Fingerprint for Access Control

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 03, 2013

Despite being touted as the next big thing for access control, fingerprint readers struggle to dethrone traditional manufactured credentials as "the" standard. Despite the promise of high-tech readers making credentials as unique and secure as individual identites, real engineering challenges exist. In this note, we examine how fingerprint readers are best used for access control.

Key Considerations

**** ********* *** ******** "*** ***'* ** *** *********** ******* more *****?" ******* ***** ******* ****** *****. * ***** ****** of ********* ******* ******* ***** ********** ********:

  • ****: *********** ******* ****** **** **** ******** ** '******' ********* proximity-type *******.
  • ****** ***********: ** **** *****, ************ *** *** ******** ****** ** be **** ** *** **** **********, *** **** ** ****** with * ********* *** ** **** **********.
  • ****: ******** ** *** *******, *** ***** ****. ***** ********* can **** ********** ******* ** **** ******* ******** ** *********** manufactured ***********.
  • ******* *********** ******: *** *** ******* *** ******** ** ***** *******.

** *** ******* ****** *** ******** ********* ****** ** *********** (ie: "* ** ****** **** ** ***** * ****"), *********** readers ********** *** **** *********** *** ** *** ******* ****** above. *******, **** *** ****** *** *********** ******** ** ********** security ******* ************ *****-****** ***********, ****** ** ***** ******** ** as **** ** *********.

** *** ******* *****, ** ******** *** ***** *********** ******* 'traditional' ********* ***** ******* **** ********* *********** *******.

****

**** ********* ****** ******* *******, **** *** ***** *** ********* to ***** *** **** **** ********* *********** ******* *** ******** to ********* ***** *******. *** ******* ******** ** *******, *** options ***** ******** ******* **** ** ****-********* ******* ********* (**: a **** ******** ** ** ********* ****):

  • *********** ******: ********* ****** ****~$******
  • ********* ******: *** ********* **** **** ****~$*****

**** *** ******** ** **** *** * *********** ******* ** ~10 ***** **** ********* **** ** ********** ********* ******, **** end-users *** *** *** **** ****** ******. **** **** ******** the ********** ***** ** ********** ***** (******* $*.** - $* each), *** ********* ****** ** ************* **** *********.

Strip ** *******

*** *** *********** ******* *** *** ****. **** **** ********** devices, ******* ********** **** *****. *** ******** ******* **** *****************-***** *********** *********** **********-***** ********** *** *** **** ** ****** ********** ****.

  • ************* *****: **** **** ********* **** ** ****** ***** ** **** space, **** *****, *** ** ****** **** ** ******** ***** electronic *******. ** ********** ************ **** ******* **** *** *****, the ********** ******** ** * *********** **** ******* **** *** strip *** ******** * ****** '***********'. ***** ********** ** ** individual *********** ** ****, *** ****** ** **** ********* ** changes ** *** *****, *** **** ********* ** ****** ** hand-lotion ***** ** ********* **** ********** *****.
  • ******* ******:**** ***** ** ****** ***** *********** **** **** ***** *******, but ***** * ****** ** * ***-****** *****, ******** ******** to **** ************ *** ******* **** ** *******. *** ****** collects ** '*****' ** *** ******, ***** ** **** ** a ********* *** ********** ** * ******* ** ******. *** end ****** ** **** ******* ******* ** ****** **** ******** reads, *** ******** *** ****** ****** ** ****** ********* **** harsh *******. ***** **** ******* *** **** ** ******* ******* perimeter ********, ******* **** ***** ** ****** ******** ** ********* and ** ***** ** ****-*** *********.

**** ***** ** ******* *** **** ** ********** ********. *******, most ********** ********* *** *** *** ******* ******* ******* *** higher ****, ** ** * - * ***** **** ***************** ***** *******. (**: ~$*** *** ********** **** *** ~$*** **** ** optical-based *******) ***-***** ******* ****** ** *****, ** **** **** tight *******, *** ****** *** ******* ********. *******, ************* *** practical *********** ** ****** *********** *** *** *********** ******* ** the *****, ** *********. *** ***** ***** ***** * '************* strip' ***** **** ******:


Backup ***********

********** ** ************ ******, ** *********** ****** ** ******** ***% of *** ****. ***** *** '***** ********' *****, ** ********** granting ****** ** ** ************ ******, ** *********** ****, ***** is ********* *** *********** '***** ********' *****, ** ********** ******** a ********** ********** ******.

******* ****** ******* ******, *** ******* ** ******** ************ ** weather *** *** ***** ****, * ********** *********** **** ****** always **** *****. **** ***** **** **** **** ** ********* credential **** **** ** ***** *** ***. ******* **** ** a ****, ***, ** * ********** ***, *** **** ** carry ******* **** ********** ** ** ********* ********.

****

*** ****** *** *********** ******** *****, *** **** ********** **** is ******** ** ***** ***********. ******* *** ***** ** ********* credentialing ** ****** * '****' *** ********* ** ******* * 'known' ******* ** *******, *** **** ** *** ********** ******** effects *** **** * **** ***** ** ********.

*** ***** *** *** ** *********** ******** ** *********** ********** delays, *** *** ***** ********* ***** ** ** **** ******* when * **** ** ******** ** * ****** ****, *********** outside ** **** ** **** ************. ******** ** *** **** instantaneous ******* ** ******* *** ********* * ********** ****, *********** scanners **** * ************.

Environmental ******

*** **** ** *** ****** ******* ********** ******* ********** **** outside *******, ************ ********** ******* ******* ***********. ************ **** ***** hands, **** *** ******* ** ****** ****, *** *** *** of *** ****** ****** *** ****** ** *** ****** *** accurately *** ***** ** ****. ********, ******* ********* ** *** or ***** ************ **** ********* ********.


***** **** ****** *********** *******, ***** *** '********' ************** ** well. *** *******, ******** *********** **** ****** **** ** ** removed ** ***** ** **** * *****. ***** * ***** consideration, **** **** ** **** ************ ****** ***** ** ****** gloves ****** ***** ** ********** ******. ** ********, ****** ******** a ******* ***** *** *********** ** ******* ****, ********, *** without **** ** ****** **** ** *** ******* ** ************, and **** ********* ***** ******* *** ********* ** '******' ********* that ** *** *** *********** ****, ***** ****** **** ********* to ***** *******.

Most ****** ************

***** *** ******* ************** *** *********** *******, **** **** *** replaced ********* ******* ** *** ********, *** ** **** ****** poised ** ****** ******** ** *** ******. *** **** ********** openings, *********** *********** *** *** * ***** ********** ** *****, and ***** ** ** ********** ****** ** '*** ********* **** is *** ******' ***** *** **** ******** **** ** *********** readers. ******* ************ *** ******* ***** *** ******* ** ************* factors, **** ********* *** **** ** '**** ********' ****** ************ where '*****-******' *********** *** *********.


'*****-****** **************' ******** **** **** * ****** ********** ** **** *****. For *******, **** * *********** **********, **** ****** **'* **************** tied ** *** ******, ****** *** **** ** ** *** gain ******. *******, **** **********, *** **** ** * ***** credential ********, *** ********* '*****' **** *** *** *** ****** issued *** **** ** **** *****-*******. *** ****-******** *********, **** extra **** ** ********** ********** ****** ** ******* ******, *** is ***** *********** ******* *** **** ***** ****.

Special ************

*******, ************** ***** ** ************ **** ****** ** *** ************ for *** *********. ***** *** '********' ************ ** **** *****:

  • ******* ****** / ***:******* *****-** ***** ** ************, ********* *** *** *** *********** lengthy ******* ** ******** ***** ********.
  • ********* **********: ** ***** ** ******** ********, * **** **** **** a *********** **** ******* *** '******** ** ****-** ********' ****. This ******** ** ********** ********* ***** ******* ** ******** ** a *********** ***** ***** *** **** ******.
  • ****-******* *******: *** *********** ** *** ******** **** ******* ****** ** drop *** *** **** ** ********* ***** ** *********** **.

Comments (17)

Couple of observations: We we were made aware of a firm that removed fingerprint access scanners because of the employees perceived concerns over sanitary (ie: flu) issues. While I chuckled upon first hearing it, it could be a real issue. (I type this as I am recovering from a week long bout with it myself)

Second: We've installed the J reader from Sagem Morphotrak in a few places and their one to many read time is very good. No real latency that the end user would be frustrated by.

Same issue

Customer's employee's had same (ie: flu, colds ) finger reader issues.

Lucky, the reader was a prox and/or finger access card reader(dual tech).

customer assigned cards as needed.

Hello John:

Thanks for the real-world feedback. I have heard, but never really understood the push behind objecting to fingerprints on a santiary basis.

Of course, I understand numerous nasty sicknesses are communicable, (I wish you a quick recovery!) but after touching my finger to a reader, most of the time I must immediately grab a handle with my whole hand to open the door. Interestingly, ASSA sells hardware with a 'germ-proof coating' for this very reason.

I'm all for maintaining cleanliness and antiseptic surfaces, but objecting to fingerprint readers because they help spread disease is a little strong for me.

Thanks for feedback on the read time. For reference, how many users are enrolled in the system?

a couple of hundred at both sites. One is a fraternity house at a college and they initiated the request because they feared the rowdy boys forgetting their credentials after a large evening. Cost more on the front end, but graduating 50 and pledging 50 each year, assuming the credentials aren't reissued, means a pretty good cost savings just in cards.

'large evening'. You make it sound polite!

I haven't used finger readers for security, but I have used them for a time clock system. After spending about 7 months troubleshooting them a can tell you this.

we have about 250 users enrolled in the system. Our goal was a single factor authentication. Out of the 25O there are about 15 that no matter what I do can't get enrolled. For some reason the system doesn't see or read their finger. In addition to that about 10-15% have issues on a regular basis.

im about to pull them out and just use prox cards. Very frustrating.

Josh Ennis thanks for the real world numbers. Were those optical or semiconductor scanners?

We have used finger print readers as a dual authentication for corrections staff to get keys out of keysafes. They worked well when used with a 'smart' card that held the users unique algorithm, this meant a 1 to 1 read which kept authentication down to around 1 second. Problem was the readers were a semiconductor type that didnt take kindly to wet fingerprints(rainy days). There was also some confusion from the end user who did not realise that there is always a quantity of people that this technology did not work well with (around 1-2%) Numbers enrolled were approx 800 with around 10 - 15 users that regularly had issues.

We use Suprema from Entertech as well as Morpho and have not had too many issues. 1eg. come to mind though, 1 Client with 3 locations, 100s of prints from ea. site and only the one maintenance guy having issue. His hands are so worned out, you almost can't enroll his fingers (very difficult) They had the brilliant idea of having him cream/moisturize his hands... BAD If you give too good of a print (too many points) to the enrolled fingerprint, the reader will be looking for a high quality print which will never happen unless he does the same everytime he would like his fingerprints read at the reader... Just an FYI

One recommendation is do not cheap out on fingerprint readers as you will get what you pay for... Some T&A Fingerprint readers are terrible, bad quality, so we go with the real deal and use an ACS to manage it. What brand did you use Josh Ennis?

Regarding to backup credentials, normally our devices can capture all of your 10 fingerprints under your account during enrolment. So you will use any of the “healthy” fingers to verify your identity. Unless all of them 10 fingers are injured then you will need to use card or password as backup credentials, but very minimal cases.

The current system and algorithm can store up to 10000 fingerprint images into its memory. The verification takes approximately 2 second to verify your fingerprint out of 10000 stored fingerprint images.

Our gym uses an optical "back of the hand" reader; it's not very accurate, and pretty frustrating. Probably 1/5 of the time members have to tailgate in to the facility with another member who had success with the reader that morning.

Another negative is employee privacy issues. I have one client where the union vitoed the installation of fingerprint biometrics based on the storage of fingerprint scans and the potential for them to be used for other purposes. For this reason the client ended up going with facial recognition.

Just goes to reiterate my previous comment

Probably most widely used place with fingerprint scanners is DMV.

Love the down to earth practicality of this report. I wonder if the technology will ever become cheap enough, and accurate/quick enough to merit its own single credential system.

The pricing example used was a bit outdated as the entire Bioscript line has been discontinued by Safran. They (Morpho) have released new models called the SIGMA Lite versions that cut that cost in half. There are others in the bio space that offer reliable readers in the $200 range...XPR from Belgium is one to consider, small units with plenty of power.

I recently assisted in installing palm readers for car dealership employees to clock in and out for there shifts. iI dont know any specifics on these readers but i'm interested to see how well they hold up, especially in the service department with all the dirt and grease.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 26, 2018
150+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why? Unlike the 2016 access favorites where a group...
Favorite Biometrics 2018 on Apr 23, 2018
Biometrics are on the rise, or at least integrator opposition to them is declining, according to new IPVM integrator statistics.   Almost half of...
Dedicated Vs Converged Access Control Networks (Statistics) on Apr 20, 2018
Running one's access control system on a converged network, with one's computers and phones, can save money. On the other hand, hand, doing so can...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Key Control For Access Control Tutorial on Apr 16, 2018
End users spend thousands on advanced systems to keep themselves secure, but regularly neglect one of the lest expensive yet most important aspects...
Alarm.com Business Market Expansion on Apr 13, 2018
Alarm.com has millions of subscribers, but the company has traditionally been mostly a residential/home focused offering.  ADC's new Smart Business...
Average Access Control Project Size 2018 on Apr 10, 2018
  The most common access control project size is 5 - 16 doors per project. This 2018 result mirrors previous statistics, most recently in 2016...
ISC West 2018 Access Control Rundown on Apr 06, 2018
For ISC West 2018, what is new and interesting in access control?  This rundown will bring you up to speed on the exhibitors, what they are...
VMS New Developments Spring 2018 (Avigilon, Exacqvision, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix) on Apr 04, 2018
What's new with VMS software? In this report, we examine new features and releases for Spring 2018 to track different areas of potential...
Forced Door Alarms For Access Control Tutorial on Apr 04, 2018
One of the most important access control alarms is also often ignored. "Forced Door" provides a vital and even critical notification against...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 26, 2018
150+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why? Unlike the 2016 access favorites where a group...
Last Day Save $50 - May 2018 Camera Course on Apr 26, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on early registration. Register now (save $50) for the Spring 2018 Camera Course This is the only independent...
Hikvision DarkfighterX Vs Darkfighter PTZ Tested on Apr 26, 2018
Hikvision has focused on improving low-light performance for PTZs, an area that has traditionally been a problem, even more so than fixed cameras,...
Digifort VMS Profile on Apr 25, 2018
Digifort, a Brazilian company, has a strong presense in their home country. In a crowded and mature Enterprise VMS market, will they be able to...
Death Of A Dummy Camera Manufacturer on Apr 25, 2018
5 years ago, IPVM gathered insights from a dummy camera manufacturer, who was then the top selling dummy camera provider on Amazon and 3rd in all...
Hikvision Critical Cloud Vulnerability Disclosed on Apr 25, 2018
Security researchers Vangelis Stykas and George Lavdanis discovered a vulnerability in Hikvision's HikConnect cloud service that: just by...
The Yolo Bro And The Death of Journalism on Apr 24, 2018
There's an old quote: The job of the newspaper is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable Unfortunately, the opposite is more...
DMP Adds Ring Video Doorbell Integration on Apr 24, 2018
Video doorbells have become one of the hottest items for security systems. After several years with no doorbell, DMP has announced integration with...
Milestone 2017 Financials Examined on Apr 24, 2018
For ISC West 2018, Milestone released ... their financials, touting "strong revenue growth in 2017". However, there were discrepancies with the...
Chinese Manufacturer Kickstarter Campaign Huge Success (EverCam) on Apr 23, 2018
In a week, a Chinese manufacturer's expertly done Kickstarter campaign has received $1.4 million in pledges, an incredible amount for a video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact