Project NOLA - 500+ Camera City System at 90% Lower Cost

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Dec 03, 2013

The most disastrous citywide surveillance system is likely from New Orleans. After spending more than $10 million, it resulted in criminal charges and convictions .... unfortunately against the people involved in deploying it. Now, it exists as a zombie, offline but still consuming tens of thousands in electrical costs.

At the same time, an online surveillance retailer has quietly built a 500+ all HD city system in New Orleans at 90 percent less than the original city system cost. What's the catch and tradeoffs?

** **** ****, ** ******* *** *******, ******* *** ************** of **** ******, *********** ******* **** ***** ** * ******** for ***** ******.

**********

** ****, ***** *******, * ****** ****** ******* *** ************, launched******* ****** * *** ** ******** *** ****** ** ******** *** public ***** ******* ****** ***** * ***** *** **** ***** law *********** ****** *********** *********.

“** ****** ** **** ****** * *** ** **** **** something *** *** ****** ***** *** *** **’** ****** **** ** help ******** *** ********** ** *** *** ******* ******,” ** said. *** ******* ******** ************ ******* ** *** ****** *** discounted ****** *** ** **** **** *** ******* ** **** local ****** ***** ******. ******* **** **** **** * ******* *** emergency ****** *** ******** ********* ****** ** ****** ******** *** public *** *********** ***********. 

Project **** *****

*** ****** ************ ******** / ******* ******* ****** ****:

  • ****** *** **** ** ****, ******* **** *** ******** ** 66 ******* ** ******** ************** ** *** *******.
  • ******* **** ******* **** *** ****** ***** **** **** *** major *****. 

The ******* 

*** ******* *** ******, ******* ******.

“** *** ********* ** **** ***** * *** ** ******* equipment. *** **’** ****** ***-*** **** ********, *** ** **** as **’* ***** **********, **’** *** ** **** *** ******,” he ****.

**** ************ *** *** ******** *** ******* ** ******* **** for $***. ** ******** ** * *.*** ********** ** ******, a *** ******** *** * ** **** ***** ***** (**** ***** ****). ** **** ******** ******** **** *******. 

************ *** ** ********** $**.** *** ** *** ****** **** be ****** ** *** ******** ** * ****** ******** *** an ********** $**.** ** ** *** ****** ** ** * fixed ****** ** ******* ******* **********. ** *** ***** ****, if *** *********** ******* ** ****** *** ****** **** "*** be *********** ******* ** ***** *********** *** ** $***."

******** ** ****'* ****** **** **** ** **** ** ** below ****, ***** ******'* ************** *** **** ******* ** *** super *** **** **** ******** **** ** ******** ****** **** $*** ** ****.

****** ******

******* **** ******************** ****** ** ******** ****** ***********. ** ** **** *** would ****** *** ******* ** *** *****, ********* ****** **** legacy ****** **** **** **** ******** ********** *** **** ** but *** ******* *** ** / ** *******.

*******

“** ****** ** ** *** ****** *** *** *********** *** we ******* **** ****** ******* ** ************, *** **** ***’* want ***** ** **** *******,” ******* ****. ** **** ***, video ** **** ****** *** ** **** -- **** *** the ********** *** ****** **** **** *********** ****. “**’* *** often ** **** * ***** ******* ** *** **-*** *********," he ****. 

*** ***** *** *** ***+ ******* ** ****** ** ******* at ******* ****'* ************. 

**********

*** ******* *** ****** ********* *** *** *** ****** ********* live. ********* **** *********** ******* ****** ***** ****** **** ***** Gras ** ***** **** *** ********* *** ******* *** *******, but ** * ***-**-*** *****, ******* **** ***** ***** ***** on **** *** ****** ******* *******.

**** ***** ** * ******** ** ***** ********, ******* **** immediately ****** ******* ******** * ***** ******* *** *** ***********. “We *** ***** *** ** ****** ** *** ********** ****** **** make ** ** *** ***** *****,” ** ****.

****** ** *** **** ****** ** *** *******. "**** **** ** go ******* **, *** ** *** ****** ***** ** ****** when *** ****** ******," ** ****. **** **** ******* ****** ******* traffic *** **** ** ***** **** ****** ** ********. *** video ** **** ** ** *** ****** *** ***** *** enforcement *** ******** *** ****** *****.

*******

** ***** ******* ****’* ******* ****** ** ****** *******, **** must ** ********* ** * *********’* ********. ** * ****** doesn't **** **** ******** *******, ******* **** *** ****** *** an ********* **** *** ***** ********* ******* ** ******* ******** at * ******* ***** *** ****** *** **** ** ** a **** ** ******* ****.

“**** *** ****** ****** ** *** *** ******* ***** ** economically ********** ***** ** *** ****,” ******** ****.

** ******* **** ******* **** ** ****** ******* ***** ** firewalls ** ***** ******* ** *** ***** *** ******* ***** home / *********** *** ************.

Non-Profit ******

******* **** ******* **** *** ***** **** ***** ****** *****. It ******* *** ** * **** ******* **** *** **** company,**** ***********. ***** ******* *** *********** ** ****, ** ******* **** Wholesalers, **** ** **** ** ******* ******* ****.

"** ********* **** *** ******* **** ******* *** ******* ***** surveillance ********** *** ******* *** ****** *** *****. ** **** that ****** ** ********* **** *** *** ***-****** ********, ******* NOLA," ** ****.

**** *********** **** $***,*** ** ****** *** *******. ******* **** gave **** *** ***** *** ******* ** ********** ** *** French *******. **** ** ***** ******* *** $*** ****. ***** adoption ******, ******* **** *** ******* ***-****** ******. *** *** project **** ******* **** **** *********** *** ** **** ** take ********* **** *** ******. *** ******* ******** ** *** came **** * *** ******* ******* *** **** $**,*** *** wanted ** **** ** ******* **** ******* ********* ** * neighborhood.

Pros *** **** ** **** ********

*** ******* ********* ** ******* *** *** ****. **** **** surveillance******* ********* **** $**,*** ** **** *** ******. **** ******* NOLA's ********, ****** ********** ***** ** ** ***** ******** *** using ******** ******** ******, *** ***** **** *** ****** ***** dramatically. ** ***** ** **** ***** $*,*** *** ****** *** in.

*** ****** **** ******* ********* ** **** ** **** *** require **** ******** *** *** ** **** ** ********* ********.

*******, ***** *** * ****** ** ***** ********* ** ****:

  • ********* ** ********** *** ****** ****** ****** ***** ******* *** located.
  • ********** ** * ******* ****** *** ** *********** ******** ****** / ******** **************. 
  • ********* ** ***** ******** *** ****** ** ******.
  • ******* ** ******* **** ********** ** *******.

** ** **** ** ***** **** * **** **** ************ is ****** ******* **** **** ******* **** ** *****. ** the ***** ****, ***** *** ******* ********* ** **** *** complexity, ** ***** ******* **** *** ******** **** *** ******* mega ************ ******** **** ****** ** **** ********* *** ************ results.

******, ** ******* * ******* ******** ***** ************ *** ************ *******.

Comments (13)

Interesting. I know at one time a significant amount of this system was running OnSSI? Many of the cameras were also Sony. Is that system still running? Has it been scrapped entirely?

Which system? Project NOLA or the 'official' New Orleans city surveillance system?

To be fair I thought they were one in the same, regardless, it's a political nightmare down there.

They are completely different. One is the city's own traditional system. The other is a 'crowdsourced' effort lead by an online retailer.

John,

Are there legal hurdles here with chain of custody or rights to the video? How about privacy concerns?

Presumably, these cameras are pointed towards public areas, so in the US it's almost always considered fair game, with no expectation of privacy.

I do not see any legal hurdles with video from this type of system. It's not much different than a homeowner catching a crime committed outside his house and sharing it to the police.

My concern was what if, since they don't have exact control over the placement or view of the cams, the cam owner points the cam inside the window of a neighbor? Or over a fence and into the backyard of their neighbor to watch their hot tub?

Does Project NOLA have liability? Do they have reponsibility to oversee placement of cameras?

There are so many red herrings here that I don't see this thing being as simple as described or lasting very long.

"... if the participant decides to remove the camera they 'may be immediately charged an early termination fee of $150.'"

If they don't adhere to the terms (keeping the cameras from facing places where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy, then they're out of the network.

Jon, as we discussed in the hot tub case, there's little legal ground for someone (in the US). They could destroy the camera or beat up the neighbor, I suppose, but winning a lawsuit is unlikely.

Jon, Project NOLA owns the video and they provide it to law enforcement as a courtesy. There have not been any chain of custody issues yet.

Can you expand a little more on your question about privacy concerns? In general have people had privacy concerns? Yes, but I think that's par for the course for any city system. Can you be more specific?

As long as it is being gathered by a private entity, there are no chain of custody issues until it gets into law enforcment's hands. However, anyone still incurs civil liablity and that camera system definately could be a target for those prosecuted by footage from project NOLA.

This is something I wish more jurisdictions would do, I would love to know more about it.

Hi Steve, how could the camera system be a target for civil liability? You mean someone might sue Project NOLA? If so, on what grounds?

Lagarde contacted me today and said the number of cameras just reached 600.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Police

Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...
French National Police Buy 10,400 Hikvision Body Cameras on May 31, 2018
France’s national police forces bought 10,400 Hikvision body cameras earlier this year, in a high-profile deal that’s coming into effect as the...
Amazon Enters Home Security Services on Apr 26, 2018
Move over ADT? It is certainly what investors have feared for ADT, especially since Amazon acquired Ring. [Update: We spoke with Amazon and have...
ISC West 2018 Access Control Rundown on Apr 06, 2018
For ISC West 2018, what is new and interesting in access control?  This rundown will bring you up to speed on the exhibitors, what they are...
30+ Emerging Tech Companies Examined on Mar 28, 2018
ISC West has a new segment for 2018: the 'Emerging Technology Zone', which they boast: Featuring 50 of the latest and greatest startup...
Audio Usage In Video Surveillance Statistics on Mar 28, 2018
Audio is more widely available and easier to use than ever, with many IP cameras building audio in and often making integration as simple as...
Chinese Police Wearing Facial Recognition Are Here on Feb 06, 2018
This is a very interesting and highly atypical usage of facial recognition that the Chinese government touted this week: It is a PRC police...
Washington DC Surveillance Hackers Arrested on Dec 29, 2017
The US Department of Justice has announced that "Two Romanian Suspects Charged With Hacking of Metropolitan Police Department Surveillance Cameras...

Most Recent Industry Reports

SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Nortek Sues SDS, Battle Over Unpaid Bill and Cancelled Lines on Aug 13, 2018
Nortek and SDS legal battle continues. As IPVM reported, SDS sued Nortek alleging bribery and antitrust violation. However, Wave fired back at SDS,...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
ADT Employees Protest ADT CEO on Aug 10, 2018
So many ADT employees were so upset with ADT's CEO speech reported on by IPVM, that ADT's CEO was forced to send a mass email to employees to...
Axis / Avigilon Legal Battle Rises on Aug 09, 2018
In what is shaping up to be high-powered, will-not-back-down battle, Axis and Avigilon are squaring off in multiple legal contests. In 2017, IPVM...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
Dahua Ban Response: NOT Chinese Government Owned on Aug 08, 2018
Dahua has responded to the US Congress passing a US government ban on Dahua and Hikvision's products. While Dahua offered the now standard...
Bad Move: ADT Markets Rival Amazon on Aug 08, 2018
Amazon may be lining up ADT as its next victim but ADT is happy to promote Amazon. Amazon has made major moves recently, including acquiring...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact