendering of the subject's clothing color was worse.
    • Reliability - We encountered no problems with the Ubiquiti hardware, firmware or software used. Setup and use was smooth across a variety of web browsers as Ubiquiti uses Flash rather than ActiveX controls.
    • 3rd Party Integration - Works fine via RTSP but no direct 3rd party VMS integration nor ONVIF. With RTSP connection, configuration must be done via the Ubiquiti web browser.
    • Feature Breadth - The Ubiquiti Aircam has a narrow range of features - CBR only, no camera side motion detection, no audio, no storage, proprietary power over Ethernet and a fixed focal lens.

    All in all, the Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet is a solid camera and attractive because of its very low price. Given that this is Ubiquiti's first ever camera, it is quite impressive. Very low cost cameras from new entrances are typically buggy, hard to set up and have significant problems.

    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

    On the other hand, the Ubiquiti camera is across the board clearly inferior to the Axis entry level HD camera though the Axis M114 is more than 4x the price (~$100 vs ~$470) [Note the Axis M1114 has a varifocal lens while the Aircam Bullet does not. However, even against the Axis M1104, a fixed focal camera, the price variance is still 4x].

    Recommendations

    For $100, users looking for very inexpensive but nearly HD video quality in well lit areas, will find the Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet highly attractive. They will have a difficult choice in VMS integration - (1) Ubiquiti's own free VMS that lacks 3rd party support and is fairly basic or (2) integrate via RTSP to a 3rd party VMS and configure the camera through its web browser.

    For those looking at a cheap entry level 4 or 9 channel system, a Ubiquiti based solution is the most price competitive IP alternative to cheap DVR kits yet. The pricing is close and nearly identitical if any older/existing PC can be used. Plus, the image quality will clearly be better with the Ubiquiti than an SD / interlaced analog camera.

    This camera is clearly not a replacement for professional IP cameras nor is it for those who want best in class image quality. Ubiquiti is planning to release a professional line of IP cameras in 2012. It will be interesting to see how well those will compete when that occurs.

    Competitive Impact

    We think Ubiquiti's line will have the most immediate impact on the budget surveillance market, specifically ACTi, Hikvision and Vivotek. Ubiquiti's cameras are already easier to use than those brands, have similar image quality and are cheaper.

    From an American company perspective, there are some similarities to Arecont Vision but we do not see Ubiquiti having much of an impact on Arecont as Arecont overwhelmingly sells multi-megapixel cameras. However, over time, we do think that Ubiquiti can overtake Arecont as the low cost brand of choice in the market. 

    Physical Features Review

    The video below looks at the camera's physical features. The two most important to pay attention to are the non standard mounting system and the challenging method for fine focusing the lens.

    One other important physical / installation aspect is the requirement for a non standard power over Ethernet injector. Ubiquiti includes one that can be setup just like a normal PoE injector including requirement to be plugged into mains power. However, of course, you can not plug the Ubiquiti straight into a regular PoE switch. Note: As a commenter mentions, an inline PoE adapter can be bought separately for about $20. This eliminates need to plug into mains power.

    Configuration and Monitoring

    The video below shows the basic settings of the camera and the use of Ubiquiti's own AirVision NVR.

    While AirVision NVR is beyond the scope of the test, as it is designed to be the free compliment to Ubiquiti's cameras, a few points are worth making:

    • Installing the AirVision NVR was simple and quick. The installation is light weight (under 50 Mb versus 1000+ Mb for any Milestone version).
    • AirVision NVRs are managed via web browser and a clean Flash implementation.
    • Motion detection is supported on server side, compensating for lack of camera side detection (Ubiquiti reports camera side motion detection will be added in the future).
    • AirVision's live monitoring has solid basics including a map view.
    • AirVision's investigation feature sets are quite limited with rudimentary searching, playback and no multi camera export

    We integrated the Aircam with Exacqvision using an RTSP connection (with the following address format -rtsp://192.168.0.3:554/live/ch00_0). We found:

    • Video displayed fine and there was no connection problems. 
    • No configuration of the stream (frame rate, resolution, etc.) is possible.
    • Only continuous recording was possible since Exacq does not support server side motion detection and the Ubiquiti camera does not support camera side motion.
    • Recording of the Ubiquiti's stream was 5 seconds behind real time and the other IP cameras that were connected via direct drivers or ONVIF (though time syncronization is a regular and frustrating problem with Exacq [link no longer available]).

    Low Light Testing

    The Ubiquiti camera was outperformed in low light testing in normalized, same shutter speed tests. Here it is at 1 lux:

    The Ubiquiti image is dark and muddy. The competitive difference would be even more significant if we allowed the Axis and IQ cameras to go to their default slow shutter speed (though this would increase probability of motion blur).

    Now, let's look at 2 lux:

    All the images clearly improve but the relative performance gap remains the same.

    Now here are the results from 6 lux:

    In the 6 lux example above, we have the SD Axis included which is clearly the worst image of the 4 cameras.

    Indoor Lighted Testing

    Now, let's examine with more light, this time at 16 lux:

    Now, the Ubiquiti and Axis M1114 HD show similar level of details. Two important points though stand out:

    • The coloration on the subject's face and facial hair is more accurately rendered on the Ubiquiti than the Axis M1114.
    • The color of the subject's shirt is more accurately rendered on the Axis M1114 than the Ubiquiti. The subject is weaing a navy blue shirt but the Ubiquti makes it appear black.

    Now we move to 250 lux scene which is the equivalent light level of an office:

    The same pattern remains here with the Ubiquiti producing a more realistic image of the subject's facial tone and hair with a distorted display of the subject's shirt color.

    Longer Range Testing

    Finally, we tested for longer ranges and wider field of views. One point to keep in mind was that the SD Axis M1011 has a slightly narrower FoV than Ubiquiti (because both have fixed lenses).

    In the image below, the 'mid' range of approximately 40' wide FoV. The Ubiquiti's image details are close to the HD Axis and significantly above the SD Axis. However, the 2MP IQ clearly provides more details than all others.

    Finally, here is a long range comparison of approximately 80' wide FoV. Here the Ubiquiti captures moderately less details of the subject than the HD Axis. However, it is still much better than the SD Axis even with its slightly narrower FoV.

3 reports cite this report:

Ubiquiti Open IP Cameras Tested on Apr 04, 2016
Back in 2011, Ubiquiti broke ground, offering IP cameras for the then shocking amount of ~$100. And, for a while, Ubiquiti included 3rd party...
Ubiquiti Micro HD Camera Tested on Jul 13, 2015
With nearly $600 million in revenue, Ubiquiti has become a major force in wireless networking and a very common one for wireless video surveillance...
Top 5 Disruptive Surveillance Companies 2012 on Dec 15, 2011
What companies are driving changes in the video surveillance industry? What companies are the toughest competitors? In this new report, we answer...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

2019 Video Surveillance Cameras State of the Market on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
Milestone Machine Learning Camera Auto-Setting Examined on Mar 13, 2019
Milestone wants to improve image quality using Machine Learning to solve the problem of "a camera doesn't know what it is being used for",...
Startup Spectral Edge RGB+IR Claims "Unique Low Light Performance Tech" on Apr 03, 2019
This UK startup, born out of university research, is boldly proclaiming that they deliver "Unique low light performance tech for video surveillance...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
Lens Iris Tutorial on Aug 08, 2019
Cameras, like humans, have irises, controlling the light which hits the imager and impacting image details. However, cameras have multiple types of...
Fujifilm Expanding Into Video Surveillance on Jul 26, 2019
While Sony continues to fade out of the video surveillance market and Canon continues to make huge investments into acquiring video surveillance...
Hikvision ColorVu is Smart Marketing on Oct 03, 2019
Hikvision ColorVu (see IPVM test results) is smart marketing, a lesson to be learned by competitors and a rising trend. Inside this note, we...
Axis HD Analog Encoder Tested on Oct 11, 2019
Two years after declaring "Everything is IP", Axis has released their first HD analog encoder, the P7304, with support for AHD, CVI, TVI, and SD...
Biggest Low Light Problems 2019 on Nov 08, 2019
Over 150 integrators responded to our survey question: "What are the biggest problems you face getting good low-light images?" Inside, we share...
Budget Covert Cameras Tested on Nov 26, 2019
Covert cameras under $100 are widely available online but are they any good? To see how these models really work in the real world, we bought...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Severe Impact' Mercury Security 2020 Leap Year Firmware Issue on Jan 17, 2020
One of the largest access controller manufacturers has a big problem: February 29th. Mercury Security, owned by HID, is alerting partners of the...
Apple Acquires XNOR.ai, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired XNOR.ai for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss for the video surveillance industry. XNOR.ai stunned the industry...
Installation Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 16, 2020
Thursday, January 16th is your last chance to register for the Winter 2020 Video Surveillance Installation Course. This is a unique installation...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...
PRC Government Entity Now Controlling Shareholder of Infinova / March Networks on Jan 16, 2020
A PRC government entity is now the controlling shareholder of US security manufacturer Infinova as well as its wholly-owned subsidiary March...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
ONVIF Trashed Statement, Confirms Dahua and Hikvision Still Suspended on Jan 15, 2020
ONVIF has 'trashed' the suspension statement for Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, etc. but confirms to IPVM that those companies are all still...
Wyze Smart Door Lock Test on Jan 14, 2020
Wyze's inexpensive cameras have grabbed the attention of many in the consumer market, but can the company's new smart lock get similar...
Wesco Wins Anixter on Jan 13, 2020
Despite Anixter earlier arguing that Wesco's bid was inferior to CD&R's by nearly 10%, Anixter confirmed that they are taking Wesco's 3.1%...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor, Bidding War Emerges, Wesco Wins on Jan 13, 2020
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....