Fingerprint for Access Control

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 03, 2013

Despite being touted as the next big thing for access control, fingerprint readers struggle to dethrone traditional manufactured credentials as "the" standard. Despite the promise of high-tech readers making credentials as unique and secure as individual identites, real engineering challenges exist. In this note, we examine how fingerprint readers are best used for access control.

Key Considerations

**** ********* *** ******** "*** ***'* ** *** *********** ******* more *****?" ******* ***** ******* ****** *****. * ***** ****** of ********* ******* ******* ***** ********** ********:

  • ****: *********** ******* ****** **** **** ******** ** '******' ********* proximity-type *******.
  • ****** ***********: ** **** *****, ************ *** *** ******** ****** ** be **** ** *** **** **********, *** **** ** ****** with * ********* *** ** **** **********.
  • ****: ******** ** *** *******, *** ***** ****. ***** ********* can **** ********** ******* ** **** ******* ******** ** *********** manufactured ***********.
  • ******* *********** ******: *** *** ******* *** ******** ** ***** *******.

** *** ******* ****** *** ******** ********* ****** ** *********** (ie: "* ** ****** **** ** ***** * ****"), *********** readers ********** *** **** *********** *** ** *** ******* ****** above. *******, **** *** ****** *** *********** ******** ** ********** security ******* ************ *****-****** ***********, ****** ** ***** ******** ** as **** ** *********.

** *** ******* *****, ** ******** *** ***** *********** ******* 'traditional' ********* ***** ******* **** ********* *********** *******.

****

**** ********* ****** ******* *******, **** *** ***** *** ********* to ***** *** **** **** ********* *********** ******* *** ******** to ********* ***** *******. *** ******* ******** ** *******, *** options ***** ******** ******* **** ** ****-********* ******* ********* (**: a **** ******** ** ** ********* ****):

  • *********** ******: ********* ****** ****~$******
  • ********* ******: *** ********* **** **** ****~$*****

**** *** ******** ** **** *** * *********** ******* ** ~10 ***** **** ********* **** ** ********** ********* ******, **** end-users *** *** *** **** ****** ******. **** **** ******** the ********** ***** ** ********** ***** (******* $*.** - $* each), *** ********* ****** ** ************* **** *********.

Strip ** *******

*** *** *********** ******* *** *** ****. **** **** ********** devices, ******* ********** **** *****. *** ******** ******* **** *****************-***** *********** *********** **********-***** ********** *** *** **** ** ****** ********** ****.

  • ************* *****: **** **** ********* **** ** ****** ***** ** **** space, **** *****, *** ** ****** **** ** ******** ***** electronic *******. ** ********** ************ **** ******* **** *** *****, the ********** ******** ** * *********** **** ******* **** *** strip *** ******** * ****** '***********'. ***** ********** ** ** individual *********** ** ****, *** ****** ** **** ********* ** changes ** *** *****, *** **** ********* ** ****** ** hand-lotion ***** ** ********* **** ********** *****.
  • ******* ******:**** ***** ** ****** ***** *********** **** **** ***** *******, but ***** * ****** ** * ***-****** *****, ******** ******** to **** ************ *** ******* **** ** *******. *** ****** collects ** '*****' ** *** ******, ***** ** **** ** a ********* *** ********** ** * ******* ** ******. *** end ****** ** **** ******* ******* ** ****** **** ******** reads, *** ******** *** ****** ****** ** ****** ********* **** harsh *******. ***** **** ******* *** **** ** ******* ******* perimeter ********, ******* **** ***** ** ****** ******** ** ********* and ** ***** ** ****-*** *********.

**** ***** ** ******* *** **** ** ********** ********. *******, most ********** ********* *** *** *** ******* ******* ******* *** higher ****, ** ** * - * ***** **** ***************** ***** *******. (**: ~$*** *** ********** **** *** ~$*** **** ** optical-based *******) ***-***** ******* ****** ** *****, ** **** **** tight *******, *** ****** *** ******* ********. *******, ************* *** practical *********** ** ****** *********** *** *** *********** ******* ** the *****, ** *********. *** ***** ***** ***** * '************* strip' ***** **** ******:


Backup ***********

********** ** ************ ******, ** *********** ****** ** ******** ***% of *** ****. ***** *** '***** ********' *****, ** ********** granting ****** ** ** ************ ******, ** *********** ****, ***** is ********* *** *********** '***** ********' *****, ** ********** ******** a ********** ********** ******.

******* ****** ******* ******, *** ******* ** ******** ************ ** weather *** *** ***** ****, * ********** *********** **** ****** always **** *****. **** ***** **** **** **** ** ********* credential **** **** ** ***** *** ***. ******* **** ** a ****, ***, ** * ********** ***, *** **** ** carry ******* **** ********** ** ** ********* ********.

