The Value of Hybrid NVR/DVRs in IP Video Systems

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jun 15, 2008

Hybrid NVR/DVRs are appliances (purposed built computers) that can simultaneously support IP cameras and directly connected analog cameras. This provides simplicity and flexibility. Customers can start with their existing analog cameras and slowly migrate to IP. Specifically, unlike a 'pure' NVR, a hybrid NVR/DVR eliminates the need for a separate video encoder when connecting to analog cameras.

Hybrid NVR/DVRs are now being offered by almost all of the traditional DVR companies. However, many have questioned whether this meets a customer need or is done simply because it is easy for the traditional DVR companies to do.

Nevertheless, the hybrid NVR/DVR is quite legitimate and plays a critical role in very common scenarios in video surveillance:

  • 80%+ of cameras today are analog and most of those cameras have many years of service left in them.
  • In many applications (perhaps 30% or more of all systems), bandwidth constraints force customers to deploy recorders at the remote site near the on-site cameras.

In these scenarios, hybrid NVR/DVR systems will be very attractive. And since this scenario is very common, it will be a major factor for many security managers and the industry as a whole. To see why this will be a major factor, let's examine general NVR benefits and why they are reduced in these scenarios.

A main benefit of a pure NVR is consolidation of video management and storage functionalities. Rather than managing video in chunks of 16 or 32 across potentially dozens of appliances, centralized servers and storage clusters can be used. These servers and storage clusters can reduce equipment cost, power consumption and service costs. Indeed, main of the early adopters of pure NVRs and IP video systems did so because of this advantage.

The biggest challenge in consolidation is bandwidth availability. Consolidating requires video feeds from various parts of a facility/facilities be transmitted to a central location(s). To do this, requires sufficient bandwidth. Inside the local area network (usually inside a building), bandwidth availability is plenty and fairly inexpensive. However, in the wide area network (usually between buildings or campus), bandwidth is scarce and quite expensive. To centralize video management and storage across the WAN could easily cost hundreds or thousands of dollars per month, negating the benefits of consolidation.

In many distributed facilities with 4 to 32 cameras, organizations will have to manage and store their local feeds in their local premises. This is, of course, not new as it is the common practice with DVRs. However, it does affect the NVR business case and create incentive to choose hybrid NVR/DVR systems.

Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter
Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter

Economic Comparison of Hybrid DVR/NVR to pure NVR

When you have less than 32 cameras and you need to store and manage those cameras locally, the economics of hybrid NVR/DVRs are far better than pure NVRs.

A mid-tier 16 to 32 channel hybrid NVR/DVR costs about $6,000 to $8,000 (using online Google pricing for all estimates). The hybrid NVR/DVR does encoding, storage, management and serving of the video, all in one, with minimal on-site setup and configuration.

By contrast, a pure NVR solution can cost 20% – 50% more than a hybrid system and is more complex to setup and maintain. The additional costs come from having to (1) purchase standalone encoders to convert the analog cameras to IP ($200 to $300 per camera), (2) purchase software licenses for the NVR($100 to $150 per camera) and (3) purchase a PC/server with storage ($75 to $125 per camera). Additionally, the server needs to be set up, software loaded, OS tuned, encoders configured and connections established between encoders and NVR. It also takes more space, more IP addresses and because there are now multiple systems, increases the risk of integration or future service issues.

The NVR approach is much more complex and time consuming than the comparative hybrid NVR/DVR which is relatively plug and play. In a large scale environment where 100s of cameras were being consolidated, the cost savings often justify the additional complexity and setup time. However, in a small setup, the costs are quite significant.

Hybrid DVR/NVRs Provide a Smooth Transition

For any given customer, the most attractive hybrid DVR/NVR will be the unit from their existing DVR supplier. Even if the customer does not especially like their DVR vendor, all of their staff is trained on using that DVR's client software. Moreover, often, all of the DVRs are from one vendor, so the staff never has to worry about which software client to use. The same client software for the DVR can usually be used for the hybrid systems. This makes the switch seamless and transparent to the users. Customer are willing to switch but when it's close, the comfort of the staff is a major factor in sticking with existing processes and products.

What's the Downside of Hybrid DVR/NVRs

The biggest downside of Hybrid DVR/NVRs is that many are not truly hybrid. A genuine hybrid would be equally flexible with IP and analog. Mixing and matching many combinations of analog and IP would be standard. Supporting a variety of IP and megapixel cameras would also be standard. Exacq is a good example of a true hybid. The problem is a lot of so called 'hybrid' systems offer only token support for mixing and matching and for different IP cameras. One common technique is to offer only a few additional IP cameras, constrained to 1 or 2 IP suppliers, in addition to the 16 analog inputs. GE's Symdec is an example of a "fake" hybrid. Hybrid systems are supposed to give you flexibility to grow into IP. This approach is more of a trick than a benefit.

The other downside of Hybrid DVR/NVRs is that they may not offer the same advanced functions as NVRs. Though individual units certainly do not, most mainstream DVRs support the same type of advanced functions as NVRs do. For more information, examine my review on how DVRs have been catching up to NVRs. Buyers should examine this point but most mainstream hybrid systems should be quite close to NVRs.

Conclusion

For many mainstream security buyers, hybrid DVR/NVR systems are going to be the best choice. The lower cost, easier deployment, and lack of client changes needed will make the hybrid DVR/NVR very attractive for applications needing recording of moderate camera counts at distributed facilities. Buyers should carefully examine how hybrid the system truly is and how the functionalities compare to pure NVRs but may conclude that hybrids work best for their needs.

4 reports cite this report:

New Surveillance Products Spring 2011 Final on Apr 06, 2011
In this report, we provide a single source listing new video surveillance products announced in Spring 2011 and in conjunction with ISC West.For...
Pelco's Hybrid DVRs (DX4700/4800) Examined on Mar 08, 2011
In this note, we examine Pelco's 2 new Hybrid DVR series: the DX4700 and 4800 series. Pelco is marketing these recorders to users who want to add...
2010 Spring Surveillance Trends on Apr 01, 2010
Emerging from ISC West, a number of clear trends will likely impact purchasing decisions over the next 12 months. In this premium report, we...
Why Analog is Gaining Ground Against IP Video on Feb 16, 2009
Those who think the recession is speeding up IP convergence are likely ignorant or hopeful. Indeed, the recession is dramatically slowing...

Other Reports on NVRs

Milestone Launches Disruptive ONVIF Bridge 'Out' on Dec 15, 2015
This is good news for the industry, for those wanting simpler integration and for the much battered PSIM market. As part of Milestone's XProtect...
VMS Market Getting Tougher on Nov 19, 2015
A new member asked us: "What are your thoughts on the future of VMS now that the new camera makers seem to be bundling it with their cameras...
Claimed Security Vulnerability in Axis, Aimetis and Milestone VMSes on Nov 09, 2015
A Swedish research firm has claimed to discover a 'critical vulnerability' in major VMS software platforms including Axis (ACS), Aimetis and...
Favorite Large Scale VMSes 2015 on Aug 10, 2015
If you have 100+ cameras in your system, what should you use for recording? What is used for recording? This report shares the results of IPVM's...
VMS vs CMS on Jul 15, 2015
VMS and CMS both refer to software that manages video surveillance recordings yet they are different. In this note, we explain the differences...
VMS Webinar Series on Aug 07, 2014
Over the next month, each Monday at 11am EDT / 15:00 GMT, IPVM will be hosting a webinar on a different VMS (OnSSI, NUOO< Network Optix), doing...
New VMS 'Orchid' Released on Apr 03, 2014
New VMSes are fairly rare. However, one VMS provider, IP Configure, is releasing a brand new VMS, called "Orchid". The company is touting it as...
Worst VMS Manufacturers 2014 on Feb 24, 2014
With the favorite VMSes revealed, we now turn to the worst. We asked 120+ integrators from more than 20 countries: "In the past year, what VMS...
Favorite VMS Manufacturers 2014 on Feb 17, 2014
With the favorite and worst IP camera manufacturers identified, we now turn to the VMS manufacturers. 120 integrators from 20 countries answered...
Testing $39 ONVIF NVR on Feb 05, 2014
You are probably used to paying thousands of dollars for NVRs and even hundreds for budget ones, like the Q-See kit we tested. But how about just...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis OrwellLabs Exploit Tested on Jul 29, 2016
Another exploit has been reported for Axis cameras (OrwellLabs AXIS Authenticated Remote Command Execution), less than a month after Axis critical...
Hikvision 12MP IR 360 Tested on Jul 28, 2016
Hikvision has released their latest IR panoramic camera, the DS-2CD63C2F-IV, with a 12MP sensor.  To find out, we bought one of these new models...
Surveillance Recording Mode Statistics 2016 on Jul 28, 2016
Continuous? Motion? Boost? What recording should be used? What is used? This report compiles data from 90 integrators on storage modes most...
Nuvico Shutting Down - The Chinese Conclusion on Jul 27, 2016
Nuvico is shutting down. And this is the end game of the Hikvision and Dahua race to the bottom. [premium_content] Who is Nuvico? Nuvico, never...
Anixter Touts Selling to End Users on Jul 27, 2016
Anixter's track record of selling to end users inspires much negativity in the industry. But Anixter's CEO has a different take on it. In this...
Access Control Does Not Want ONVIF on Jul 27, 2016
ONVIF has become a major force in video surveillance. Despite its well deserved criticisms, ONVIF is widely embraced by video surveillance...
Imaging Developer Claims Massive Low-Light Improvements on Jul 27, 2016
In the early days of megapixel, binning was a crutch used to compensate for poor low-light performance.  Low-light sensitivity improvements have...
Hikvision Desperate And Destructive Slashing on Jul 27, 2016
Now a 20% across the board price cut. Hikvision has taken their price slashing to a whole other level. And it is bad news, for Hikvision and their...
Pivot3 Says Big Growth Despite 3 Top Execs Out on Jul 26, 2016
Pivot3's significant turnover continues, with 3 more executives out. However, Pivot3 responded to us saying this is all a normal part of their...
Panasonic Embraces Advidia OEMing of ACTi, Dahua and Hikvision on Jul 26, 2016
Clever move or surrender? When Panasonic bought Video Insight in 2015, the focus clearly was their VMS. But Video Insight also offered their...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact