Testing Decentralized / Edge Recording (Mobotix / MxControlCenter)

By: John Honovich, Published on May 10, 2010

What if you could eliminate your VMS servers and get your video management software for free? That's the value proposition behind Mobotix's IP video surveillance solution. They refer to this architecture as 'decentralized' in contrast to 'centralized' approaches where cameras must connect and record to dedicated VMS servers.

Free software and less hardware is certainly attractive but what are the tradeoffs and limitations involved?

In this test, we examine Mobotix's overall video management solution including the use of Mobotix's MxControlCenter client and on-board storage for Mobotix's panoramic cameras and their dome cameras. For a primer on Mobotix's cameras, please review our test/examination of Mobotix camera configuration.

We find 2 major differences that make Mobotix somewhat 'unique' among IP video offerings:

  • The decentralized approach makes some things much better and others easier much worse or harder to do
  • Mobotix makes it easy to access and use advanced functionality but this makes it harder for people to do basic tasks without training

For example, with a decentralized approach, you eliminate a single point of failure but you know need to ensure that cameras are time synched because the VMS server does not act as the synchronizer, you have to set up workarounds or manually copy client settings from user client to user client. Additionally, there are limitations in managing users or doing batch configurations across multiple cameras. [Note: this is just an overview - details are provided in the usability and admin video screencasts].

Additionally, Mobotix offers dozens of advanced functionalities but they are almost always listed side by side with basic ones, obscuring where to find common activities. For instance, you cannot drag and drop cameras into 'normal' matrix views but you can create nearly unlimited custom layouts of cameras. When you search, the default is asynchronous and their are two options for synchronous search. Additionally, there are two ways to use the digital PTZ controls (and depending on how you set these controls can impact recording, latency of control, etc.).
 
If you really learn the system well and use it regularly this should not be a problem. However, it's a big burden to task of any normal security user or technician and not something many (if not most) can commit to do.

Key Criteria / Decision Points

When evaluating Mobotix, the following 9 key criteria / decision points should be considered.

Criteria Strength Description
 Pricing Strong VMS Software Free, Storage can be done entirely and directly to low cost NAS devices
 Simplicity Weak Training critical, infeasible for people to learn by experimentation; violates standard conventions making it hard for even experience operators to figure out without training
 3rd Party IP Camera Support  Weak Limited range of support, only MJPEG encoding, only continuous recording
 3rd Party System Support Moderately Weak Little to no 'out of box' integrations, requires custom integration using IP Notify/Receive
 Analytics Support  Moderate Not true video analytics but complex event configuration possible with VMD and audio analytics
 Enterprise Management  Moderately Weak Limited enterprise management, requires 'work-arounds' to centralize configuration
 Alarm Monitoring  Moderately Strong Integrated column, provides tracking of alarms, instructions for guards
 Video Distribution  Moderate IP Notify can trigger changes to applications and switching to preferred views
 Redundancy Strong Eliminates VMS Server as central point of failure

Recommendations

Recommendations are tough because this is an inexpensive but complex system to use. Inexpensive is generally good for residential and SMB. However, because of the system's complexity, non-technical users may become frustrated and waste significant amount of time. This is reminiscent of the old saying that 'Linux is only free if your time is worthless.' 

On the other hand, if you are technically strong and you like to optimize and personalize your solution, Mobotix is attractive. This is even more so if your technical skills outpace your budget as Mobotix provides a technologically sophisticated offering for the price basically of a camera.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

For larger scale systems (with hundreds of cameras), we think the limitations on 3rd party IP camera support and 3rd party security system support plus the constraints on management will become more significant issues. Perhaps the cost savings can outweigh the specific functional limitations. However, in our experience, the bigger the organization, the more 3rd party support and 'first class' enterprise management become hard requirements.

The cost savings are significant and if the system's usability was simplified we believe this would become a very attractive mass market solution. Mobotix's cameras are fairly competitively priced to other megapixel cameras (even without factoring in the free VMS, NAS storage etc.). The hard cost reduction for eliminating VMS licenses, servers and allowing for cheaper/more flexible storage options is worth easily $200 USD which is about a 20% cost reduction for overall video surveillance equipment (compared to most mainstream competitive offerings). As it is today, though, specifiers should carefully weigh the tradeoffs.

3rd Party Systems Support

For 3rd party IP camera support, Mobotix offers integration through its MxServer application/service. However, there are important limitations:

  • Narrow range of manufacturers supported: Axis, LILIN, Toshiba, Sony
  • Only MJPEG encoding
  • Only SD resolution [Note: In Summer 2010, a new version will support up to 3 MP]
  • Only continuous recording

3rd party cameras are second class citizens in Mobotix's VMS. While support is free, the functional drawbacks are significant.

Usability

In the screencast below, we examine the key usability challenges we found:

  • Overview of administration (00:14 min)
  • Administering live monitoring functionality (01:12 min)
  • Configuring cameras (03:00 min)
  • Optimization options (05:07 min)

Live Monitoring

In the screencast below, we examine

  • Overview of layout (00:11 min)
  • Creating Layouts (00:35 min)
  • Creating Background Layouts (03:45 min)
  • Network Video Display (06:20 min)

Investigations

In this video we examine investigations. We found investigation functionality hard to locate on the UI and complex to use, especially for multi-camera synchronous search and exporting.

  • Overview of stored video (00:20 min)
  • Two search modes (00:50 min)
  • Synchronize camera controls (03:40 min)
  • Exporting (04:55 min)

Administration

In the screencast below, we examine key elements of administering a Mobotix system. Given its 'decentralized' approach, a number of elements are materially different or restricted compared to traditional enterprise video management systems.

  • Potential money savers (00:19 min)
  • Understanding storage workflow (00:25 min)
  • Issues working with live monitoring (01:20 min)
  • Issues in investigations (03:50 min)
  • Isssues in administration (07:11 min)
  • Recommended support (08:55 min)

4 reports cite this report:

Avigilon's "Revolutionary" H4ES Announcement on Apr 01, 2016
Avigilon has a revolutionary announcement, according to Avigilon. Have they solved terrorism as their CEO explained? No, not yet at...
New Surveillance Products Directory Fall 2011 on Sep 21, 2011
This report provides a summary of key announcements and news being made related to or around the ASIS 2011 show.For each product or change, where...
New Surveillance Products Review June 2011 on Jun 14, 2011
In this report, we provide in depth coverage of new surveillance product releases announced in May and June 2011. Below are the products we are...
T24 Test Criticisms Reviewed on Dec 16, 2010
In this note, we review the key criticisms of Mobotix's T24 access control offering from NetworkWebcam's T24 test. We strongly recommend you read...

Related Reports

Exacq's Cloud Drive Storage Tested on Feb 04, 2019
Less than a year after acquiring cloud video company Smartvue, Exacq has launched its 'cloud drive storage' offering. We see the VSaaS market...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Salient CompleteView 20/20 VMS Tested on Feb 27, 2019
In IPVM's last test of Salient 3 years ago, we found various problems and deficiencies. Now, Salient says their new CompleteView 20/20 "unified...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
Network Optix / Hanwha Cloud Access Tested on Jul 02, 2019
Remote cloud access is becoming a bigger differentiator, as cybersecurity issues underscore the problems of port forwarding and many integrators...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Genetec Stratocast VSaaS Tested on Sep 05, 2019
The VSaaS market is rapidly expanding in 2019, with Verkada, Meraki, Eagle Eye, Avigilon and numerous startups growing their market share. When we...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R3 'Centralized Search' Tested on Oct 30, 2019
Milestone has had problems over the last few years releasing significant new software. Now, in XProtect 2019 R3, Milestone is touting "one search...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Severe Impact' Mercury Security 2020 Leap Year Firmware Issue on Jan 17, 2020
One of the largest access controller manufacturers has a big problem: February 29th. Mercury Security, owned by HID, is alerting partners of the...
Apple Acquires XNOR.ai, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired XNOR.ai for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss for the video surveillance industry. XNOR.ai stunned the industry...
Installation Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 16, 2020
Thursday, January 16th is your last chance to register for the Winter 2020 Video Surveillance Installation Course. This is a unique installation...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...
PRC Government Entity Now Controlling Shareholder of Infinova / March Networks on Jan 16, 2020
A PRC government entity is now the controlling shareholder of US security manufacturer Infinova as well as its wholly-owned subsidiary March...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
ONVIF [Un]Trashed Statement, Confirms Dahua and Hikvision Still Suspended on Jan 15, 2020
ONVIF has 'trashed' the suspension statement for Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, etc. but confirms to IPVM that those companies are all still...
Wyze Smart Door Lock Test on Jan 14, 2020
Wyze's inexpensive cameras have grabbed the attention of many in the consumer market, but can the company's new smart lock get similar...
Wesco Wins Anixter on Jan 13, 2020
Despite Anixter earlier arguing that Wesco's bid was inferior to CD&R's by nearly 10%, Anixter confirmed that they are taking Wesco's 3.1%...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor, Bidding War Emerges, Wesco Wins on Jan 13, 2020
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....