Testing Axis's Q1755 HD Surveillance Camera v. 2

By: John Honovich, Published on Jan 04, 2010

This report shares extensive test results, video clips and training screencasts on the Axis Q1755 HD camera. The goal is to educate on how the camera works and what issues to consider when selecting or deploying this camera.

The Q1755 is a High Definition, 2MP, 30 fps camera with built in 10x optical zoom from Axis. For background information, see the Q1755 datasheet [link no longer available].

Updated Testing - January 2010

This version provides 2 major updates from the original April 2009 test:

  • Testing at multiple exposure settings (the default 1/30s and 1/8s) for analyzing low light performance. While we were originally critical of the Q1755's low light performance, further tests of competitors revealed that many used much lower maximum exposure settings than Axis providing an unrealistic and unfair comparison. Q1755 tests with 1/8 second maximum exposure show dramatic improvements for noise reduction and visible detail. For background, see our critique and analysis of how exposure setting 'tricks' can impact low light performance.
  • Providing test sample videos consistent with the 9 other megapixel camera tests we have done (review in our surveillance test directory).

Key Observations from the Test

In the report, I will explain a number of details, both in the written review and the series of screencasts below. Here are the observations that I found most interesting or surprising:

  • The setup was easy - no focusing, no tuning of image settings - delivered high quality immediately
  • H.264 bit rate varied between 1 and 6 Mbps and between 50% to 95% lower than MJPEG
  • H.264 consumed less CPU than MJPEG on my system
  • The visible image quality/resolution seemed to be about the same for 1080i and 720p

Below is our screencast commenting and showing the Q1755's image quality.  More importantly, is a ZIP package of video clips for you to review yourself.

Download the package of Q1755 test video clips and image snapshots [link no longer available] (41 MB total). Note: the videos were generated from Axis Camera Station VMS and may require installation of the included CODEC.

Overview of Using the Axis Q1755 Camera

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The video below explains the key characteristics of the Q1755 and its general use.

The other basic element to ensure is that your VMS system supports (1) megapixel cameras, (2) H.264 codec and (3) the 16 x 9 aspect ratio of this camera. The second and third points are especially important as VMS manufacturers are still in the process of adding support. A few providers have already announced support but many have not. If in doubt, check on this before deploying.

Mechanical and Physical Overview of the Camera

As you watch the video below, you may want to reference the Q1755 datasheet [link no longer available], the user manual [link no longer available].

Configuration and Software Features of the Q1755

In this video, we focus on specific features and options that are either unique or especially useful to the Q1755 camera.

Comparing 720p and 1080i image quality

For megapixel resolution, the Q1755 offers two options: 1280 x 720 and 1920 x 1080. What's interesting to me is that the image quality / details displayed were not much better at 1920 x 1080 then they were at 1280 x 720. This was generally true for day time viewing and certainly true for night time viewing.

Of course, this raises a question: Is this really a 1080i camera or is it a 720p camera?

On the other, what's most important is the effective image quality. Future tests will compare different manufacturers megapixel cameras to better understand and contrast the effective image quality provided.

Night Time Viewing

As you can see from the downloaded video clips, night time viewing is especially challenging. The camera is rated at 2.0 lux for color mode and 0.2 lux for B&W. In either mode, the image quality was very noisy and it was difficult to see many details.

If you are going to use the Q1755 in dark conditions, you should be careful.

Comparing H.264 and MJPEG - Storage/Bandwidth/Quality

I found the image quality to be similar for both H.264 and MJPEG. However, it did appear that when cars were moving, the cars moved smoothly in the MJPEG video but not in the H.264. If smooth motion and small changes for moving objects are important for you, you should consider this point.

While marketing material suggests H.264 reduces bit-rate by 80%-90% compared to MJPEG, my tests displayed greater variance. Sometimes, the savings were as great as 95% but others they were only 60%.  The complexity of the scene and the amount of motion were common scenarios where the bit-rate reduction was lower. Also, at night, H.264 consistently consumed more bandwidth than the day (often 5-6 Mb/s at night whereas the same scene in the day only consumed 1 - 1.5 Mb/s). This is especially concerning given that the night time view provides less image detail.

The video below shows the measurements in action for both day and night:

Examining CPU Use for H.264 Codec

Both Axis and many VMS manufacturers acknolwedge that H.264 can require increased CPU resources. The metric often cited is 50% to 100% increase in CPU load. 

I tested CPU use 5 times and for 4 of those 5 times, CPU utilization was lower with H.264 than with MJPEG. I am not sure why and I could certainly be doing something wrong. I also cannot run a screencast because it would significantly throw off the CPU measurements.

One theory could be that my graphics card is off-loading the load and therefore my CPU is not being effected. Also, since I used Exacq's software and they do not run any motion detection in their server, there was no CPU differential between MJPEG and H.264.

16 reports cite this report:

New Products Reviewed Fall 2010 on Oct 12, 2010
In this report, we aggregate all our new products reviews for Fall 2010 announcments. Products Reviewed The following new products are reviewed....
Arecont's Bullet Cameras with IR LED Examined on Oct 10, 2010
Arecont Vision announced H.264 megapixel cameras in bullet style, outdoor rated IP66 form factors. These are the first bullet as well as...
Testing WebcampXP Pro's VMS on Jul 27, 2010
For those looking for an inexpensive video management system online, WebcamXP Pro has been frequently cited for many years. At no more than $120...
Testing Avigilon ControlCenter VMS 2010 on Mar 08, 2010
[UPDATE: This report has been replaced with Testing Avigilon ACC 5 VMS. The report below is left simply for historical purposes.] While Avigilon...
Testing Digifort's VMS (Version 6.3) on Mar 06, 2010
As video management software matures, more choices are emerging from around the globe. In the past year, we have heard increasing discussion about...
Testing LuxRiot VMS (Version 1.7) on Feb 28, 2010
As video management software matures, complaints increase about its high price. Even a small deployment of 16 cameras in a single site can cost...
Megapixel Camera Comparison 2010 on Feb 22, 2010
Megapixel cameras are clearly 'hot' - the fastest growing segment in the industry for multiple years now. Which should you use? What makes one...
Top 5 Reasons Analog Cameras are Easier to Install than IP on Jan 15, 2010
While IP has many advantages over analog, ease of installation is not one of them. IP cameras are far harder to install even if the installer has...
Testing Milestone XProtect Enterprise VMS Software (6.5f) on Dec 31, 2009
Milestone is one of the most used and well-known Video Management Software providers, with 4 VMS versions. Of them, Milestone XProtect Enterprise...
Testing Pelco's Sarix Megapixel Cameras (IXE20DN) on Dec 05, 2009
While Pelco is a leader in analog surveillance cameras, they are not even in the top 10 for 2008 global network camera sales. Pelco aims to rectify...
Testing Sanyo's HD Surveillance Camera (VCC-HD4000) on Dec 01, 2009
Sanyo is making an aggressive push into the IP video surveillance market introducing a broad line of HD cameras [link no longer available] in 2009....
Testing Basler's Megapixel Cameras (BIP-1300/1600) on Nov 29, 2009
Basler is a recent entrant into the IP video surveillance megapixel market. Leveraging its extensive expertise in machine vision [link no longer...
IP Camera 2009 Mid Year Review on Jul 26, 2009
Megapixel was the most dominant trend in IP cameras over the first half of 2009. So dominant was megapixel, that not only did most manufacturers...
Top 5 IP Camera Problems: 2009 on Jul 12, 2009
In the last year, IP cameras have made great strides and while there are still important barriers that constrain broader use, problems are...
Testing Vivotek IP7161 - 2MP MPEG-4 Camera on Jun 03, 2009
Vivotek's new 2MP camera (the IP7161) expands low-cost product options in multi-megapixel cameras. The IP7161's specification include support for...
What Differentiates Video Surveillance Products? on Apr 28, 2009
Figuring out how video surveillance products are different is a challenging task. While some products are literally the same, most of them are...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
Milestone Machine Learning Camera Auto-Setting Examined on Mar 13, 2019
Milestone wants to improve image quality using Machine Learning to solve the problem of "a camera doesn't know what it is being used for",...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Budget Covert Cameras Tested on Nov 26, 2019
Covert cameras under $100 are widely available online but are they any good? To see how these models really work in the real world, we bought...

Most Recent Industry Reports

"Hikvision Football Arena" Lithuania Causes Controversy on Jan 24, 2020
Controversy has arisen in Lithuania over Hikvision becoming a soccer team's top sponsor and gaining naming rights to their arena, with one local MP...
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...