Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet Test

By John Honovich, Published on Nov 19, 2011

Can a $100 HD network camera change the surveillance industry? We are about to find out as Ubiquiti, a company whose massive growth has disrupted the wireless network industry commences its attack on the video surveillance market.

What makes Ubiquiti really interesting is that its market approach fundamentally opposes all industry norms. An American company, they focus on making very low cost products without any real spending on sales, marketing or PR. They leverage forums and Internet 'word of mouth' to build their customer base. They already have a huge customer base in the wireless market. Despite selling primarily $100 radios, the company did a whooping ~$200 Million in revenue in the last year.

Ubiquiti's Surveillance Product Line

In the past few months, Ubiquiti has started to roll out their own IP cameras and VMS software. They are taking the same approach in surveillance as they did in wireless, releasing very low cost cameras and free VMS (for details, see our Ubiquiti surveillance  product line overview).

The Test

While the price is outstanding, we wanted to see how well Ubiquti's surveillance cameras really performed head to head against reputable incumbents. To do so, we did a series of shootouts between Ubiquiti's Aircam Bullet, an Axis SD camera (the M1011), an Axis HD camera (the M114) and an IQ 4 series 2MP camera. While all the cameras are color only entry level models, the competitive offerings represent higher quality professional options.

We did a series of tests:

  • Low Light Testing: At 1 lux, 2 lux and 6 lux to see differences in low light performance
  • Day Time Tests: At 16 lux and 250 lux to see differences in 'regular' indoor lighting scenes
  • Long Range Tests: At wide FoVs of 40 to 80 feet to see how much difference in image capturing occur in larger scenes
  • From our hands on testing, here are the most notable findings:

    • Low Light - At normalized exposure settings, the Ubiquiti Aircam had significantly worse low light performance than the Axis M1114, roughly equal to the IQ 4 series and superior to the Axis M1011. However, Ubiquiti does not yet support a slow shutter mode (max shutter is 1/30th) which gives an advantage to other cameras though at the risk of motion blur.
    • Wide Range - At 40 - 80 foot wide FoV, the Ubiquiti Aircam delivered slightly less details than the 720p Axis M114 but far more details than the SD Axis M1011
    • Narrow Range - At under 20 feet wide FoV, Ubiquiti Aircam delivers the same details as the 720p Axis M114. Ubiquit's rendering of subject's skin color and facial details was superior to Axis's but rendering of the subject's clothing color was worse.
    • Reliability - We encountered no problems with the Ubiquiti hardware, firmware or software used. Setup and use was smooth across a variety of web browsers as Ubiquiti uses Flash rather than ActiveX controls.
    • 3rd Party Integration - Works fine via RTSP but no direct 3rd party VMS integration nor ONVIF. With RTSP connection, configuration must be done via the Ubiquiti web browser.
    • Feature Breadth - The Ubiquiti Aircam has a narrow range of features - CBR only, no camera side motion detection, no audio, no storage, proprietary power over Ethernet and a fixed focal lens.

    All in all, the Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet is a solid camera and attractive because of its very low price. Given that this is Ubiquiti's first ever camera, it is quite impressive. Very low cost cameras from new entrances are typically buggy, hard to set up and have significant problems.

    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

    On the other hand, the Ubiquiti camera is across the board clearly inferior to the Axis entry level HD camera though the Axis M114 is more than 4x the price (~$100 vs ~$470) [Note the Axis M1114 has a varifocal lens while the Aircam Bullet does not. However, even against the Axis M1104, a fixed focal camera, the price variance is still 4x].

    Recommendations

    For $100, users looking for very inexpensive but nearly HD video quality in well lit areas, will find the Ubiquiti Aircam Bullet highly attractive. They will have a difficult choice in VMS integration - (1) Ubiquiti's own free VMS that lacks 3rd party support and is fairly basic or (2) integrate via RTSP to a 3rd party VMS and configure the camera through its web browser.

    For those looking at a cheap entry level 4 or 9 channel system, a Ubiquiti based solution is the most price competitive IP alternative to cheap DVR kits yet. The pricing is close and nearly identitical if any older/existing PC can be used. Plus, the image quality will clearly be better with the Ubiquiti than an SD / interlaced analog camera.

    This camera is clearly not a replacement for professional IP cameras nor is it for those who want best in class image quality. Ubiquiti is planning to release a professional line of IP cameras in 2012. It will be interesting to see how well those will compete when that occurs.

    Competitive Impact

    We think Ubiquiti's line will have the most immediate impact on the budget surveillance market, specifically ACTi, Hikvision and Vivotek. Ubiquiti's cameras are already easier to use than those brands, have similar image quality and are cheaper.

    From an American company perspective, there are some similarities to Arecont Vision but we do not see Ubiquiti having much of an impact on Arecont as Arecont overwhelmingly sells multi-megapixel cameras. However, over time, we do think that Ubiquiti can overtake Arecont as the low cost brand of choice in the market. 

    Physical Features Review

    The video below looks at the camera's physical features. The two most important to pay attention to are the non standard mounting system and the challenging method for fine focusing the lens.

    One other important physical / installation aspect is the requirement for a non standard power over Ethernet injector. Ubiquiti includes one that can be setup just like a normal PoE injector including requirement to be plugged into mains power. However, of course, you can not plug the Ubiquiti straight into a regular PoE switch. Note: As a commenter mentions, an inline PoE adapter can be bought separately for about $20. This eliminates need to plug into mains power.

    Configuration and Monitoring

    The video below shows the basic settings of the camera and the use of Ubiquiti's own AirVision NVR.

    While AirVision NVR is beyond the scope of the test, as it is designed to be the free compliment to Ubiquiti's cameras, a few points are worth making:

    • Installing the AirVision NVR was simple and quick. The installation is light weight (under 50 Mb versus 1000+ Mb for any Milestone version).
    • AirVision NVRs are managed via web browser and a clean Flash implementation.
    • Motion detection is supported on server side, compensating for lack of camera side detection (Ubiquiti reports camera side motion detection will be added in the future).
    • AirVision's live monitoring has solid basics including a map view.
    • AirVision's investigation feature sets are quite limited with rudimentary searching, playback and no multi camera export

    We integrated the Aircam with Exacqvision using an RTSP connection (with the following address format -rtsp://192.168.0.3:554/live/ch00_0). We found:

    • Video displayed fine and there was no connection problems. 
    • No configuration of the stream (frame rate, resolution, etc.) is possible.
    • Only continuous recording was possible since Exacq does not support server side motion detection and the Ubiquiti camera does not support camera side motion.
    • Recording of the Ubiquiti's stream was 5 seconds behind real time and the other IP cameras that were connected via direct drivers or ONVIF (though time syncronization is a regular and frustrating problem with Exacq [link no longer available]).

    Low Light Testing

    The Ubiquiti camera was outperformed in low light testing in normalized, same shutter speed tests. Here it is at 1 lux:

    The Ubiquiti image is dark and muddy. The competitive difference would be even more significant if we allowed the Axis and IQ cameras to go to their default slow shutter speed (though this would increase probability of motion blur).

    Now, let's look at 2 lux:

    All the images clearly improve but the relative performance gap remains the same.

    Now here are the results from 6 lux:

    In the 6 lux example above, we have the SD Axis included which is clearly the worst image of the 4 cameras.

    Indoor Lighted Testing

    Now, let's examine with more light, this time at 16 lux:

    Now, the Ubiquiti and Axis M1114 HD show similar level of details. Two important points though stand out:

    • The coloration on the subject's face and facial hair is more accurately rendered on the Ubiquiti than the Axis M1114.
    • The color of the subject's shirt is more accurately rendered on the Axis M1114 than the Ubiquiti. The subject is weaing a navy blue shirt but the Ubiquti makes it appear black.

    Now we move to 250 lux scene which is the equivalent light level of an office:

    The same pattern remains here with the Ubiquiti producing a more realistic image of the subject's facial tone and hair with a distorted display of the subject's shirt color.

    Longer Range Testing

    Finally, we tested for longer ranges and wider field of views. One point to keep in mind was that the SD Axis M1011 has a slightly narrower FoV than Ubiquiti (because both have fixed lenses).

    In the image below, the 'mid' range of approximately 40' wide FoV. The Ubiquiti's image details are close to the HD Axis and significantly above the SD Axis. However, the 2MP IQ clearly provides more details than all others.

    Finally, here is a long range comparison of approximately 80' wide FoV. Here the Ubiquiti captures moderately less details of the subject than the HD Axis. However, it is still much better than the SD Axis even with its slightly narrower FoV.

3 reports cite this report:

Ubiquiti Open IP Cameras Tested on Apr 04, 2016
Back in 2011, Ubiquiti broke ground, offering IP cameras for the then...
Ubiquiti Micro HD Camera Tested on Jul 13, 2015
With nearly $600 million in revenue, Ubiquiti has become a major force in...
Top 5 Disruptive Surveillance Companies 2012 on Dec 15, 2011
What companies are driving changes in the video surveillance industry? What...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Clorox Announces, Then Pulls, Fever Camera on Oct 15, 2020
For almost one week, Clorox was marketing fever cameras. The booming...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
USA's Feevr Thermal Temperature System Examined on Mar 31, 2020
This US company has burst on to the scene, brashly naming itself 'feevr' and...
Directory Of 150 Video Analytics Suppliers on Dec 17, 2019
This directory provides a list of video analytics providers to help you see...
Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
Apple Acquires XNOR.ai, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired XNOR.ai for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss...
Verkada Speaks On Disrupting Security Sales Channel on Aug 28, 2020
Verkada's fast growth has taken the industry by storm and their enterprise...
RapidSOS Company Profile on Oct 12, 2020
RapidSOS has raised $100+ million providing dispatchers free software and...
Directory of 97 Video Surveillance Startups on May 20, 2020
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see...
Budget Covert Cameras Tested on Nov 26, 2019
Covert cameras under $100 are widely available online but are they any...
Faked Coronavirus Fever Detection, Athena Used Hikvision; Responds - Selling NDAA Compliant Cameras, Pledging 50% Of Profits to Victims on Mar 24, 2020
US company, Athena Security, faked its coronavirus fever detection marketing,...
CDW Sells School District 36 Low-Res, No Blackbody Hikvision Fever Cameras With Federal Funds on Oct 01, 2020
Mega IT distributor CDW sold low-resolution Hikvision fever cameras with no...
Low Voltage Nation Wants to "Help You Carve Out A Fulfilling Career" Interviewed on Jul 06, 2020
It is difficult to make your way in this industry as there is little formal...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...

Recent Reports

Recruiters Online Show LIVE Today! on Oct 29, 2020
IPVM's 7th online show resumes today with 12 recruiters presenting themselves...
Hikvision AcuSense G2 Camera Test on Oct 29, 2020
Hikvision has released their next generation of AcuSense analytic cameras...
Biggest Problems Selling Access Control 2020 on Oct 29, 2020
Access control can cause integrators big headaches. What practical issues do...
Taiwan Geovision AI Analytics and NDAA Examined on Oct 29, 2020
Taiwan manufacturer Geovision's revenue has been falling for years. However,...
Bedside Cough and Sneeze Detector (Sound Intelligence and CLB) on Oct 28, 2020
Coronavirus has increased interest in detecting symptoms such as fever and...
Fever Tablet Thermal Sensors Examined (Melexis) on Oct 28, 2020
Fever tablet suppliers heavily rely on the accuracy and specs of...
Verkada Fires 3 on Oct 28, 2020
Verkada has fired three employees over an incident where female colleagues...
Eagle Eye Networks Raises $40 Million on Oct 27, 2020
Eagle Eye has raised $40 million aiming to "reinvent video...
Hikvision Q3 2020 Global Revenue Rises, US Revenue Falls on Oct 27, 2020
While Hikvision's global revenue rises driven by domestic recovery, its US...
VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...