Project NOLA - 500+ Camera City System at 90% Lower Cost

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Dec 03, 2013

The most disastrous citywide surveillance system is likely from New Orleans. After spending more than $10 million, it resulted in criminal charges and convictions .... unfortunately against the people involved in deploying it [link no longer available]. Now, it exists as a zombie, offline but still consuming tens of thousands in electrical costs [link no longer available].

At the same time, an online surveillance retailer has quietly built a 500+ all HD city system in New Orleans at 90 percent less than the original city system cost. What's the catch and tradeoffs?

In this note, we analyze the cameras, options and implementation of this system, considering whether this could be a template for other cities.

Background

In 2009, Bryan Lagarde, a former police officer and investigator, launched Project NOLA as a way to increase the amount of evidence the public could provide police after a crime and give local law enforcement better situational awareness.

“We wanted to give people a way to know when something bad was headed their way and we’re really here to help increase the efficiency of the New Orleans police,” he said. The project provides surveillance cameras to the public for discounted prices and in turn uses the footage to help local police solve crimes. Project NOLA also runs a website for emergency alerts and provides residents access to police scanners and public law enforcement information. 

Project NOLA Stats

The online surveillance retailer / project founder claims that:

  • During the last 30 days, Project NOLA was involved in 66 percent of homicide investigations in New Orleans.
  • Footage from Project NOLA has helped clear more than 100 major cases. 

The Cameras 

The cameras are budget, outdoor models.

“In the beginning we were using a lot of Vivotek equipment. Now we’re mainly OEM-ing from overseas, but as long as it’s ONVIF compatible, we’ll put it into our system,” he said.

Most participants buy the standard kit offered by Project NOLA for $295. It consists of a 1.3MP integrated IR camera, a POE splitter and a 50 foot CAT5E cable (full specs here). It also includes lifetime tech support. 

Participants get an additional $95.00 off if the camera will be placed in the location of a recent homicide and an additional $55.00 of is the person is on a fixed income or getting federal assistance. On the other hand, if the participant decides to remove the camera they "may be immediately charged an early termination fee of $150."

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Contrary to NOLA's claims that they do this at or below cost, these camera's specifications are very similar to the super low cost ones included in HD IP kits that likely cost $150 or less.

Sample Videos

Project NOLA has day and night sample videos to showcase camera performance. It is what one would expect for cameras in the class, obviously better than legacy analog kits that many consumer purchasers are used to but not special for MP / IP systems.

Storage

“We talked to to the public and law enforcement and we learned that people believe in surveillance, but they don’t want video to last forever,” Lagarde said. To that end, video is only stored for 10 days -- that was the compromise the public felt most comfortable with. “It’s not often we miss a crime because of the 10-day threshold," he said. 

The video for all 500+ cameras is stored on servers at Project NOLA's headquarters. 

Monitoring

The cameras are always recording but are not always monitored live. Operators will proactively monitor during major events like Mardi Gras or times when the president has visited New Orleans, but on a day-to-day basis, Project NOLA pulls feeds based on tips and police scanner traffic.

When there is a shooting or major incident, Project NOLA immediately starts putting together a video package for law enforcement. “We can often get he videos to the dispatcher before they make it to the crime scene,” he said.

Police do not have access to the cameras. "They have to go through us, but we are always there to assist when bad things happen," he said. They also monitor police scanner traffic for tips on where they should be watching. The video is sent to an FTP server for where law enforcement can download and review video.

Network

To allow Project NOLA’s command center to access cameras, they must be connected to a homeowner’s Internet. If a person doesn't have home Internet service, Project NOLA has worked out an agreement with the local broadband company to provide Internet at a reduced price for people who want to be a part of Project NOLA.

“This has really helped us get the project going in economically challenged areas of the city,” Largarde said.

We suspect that Project NOLA is simply opening holes in firewalls as these cameras do not claim any special phone home / application VPN capabilities.

Non-Profit Status

Largard says Project NOLA has never been about making money. It started out as a side project from his main company, CCTV Wholesalers. After leaving law enforcement in 1994, he started CCTV Wholesalers, then in 2010 he started Project NOLA.

"We basically took the profits from selling our selling video surveillance equipments and designs all around the world. We used that profit to initially fund the now non-profit endeavor, Project NOLA," he said.

CCTV Wholesalers used $300,000 to launch the project. Project NOLA gave away the first 150 cameras to homeowners in the French Quarter. Then it began selling the $295 kits. After adoption spread, Project NOLA was granted non-profit status. Now the project uses funding from CCTV Wholesalers and is able to take donations from the public. The biggest donation so far came from a New Orleans company who gave $10,000 and wanted to have 40 Project NOLA cameras installed in a neighborhood.

Pros and Cons of This Approach

The biggest advantage is clearly the low cost. City wide surveillance systems regularly cost $20,000 or more per camera. With Project NOLA's approach, having homeowners mount it on their property and using existing Internet access, the total cost per camera drops dramatically. We doubt it even costs $1,000 per camera all in.

The second most notable advantage is that it does not require city approval and can be done by concerned citizens.

However, there are a number of major drawbacks to this:

  • Dependant on volunteers and cannot easily choose where cameras are located.
  • Controlled by a private entity who is essentially assuming public / policing responsibility. 
  • Dependent on local Internet for access to camera.
  • Limited to minimal live monitoring of cameras.

It is easy to argue that a true city surveillance is better overall than what Project NOLA is doing. On the other hand, given the radical reduction in cost and complexity, it might provide more net benefits than the massive mega surveillance projects that depend on huge subsidies and questionable results.

Indeed, we believe a similar approach would be beneficial for neighborhood watches.

1 report cite this report:

US Capital Paying for Homes and Business to Get Security Cameras on Feb 09, 2016
Since 9/11, US cities have spent hundreds of millions collectively on city-wide video surveillance system. Now, the US Capital, has an interesting...
Comments (13) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws have been known for more than a decade. The good news is that this is...
XNOR.ai Terminates Wyze on Nov 27, 2019
Wyze has shocked the industry again - this time with a major setback. Just months ago, Wyze triumphantly added AI analytics to their ~$20 cameras,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Amazon Ring Launches $10 Monthly Professional Alarm Monitoring on Jun 15, 2018
Amazon's Ring has announced an alarm system with 24/7 professional alarm monitoring for $10 per month, a fraction of the $30+ per month traditional...
Axis Z-Wave IP Camera Tested Poorly on Mar 20, 2018
Z-Wave is drawing notable interest for video surveillance use. In IPVM's initial coverage, 84% expressed interest in it, with nearly half being...
ONVIF Usage Statistics 2018 on Mar 05, 2018
ONVIF has long 'won' the standards battle for video surveillance. But has the now 10-year-old ONVIF 'won' vs direct integrations? Undoubtedly,...
3VR Firesale to Identiv on Feb 07, 2018
A decade ago, 3VR raised more than $60 million to deliver facial surveillance and video analytics in a '3rd generation' video recorder. Now, 3VR...
Honeywell Crowdfunding Bombs on Nov 08, 2017
100,000+ employees and $40,000,000,000 in annual revenue. That's Honeywell. ~200 backers and ~$67,000 in funding in a week. That's Honeywell...
Blink XT Outdoor Totally Wireless Camera Tested on May 11, 2017
Running wires for cameras outdoors is one of the biggest challenges, especially for consumer or DIY installs. Now, Blink has released an outdoor...
$38+ Million Funding Powers VMS Challenger IronYun on Nov 09, 2016
VMS and video analytics have received little funding this decade. However, one Taiwan startup, IronYun, has bucked this trend, with a relatively...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...