Testing Video Analytic Alerting (Agent Vi System)

By: John Honovich, Published on Jun 06, 2010

Video analytic debates often center around edge vs core and which is 'best'. By contrast, Agent Vi offers a 'hybrid' solution where part of the analytics runs on third party IP cameras and the remainder is performed on a server. It is definitely a different approach and one which many would like to better understand how it is implemented and how well it works.

In this test of Agent Vi's Vi-System offering, we examine deploying Agent Vi and its real time alerting for motion detection. We integrate their analytics with the Axis Q1910 thermal camera, the Axis Q1755 HD day/night camera and IQinVision's 752 MP day/night camera. We do not examine Agent Vi's search capabilities, PTZ tracking nor retail analytics (which we plan to cover in later dedicated tests).

Contrast to other analytic tests we have performed including Video IQ's iCVR and Vitamin D's video analytic software.

Agent Vi's extensive options for camera support and analytic optimization provides flexibility and power for technical users. This allows and also requires IT expertise and real world experience in using video analytics. However, these same elements make it time consuming and difficult for applications where 'plug n play' deployment by non technical staff is desired.

Because of the many options and settings, providing a simple answer on analytics performance is not feasible. For instance, on most cameras Agent Vi analyzes at QVGA (320 x 240) but a few offer VGA (640 x 480) - resulting in significant variances in detection area. Furthermore, settings on Agent Vi's half dozen advanced settings can materially impact performance for common functionalities such as motion detection and line crossing.

On the most common false alert sources - shadows, glare and foliage , Agent Vi performed well on the lighting issues but poorly with foliage. Tuning of advanced settings helped on some foliage issues but large palm trees remained a challenge for any setting attempted (short of simply blocking out the area of the tree completely).

While the system almost always detected 'real subjects', the system had continuous problems differentiating between vehicles and people. Advanced settings could be changed but this materially increases the risk of missing groups of people (who, to Agent Vi can 'look' like a car).

Like most video analytics we have used, Agent Vi's anlytics are not intelligent in the way one thinks of human intelligence. The system uses a collection of inherently imprecise heuristics to judge if an onscreen object is a human or a vehicle. This makes it especially important for an integrator with technical and domain expertise to deliver on-site optimization.

With Agent Vi's fairly broad camera support and VMS integrations, Agent Vi is most appropriate for use in larger enterprise applications with an experienced integrator who understands the risks and issues in implementing and optimizing the system.

System Overview

The following screencast provides a high level overview of the Agent-Vi system.

Key points include:

  • Vi-Agent software can be uploaded directly to a supported camera (including a number of Axis, Sony, IQ, Vivotek and Mango DSP camera/encoders)
  • As an alternative, Vi-Agent Proxy can handle analytics for a camera as a server based method
  • Part of the analytics is run directly on the camera (or Vi-Agent Proxy), while the server runs the other half of the analytics processing
  • Camera agents are associated in the Vi-Config application
  • Analytics rules and configuration is performed in the Vi-Setup application
  • Alarm management is performed on the Vi-Monitor application

Pricing

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Agent Vi's video analytics is distributed as software licenses and have an MSRP of $600 - $1000 per camera. Cameras and server purchased separately.

Monitoring with Agent Vi's UI

Key points include:

  • Vi-Monitor handles the alarm management for the Agent-Vi analytics
  • The list tree shows the associated sensors in the system; In addition, this list serves as a visual indicator to the status of each sensor
  • Buttons are available to toggle viewing of the detection zone, people counter, and bounding box around subject
  • Live view layouts can be switched to support 1, 4, or 6 camera views
  • The event pane lists the triggered alarms from the associated sensors
  • The alarm list can be filtered using the buttons below the list
  • Use the Classification button to acknowledge an alarm
  • VQM (Video Quality Monitors) are automatic rules that report sensor status
  • The alarm is verified on the left pane as a preview snapshot: Vi-Monitor does not record live video
  • Right click on the alarm and select "Generate Report" to create and export a report of the alarm
  • Right click on the preview image to export it as a jpg snapshot

Basic Setup/Configuration of Cameras and Analytics

The following screencast focuses on two components of the Vi-Sentry suite: Vi-Config and Vi-Setup.  It's from these two applications all your camera associations, calibrations, rules, and optimizations will occur.

Key points include:

  • Agent-Vi analytics software is uploaded to supported IP cameras, but the procedure varies between manufacturers
  • In Vi-Config, the list tree displays the available sensors associated to Agent-Vi
  • Right click on your Video Sensor and select "Properties" to select the Sensor Type and Environment that is appropriate for the camera
  • Each associated sensor needs to be calibrated: You will need a subject in the scene as a reference
  • Once sensor type is established and calibration is completed, open the Vi-Setup program to establish the Analytics rules
  • In Vi-Setup, the list tree displays the associated sensors
  • Click "New Rule" and select a rule type: Choose between Vehicle, Person, or Object
  • Establish a detection zone by drawing the borders inside the preview window
  • The established rules are now ready to report on the Vi-Monitor alarm management client

Advanced Settings Examined

Key points include:

  • Under Detection Parameters for a thermal camera, Agent-Vi recommends to change the sensitivity to High
  • For standard d/n cameras, Agent-Vi recommends to leave the sensitivity to Normal
  • When sensitivity is adjusted (High, Normal, Low), it impacts the advanced settings
  • Agent-Vi recommends formal training for adjusting these advanced settings
  • Once a rule is modified, the system immediately takes it into effect
  • Increasing the minimal distance yielded less false alerts from swaying trees
  • The trade-off is that the analytics may miss a subject or it may take longer for the alert to trigger
  • For vehicles, Normal sensitivity has different properties in advanced settings
  • Each rule detection type (moving in area, tripwire, crowding, etc) has different advanced parameters available

Examining the Analytics Performance

The following screencast details the series of tests we conducted on the performance of Agent-Vi's analytics.  We tested multiple types of cameras with the embedded agent software installed on each type and noted the factors that limit the system's performance.

Key points include:

  • The analytics succumb to false alerts from swaying trees
  • Performance fairly solid in accurately detecting people
  • Analytics not affected by simple light changes
  • With a subject walking across a scene at 150 ft distance (d/n cam 70ft fov, thermal 48ft fov) the analytics on both the d/n camera and thermal camera was triggered
  • With a subject walking across a scene at 200ft distance (d/n cam 94ft fov, thermal 60ft fov) the analytics triggered an alarm for the thermal but not the d/n camera
  • With a subject walking straight towards the camera, analytics took longer to trigger an alarm 

CPU Performance Examined

Key points include:

  • Two elements to Agent-Vi: The embedded software on the camera, and the server component
  • The embedded software on the thermal camera measured a CPU load range between 4% - 9%
  • The embedded software on the day/night camera measured a CPU load range between 15% - 20%
  • Agent-Vi statistics information can be accessed via web interface, but not all implementations have certain details available
  • Agent-Vi reports that 8-10fps is the normal range for processed frames
  • On the server side, the Agent-Vi service is called VIAS: CPU consumption was very low

1 report cite this report:

New Surveillance Products Spring 2011 Final on Apr 06, 2011
In this report, we provide a single source listing new video surveillance products announced in Spring 2011 and in conjunction with ISC West.For...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...
AI Video Surveillance (Finally) Goes Mainstream In 2020 on Sep 03, 2019
While video surveillance analytics has been promoted, hyped and lamented for nearly 20 years, next year, 2020, will be the year that it finally...
Scylla AI Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 29, 2019
Scylla, an AI analytics startup, says they are targeting 1 Billion dollar valuation in 5 years and it "is not rocket science" to detect weapons and...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Dahua Analytics+ Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Dahua's analytics have performed poorly in past shootouts. But now, they claim their new Analytics+ "algorithms significantly improve accuracy and...
Honeywell Speaks On NDAA Ban, New Non-Banned Cameras and Cybersecurity on Aug 06, 2019
For years, Honeywell has depended on Dahua, a company with a poor cybersecurity track record and now banned by the US NDAA, for the development and...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Suspends Huawei on Sep 20, 2019
Huawei has been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF so long as US sanctions remain on the mega Chinese manufacturer. Inside this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...