Testing Lowest Bandwidth Camera? (DVTel Quasar)

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 12, 2012

DVTel is making bold claims about their new HD camera line, Quasar, boasting that:

"DVTEL’s Quasar video surveillance cameras offer the highest quality video with the most cost effective, lowest bandwidth and storage requirements on the market today." [emphasis added]

Not only did they say it, but they sang it:

Needless to say, we are always excited to see if such breakthroughs in video quality and low bandwidth consumption can be delivered.

We put the DVTel Quasar 1080p camera up against leading cameras from Axis, Bosch, Arecont, Sony and more to see how good it really was. We were disappointed.

Key Findings

Overall, the DVTel camera is ok but has a few surprising issues, in how it controls the shutter and fixes the compression level. Additionally, the quality is neither better nor is the bandwidth consumption lower after adjusting for compression tricks.

A few important things to keep in mind:

  • This series does have 3rd party integration via ONVIF and we were able to use it with Exacq without any problem
  • Low light performance was relatively poor compared to top cameras tested against.
  • While the camera is marketed as WDR, DVTel acknowledges and our tests showed that it was not on the same level as 'true' WDR from Axis, Sony, etc.
  • Exposure Mode Complication: This camera only allows controlling iris or shutter speed but not both at the same time. This can create video quality problems and is not common with other high end professional cameras (that dynamically control both simultaneously).
  • Compression Settings: When using VBR, the quality/compression level is fixed at a fairly high loss level. This drives bandwidth savings but creates noticeable artificating.
  • Price: The MSRP is $975, without a lens. After dealer discount, that puts it roughly at the same level as other high end HD cameras.

Recommendation

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

If you are using an end to end DVTel offering, the camera may make sense. However, for everyone else, there are equally good or better cameras at the same or lower pricing from more mainstream providers.

Most importantly, the low bandwidth and high quality claims should simply not be considered as we see no evidence to support them. For professional HD cameras in 2012, the performance is average.

Camera Configuration and Options

The video screencast below overviews key camera settings and configurations:

Auto Iris vs. Auto Shutter Modes

Be careful about choosing between auto iris and auto shutter modes, a choice that is unnecessary on most professional auto-iris cameras.

iris vs shutter

  • The default auto iris mode allows the camera to dynamically adjust the iris opening but fixes the shutter speed at 1/30s. Any fast moving objects (like cars) will likely blur.
  • The optional auto shutter mode allows the camera to dynamically control the shutter speed but fixes the iris to fully open, essentially making it a manual iris camera.

This is a bad default and an unnecessary restriction for cameras in this tier.

This image shows a comparison between these two modes on a busy road. Both vehicles in these images were moving at approximately the same speed. Note the greatly reduced motion blur in the right-hand (Auto Shutter) image (click for larger version):

auto iris - auto shutter

Both modes still display artifacting highlighted in this comparison:

VBR vs. CBR

DVTel recommends to use the camera in CBR mode. In testing, we used both VBR and CBR. VBR was used to see how far bandwidth consumption would drop dynamically. CBR was used to confirm and compare.

Important: If you use this camera in production, we recommend against using VBR because, unlike nearly every other professional camera, there is no user adjustable quality/compression control. Worse, the locked quality level is low and leads to artificating that is especially noticeable in high motion scenes.

Indoor Daytime Comparison

In an indoor, evenly lit (~295 lux), 22 foot wide FoV (about 28' to target), DVTel consumed the least bandwidth by far (using VBR) but showed moderate levels of artifacting around the subject's body.

Daytime comparison

This artifacting becomes apparent when zoomed in on the subject.

Daytime Image Comparison

Overall, though the images were roughly comparable, with the 720p Axis, not surprisingly capturing less details than the 1080p/3MP cameras.

Warning - DVTel's Default Exposure

DVTel has an extremely aggressive default minimum shutter speed of 1/4s. This is 750% slower than the shutter required for full frame rate 30fps streaming that will cause massive motion blur. The default is show below:

default shutter

Be careful with such a slow shutter. For purposes of our test, we normalized all cameras to a minimum 1/30s shutter.

Nighttime Comparison

In low light (~.1 lux), the CF-4221 essentially becomes black, while the other cameras in this test produced at least some usable image (with normalized 1/30s exposures). Despite the lack of usable image, bandwidth also increases by 2-3x, from 800-900 kbps to around 3.5 mbps in variable bitrate mode.

Nighttime Image Comparison

Intersection Comparison

We did two test runs for the intersection. In the first run, we set DVTel at VBR and the bitrate it settled on was ~4Mb/s.

4Mb/s VBR for DVTel

While DVTel's bandwidth was lower than the other VBR streams (especially Axis, Arecont and Avigilon which were 2 to 3x more), DVTel demonstrated far more image artifacting and motion blur as shown below:

In addition to the image artifiacting due to the high locked VBR compression level, DVTel displayed more blur because it was in its default auto iris control which fixes the shutter to 1/30s.

Users may download a 10-second video clip (66 MB file) to review video from all six cameras in this scene.

We also tried DVTel at CBR of 4Mb/s but not surprisingly image quality issues / differences remained the same. We then doubled DVTel's CBR rate to 8Mb/s.

8Mb/s CBR for DVTel

Enabling constant bitrate of 8 Mbps in the CF-4221 results in less noise, with the grass seen in the background becoming more clear. In this comparison, we also increased the Sony SNC-CH240's bitrate to 8 Mbps. It still displays noise, though there is less blur on the moving car than in the DVTel image.

Bottom line, what we found was aggressively high default compression levels with DVTel, not any breakthrough improvement in compression or image quality.

1 report cite this report:

ASIS 2014 - 17 Manufacturer Tech Review on Sep 30, 2014
This long post recaps key findings from IPVM team members meeting with manufacturers at ASIS 2014 including Hikvision, EMC, Pelco, Digital...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Bandwidth

Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Nov 05, 2018
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals.  Lots of network training exists but none of it...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...
Video Quality / Compression Tutorial on Oct 17, 2018
While CODECs, like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG, get a lot of attention, a camera's 'quality' or compression setting has a big impact on overall...
Last Chance - October 2018 Camera Course on Oct 04, 2018
Today is the last day to register for the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
Axis 4K vs. 5MP Camera Shootout (Q3518-LVE + Q3517-LVE) on Oct 04, 2018
Axis has released the 4K counterpart to their 5MP Q3517-LVE (see our test). Axis claims of both these cameras: Simply put, AXIS Q3518(17)-LVE...
SNMP / Network Monitoring For Surveillance 2018 on Aug 21, 2018
Surveillance systems typically rely on the the VMS to report issues, but this most often just means knowing a camera is "down" with no warning or...
Eagle Eye Networks Cloud VMS Tested on Jul 26, 2018
Eagle Eye has become one of the most significant players in the industry in the past few years: Eagle Eye's Owner Acquired Brivo Eagle Eye...
Powerline Networking For Video Surveillance Advocated By Comtrend on Jun 08, 2018
Powerline networking, using existing electrical wiring, has been around for many years. Indeed, over the years, some video surveillance providers...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jun 07, 2018
H.265 support has improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and more manufacturers...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Sticker' Surveillance Camera Developed (CSEM Witness) on Nov 16, 2018
The Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) has announced what it calls the: world’s first fully autonomous camera that can be...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact