Testing Axis's Q1755 HD Surveillance Camera v. 2

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jan 04, 2010

This report shares extensive test results, video clips and training screencasts on the Axis Q1755 HD camera. The goal is to educate on how the camera works and what issues to consider when selecting or deploying this camera.

The Q1755 is a High Definition, 2MP, 30 fps camera with built in 10x optical zoom from Axis. For background information, see the Q1755 datasheet.

Updated Testing - January 2010

This version provides 2 major updates from the original April 2009 test:

  • Testing at multiple exposure settings (the default 1/30s and 1/8s) for analyzing low light performance. While we were originally critical of the Q1755's low light performance, further tests of competitors revealed that many used much lower maximum exposure settings than Axis providing an unrealistic and unfair comparison. Q1755 tests with 1/8 second maximum exposure show dramatic improvements for noise reduction and visible detail. For background, see our critique and analysis of how exposure setting 'tricks' can impact low light performance.
  • Providing test sample videos consistent with the 9 other megapixel camera tests we have done (review in our surveillance test directory).

Key Observations from the Test

In the report, I will explain a number of details, both in the written review and the series of screencasts below. Here are the observations that I found most interesting or surprising:

  • The setup was easy - no focusing, no tuning of image settings - delivered high quality immediately
  • H.264 bit rate varied between 1 and 6 Mbps and between 50% to 95% lower than MJPEG
  • H.264 consumed less CPU than MJPEG on my system
  • The visible image quality/resolution seemed to be about the same for 1080i and 720p

Compare to our test results for Sanyo's VCC-HD400 megapixel camera that also provides 2MP and a built in 10x optical zoom

Image Quality Analysis

Below is our screencast commenting and showing the Q1755's image quality.  More importantly, is a ZIP package of video clips for you to review yourself.

Download the package of Q1755 test video clips and image snapshots (41 MB total). Note: the videos were generated from Axis Camera Station VMS and may require installation of the included CODEC.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Overview of Using the Axis Q1755 Camera

The video below explains the key characteristics of the Q1755 and its general use.

The other basic element to ensure is that your VMS system supports (1) megapixel cameras, (2) H.264 codec and (3) the 16 x 9 aspect ratio of this camera. The second and third points are especially important as VMS manufacturers are still in the process of adding support. A few providers have already announced support but many have not. If in doubt, check on this before deploying.

Mechanical and Physical Overview of the Camera

As you watch the video below, you may want to reference the Q1755 datasheet, the user manual.

Configuration and Software Features of the Q1755

In this video, we focus on specific features and options that are either unique or especially useful to the Q1755 camera.

Comparing 720p and 1080i image quality

For megapixel resolution, the Q1755 offers two options: 1280 x 720 and 1920 x 1080. What's interesting to me is that the image quality / details displayed were not much better at 1920 x 1080 then they were at 1280 x 720. This was generally true for day time viewing and certainly true for night time viewing.

Of course, this raises a question: Is this really a 1080i camera or is it a 720p camera?

On the other, what's most important is the effective image quality. Future tests will compare different manufacturers megapixel cameras to better understand and contrast the effective image quality provided.

Night Time Viewing

As you can see from the downloaded video clips, night time viewing is especially challenging. The camera is rated at 2.0 lux for color mode and 0.2 lux for B&W. In either mode, the image quality was very noisy and it was difficult to see many details.

If you are going to use the Q1755 in dark conditions, you should be careful.

Comparing H.264 and MJPEG - Storage/Bandwidth/Quality

I found the image quality to be similar for both H.264 and MJPEG. However, it did appear that when cars were moving, the cars moved smoothly in the MJPEG video but not in the H.264. If smooth motion and small changes for moving objects are important for you, you should consider this point.

While marketing material suggests H.264 reduces bit-rate by 80%-90% compared to MJPEG, my tests displayed greater variance. Sometimes, the savings were as great as 95% but others they were only 60%.  The complexity of the scene and the amount of motion were common scenarios where the bit-rate reduction was lower. Also, at night, H.264 consistently consumed more bandwidth than the day (often 5-6 Mb/s at night whereas the same scene in the day only consumed 1 - 1.5 Mb/s). This is especially concerning given that the night time view provides less image detail.

The video below shows the measurements in action for both day and night:

Examining CPU Use for H.264 Codec

Both Axis and many VMS manufacturers acknolwedge that H.264 can require increased CPU resources. The metric often cited is 50% to 100% increase in CPU load. 

I tested CPU use 5 times and for 4 of those 5 times, CPU utilization was lower with H.264 than with MJPEG. I am not sure why and I could certainly be doing something wrong. I also cannot run a screencast because it would significantly throw off the CPU measurements.

One theory could be that my graphics card is off-loading the load and therefore my CPU is not being effected. Also, since I used Exacq's software and they do not run any motion detection in their server, there was no CPU differential between MJPEG and H.264.

15 reports cite this report:

New Products Reviewed Fall 2010 on Oct 12, 2010
In this report, we aggregate all our new products reviews for Fall 2010 announcments. Products Reviewed The following new products are reviewed....
Arecont's Bullet Cameras with IR LED Examined on Oct 10, 2010
Arecont Vision announced H.264 megapixel cameras in bullet style, outdoor rated IP66 form factors. These are the first bullet as well as...
Testing WebcampXP Pro's VMS on Jul 27, 2010
For those looking for an inexpensive video management system online, WebcamXP Pro has been frequently cited for many years. At no more than $120...
Testing Avigilon ControlCenter VMS 2010 on Mar 08, 2010
[UPDATE: This report has been replaced with Testing Avigilon ACC 5 VMS. The report below is left simply for historical purposes.] While Avigilon...
Testing Digifort's VMS (Version 6.3) on Mar 06, 2010
As video management software matures, more choices are emerging from around the globe. In the past year, we have heard increasing discussion about...
Testing LuxRiot VMS (Version 1.7) on Feb 28, 2010
As video management software matures, complaints increase about its high price. Even a small deployment of 16 cameras in a single site can cost...
Megapixel Camera Comparison 2010 on Feb 22, 2010
Megapixel cameras are clearly 'hot' - the fastest growing segment in the industry for multiple years now. Which should you use? What makes one...
Top 5 Reasons Analog Cameras are Easier to Install than IP on Jan 15, 2010
While IP has many advantages over analog, ease of installation is not one of them. IP cameras are far harder to install even if the installer has...
Testing Pelco's Sarix Megapixel Cameras (IXE20DN) on Dec 05, 2009
While Pelco is a leader in analog surveillance cameras, they are not even in the top 10 for 2008 global network camera sales. Pelco aims to rectify...
Testing Sanyo's HD Surveillance Camera (VCC-HD4000) on Dec 01, 2009
Sanyo is making an aggressive push into the IP video surveillance market introducing a broad line of HD cameras in 2009. Sanyo is positioning high...
Testing Basler's Megapixel Cameras (BIP-1300/1600) on Nov 29, 2009
Basler is a recent entrant into the IP video surveillance megapixel market. Leveraging its extensive expertise in machine vision, Basler's...
IP Camera 2009 Mid Year Review on Jul 26, 2009
Megapixel was the most dominant trend in IP cameras over the first half of 2009. So dominant was megapixel, that not only did most manufacturers...
Top 5 IP Camera Problems: 2009 on Jul 12, 2009
In the last year, IP cameras have made great strides and while there are still important barriers that constrain broader use, problems are...
Testing Vivotek IP7161 - 2MP MPEG-4 Camera on Jun 03, 2009
Vivotek's new 2MP camera (the IP7161) expands low-cost product options in multi-megapixel cameras. The IP7161's specification include support for...
What Differentiates Video Surveillance Products? on Apr 28, 2009
Figuring out how video surveillance products are different is a challenging task. While some products are literally the same, most of them are...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact