Testing Avigilon Integrated IR

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jul 15, 2013

Integrated IR is a big trend in IP cameras. After years of major manufacturers criticizing IR illumination inside their cameras, pretty much all IP camera manufacturers offer integrated IR options.

Avigilon's integrated IR cameras claim to now only eliminate IR washout/bloom, but to extend coverage range far farther than any of their competitors. Specifically, Avigilon offers a 9 - 22mm lens option that is rated for 60 meter. Here is an overview of how those claims match up:

Because of this, we were interested to know how well the Avigilon IR bullets truly performed. So we bought 2 of their 2MP IR bullets, the 'short' focal length and the 'long' 9-22m one, and put them to the test.

Inside, we break down performance in image quality comparisons and video screencasts.

Key Findings

Here are our key findings from this test:

  • Infrared illumination reached specified distances (30 or 60m, depending on lens type), rare among integrated IR cameras, as most overspecify.
  • However, IR power is greatly weakened at maximum range, making image quality suitable for detection only, a drastic reduction from daytime image quality.
  • Illumination was even across the field of view at multiple FOVs, with no visible blooming or hot spots, common when using many integrated IR cameras.
  • Adaptive IR was most effective outdoors, very responsive with moving objects in the scene.
  • Indoor effects of adaptive IR were lessened, due to the smaller area and reduced IR power.
  • Full light performance similar to other Avigilon cameras and competitive models.
  • In very low light (<1 lux) bandwidth decreases substantially with IR on, ~50% outdoors, and ~80% indoors.

MSRP pricing on the HD bullet series starts at $795 USD for the 1.0 MP 3-9mm model (The 9-22mm lens option is $40 more). Based on dealer discounts, we estimate street pricing to be in the mid-$600s for the 1.0 MP 3-9mm model.

This pricing is less expensive than many major brand IR cameras, such as Axis, Arecont, and Sony, though on par with Vivotek, and pricier than comparable from ACTi and Dahua:

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Recommendations

For night time / low light monitoring, the Avigilon IR bullets are worth considering as they cover a long range and eliminate the blooming / overexposure common in integrated IR cameras. The main constraint is recognizing that the coverage area still falls significantly compared to day time performance.

In an upcoming test, we will match up Avigilon IR bullets with Axis Lightfinder and Bosch Starlight models to see how they compare in low light.

Physical Overview

In this screencast, we review the physical features of the HD bullet camera. Of note:

  • Cast aluminum housing, articulated at multiple points to adjust for proper mounting angle.
  • Bottom mounted Ethernet port for easier installation and maintenance, not found on most competitive models.
  • Newer design IR LEDs larger and more powerful than smaller LEDs found on many cameras.

Configuration Screencast

This video reviews the web interface and configuration of the HD bullet camera. The bulk of the web interface is identical to other current generation Avigilon cameras, with the addition of settings controlling the camera's adaptive IR.

Adaptive IR Performance

Avigilon's adaptive IR claims two benefits:

  • The illumination angle is changed as the camera's field of view is adjusted, better matching to the scene. This occurs via multiple sets of IR LEDs with differing illumination patterns, which are switched on and off as the camera zooms.
  • IR power is reduced based on the scene. This may be due to either reflectance in background objects or moving subjects.

We found that adaptive IR resulted in even illumination across the scene at multiple zoom ranges, without substantial hotspots or blooming common in other IR cameras where the illuminator does not match the FOV. Additionally, the IR power adjustment worked well in response to moving objects in the scene in our outdoor tests, adjusting power quickly. This is shown in the following screencast:

In our indoor test scene the effects of adaptive IR on our subject were very limited. With the subject directly in front of the camera, at about 6', there is minimal difference in images with adaptive IR on and off, seen in this example below.

IR Range Performance

We found Avigilon's actual IR range to be closer to the specified range (30m/60m in 3-9mm/9-22mm models, respectively) than many other cameras/illuminators we've tested. However, at max ranges IR power is weak, essentially suitable for detection only despite relatively high pixel density. We review this in the following screencast:

These images compare each camera's widest and narrowest FOV in both sunny daytime scenes and low light scenes with IR on, to show this drop in image quality.

First, using the 3-9mm model, with the subject at 30m (maximum IR range), the camera is barely able to detect our subject in low light at 3mm. At 9mm, he is easily detectable, but with no details:

This images compares the 9-22mm model's widest and narrowest FOVs. At 9mm, our subject is detectable at night, with very little detail, making even classification as human or animal difficult. At 22mm, details are improved, with the top line of the chart minimally readable in low light:

License Plate Capture

We tested the HD bullet's license plate capture performance by setting it to its narrowest field of view, 11°, about 30m from our test car. With the car moving at approximately 30mph, the license plate was easily readable (ELJ-55**, last two characters masked). Significant motion blur and artifacting made identifying the make and model difficult.

However, despite these issues, the license plate was clear, seen in this image.

Note that this test was run using default shutter settings (1/30s). Motion blur may be less of an issue using faster shutter speeds, but we have not tested capture performance using anything other than defaults. Users may download a clip of this scene (~13.9 MB).

Full Light Performance

In full light, the Avigilon bullet is comparable to the non-IR Avigilon H3 series camera, with slightly less saturation. The H3 and Bosch NBN-932V, another current generation 1080p camera, are shown here for comparison.

Performance in Avigilon Control Center

As we demonstrated in our test of Avigilon's image adjustment features, Avigilon Control Center may provide modest improvements to low light performance. Due to these adjustments, at maximum IR range (60m), detection performance is improved, as can be seen in the comparison below. However, enhancement is modest, with no additional identifying details available.

FOV Differences

This daytime image shows both cameras at their widest field of view, 3mm and 9mm, respectively, with the subject located 30m from the camera (click image for larger version):

This image shows each at their most telephoto, 9mm and 22mm, with the subject 60m from the camera:

Bandwidth

The HD bullet's IR illumination significantly reduced bandwidth both indoors and outdoors. In the following comparisons, note that Avigilon uses VBR encoding with a cap with a maximum value of 12 Mb/s.

Outdoors, below 1 lux, we measured the following averages:

  • Avigilon HD bullet, 1080p: ~5.5 Mb/s
  • Avigilon H3 series, 1080p: ~11.5 Mb/s
  • Bosch NBN-932V: ~9.5 Mb/s

This equates to an approximately 40-50% reduction in bandwidth.

Indoors, again under 1 lux, bandwidth reduction was greater, due to the more reflective area. Bandwidth dropped by as much as 80% with IR on:

  • Avigilon HD bullet, 1080p: ~2.5 Mb/s
  • Avigilon H3 series, 1080p: ~11.5 Mb/s
  • Bosch NBN-932V: ~9 Mb/s

Finally, we measured bandwidth in our indoor scene in full light to provide a baseline of bandwidth. In this case, bandwidth is near equal to the Avigilon H3 box camera, though higher than Bosch:

  • Avigilon HD bullet, 1080p: ~3.7 Mb/s
  • Avigilon H3 series, 1080p: ~3.5 Mb/s
  • Bosch NBN-932V: ~1.1 Mb/s

4 reports cite this report:

The Super Low Light Shootout 2016 on Mar 28, 2016
How good are surveillance cameras in low light? With the advances in integrated IR, image processing and larger imagers over the past few years, we...
Exacq vs Avigilon on Jun 17, 2015
A member requested: "I need to find some IPVM info on Exacq vs. Avigilon. I don't have time to read 500 articles. Is there a short cut comparison...
Milestone LPR Tested on Mar 31, 2015
How well does Milestone's LPR work? Milestone's LPR supports off the shelf IP cameras, integrating license plate recognition with the Milestone...
Avigilon Dirty Tricks on Jan 15, 2014
Avigilon's products are strong but their marketing is consistently and utterly irresponsible - one dirty trick after another. While their rapid...
Comments (23) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Axis "Best Of The Best" 4K Camera Tested (Q1798-LE) on Nov 21, 2019
Axis has released their "best of the best" Q1798-LE bullet camera, touting "4K without compromise" with a large Micro 4/3" image sensor, custom...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Axis First IR PTZ Tested (Q6125-LE) on Aug 21, 2018
Axis is very late in releasing IR PTZs. While competitors such as Hikvision and Dahua have offered them for years, Axis has just released their...
Hikvision ColorVu Integrated Visible Light Cameras Examined on Jun 22, 2018
UPDATE: Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested When it comes to low light, infrared light has become the defacto standard in surveillance. But IR is...
Hikvision PanoVu 20MP Flexible Camera Tested on Jun 01, 2018
Hikvision has released their first repositionable multi imager cameras with integrated IR included, atypical in competitors. We bought and tested...
Super Low Light Surveillance Guide on Aug 01, 2017
At the beginning of this decade, low light performance of megapixel cameras was generally terrible. This was the era of super slow shutter where...
Axis P3225 Mk II Tested Vs. Original on Jun 20, 2017
Axis has released a number of 'Mk II' versions of their cameras, which are the same fundamental camera but with specific improvements. We tested...
Axis Lowest Cost Outdoor IR Camera M2025-LE Tested on Apr 24, 2017
Axis has lagged offering low cost IR cameras while their Asian competitors have made IR standard even in their most entry level cameras. Recently,...
Invisible IR Camera Tested (Vivotek) on Jan 30, 2017
Integrated IR is everywhere in surveillance, from high-end long range cameras to even the lowest cost models. But this IR usually comes with a...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...