PoE for IP Video Surveillance Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Mar 08, 2018

This guide provides comprehensive explanations of the elements in selecting and using Power Over Ethernet with IP cameras.

IPVM Image

Inside this report we cover:

  • PoE vs Low Voltage
  • When to Use PoE, When Not
  • PSEs vs PDs
  • PoE Classes
  • 802.3af vs 802.3at vs 802.3bt
  • Nonstandard PoE Implementations
  • Passive PoE
  • Spare Pairs
  • Distance Limitations
  • PoE Extenders
  • Power Consumption vs Specification
  • Calculating Power Budget
  • PoE via Switch, MidSpan or NVR
  • The Top 5 PoE Misunderstanding

PoE vs Low Voltage

All cameras need electrical power to operate.

'Power over Ethernet' (PoE) uses a single cable to connect a camera to both the data network and a power supply. In most cases, powering cameras before the advent of PoE meant using low voltage power using separate power supplies and dedicated power wiring. PoE eliminates the second cable / supply.

Using this single cable with power built into switches saves cost compared to low voltage power supplies, typically ~$10-30 per camera. See: PoE vs Low Voltage Power Supplies Cost Compared.

PoE Almost Always Used

PoE is supported and used, in practice, in almost all professional IP cameras and installations.

Exceptions To PoE Use

There are some exceptions where PoE is not used with IP cameras:

**** ***** ******** ************* explanations ** *** ******** in ********* *** ***** Power **** ******** **** IP *******.

IPVM Image

****** **** ****** ** cover:

  • *** ** *** *******
  • **** ** *** ***, When ***
  • **** ** ***
  • *** *******
  • ***.*** ** ***.*** ** 802.3bt
  • *********** *** ***************
  • ******* ***
  • ***** *****
  • ******** ***********
  • *** *********
  • ***** *********** ** *************
  • *********** ***** ******
  • *** *** ******, ******* or ***
  • *** *** * *** Misunderstanding

PoE ** *** *******

*** ******* **** ********** power ** *******.

'***** **** ********' (***) uses * ****** ***** to ******* * ****** to **** *** **** network *** * ***** supply. ** **** *****, powering ******* ****** *** advent ** *** ***** using *** ******* ***** using ******** ***** ******** and ********* ***** ******. PoE ********** *** ****** cable / ******.

***** **** ****** ***** with ***** ***** **** switches ***** **** ******** to *** ******* ***** supplies, ********* ~$**-** *** camera. ***:*** ** *** ******* Power ******** **** ********.

PoE ****** ****** ****

*** ** ********* *** used, ** ********, ** almost *** ************ ** cameras *** *************.

Exceptions ** *** ***

***** *** **** ********** where *** ** *** used **** ** *******:

[***************]

  • ***** ********:** ************ ***** ******* are ********* *** *****, cameras *** ***** ******* via ***** *** ******* power *******.
  • ***** *****:***** ******* *** ***** may ****** *** ******* power ** ****** *********** from **/***** ********* ** higher ******** ******** *** PoE.

************, **** ******* ***** only ******* *** ******** logistical ****** ** ***** edge ***** ***** *** voltage ***** ** ********. For ******** *** *******, see:******* **** *** **** Cameras.

PSEs **. ***

**** ******* ** *** specs, ***** *** *** the ************* *** *** PD **** **********. ***** are ****** ********* *** Power ******** ********* (********, midspans, ****, ***.) *** Powered ****** (*******, ****** points, ***********, ***.).

IPVM Image

************

*** ** ******* ** IEEE *********. ***** *******:

  • ***.***, ***** ** *** 'standard' *** **** ** 90%+ ** *** ** cameras, ********** ** ** 15.4W
  • ***.***, ***** ** '****' PoE **** **** ** a ***** ******** ** IP ******* **** **** more **** **.** *** up ** ***. ***.*** support ** **** ******** found / ****** **** dealing **** **** ** cameras **** ********** ******* / *******.
  • ***.***,******** ********, **** *** ********* for **** ***, **** is ****** *** ***** of **** ** *******.

PoE *******

*** ********* ******* "*******" which ******* / ******* more ********* *** **** power *** ****** ********. The ***** ***** ********** the ***** *** *******:

IPVM Image

* ****** *** ************* should ******* **** * type *** *****, *** that *********** ** ********* ignored. **** *****, *** is ******* ** '***.***' only **** ** ***** modifier, ******* **** ******** between *.** ** **.* W ** ********* ** the ******. *******, **** a ***** ** *****, it ****** ******* *** minimum *** ******* ***** available. *** *******, ** a ******* ** ***.*** Class * *****, ** can **** ******* * max ** *.* *****.

PoE ***********

**** ********** * ******* device ** * ****** or ***** ***, * negotiation ******* ******, ** which *** ****** *** switch ********* *** ******* voltage *** ******* *** determine ***** ***** **** be ****. **** ******* is *****, * ****** of **** * *** seconds, *** ********* *** observable ** *****.

IPVM Image

Wattage ***** *** *** *******

**** **** ***** **** cameras **** ***** ************ in ***** *****, **** does *** **** **** a ****** **** ** registered ** *** ****** PoE ***** ** * PSE.

*** *******, ** ** camera **** * ********* power **** ** ************ **** ***** *, but ** **** ** likely ** ** ********** as *. ***** ****** not ****** * ***** device **** ********* ** a ******** ***** ****** it ** ****** ** spec ******, *** **** then, ********** ** ******* as **** ******* *** simply ********** ** * by ***.

Class * ********* ******

********** ** ****** ***********, many ******* *** ********** as ***** * (*** of **.**) ** ***. Because ** ****, ******** may ******** **** ***** than ** ********. ** if * ** ******* requiring ** **** (*** total) *** ********* ** a ****** **** * 60W ***** ****** *** classified ** ***** *, cameras *** *** *** power ** ** *** cycle *****. *******, **** is *** ****** *** case, **** **** ******** ignoring ***** *** ****** allocating ***** ***** ** actual ****.

Higher *****: ***.*** ******** ** ****

** **** **** *********** class ** *** (***.***) ***** ******** ** ********* of ****. **** ******** ******** a ******* ** *** able ** ******* *** watts ** *** ****** by ***** *** **** pairs ** * ******** cable, * ***** ** cover ** ***** ** the **** *******.

IPVM Image

***** *** ******** ** more **** ******** ***.*** wattage ** ******** ****, using ** *** ************ gear *** *** ** necessary, ** **** ** cameras ******* **** **** 10W. ******* ****** ********** ***.*** ****** ** be ******** *******, ********** motor ***********, *** **** powered ********** *******. *** more ***************** **** *** ***.*** report.

Proprietary ***

*** *** ******* ******** to ** *** *** the ***.***/** *********. ******* manufacturers **** ******** *********** variants ***** ***** ****** wattages, **** *******'* ********* ***(***) *********'* *******(***).

** **** *****, *********** PoE *************** **** **** with *********-***** *******, ** an ***.*** ****** *** be ********* ** * UPoE ******, *** *******. In ***** ********, ********* compatibility ** *** **********. Users ****** ****** ***** this ************* ****** ********** equipment.

Passive ***

** ******** ** *** 802.3af/at/bt *********, **** ******* use **-****** "*******" ***, which ******* ** ** 24 *** **** ***** cable ***** **** ** negotiation ******* **** ** standards ***** ***. ***** is ******** ** ***** pairs ******* *** ****** "requests" ** ** ***.

** **** *****, ******* devices *** ****** ******* PoE ******* *****. *******, those ***** *** *** specified ** *** *** be *******. ******* ** this, ** ** *** recommend ***** ******* *** unless *** ****** ********** specifies **.

******* *** ** **** common ** ******** *********, such ********************, *** *** ****** in ** *******.

Alternative * **. *********** *

*** ** ******** **** different **** ********* ** the ***** ****** ****, referred ** ** ************ A *** *.

  • *********** * *** ******* power ** *** **** pairs **** *** **** (pins *, *, *, and *) **** *** remaining *** ***** ******
  • *********** * ******* ***** on ****** ***** (**** 4, *, *, *** 8)

IPVM Image

**** ************ ******* ****-***** which ***** *** **** to ****** *****. **** PoE ******* *** '********* A ** * ********' and **** **** ******* issue ***** ****** **** of ******. *******, **** devices **** **** * minority ** ********** (**:**** *** *********) ** ********* **** specific. (*** *** ** Type * *** ****.)

***** *** ****** ***** of **** **** ********* to ******* ********* (**:***/*** **** ** *), ***** ********* ****** the * **** *****, not *** ***** *****. Regardless ** ***** ****** standard ** ****, ** power ******* *** ******* comply **** *** ***.***/** spec, ***** *********** **** be **** ** *** same ***.

Distance ***********

*** ** *********** ******* to *** **** **** distance ********** ** ** non-PoE ******** *******. **** being ******* ** *** cable **** **** *** degrade ****** *** ***** drops ***** **** *** standard **********.

****** ****, ***** *** two ******* ******* *** extended ****** ***: ********* and *********** **** ****** PoE.

PoE *********

*** ************ ********* **** than ****, *** ********* are *********. *********, **** are ***** ** ******** for **** ******, **** power ******** ** *** headend ****. *** ********* often ******* **** ** even ** ** **** total ********.

IPVM Image

*** ********* **** ** price, *** ********* **** for $***-*** ***. *** more, ******* ** ****** *** Options: *****, *** ********* and *** ********.

Proprietary ******** ***

**** ************* **** ******** NVRs *** ******** ***** allow ****** *** *********, as **** ** ***-****. This ** ********* ******** by ***** ****** ******** (70-80VDC) ** ******* ********** ****** ****** *********.

**** **** ***** ******** are *** ************ *** are ********* ** **** only ****** * ***** manufacturer's ******* **** (******* ******* **** ******* NVRs, *** *******). ***** standard ******* ** ***** configured *** ******** *** may ***** ****** ** the ******.

Typical *** *********** ** *************

**** ** ****** ************ publishes ************** *** ***** draw ** ******** ** whether ** *** *** camera ******** ***. **** is ********* ******* *** much ***** ***** *** need ** **** ** all ******* *** '*******' 802.3af ***, ***** **** can ***** **** ** low ** * ***** to ** **** ** 15. ** * ******* rule ** *****, ***** IP ******* ********* ******* about * - * watts ** *****.

** ****** ***** ************** are ********* ****** **** what ** ******** ******** by *** ******, ** verified ** ***** ****** *** ***** Consumption ****.

Calculating ***** ******

******** ** ******* *** typically ******* ** * single ******. ** ****, one ***** ** ***** and *** ** *** individual ***** ************ ** cameras ** ***'* ******. For *******, *** *** cameras ***** ***** *** power ****, *** *** switch ** **** ** supply **** *** *****. Because ** ****, *** camera **** *** ***** up ** **** ***** power **********.

IPVM Image

PoE *** ****** ** ******* ** ***

*** ** ********* ******** in *** ** ***** ways:

  • **** * ******* ****** that ******** ***
  • *** * *** ********* in ****** **** *** cable ****** * ******* injector
  • **** ** *** **** an ******** *** ******

*** ******* ****** **, by ***, *** **** common ******** *** ********* PoE *****. *** ******* is **** **** **** often ****** ** ********* by **** ** ** allows ********** ****** ********* and ******* **** ******* / *** *****. ***:***: ****** **. ******* Usage

Switch ******

**** *** *** ** PoE ****** ** **** areas, ******* ******** **** offer *** ** *** difficult.

*******, **** ****** ** taken ** ******* ***** is ********* ** *** switch *****. ********** ** lower-end ** ******** ****** gear, ** ** ****** to ****** *** ** one ** **** *** available *****, *** *** them ***:

IPVM Image

**** '************' ******** *** only ******* ***** ***** that ** **** ** what ** ****** *** full ***.*** *******. *** example, ** **** ******** often ******* ** ***** watts ** *** *****, which ** ********** ** 7.5 * *** ****. If *** *** ** cameras ** *** ** ports, **** *** *** require **** ** ***** total.

** **** *****, ******* can ******** ** ******* and ** ******** *** a '***' ****** ****, in ****, ** **** the ****** ** ******* off ***** ******* ** does *** **** ********** power ** ******* *** cameras (****** ***** *********** **** *******). *** a ****** *******, **** switches ***** '****' *** power ** *** *****. In *** ** **** switch *******, **** ***** be *** ***** (*.*., 15W * **).

********

*** ***** ******, ******* power *********, *** **** commonly ****.

*******, **** *** ** the ***** ****** ** applications ***** *** ******* are ******* *** ***** a ***-*** ******* ******* exists.

*** *******, ** * cameras *** ********, *** only *** ** ***.***, it *** ** **** cost ********* ** *** a ***** ***** ***.*** switch *** * ****** 802.3at ********.

IPVM Image

PoE ******** ****

**** **** **** *** switches ***** **, ***** has ****** ******** ****** *** ***** systems. *** **** ******* of ***** ***** ** simplicity, ***** ****** / connecting ** * ******** PoE ****** ** **********.

IPVM Image

**** **** ***** ****** be ********** ******* **** calculating ***** ****** *** use **** *** ****, as ***** ***** ***** support **** ***** ***** classes ** *** ***** and *** *** ******* 802.3at.

Top * *** *****************

** *** ****** **** IP ********** ******, ** include *** ** * core ********** *******. **** the ****** ** ******* sessions, ******* ********* *** asked ** ******** ** a ******* *****. **** they ***:

  1. *** * ************ ****** PoE ******* ** ***** midspans & ******** ********?
  2. **** **** **** ******* max ***** *******?
  3. *** * ***** ******* into * ****, *** not * ****** *********** me ** ** * safety ******?
  4. *** *** *** *** travel ** *****?
  5. **** ******* ***** ***** supplies ** ******* ** also ******** **** **** PoE *****?

** *** ******** *****, we ****** **** ********.

Question: "*** * ************ ****** *** ******* ** ***** ******** & ******** ********?"

******: **. *** ******* of ******* ***** *** generally ******** * *********** process ***** * ****** identifies *** ******** *** power **** * ****** like * ****** ** midspan ********. ******* ***** source ******* ** *** request ***** **** ********* sources, **** ** *** themselves ******* *** *** power. ** **** ***, the '****' *** ******* to *** ***** ** done ** *** ****** nearest ** *** *** powered ****** ** ******** device.

** ****** **** ******** in ****** ******* **** ****** Tested****** *** ******** *** mechanics ** **** ******.

Question: "**** **** **** ******* *** ***** *******?

******: ** ** *** guaranteed. ***** * **** may ** ***** ** deliver *** *******, (**: 15.4W *** ***.*** ** 60W *** ***.***) *** ability ** *** *** to ******* ** ******* on *** ***** ****** of *** ****** *** maximum ********* ***** *********. In **** *****, ****** outpaces ******, ******* *********** issues ** ******** ********** for *** *******.

*** *******, **** ******** grade *** ****** (****** **-*******) *** *** ********* output *****:

IPVM Image

*** *** *** ***** available ** *** ****** is ***. **** * PoE *****, **** *** power ** ******* ******* each, **: *** / 4 ***** = **.*** per ****. *******, *** max *** ***** ********* per **** ** ***** at **.** *** ***.*** to **.* * * 4 = **.**. *** difference ******* ******* **** specifications *** *** ****** power ********* ** *** switch ** * **** 8.6W. **** ***** ** we *** * ******* that ******** *** ****, the ***** ****** ***** be *********.

Question: "*** * ***** ******* **** * ****, *** *** * ****** *********** ** ** ** * ****** ******?"

******: **. *** ** the ******* *********** *******, PoE ***** ** *** actively ****** ****** * connected ****** ******** **. This ***** **** * cable ********* ** * PSE ** *** '***********' at *** ***** ******* in ** * *** device *** **** *** present * ****** ****** because ** ********** *******.

Question: "*** *** *** *** ****** ** *****?"

******: *** ******* **** described ** *** ******** IEE802.3 ******** ******* ***** extenders ** ***** *****. By ******, ***** **** extend ** *** ** any ******* ****** ***** can ** *********. ** reality, **** ******* ****** is **** *******, *** our** ****** **** ******** Ethernet ****, ***** **** *** voltages **** ******** * full ****' **** **** the ******, ****** *** point *** **** ***** travel ** *** **** connected *****.

***** *** ** ***** for *** *** ***** distance, *** ******** ******* than **** **** *** meet ******** *********, *** additional ******* **** *** be ********* *** *** void ******* ********** ** used.

Question: "**** ******* ***** ***** ******** ** ******* ** **** ******** **** **** *** *****?"

******: *** ******, *** beware. ** **** *****, cameras ** ***** *** devices **** *** ******* power **** **** ********* from * *** ** the ****** ** ******* receiving ***** **** * low-voltage ***** ******. *******, especially **** ***** *** devices, ************ *** **** against ***** **** ** the **** ** ******** the ******.

** *******, **** ** not ** ***** **** newer *******, *** *** disclaimers ******* **** ********* should ** ******** ******.

Test **** *********

**** ***** ******** *******

Comments (30)

I have found that a lot of devices which are PoE will also have no issues with a 12v supply connected at the same time as PoE. (only from own checking of devices)

Whilst it's not really needed, and why should it be, perhaps there is some value in having maybe a critical device have a fallback supply if the PoE is accidentally turned off. or some nugget unplugs a device by mistake from the Switch.

At least you won't need to wait for the device to come back online with the PoE re-instated.

Startup time for old IP cameras use to be quite long, this has improved with newer solutions, but it does seem to take like more time when you are waiting for it to appear on the NVR display!

 

I like PoE only, so I can reboot cameras from a CLI or GUI. Now if the power supply could be faulted when taking a command that would be awesome if the camera manufacturer could incorporate that.

I seem to remember earlier Arecont cameras, circa 2010, had a dip switch to set for either POE or 12V power, and they warned against having 12V powered cameras connected to POE, but my memory may be fuzzy.

Great guide! It covers things I never though of.

Thank you for your work!

Did I misread?  Or maybe I've always had this wrong.  I've always known the standards to be as follows:

Standard 15.4w

POE +  30w

Hi POE  60w 

That is what I thought too

UI3 - The first two are standards, but the last is yet to be ratified. High PoE and PoE+ have been used to describe anything over 15.4 for years.  A more specific name for 60w PoE is PoE++ (or UPoE for Cisco gear)

Yes, have just started to notice the PoE++ designation for Hi POE.  My experience is in the Axis world which was always POE+ for 30w and Hi Poe for 60w.  Going by memory which is getting more and more suspect.  Good information to know...

Can a cable plugged into a port, but not a camera electrocute me or be a safety hazard?"

Answer: No. Due to the initial negotiation process, PoE power is not actively issued unless a connected device requests it. This means that a cable connected to a PSE is not 'electrified' at all until plugged in to a PoE device and will not present a safety danger because of incidental contact.

In the most common of implementations, this “negotiation” consists of nothing more than the PSE sending out a short pulse and measuring the load for a signature (passive) resistance of the device.

Pro Tip: Just keep your body’s resistance over 25 Ohms ;)

 

 

However, some devices with only a minority of connectors (ie: Axis M12 connector) as Alternate Type specific. (The M12 is Type B PoE only.)

The M12 is actually Type A; since the connector is only four wires it has no choice but to share with the data pairs.

In some cases, powered devices may handle passive PoE without issue. However, those which are not specified to use may be damaged. Because of this, we do not recommend using passive PoE unless the device explicitly specifies it.

Passive PoE is most common in wireless equipment, such as Ubiquiti or Mikrotik, but not common in IP cameras.

Also, passive POE @ ~48V can be found on many (older) midspan injectors.  Since they provide an 802.3af level voltage, (sans negotiation), they can be used without fear of damaging actual 802.3.af gear.

Question regarding distance on PoE:

Paige Game Changer cable (22 gauge instead of 23 Cat6) is supposed to send data up to 200m... does that mean that PoE running on the same data cable would travel the same distance due to the larger gauge? We are looking in to using them for an upcoming video surveillance contract and want to make sure we’re specing this in properly without having to using injectors, creating another potential point of failure. 

My 2 cents, ask the cable manufacturer. I doubt they are following an official certification spec because I never heard of one that goes beyond 100 meters for 8 conductor twisted pair Ethernet, so I would put it on them to say if it would work or not. After all, they are the ones who has to stand behind it. I think it'd be pure speculation on anyone's part here unless they have used the product in the past. Even if it they have, I think (unless I'm wrong) it's still a not based on an industry spec.

NOTE: I'm not an electrician but I play one on the internet.

Whenever you increase the size of your conductor you decrease resistance, so a larger gauge cable will carry current further and have less voltage drop. However you're only going up one gauge size here. Every three gauges your wire doubles or halves in cross sectional area (i.e. 20 ga is twice as thick as 23 ga).

23 ga wire has a resistance of 20.3074 Ω/1000 ft while 22 ga wire has a resistance of 16.1045 Ω/1000 ft. You're definitely gaining something with the extra gauge size but you'd need to work out the power draw of the device and the voltage drop of the cable over that distance. Google it, calculators for this sort of thing abound.

Pro tip: the +3 gauge size also works when simply twisting conductors together. If you have 24 ga CAT5 and you combine two conductors together, you now have the electrical equivalent of a 21 ga wire. Put four conductors together and it's the equivalent of an 18 ga wire. Twist all four pairs into one giant conductor and it is equivalent to a 15 ga wire. In a pinch, you can use various wires this way to effectively carry more current than they were intended for at the expensive of conductor count. If you have the ability to run the proper spec cable however, obviously do so.

NOTE: I'm not a comedian but I play one on the internet.

I am teaching my newly GF electronics-101 and she can attest that the increased size of a 1 conductor does not decrease the resistance, she does however agree that the larger gauge carries more current without the voltage drop.

/wave @IPVM (future ex-wife).

that's a lot of writing about the gauges and ohms. The formula i fairly simple, we learnt it in grade 9 if I'm not mistaken: 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + .... + 1/RX, where RX are resistances of your conductors and R is a result for twisted cable.

So, if you have two 23ga 1000ft wires (you said it's 20 Ohm and I believe you), your twisted wire would be 1/R=1/20+1/20. R=10 Ohm. If you use four of those, your R=5 Ohm.

Just measure the single-wire resistance, and calculate how many cables you need to get the acceptable total

CAT6A from certain manufacturers (Belden being one) tends to have 22 gauge conductors. We're having one hell of a time finding male RJ45 connectors to fit. Yes, I know many say to terminate the camera end with a jack and use a patch cable to the camera but that is just not possible in many situations. In particular, we're installing some cameras outdoors on 4x4 metal fence posts. There is absolutely no way to run a terminated cable either through the post or through the 3/4" conduit between the pull boxes and the posts.

Who makes connectors that can accommodate heavier gauge wires, especially the direct burial CAT6A used on this job?

CAT6A from certain manufacturers (Belden being one) tends to have 22 gauge conductors.

Little known irony, a 22 gauge conductor at gig Ethernet speeds, carries almost all its current on the very edge of the cable...

Little known irony, a 22 gauge conductor at gig Ethernet speeds, carries almost all its current on the very edge of the cable...

 

So many U#4s!

Great article I'm learning a great deal thanks

I recently received an ad for a Bertek product and found some great material on their website including a detailed explanation of:

802.3af/at/bt

http://www.berktek.us/eservice/US-en_US/navigate_329398_4896_40_15350/Power_over_Ethernet_How_it_Works.html

 

 

Coming from a microwave internet background, I have a question about reversing polarity.

Are there any camera manufacturers that do reverse the polarity on their POE? 

In the microwave radio world there are a few manufactures that do.  So I had a chart of model numbers and pinouts to keep from burning up devices.  I've been searching and can't find anything, so I'm hoping they all use the standard in the camera world.

You raise an interesting question.  I'll look into the particulars of why this isn't an issue, but I have not heard about polarity reversal being an issue and burning devices up.

I expect in order to be IEE802.3af/at/bt, et al compliant, devices must observe defined polarity per spec, but I'll look deeper into this.

yes, the spec mentions a polarity:

though in practice, as far as I recall, it doesn’t matter because there are always bridge rectifiers on input to sort it:

That's interesting.  Do you know if the rectifiers are required on the PD side per the IEEE PoE specs?

I think that technically only “polarity protection” is required for “af”, like this article shows, diodes are just the most common implementation.  

Thank you, Brian.

I'll keep looking and post here as well.

here’s some work i did on this, after i found a switch with reverse poe polarity:

Does This Switch Comply With 802.3 POE?

 

Great info

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,366 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...
Solar-Powered, Smart-Phone-Based Access Kit (VIZPin) Examined on Nov 02, 2018
Cloud-based access control company VIZPin is releasing a solar-powered and smart phone based access control system for gates and other remote...
Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
IP Network Hardware for Surveillance Guide on May 02, 2018
Video surveillance systems depend on IP networking equipment. In this guide, we explain the key pieces of equipment and features, explaining where...
PoE Powered Access Control Tutorial on Jan 19, 2018
Powering access control with Power over Ethernet is becoming increasingly common.  However, access requires more power than cameras, and the...
NVRs - Embedded vs Separate PoE Switch (Statistics) on Dec 21, 2017
Many NVRs now offer PoE switches embedded, allowing IP cameras to be connected directly to the recorder. On the plus side, these units can...
STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Dec 20, 2017
For many video system designers, deciding which ethernet cabling to use is a quick decision: go with the cheapest. However, this overlooks the...
5 Most Common PoE Questions on Feb 02, 2017
In our IPVM IP Networking course, Power Over Ethernet (PoE) is a core component that students show significant interest in. The top ones...
VLANs for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Sep 26, 2016
Many people confidently say to 'use VLANs' as an answer to IP video networking problems and as a way to signal expertise. But how should VLANs be...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...