Testing Lowest Bandwidth Camera? (DVTel Quasar)

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 12, 2012

DVTel is making bold claims about their new HD camera line, Quasar [link no longer available], boasting [link no longer available] that:

"DVTEL’s Quasar video surveillance cameras offer the highest quality video with the most cost effective, lowest bandwidth and storage requirements on the market today." [emphasis added]

Not only did they say it, but they sang it:

Needless to say, we are always excited to see if such breakthroughs in video quality and low bandwidth consumption can be delivered.

Overall, the DVTel camera is ok but has a few surprising issues, in how it controls the shutter and fixes the compression level. Additionally, the quality is neither better nor is the bandwidth consumption lower after adjusting for compression tricks.

A few important things to keep in mind:

  • This series does have 3rd party integration via ONVIF and we were able to use it with Exacq without any problem
  • Low light performance was relatively poor compared to top cameras tested against.
  • While the camera is marketed as WDR, DVTel acknowledges and our tests showed that it was not on the same level as 'true' WDR from Axis, Sony, etc.
  • Exposure Mode Complication: This camera only allows controlling iris or shutter speed but not both at the same time. This can create video quality problems and is not common with other high end professional cameras (that dynamically control both simultaneously).
  • Compression Settings: When using VBR, the quality/compression level is fixed at a fairly high loss level. This drives bandwidth savings but creates noticeable artificating.
  • Price: The MSRP is $975, without a lens. After dealer discount, that puts it roughly at the same level as other high end HD cameras.

Recommendation

If you are using an end to end DVTel offering, the camera may make sense. However, for everyone else, there are equally good or better cameras at the same or lower pricing from more mainstream providers.

Most importantly, the low bandwidth and high quality claims should simply not be considered as we see no evidence to support them. For professional HD cameras in 2012, the performance is average.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Camera Configuration and Options

The video screencast below overviews key camera settings and configurations:

Auto Iris vs. Auto Shutter Modes

Be careful about choosing between auto iris and auto shutter modes, a choice that is unnecessary on most professional auto-iris cameras.

iris vs shutter

  • The default auto iris mode allows the camera to dynamically adjust the iris opening but fixes the shutter speed at 1/30s. Any fast moving objects (like cars) will likely blur.
  • The optional auto shutter mode allows the camera to dynamically control the shutter speed but fixes the iris to fully open, essentially making it a manual iris camera.

This is a bad default and an unnecessary restriction for cameras in this tier.

This image shows a comparison between these two modes on a busy road. Both vehicles in these images were moving at approximately the same speed. Note the greatly reduced motion blur in the right-hand (Auto Shutter) image (click for larger version):

auto iris - auto shutter

Both modes still display artifacting highlighted in this comparison:

VBR vs. CBR

DVTel recommends to use the camera in CBR mode. In testing, we used both VBR and CBR. VBR was used to see how far bandwidth consumption would drop dynamically. CBR was used to confirm and compare.

Important: If you use this camera in production, we recommend against using VBR because, unlike nearly every other professional camera, there is no user adjustable quality/compression control. Worse, the locked quality level is low and leads to artificating that is especially noticeable in high motion scenes.

Indoor Daytime Comparison

In an indoor, evenly lit (~295 lux), 22 foot wide FoV (about 28' to target), DVTel consumed the least bandwidth by far (using VBR) but showed moderate levels of artifacting around the subject's body.

Daytime comparison

This artifacting becomes apparent when zoomed in on the subject.

Daytime Image Comparison

Overall, though the images were roughly comparable, with the 720p Axis, not surprisingly capturing less details than the 1080p/3MP cameras.

Warning - DVTel's Default Exposure

DVTel has an extremely aggressive default minimum shutter speed of 1/4s. This is 750% slower than the shutter required for full frame rate 30fps streaming that will cause massive motion blur. The default is show below:

default shutter

Be careful with such a slow shutter. For purposes of our test, we normalized all cameras to a minimum 1/30s shutter.

Nighttime Comparison

In low light (~.1 lux), the CF-4221 essentially becomes black, while the other cameras in this test produced at least some usable image (with normalized 1/30s exposures). Despite the lack of usable image, bandwidth also increases by 2-3x, from 800-900 kbps to around 3.5 mbps in variable bitrate mode.

Nighttime Image Comparison

Intersection Comparison

We did two test runs for the intersection. In the first run, we set DVTel at VBR and the bitrate it settled on was ~4Mb/s.

4Mb/s VBR for DVTel

While DVTel's bandwidth was lower than the other VBR streams (especially Axis, Arecont and Avigilon which were 2 to 3x more), DVTel demonstrated far more image artifacting and motion blur as shown below:

In addition to the image artifiacting due to the high locked VBR compression level, DVTel displayed more blur because it was in its default auto iris control which fixes the shutter to 1/30s.

Users may download a 10-second video clip (66 MB file) to review video from all six cameras in this scene.

We also tried DVTel at CBR of 4Mb/s but not surprisingly image quality issues / differences remained the same. We then doubled DVTel's CBR rate to 8Mb/s.

8Mb/s CBR for DVTel

Enabling constant bitrate of 8 Mbps in the CF-4221 results in less noise, with the grass seen in the background becoming more clear. In this comparison, we also increased the Sony SNC-CH240's bitrate to 8 Mbps. It still displays noise, though there is less blur on the moving car than in the DVTel image.

Bottom line, what we found was aggressively high default compression levels with DVTel, not any breakthrough improvement in compression or image quality.

1 report cite this report:

ASIS 2014 - 17 Manufacturer Tech Review on Sep 30, 2014
This long post recaps key findings from IPVM team members meeting with manufacturers at ASIS 2014 including Hikvision, EMC, Pelco, Digital...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Glossary / Acronyms for Video Surveillance on Feb 10, 2020
This directory provides definitions and explanations for over 70 common video surveillance industry terms, including links to related IPVM...
IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is created equal, with many differences in coverage, overexposure,...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former FLIR employees is offering a thermal temperature system for the...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts, Convergint is touting 'extensive research' that is either grossly incompetent...
The IPVM New Products Online Show April 2020 Opens With 40+ Manufacturers on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce the first New Products Online show, with 40+ manufacturers, to be held April 14 to the 16th, free to IPVM members,...
USA's Feevr Thermal Temperature System Examined on Mar 31, 2020
This US company has burst on to the scene, brashly naming itself 'feevr' and branding itself as a "COVID 19 - AI BASED NON CONTACT THERMAL...
JCI Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 31, 2020
JCI has made coronavirus cuts, the company told employees in an email that IPVM has reviewed. Inside this note, we examine the cuts made, the...
Add Door Operators To Fight Coronavirus on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM recommends that integrators advocate and end-users consider adding door operators to fight the spread of coronavirus. This delivers...
Video Surveillance Business 101 on Mar 30, 2020
This report explains the fundamental elements of the video surveillance business for those new to the industry. This is part of our Video...
FDA Gives Guidance on 'Coronavirus' Thermal Fever Detection Systems on Mar 30, 2020
The US FDA has given IPVM guidance on the use of thermal fever detection systems being marketed for coronavirus, as an explosion of such devices...