Testing Avigilon / VideoIQ Rialto

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 22, 2014

After years of supplying their analytics only on their own cameras, VideoIQ released the Rialto series in 2013, allowing third party cameras to be used. We tested the Rialto with 7 cameras from major manufacturers Axis, Bosch, Sony, and Avigilon (who recently acquired VideoIQ), and put them up against VideoIQ's own HD dome, the iCVR.

We tested in two scenes, an open field, typical of many perimeter protection scenarios:

And a parking lot/driveway, monitoring vehicles in addition to human targets:

In order to answer the following questions:

  • How did VideoIQ's own HD dome stack up against the Rialto with third party cameras?
  • Which manufacturer performed best?
  • What differences were there between 720p and 1080p?
  • Were there any compatibility problems?

Here are our key findings from this test:

General Findings

  • Detection of human targets was best when subjects moved across the field of view, instead of toward the camera. Subjects moving away from the camera were tracked consistently farther than the camera could detect subjects moving in.
  • False activations were very low in our test scenes, and nearly nonexistent once the cameras' initial learning period was over. Neither moving lights nor shadows, two of the most common sources in analytics systems, caused false triggers.
  • Headlights aimed toward the camera obscured vehicle details and caused high missed activation rates (75%+). Headlights moving across the FOV were not a problem.
  • Virtual tripwires (IQBeam) are not recommended when using VideoIQ. Object detection rules may be used for the same purpose, including directionality, with more accurate results. IQBeams require more specific setup and area on both sides of the tripwire to function accurately.
  • Out of 14 manufacturers we attempted to connect to the Rialto, only one (Samsung) would not connect.
  • Diagnostic information for streaming errors is sparse (unsupported resolution, stream not located, etc.), with little indication as to why cameras do not connect. 
  • Occasionally, we had issues with cameras not streaming at full resolution, despite changing and applying settings. Rebooting the Rialto typically fixed this.

Camera Performance

  • VideoIQ's own HD dome, the iCVR HD, outperformed most third party cameras connected to the Rialto in the daytime. At night, performance dropped, with most third party cameras outperforming the iCVR due to better low light performance.
  • Among third party cameras, Bosch performed best, outperforming both the iCVR HD and other third party cameras, both day and night.
  • In full light, 1080p easily bested 720p resolution for range and accuracy by 100' or more. However, low light optimized 720p cameras, such as the Axis P3354, Bosch NBN-733V, and Sony SNC-VB600 outperformed all 1080p cameras in low light.

Pricing

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The Rialto I4 has a street price of about $1,750 USD, while the iCVR-HD sells for about $1,900.

Assuming a third-party outdoor 1080p camera (such as Bosch, Axis, Sony, etc.) sells for ~$100, this pricing makes the Rialto more economical starting at 2 channels ($3,750 for Rialto + cameras vs. $3,800 for two iCVR-HDs). Using lower cost cameras furthers this advantage.

The Rialto is also available in a rackmount R version capable of handling up to 8 HD channels in 1RU. Compared to VideoIQ's own HD cameras, the Rialto R is expensive at small channel counts. Again assuming a third-party outdoor 1080p camera costs ~$1,000, and an iCVR-HD sells for ~$1,900, the Rialto is more expensive until about six channels, when costs are about equal.

In systems with existing cameras, the Rialto may still be preferable, depending on where cameras are mounted, as labor costs to remove and replace cameras could make up this difference.

Recommendations

Overall, third part cameras worked as well as, or better than VideoIQ's own HD model. This may make it especially attractive to in existing systems where switching to VideoIQ cameras when analytics were desired was cost prohibitive. Additionally, for those integrators who prefer to keep working with their preferred camera line, the Rialto is a good choice.

Physical Overview

This brief video reviews the physical construction of the Rialto I4:

Adding Cameras/Configuring

In this video, we review the process for adding cameras, and provide a brief overview of configuring rules and regions of interest:

Detection Performance

Human Subjects 

Detection of humans performed best when the subject crossed the field of view, as VideoIQ's classifiers could better detect the object's movement as a person.

With the subject moving toward the camera, we can see that VideoIQ's confidence in the object classification is much lower (15% vs. 42% above), despite the subject being closer to the camera. 

Headlights/Taillights

Headlights moving toward the camera caused significant difficulty in detecting vehicles. Regardless of distance, no cameras triggered on this car moving directly toward the camera. 

Taillights, though still very bright, did not cause the same issue.

Visible Noise

When using the Axis P3354 with the Rialto, visible noise was frequently seen as objects, shown by the yellow boxes in the image below. Other cameras did not cause this issue. Note that these detections also did not trigger alarms as they were very fast and small, not crossing the alarm threshold.

Outdoor Range Comparisons

We tested the Rialto and cameras in two scenes: an open field with vegetation on multiple sides, ~600' long, to test with human subjects, and a parking lot, including driveway entrance, ~430' long, to test both human and vehicle performance.

Open Field

This overhead view shows the approximate distances cited in this test:

First, we tested in full daylight, as seen in this FOV:

Camera performance varied, from 250' using Axis and Sony to 375' with the Bosch NBN-932V. 

Next, we tested all cameras at night, with light levels dropping to 1 lux and below:

Detection performance was greatly reduced in all cameras, even super low light models such as the Bosch NBN-733V and Axis P3354. The scene is simply too dark with contrast too low to classify objects, varying from about 5 lux in the near FOV to ~0.05 lux at the far end of the field.

Parking Lot/Driveway

Distances are shown on this aerial view:

This field of view shot shows the scene:

Detection of our human subject varied from 250 to 350 feet. Detection of 1080p cameras was generally better than 720p by 50-100', but this scene was simply more difficult, with less contrast between our subject and the background than we saw in our field scene.

All cameras were able to reliably detect vehicles to the bottom of the parking lot. 1080p models were able to detect vehicle passing on the nearby road, 450'+ away.

Finally, we tested all cameras in this scene at night, as well. Light levels were around 1 - 5 lux due to the building's outdoor lighting.

Performance again decreased significantly. Detection of vehicles was possible only within the parking lot, not the road. Detection of our human subject dropped to 100-250'. In this case, low light cameras such as the Axis P3354, Bosch NBN-733V, and Sony VB600 outperformed other cameras by 100'+.

Test Procedure

All devices were upgraded to the latest firmware and factory defaulted prior to testing. Cameras were standardized at 1/30s shutter speed, with other settings left default. Current firmware versions:

  • VideoIQ Rialto I4: 4.4.1.72094
  • VideoIQ iCVR HD: 3.6.4.72091
  • Avigilon H3 1.0 MP: 2.6.0.14
  • Avigilon H3 3.0 MP: 2.6.0.14
  • Axis P3354: 5.40.17
  • Bosch NBN-733V: 5.90
  • Bosch NBN-932V: 5.90
  • Sony SNC-VB600: 1.9.2
  • Sony SNC-VB630: 1.9.2

VideoIQ View version 4.4.1.1868 was used.

7 reports cite this report:

Ranking Video Analytic Architectures on May 13, 2016
Video analytics may be implemented in a number of fundamentally different...
More Revolutionary Than Avigilon, Claims Startup Auglle on Apr 21, 2016
Startup Auglle is bringing an "all in one" camera to market that they claim...
VCA's Open Video Analytics Appliance Challenges Avigilon on Mar 29, 2016
Many want an option to add video analytics to existing IP cameras. In the...
The $500 FLIR Thermal Camera Tested on Jun 19, 2015
$5,000 thermal cameras were super 'cheap' not too long ago. Then $2,000...
Avigilon Acquires All ObjectVideo Patents for $80 Million USD on Dec 18, 2014
Wow. You thought Object Video played hardball suing large manufacturers like...
Avigilon Analytic Cameras Tested 2014 on Nov 12, 2014
Analytics remains the 'next big thing' But supply of high quality, ease to...
Industry News Roundup May 2014 on May 23, 2014
Monitoring over 100 surveillance sites, the IPVM Spider picks up 300+ pieces...
Comments (16) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
Tiandy Super Starlight Cameras Tested on Apr 30, 2020
Tiandy is taking aim at China competitors Dahua and Hikvision, with a new...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the...
Anyvision Presents AI Facial Recognition and Mask Detection on Jun 08, 2020
AnyVision presented its AI facial recognition and mask detection at the May...
Vivotek Presents AI Analytics and LPR on May 19, 2020
Vivotek presented its AI Analytics and LPR at the April 2020 IPVM New...
AndroVideo Presents Edge AI Face Recognition Cameras on Jun 26, 2020
AndroVideo presented its AI at the edge face recognition cameras at the May...
Dahua Smart Motion Detection Camera Tested on Mar 03, 2020
Dahua has introduced Smart Motion Detection, AI-based VMD, claiming to use an...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud...
"Fever Camera" Online Show June 2020 - On-Demand Recordings on Jun 03, 2020
IPVM has successfully completed the world's first "Fever Camera" show....
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
Magos Presents AI Radar Object Detector on May 08, 2020
Magos presented its AI radar object detection at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Leica Launches LIDAR / Thermal / IP Camera on Mar 04, 2020
Swiss manufacturer Leica is launching what it calls a "real-time reality...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...