****

*** ****** *** *********** ******** *****, *** **** ********** **** is ******** ** ***** ***********. ******* *** ***** ** ********* credentialing ** ****** * '****' *** ********* ** ******* * 'known' ******* ** *******, *** **** ** *** ********** ******** effects *** **** * **** ***** ** ********.

*** ***** *** *** ** *********** ******** ** *********** ********** delays, *** *** ***** ********* ***** ** ** **** ******* when * **** ** ******** ** * ****** ****, *********** outside ** **** ** **** ************. ******** ** *** **** instantaneous ******* ** ******* *** ********* * ********** ****, *********** scanners **** * ************.

Environmental ******

*** **** ** *** ****** ******* ********** ******* ********** **** outside *******, ************ ********** ******* ******* ***********. ************ **** ***** hands, **** *** ******* ** ****** ****, *** *** *** of *** ****** ****** *** ****** ** *** ****** *** accurately *** ***** ** ****. ********, ******* ********* ** *** or ***** ************ **** ********* ********.


***** **** ****** *********** *******, ***** *** '********' ************** ** well. *** *******, ******** *********** **** ****** **** ** ** removed ** ***** ** **** * *****. ***** * ***** consideration, **** **** ** **** ************ ****** ***** ** ****** gloves ****** ***** ** ********** ******. ** ********, ****** ******** a ******* ***** *** *********** ** ******* ****, ********, *** without **** ** ****** **** ** *** ******* ** ************, and **** ********* ***** ******* *** ********* ** '******' ********* that ** *** *** *********** ****, ***** ****** **** ********* to ***** *******.

Most ****** ************

***** *** ******* ************** *** *********** *******, **** **** *** replaced ********* ******* ** *** ********, *** ** **** ****** poised ** ****** ******** ** *** ******. *** **** ********** openings, *********** *********** *** *** * ***** ********** ** *****, and ***** ** ** ********** ****** ** '*** ********* **** is *** ******' ***** *** **** ******** **** ** *********** readers. ******* ************ *** ******* ***** *** ******* ** ************* factors, **** ********* *** **** ** '**** ********' ****** ************ where '*****-******' *********** *** *********.


'*****-****** **************' ******** **** **** * ****** ********** ** **** *****. For *******, **** * *********** **********, **** ****** **'* **************** tied ** *** ******, ****** *** **** ** ** *** gain ******. *******, **** **********, *** **** ** * ***** credential ********, *** ********* '*****' **** *** *** *** ****** issued *** **** ** **** *****-*******. *** ****-******** *********, **** extra **** ** ********** ********** ****** ** ******* ******, *** is ***** *********** ******* *** **** ***** ****.

Special ************

*******, ************** ***** ** ************ **** ****** ** *** ************ for *** *********. ***** *** '********' ************ ** **** *****:

  • ******* ****** / ***:******* *****-** ***** ** ************, ********* *** *** *** *********** lengthy ******* ** ******** ***** ********.
  • ********* **********: ** ***** ** ******** ********, * **** **** **** a *********** **** ******* *** '******** ** ****-** ********' ****. This ******** ** ********** ********* ***** ******* ** ******** ** a *********** ***** ***** *** **** ******.
  • ****-******* *******: *** *********** ** *** ******** **** ******* ****** ** drop *** *** **** ** ********* ***** ** *********** **.

Comments (17)

Couple of observations: We we were made aware of a firm that removed fingerprint access scanners because of the employees perceived concerns over sanitary (ie: flu) issues. While I chuckled upon first hearing it, it could be a real issue. (I type this as I am recovering from a week long bout with it myself)

Second: We've installed the J reader from Sagem Morphotrak in a few places and their one to many read time is very good. No real latency that the end user would be frustrated by.

Same issue

Customer's employee's had same (ie: flu, colds ) finger reader issues.

Lucky, the reader was a prox and/or finger access card reader(dual tech).

customer assigned cards as needed.

Hello John:

Thanks for the real-world feedback. I have heard, but never really understood the push behind objecting to fingerprints on a santiary basis.

Of course, I understand numerous nasty sicknesses are communicable, (I wish you a quick recovery!) but after touching my finger to a reader, most of the time I must immediately grab a handle with my whole hand to open the door. Interestingly, ASSA sells hardware with a 'germ-proof coating' for this very reason.

I'm all for maintaining cleanliness and antiseptic surfaces, but objecting to fingerprint readers because they help spread disease is a little strong for me.

Thanks for feedback on the read time. For reference, how many users are enrolled in the system?

a couple of hundred at both sites. One is a fraternity house at a college and they initiated the request because they feared the rowdy boys forgetting their credentials after a large evening. Cost more on the front end, but graduating 50 and pledging 50 each year, assuming the credentials aren't reissued, means a pretty good cost savings just in cards.

'large evening'. You make it sound polite!

I haven't used finger readers for security, but I have used them for a time clock system. After spending about 7 months troubleshooting them a can tell you this.

we have about 250 users enrolled in the system. Our goal was a single factor authentication. Out of the 25O there are about 15 that no matter what I do can't get enrolled. For some reason the system doesn't see or read their finger. In addition to that about 10-15% have issues on a regular basis.

im about to pull them out and just use prox cards. Very frustrating.

Josh Ennis thanks for the real world numbers. Were those optical or semiconductor scanners?

We have used finger print readers as a dual authentication for corrections staff to get keys out of keysafes. They worked well when used with a 'smart' card that held the users unique algorithm, this meant a 1 to 1 read which kept authentication down to around 1 second. Problem was the readers were a semiconductor type that didnt take kindly to wet fingerprints(rainy days). There was also some confusion from the end user who did not realise that there is always a quantity of people that this technology did not work well with (around 1-2%) Numbers enrolled were approx 800 with around 10 - 15 users that regularly had issues.

We use Suprema from Entertech as well as Morpho and have not had too many issues. 1eg. come to mind though, 1 Client with 3 locations, 100s of prints from ea. site and only the one maintenance guy having issue. His hands are so worned out, you almost can't enroll his fingers (very difficult) They had the brilliant idea of having him cream/moisturize his hands... BAD If you give too good of a print (too many points) to the enrolled fingerprint, the reader will be looking for a high quality print which will never happen unless he does the same everytime he would like his fingerprints read at the reader... Just an FYI

One recommendation is do not cheap out on fingerprint readers as you will get what you pay for... Some T&A Fingerprint readers are terrible, bad quality, so we go with the real deal and use an ACS to manage it. What brand did you use Josh Ennis?

Regarding to backup credentials, normally our devices can capture all of your 10 fingerprints under your account during enrolment. So you will use any of the “healthy” fingers to verify your identity. Unless all of them 10 fingers are injured then you will need to use card or password as backup credentials, but very minimal cases.

The current system and algorithm can store up to 10000 fingerprint images into its memory. The verification takes approximately 2 second to verify your fingerprint out of 10000 stored fingerprint images.

Our gym uses an optical "back of the hand" reader; it's not very accurate, and pretty frustrating. Probably 1/5 of the time members have to tailgate in to the facility with another member who had success with the reader that morning.

Another negative is employee privacy issues. I have one client where the union vitoed the installation of fingerprint biometrics based on the storage of fingerprint scans and the potential for them to be used for other purposes. For this reason the client ended up going with facial recognition.

Just goes to reiterate my previous comment

Probably most widely used place with fingerprint scanners is DMV.

Love the down to earth practicality of this report. I wonder if the technology will ever become cheap enough, and accurate/quick enough to merit its own single credential system.

The pricing example used was a bit outdated as the entire Bioscript line has been discontinued by Safran. They (Morpho) have released new models called the SIGMA Lite versions that cut that cost in half. There are others in the bio space that offer reliable readers in the $200 range...XPR from Belgium is one to consider, small units with plenty of power.

I recently assisted in installing palm readers for car dealership employees to clock in and out for there shifts. iI dont know any specifics on these readers but i'm interested to see how well they hold up, especially in the service department with all the dirt and grease.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
GDPR For Access Control Guide on Jul 03, 2018
Electronic access control is common in businesses plus organizations are increasingly considering biometrics for access control. With GDPR coming...
Allegion Acquires Isonas on Jun 29, 2018
Isonas failed to 'revolutionize' access control as they regularly claimed. Now, nearly 20 years after their founding, they are being acquired by...
Replacing / Switching Access Control Systems Guide on Jun 28, 2018
Ripping out and replacing access control systems is hard for important reasons. Because users typically hold on to access control systems for as...
Free Online NFPA, IBC, and ADA Codes and Standards on Jun 27, 2018
Finding applicable codes for security work can be a costly task, with printed books and pdf downloads costing hundreds or thousands. However, a...
Installation Hardware for Video Surveillance - Indoor Fasteners on Jun 22, 2018
As part of our Installation for Video Surveillance series, in this note, we cover drywall anchors. A key part of installing security hardware is...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Hikvision Fights Ban - Claims 'Red Scare', Hires 14 Term Ex-Congressman on Jul 11, 2018
Hikvision is fighting back against the House Bill Ban of their products. Hikvision has hired one of the biggest lobbying firms, led by a 14 term...
Arecont Acquisition By Costar on Jul 11, 2018
Arecont Vision acquisition by Costar Technologies has been approved by the court, concluding the bankruptcy process triggered by Arecont's...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact