Testing Avigilon / VideoIQ Rialto

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 22, 2014

After years of supplying their analytics only on their own cameras, VideoIQ released the Rialto series in 2013, allowing third party cameras to be used. We tested the Rialto with 7 cameras from major manufacturers Axis, Bosch, Sony, and Avigilon (who recently acquired VideoIQ), and put them up against VideoIQ's own HD dome, the iCVR.

We tested in two scenes, an open field, typical of many perimeter protection scenarios:

And a parking lot/driveway, monitoring vehicles in addition to human targets:

In order to answer the following questions:

  • How did VideoIQ's own HD dome stack up against the Rialto with third party cameras?
  • Which manufacturer performed best?
  • What differences were there between 720p and 1080p?
  • Were there any compatibility problems?

***** ***** ** ********* their ********* **** ** their *** *******,*************** ********* ******** ****, ******** ***** party ******* ** ** used. ** ****** *** Rialto **** * ******* from ***** ************* ****, Bosch, ****, *** ******** (*** ******** ******** *******), *** *** **** up ******* *******'* *** HD ****, *** ****.

** ****** ** *** scenes, ** **** *****, typical ** **** ********* protection *********:

*** * ******* ***/********, monitoring ******** ** ******** to ***** *******:

** ***** ** ****** the ********* *********:

  • *** *** *******'* *** HD **** ***** ** against *** ****** **** third ***** *******?
  • ***** ************ ********* ****?
  • **** *********** **** ***** between **** *** *****?
  • **** ***** *** ************* problems?

**** **** **** ** the ***** ** *** tests ** *** ******. We **** ** ******* another ********* ********** ** and ******* ****** *********** in *** **** ******.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

******* ********

  • ********* ** ***** ******* was **** **** ******** moved ****** *** ***** of ****, ******* ** toward *** ******. ******** moving **** **** *** camera **** ******* ************ farther **** *** ****** could ****** ******** ****** in.
  • ***** *********** **** **** low ** *** **** scenes, *** ****** *********** once *** *******' ******* learning ****** *** ****. Neither ****** ****** *** shadows, *** ** *** most ****** ******* ** analytics *******, ****** ***** triggers.
  • ********** ***** ****** *** camera ******** ******* ******* and ****** **** ****** activation ***** (**%+). ********** moving ****** *** *** were *** * *******.
  • ******* *********(******) *** *** *********** when ***** *******. ****** detection ***** *** ** used *** *** **** purpose, ********* **************, **** more ******** *******. ******* require **** ******** ***** and **** ** **** sides ** *** ******** to ******** **********.
  • *** ** ** ************* we ********* ** ******* to *** ******, **** one (*******) ***** *** connect.
  • ********** *********** *** ********* errors ** ****** (*********** resolution, ****** *** *******, etc.), **** ****** ********** as ** *** ******* do *** *******. 
  • ************, ** *** ****** with ******* *** ********* at **** **********, ******* changing *** ******** ********. Rebooting *** ****** ********* fixed ****.

****** ***********

  • *******'* *** ** ****, the******, ************ **** ***** party ******* ********* ** the ****** ** *** daytime. ** *****, *********** dropped, **** **** ***** party ******* ************* ********** ** ****** *** light ***********.
  • ***** ***** ***** *******, Bosch ********* ****, ************* both ********* *** ***** ***** party *******, **** *** and *****.
  • ** **** *****, ***** easily ****** **** ********** for ***** *** ******** by ***' ** ****. However, *** ***** ********* 720p *******, **** ** the **** *****, ***** NBN-733V, *** **** ***-***** outperformed *** ***** ******* in *** *****.

*******

*** ****** ** *** a ****** ***** ** about $*,*** ***, ***** the ****-** ***** *** about $*,***.

******** * *****-***** ******* 1080p ****** (**** ** *****, Axis, ****, ***.) ***** *** ~$100, **** ******* ***** the ****** **** ********** starting ** * ******** ($3,750 *** ****** + cameras **. $*,*** *** two ****-***). ***** ***** cost ******* ******** **** advantage.

*** ****** ** **** available ** *********** ******* ******* ** handling ** ** * HD ******** ** ***. ******** ** *******'* *** HD *******, *** ****** R ** ********* ** small ******* ******. ***** assuming * *****-***** ******* 1080p ****** ***** ~$*,***, and ** ****-** ***** for ~$*,***, *** ****** is **** ********* ***** about *** ********, **** costs *** ***** *****.

** ******* **** ******** cameras, *** ****** *** still ** **********, ********* on ***** ******* *** mounted, ** ***** ***** to ****** *** ******* cameras ***** **** ** this **********.

***************

*******, ***** **** ******* worked ** **** **, or ****** **** *******'* own ** *****. **** may **** ** ********** attractive ** ** ******** systems ***** ********* ** VideoIQ ******* **** ********* were ******* *** **** prohibitive. ************, *** ***** integrators *** ****** ** keep ******* **** ***** preferred ****** ****, *** Rialto ** * **** choice.

Physical ********

**** ***** ***** ******* the ******** ************ ** the ****** **:

Adding *******/***********

** **** *****, ** review *** ******* *** adding *******, *** ******* a ***** ******** ** configuring ***** *** ******* of ********:

Detection ***********

***** ******** 

********* ** ****** ********* best **** *** ******* crossed *** ***** ** view, ** *******'* *********** could ****** ****** *** object's ******** ** * person.

**** *** ******* ****** toward *** ******, ** can *** **** *******'* confidence ** *** ****** classification ** **** ***** (15% **. **% *****), despite *** ******* ***** closer ** *** ******. 

**********/**********

********** ****** ****** *** camera ****** *********** ********** in ********* ********. ********** of ********, ** ******* triggered ** **** *** moving ******** ****** *** camera. 

**********, ****** ***** **** bright, *** *** ***** the **** *****.

******* *****

**** ***** *** **** P3354 **** *** ******, visible ***** *** ********** seen ** *******, ***** by *** ****** ***** in *** ***** *****. Other ******* *** *** cause **** *****. **** that ***** ********** **** did *** ******* ****** as **** **** **** fast *** *****, *** crossing *** ***** *********.

Outdoor ***** ***********

** ****** *** ****** and ******* ** *** scenes: ** **** ***** with ********** ** ******** sides, ~***' ****, ** test **** ***** ********, and * ******* ***, including ******** ********, ~***' long, ** **** **** human *** ******* ***********.

**** *****

**** ******** **** ***** the *********** ********* ***** in **** ****:

*****, ** ****** ** full ********, ** **** in **** ***:

****** *********** ******, **** 250' ***** **** *** Sony ** ***' **** the ***** ***-****. 

****, ** ****** *** cameras ** *****, **** light ****** ******** ** 1 *** *** *****:

********* *********** *** ******* reduced ** *** *******, even ***** *** ***** models **** ** *** Bosch ***-**** *** **** P3354. *** ***** ** simply *** **** **** contrast *** *** ** classify *******, ******* **** about * *** ** the **** *** ** ~0.05 *** ** *** far *** ** *** field.

******* ***/********

********* *** ***** ** this ****** ****:

**** ***** ** **** shot ***** *** *****:

********* ** *** ***** subject ****** **** *** to *** ****. ********* of ***** ******* *** generally ****** **** **** by **-***', *** **** scene *** ****** **** difficult, **** **** ******** between *** ******* *** the ********** **** ** saw ** *** ***** scene.

*** ******* **** **** to ******** ****** ******** to *** ****** ** the ******* ***. ***** models **** **** ** detect******* ******* ** *** nearby ****, ***'+ ****.

*******, ** ****** *** cameras ** **** ***** at *****, ** ****. Light ****** **** ****** 1 - * *** *** to *** ********'* ******* lighting.

*********** ***** ********* *************. Detection ** ******** *** possible **** ****** *** parking ***, *** *** road. ********* ** *** human ******* ******* ** 100-250'. ** **** ****, low ***** ******* **** as *** **** *****, Bosch ***-****, *** **** VB600 ************ ***** ******* by ***'+.

Test *********

*** ******* **** ******** to *** ****** ******** and ******* ********* ***** to *******. ******* **** standardized ** */*** ******* speed, **** ***** ******** left *******. ******* ******** ********:

  • ******* ****** **: *.*.*.*****
  • *************: *.*.*.*****
  • ******** ** *.* **: 2.6.0.14
  • ******** ** *.* **: 2.6.0.14
  • **** *****: *.**.**
  • ***** ***-****: *.**
  • ***** ***-****: *.**
  • **** ***-*****: *.*.*
  • **** ***-*****: *.*.*

******* **** ******* *.*.*.**** was ****.

Comments (16)

The Arecont 180-degree cameras work nicely with these units. I have a large site that is deploying this configuration and are very pleased with the design. The only complaint I have is that each Railto unit will support either 4 analog cameras with the A4 units or 4 IP cameras with the I4 units. If you use 1080p cameras, only two can be connected to one Rialto blade. This is per VideoIQ. Also, there are only two audio outputs per unit, so if talk-down is desired, makes it more costly to deploy is a single speaker cannot serve more than one camera. I am waiting to hear back from VideoIQ regaring the flexibility of the audio outputs. Do they follow the Rialto blade or can it be prgrammed to work with any camera on the same network.

Good report and one I have been looking forward to.

1. Did you try connecting cameras to both the Rialot and another VMS, and see how the streams react? I can see people trying to use thse for the analytics but their own VMS for recording, since this appears to be able to accomodate.

2. Was there a minimum framerate in the spec's the Rialto said it needed? Steve above mentined using them with Arecont 180's, but the 180's only out so many frames per seond across all 4 sensors. Is it enough for the Rialto?

Luis,

I believe 7ips is the max each sensor of the Arecont dome can put out. When I contacted VideoIQ with the design approach, they had mentioned they initially had issues with the Arecont dome, but worked with them to resolve the issue. I was assured at that time, that the unit would accept the frame rate. As of right now, several of the cameras are running with the analytics functioning properly. At the end of the project there will be over twenty 180-degree domes spreadout over large property.

If you can answer, are the Areconts recording to another VMS?

No. I am using the VideoIQ software and Cloudview software. I haven't checked to see if ExacQvision has got them working yet. Last time I was on their supported camera page, the Rialto unit was still incompatible. The integration between VideoIQ and other VMS systems is just not as smooth as using the VideoIQ software.

Luis, you specifically mean adding the cameras to both the Rialto and a VMS, right? You're not asking if we recorded the output stream of the Rialto to the VMS?

The answer on the first one is that yes, we did it. Most cameras were fine. The Sony VB630 dropped the stream periodically when added to both Exacq and the Rialto. That was about it.

As far as integrating the output of the Rialto to VMSs, that I have not done yet.

Ethan, yes, that's what I meant, attaching the Arecont's to the Rialto and another VMS at the same time.

Does the Rialto actually have the ability to re-broadcast the stream from the unit itself?

Yes, it does, with bounding boxes and object IDs embedded. The integration matrix is here.

Detection of humans performed best when the subject crossed the field of view, as VideoIQ's classifiers could better detect the object's movement as a person.

Ethan,

What is the cause of this or what could be done to compensate for the lower classification of objects moving toward the camera? PIRs have the same issue due to coverage patterns but surveillance utilizes pixels (at least that is my assumption for analytics) so wouldn't it see the change and react accordingly? We are just learning about analytics and ordering some units for our office so this article is greatly appreciated and a great piece. Thank you.

Keefe,

All analytics are suffering from this issue equally. The problem is that object crossing the FOV have more distinct pixel change to be considered motion.

When object are moving directly towards the camera, the only pixel change visible is the object growth in size, which typicaly requires a significantly more distance to be established as human.

The best solution for this is to mount the camera higher. if the angle of the camera is steeper you will usually be able to get better results on the Y axis of the FOV.

I am assuming that the IPVM team is using tripods for their tests so mounting the camera higher is not an option.

Sagy,

Thank you for the information. Is there a recommended mounting height to combat the issue?

Keefe,

It is more of an angle issue, so the height realy depends on the distance you are looking at.

so, for example, if you are looking at a distance of 150Ft, 15-20Ft high would be sufficient.

You can use the rule of thumb: Height= 10% of the detection distance.

So, for 1000Ft distance, camera would idealy be mounted at 100Ft high.

It is not always realistic to mount that high, but it is the only way to improve detection towards and away from camera.

[IPVM Editor Note: Commenter is from FLIR, thermal camera manufacturer.]

Now do the test tied to a thermal and you will see greater detection reliability. The headlight, flashing lights, sunrise and sunset become non-issues.

Hello. I was told that the ArecontVision AV8185DN, which is the 180 degree Panoramic view camera is not supported by Rialto for Video Analytics, so I am surprised to see the notes above! If this is true, how is the connectivity? The camera has one output cable but esentially carries the video from 4 sensors; so using a single channel Rialto would work? The application is more about using the Panoramic camera for Perimeter Surveillance and Traffic Monitoring.

Anybody have tried the Rialto with thermal cameras, like Flir FC series?

Steve - yes, there have been several thousand channels of Rialto deployed with various thermal cameras. The firmware has a "thermal/FLIR" mode specifically optimized for thermal camera input, both in IP and analog formats.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Low Light

Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Startup Spectral Edge RGB+IR Claims "Unique Low Light Performance Tech" on Apr 03, 2019
This UK startup, born out of university research, is boldly proclaiming that they deliver "Unique low light performance tech for video surveillance...
Axis 5MP P Vs Q Camera Shootout (P3227-LVE vs Q3517-LVE) on Apr 02, 2019
While Axis' Q3517-LVE tested well, it is one of Axis' most expensive dome cameras, over $1,000 USD. Because of this, members asked us how it...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
Security Fail: ASISNYC Auto Emails Passwords In Plain Text on May 14, 2019
ASIS NYC automatically emails a user with the password the user just entered, in plain text, when one registers for the site / event, as the...
Hikvision VP On Muslim Oppression on May 14, 2019
Hikvision has won tens of millions of dollars, at least, in direct contracts with the Chinese government that oppresses Muslims, including a forced...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact