Axis VMD3.0 Analytics Vs Avigilon Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 12, 2015

Axis has released the next generation of their advanced video motion detection application, VMD 3.0. It promises improvements in false alarm rates compared to its predecessor, with new features like swaying object rejection, object size and duration settings, and more.

The question is, how does this new version compare to full-blown analytics like the Avigilon H3A analytic cameras? Can it compete while giving users more options in cameras?

We tested Axis VMD 3.0 running on two cameras, the high end 1080p Q1615 and the 720p integrated IR P3364-LV, against Avigilon's 3.0W-H3A-BO1, to see how they compared in false alerts and coverage area.

**** *** ******** *** next ********** ** ************* ***** ****** ********* application, *** *.*. ** promises ************ ** ***** alarm ***** ******** ** its ***********, **** *** features **** ******* ****** rejection, ****** **** *** duration ********, *** ****.

*** ******** **, *** does **** *** ******* compare ** ****-***** ********* like *** ******** *** analytic *******? *** ** compete ***** ****** ***** more ******* ** *******?

** ****** **** *** 3.0 ******* ** *** cameras, ******* *** ***** ******** ******* ********** ** *****-**, ***************'* *.**-***-***, ** *** *** they ******** ** ***** alerts *** ******** ****.

[***************]

Key ********

** **** ****** **** our *** ******** **** these key *****:

*** * ********

  • ** *** ******** ******** included ** *** *, short ***** ****** ******** (set ** *-* *******) proved **** ********* ** reducing ** *********** ***** alarms ******* ******** ****** on ******** ***** ** missed ***** ***********.
  • ***** ****** ******** *** be ****** ** **** scenes ****** ***** ****** be ******* *** ** set ******* **** *** small, ******* ***** ********* obscured ** ******* ******.
  • ******* ****** ******** ******* alarms ****** ** ****** brush *** ******** *** drastically ******* ******** ***** both *** *** *****.

***** ***** ******

  • ***** ******* ******** (** advanced ******** **** ** short *****, *******, ** small *******) ***** *********** ****** by ********* ****** *** moving ********** **** **** common, **** ******** ** false *********** *** *** per ******, **** *** and *****.
  • ***** ********** ***** ***** lived ****** ******* *** exclusion *****, *** ******** of ***** ****** **** eliminated, ******* ** *-* false *********** *** ****** *** day, ******* ** **** **** cameras (***** *** *****-**).
  • **** *** * ***** experienced **** ***** *********** after ************ **** ********** resolution ******** *** ******** camera, *-* *** *** vs. *-*.

********* *****

  • **** *** * ********* daytime ******** ***** ***** ******* settings *** ******** ******* than ********** ********** ******** H3 ********* ******, ~***' horizontal *** **. ~***'.
  • ********* ******* ******** ***** with ******* ****** ******** on *** ******* **** ~175' ********** ** **** ~35'.
  • ********* ******** ***** *** ******* to ~**' **** ** the ***** **** ***** vs. **' ** *** Avigilon *** ******.
  • *** ** *** ********** IR, *** **** *****-**'* nighttime ******** *** ***** 50% ****** **** *** Q1615, ~**' **. **', despite *** ***** **********.

*** ***********

  • **** *** * ** integrated **** **** **** Camera ******* *** ******* Security ****** ********* ** Axis. [[******: ***** *** supports *** *.*/* ** an ******** ** ******* 7.4 *** *****.]]
  • *** ***** ******* ****** integration, ****** **** ** camera */* *** ** used ** ******* ****** upon *****.

VMD * ******** *** ************* ***************

**** *** * ** a **** ************ ****** application ********** **** **** current *** **** ********** Axis *******. ** ******** similarly ** *** *.*,***** ** ****** ********** **** ***** ******* ********. However, **** *** ***** three ******** ************* ******* intended ** ****** **** ****** false ***** *******:

*****-***** *******

**** ******* ******* ******* which *** ** *** scene *** * ***** period ** ****. ** found **** ******* **** to *-* ******* ********** many ***** ****** **** with ** ***, **** as **** ********* ** leaves ******* ******* *** scene, ** ********* *********** from **** ****** ****. ***** the ** ****** ******* threshold ** * ******* area *** **** ***** as * *********** ********* alarm ** ******** *** typically *******, *** ****** not ** ********.

***** *******

***** **** ******* ******* under * ******* **** are *******. **** *** be ****** ** ********* of ***** ******** ** desired, *** ***** ******* should ** *******. ** may **** ** **** to ****** ******* **** particles ** ******. *******, users ****** ** ******* to *** *** ******* object **** *** *****, as **** *** ******* valid ***** ******* ** the **** ** *** scene, ** ***** ********* obscured.

******* *******

*******, **** ******** ***** users ** ****** ****** from ******* ***** ********** move **** * ***** distance, **** ** ******** or *******. ** ***** that ***** ******* **** setting ** *** ****** or ********* ****** **** these *******, ** ******* reduced ******** *****, ** much ** **-**% ********* on *** ***** ********.

******* ** **** ******* reduction ** *****, ** do *** ********* ***** this ****** ****** ********** necessary. ** ** ***** possible ** ******* ******* without ******* ******* ********, as **** ******** *** be ** *** **** of *** *** ** above *** ******* ***** subjects ***** *** ** present. Excluding ***** ******* *** no ******** ****** ** coverage ** ***** *****.

************* *************

** ****** ***** ************* options ** *** ***** below:

**** *****/*********

*** **** ***** *** selected ** ** **** represented *** ** *** above ***** ***** ******, with ***** *** ******* traffic, *******, *** ***** animals ******* ** * typical ********** ***********.

** ******* ***** ** the **** ******** ***** causes ** ***** ******, such ** ****** **********, blowing ******, ***** ********, and ***** *******, *** secondarily ** ********* *****. Testing *** * *********** of ****** ******* **** human *** ******* ********, and ******* *******, ******* the ******* ** ***** to ***** *** ***** activations *** ********* ***********.  

False ***** ***********

** ****** *** * installed ** ****' **** end ***** ***** *** camera, ** **** ** a *****-** **** ********** IR. **** **** ****** alongside ** ******** *.**-***-*** integrated ** ******.

******* ********

***** ******* ******** (** short *****, *****, ** swaying ****** ******* ****** on), ***** ****** **** ******** seen **** ***** *******:

  • ****** ******** *** *****, both *** *** *****.
  • ********* ********** ** ******* cars ** *****.

***** ***** ******** ** saw ** ****** **** other ******** ***** ****** such ** ***** ******* or ******* ******.

********* ********

** ***** *** ****** on ***** ****** ** set *** *'* ***** lived ****** ******* ** 2 ******* ** **** matched ********'* ******* ********, and ***** *** **** of *** **** ****, * valid ****** ** *** field ** **** ***** be ******* *** ** least **** ****** ** time.

** **** ***** ****** settings ***, ** ** wanted ** ***** ** distant ****** *** ******** which *** **** ***** this *********, *** **** swaying ****** ******** *** to ******** ********* *****.

***** ***** ********, ***** alerts ******* *************. ****** from ******* ***** *** branches **** ***** **** common, ****** ** * drastically ******* **** (*-* per *** **. *-** per ****). *** ***** below ********** ******* ***** which ********* ***** ******.

*** * *** *** activate ** ****** ****** due ** ****** ******* through *** ***, ******* below. *** ******** *** camera ********* ** ***** leaves *-* ***** **** the ****** ** *******.

***** ********* ********, *** 3 *** **** *** affected ** ********* ****** as ******** *** ** times. *** ***** *********** area ***** *** ********** of *** ********** **** the **** ******, ***** triggered *** *** ****** multiple ***** **** *** course ** *******. *** ****** highlighted ***** ************ ********* the ******** ********* ** object ****** **, ****** this *** *** ***** in ****** ****** ***** VMD *.

*******, ** ****** *** cameras ******* ******** ***** indoors, ********* ******* *** closing *** **** ** a **** ****, ******* lights ** *** ***, and *********** ********** ** the ***** ** *** scene. **** ** ***** issues ********* ****** ** the ******* ******* *** 3, *** ********.

******** ***********

** *** **** *****, coverage ***** ** *** ***** Axis ***** ******* *** 3 *** **** ******** less **** *** ******** 3.0W-H3A-BO1 during *** ***, ~***' vs. ~***' ********** ***** of ****. *** **** Axis *****-**'* ******** *** ~155' *** ** *** lower **********.

** *****, ******** ***** the ***** ***** ** only ***** * ~**' HFOV *** ** *** lack ** ********** **. The *****-** ******* ** ~44' ****, ~**% ****** than *** ***** *** to *** ***** ** IR. *** ******** *** camera ****** ****, ** about * **' ****.

***********

**** *** *, **** 2.1 ****** **, ********** only **** **** ****** Station *** ******* ******** Center out ** *** ***. Other ***** **** *** potential ******* *** *********** these ******:

*** ****** *******

**** *****, **** ** ExacqVision *** ********* ********, accept *** ****** **** over *** ***** *** be **** ** ***** events. ***** ****** ** event ** *** ****** which ***** * ******** string **** *** * activation. *** *** ******* for **** ****** ** trigger ********* ***/** ******. This ******* ** ******** in ********* ******* ********.

*** **** ******** ** this ****** ** ****. Creating ***** ***** ** each ****** *** ************* actions ** **** ****** and ********** **** **** properly *** **** **-** minutes *** ******. **** quickly **** ** ** even ***-***** *******.

****** */* *****

* ****** ****** ** to ********* *** ****** to ******* * ***** output **** *** * alarm. **** ****** ** then ********** ** *** camera's *****. *** *** *** then ** ********** ** trigger ********* ***/** ****** upon ********** ** *** camera *****.

**** *** ****** *********** described *****, **** ******** events ** ** ******* in **** ****** *** VMS, ***** *** ** time-consuming. ************, **** ****** assumes *** *** ******** the ******'* ***** ** an ***** *******, *** that */* ** *** required *** *** ***** purpose.

******: ***** *******

***** ******** *** * as ** ******** (***** with ***** **** ******** events) ** ******* *.* and *****. ***** *** configure *** ****** ** record ** *** * using ***** *******, **** here:

Firmware ********

******* *** ******** ******** used:

  • **** *****-**: *.**.*
  • **** ***** : *.**.*.*
  • ******** *.**-***-***: *.*.*.**

Comments (16)

Ethan,

Will you make test with shadows or rain?

We did see periods of time with shadows moving. VMD 3 didn't trigger on them in this scene. Avigilon did in only one instance over the course of testing.

As for rain, we would like to, it's just a matter of getting a reliably rainy day. We've tested some analytics in the rain in the past and found that false alerts weren't a problem, but not these specifically.

A second option is to configure the camera to trigger a relay output upon VMD 3 alarm. This output is then connected to the camera's input.

Quite disappointing that Axis would make you give up 2 I/O ports to use what is essentially a 'paperclip shunt', instead of making a checkbox in the software.

Does Avigilon analytics still only work if it is Avigilon from end to end? Or are other VMS' writing these Avigilon analytic cameras in now?

I haven't seen any third parties integrate them as of yet.

Ross I have been pushing Milestone to integrate the Avigilon analytics via OnViff but haven't gotten anywhere with them yet.

Anyone who is reading this who sells Milestone - give your RSM a call and tell them you want it!

Brian, I sent an email to Milestone corporate asking for feedback. I'll update it here if I receive any news.

I cringe when I see the workarounds in the articles. That 10-15 minutes per camera somehow equates to "free" in sales lingo simply because it can be done.

To give context, the 10-15 minute reference is from here:

"The main drawback to this method is time. Creating event rules on each camera and corresponding actions in each camera and confirming they work properly may take 10-15 minutes per camera. This quickly adds up in even mid-sized systems."

We never said this was 'free' and we emphasized that this adds up.

While it certainly isn't free I have been able to implent the TCP work around in <5 minutes which to me is well worth the time spent for much more reliable motion detection. Hopefully the VMS folks will realize that tight integration is worth their efforts!

If I got it right, the VMD software has to reside on the VMS server or a separate server, its not running in the camera itself?

No, the Axis VMD software resides on the Axis camera. However, the VMS server needs to know how to receive alerts from the camera. That's the issue / complexity discussed throughout the report.

John,

You shoud have included a Mobotix M15 with MxActivitySensor, you can pick the lens type Color, B/W or Thermal. If you pick thermal you have VMD in complete darkeness. I know you have testes VMD on a Q24 in the past but from our experiece the M15 has been the best solution for most applications requiring outdoor VMD. Actvity sensor eliminates all wind, rain, leaves and reflected light issues. The only issues we have run into is animal detection which it cannot filter out and complete sun blow out of the image in the South Florida sun. The sun blowout can be reduced using advanced setup options to where it only happens on extremely bright days with moving clouds, maybe a couple of time a month. As far as setup is concerned the default settings are highly effective and only take a minute to enable. More extreme situations will take some added time, but not 10 to 15 minutes once your used to programming the camera.

Mike,

Thanks for the feedback.

For member's reference, we tested the Mobotix analytics here and Mobotix did well in that test. The one area where it did not was simply because the Q24, like most panoramic cameras is poor in low light.

The reason for not doing any further Mobotix tests is because it's Mobotix. The company has had significant internal issues and they have weak third party support (no ONVIF, proprietary CODEC, no H.264, etc.). If and when Mobotix adds ONVIF and H.264, not only will it be good for their business but we'd be much more likely to tes them more often.

So, I tested Axis VMD3 last week as a potential VideoIQ alternative (I used VideoIQ a lot before the Avigilon Aquisition). My particular scene included leafy shadows from tall trees above, and it triggered VMD3 like crazy. I'm pretty sure VideoIQ would have rejected those correctly. Also, every freaking animal triggers VMD3. In my test scenes I could probably filter out the worst of this using minimum size restrictions, but for many perimiter protection scenarios I am often covering a VERY deep depth of field, and a possum in the foreground may appear bigger than a person in the background.

It would be nice if Axis offered a way to overlay the detection boxes on the recorded video. When you have multiple ignore regions, ignore small objects, and ignore swaying objects all turned on it can be difficult to tell which filter needs to be tweaked to eliminate a given false alarm. Does camera center play back the video with detection boxes?

From my perspective, VMD3 is still a LONG way from replacing VideoIQ as my goto analytic solution for perimiter protection. That said, it is a huge improvement over standard motion detection. VMS vendors could only benefit by adding support; less money on hard drives means more money for cameras and VMS licenses.

Note: Exacq added support for VMD 3 as an analytic in recent versions. Recording can be set up using Event Linking, which we've added to the report above, as well.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Hikvision DeepinView Camera Analytics Tested on May 08, 2019
Hikvision is expanding its 'deep learning' offerings with a new camera series called 'DeepinView' claiming false alarm reduction and improved...
Hikvision DeepinMind 2019 Test on Jun 06, 2019
In 2018, Hikvision's DeepinMind AI NVR performed terribly, recognizing vehicles, animals, and other objects as humans, misclassifying demographics,...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision, Now Improved, Now Being Terminated on Nov 25, 2019
When we originally tested Wyze's free person detection deep learning analytics in July 2019, they performed well, with few false alarms, but a long...
Dahua Analytics+ Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Dahua's analytics have performed poorly in past shootouts. But now, they claim their new Analytics+ "algorithms significantly improve accuracy and...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Consumer IP Camera Analytics / AI Shootout - Arlo, Google / Nest, Amazon / Ring, Hikvision / Ezviz, Wyze Cam, Yi Home on Sep 26, 2019
AI analytics are hitting the mainstream in the consumer camera market, with entrants Wyze and Yi Home releasing free people detection on their...
Hikvision Acusense Analytics Tested on Sep 23, 2019
Hikvision touts "The Magic Behind It All" in their new Acusense line are 'deep learning algorithms' inside these cameras and recorders. But how...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...
AI/Smart Camera Tutorial on Feb 20, 2020
Cameras with video analytics, sometimes called 'Smart' camera or 'AI' cameras, etc. are one of the most promising growth areas of video...
China Manufacturer Suffers Coronavirus Scare on Feb 20, 2020
Uniview suffered a significant health scare last week after one of its employees reported a fever and initially tested positive for coronavirus....
Cheap Camera Problems at Night on Feb 19, 2020
Cheap cameras generally have problems at night, despite the common perception that integrated IR makes cameras mostly the same, according to new...
Milestone Launches Multiple Cloud Solutions on Feb 18, 2020
Milestone is going to the cloud, becoming one of the last prominent VMSes to do so. Milestone is clearly late but how competitive do these new...
Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...
UK Stands Behind Hikvision But Controversy Continues on Feb 18, 2020
Hikvision is exhibiting at a UK government conference for law enforcement, provoking controversy from the press, politicians, and activists due to...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to be the leading Artificial Intelligence, big data video software as a service...