17,000 Cameras in Korea Wasted?

By John Honovich, Published May 08, 2013, 12:00am EDT (Info+)

A Korean newspaper bemoans the waste of money spent on 17,000 surveillance cameras. The cause? "97 percent [of cameras] are unable to distinguish the faces of people or license plates of cars entering the grounds." While this may sound bad, the rationale used and specifics claimed misunderstands key surveillance technologies.

Let's first review the claims / asssumptions the newspaper makes:

  • "[**** ** *******] ******* ******* ** ****, and *** ***** *** **** ***,*** of **** ** **,*** *******, ** an ******* ** **** *** **** school."
  • "** ***** * ****** **** * resolution ** **** **** ***,*** ******" to *********** ***** ** ******* ******
  • "* ******** ****** **** * ***,***-***** resolution ***** ****,*** [~$*** ***], *** one **** ***,*** ***** ****** ****,*** [~$300 ***], *** *** ***** *** rises ** **-* ******* [$*,*** -$*,*** USD] *** **** * ******* ******. But **** ** * ***** ***** paying ** ******* ***** ***** ** a *** ** ****** *** *****." [Note: * ** = ~**** ***]
  • "** ******* ** *** *,*** ******* the *** ******* **** **** ******* that **** *** ***** *** ** are ******* ** ***** ** ***** obstacles"
  • "*** *** ** ***** ** ******* put *** ******** ** *** ***** watchman's **** ** **** ***** *** be ****** ****** *** ***."
  • "******** ** *** ******* ******** **** have **** ***** ** **** ******* safer, ********* ******** ********, ****** ******* and ********* ********, *** ***** **** CCTV ******* *** *** **** *********."

********

***** *** **** ******* *** **** criticisms **** - ********** **** ******* being ****** ********** *** ********* *** properly *** ** *** **/* *******. Basic ****** ***** *** *** ****** easily ******* ****.

*** ********* ****** *** *** ********. While **** ****** ****, ***** ** no ***** ****** **** ******* ***** or ******* ****** **** ** ***************. It ******* ** ****** *** *** ********. **** **** * million ******, *** *********'* *********** ******, even ** * **** **** ********, 25 **** **** ***** ** *** most *** ***** ****** (******** ** aggressive *****). **** ***** ***** *** ** enough *** ******* **** *** ****** indoor *****.

************, *** ******* ************* *** **** to ******* - **** *** ********** that * *** ******* ** *** or **** **** ** ** ** (i.e., ***,*** *****) ***. *****, *** prices *** *** ****** **** ** being * ****** **** ** ***** (see*****'* ******* ************'* ****** ** *********). ** ****, ************* *** *** MP ******* ****** ** *** ****** than **** *****.

*******, *** *********** **** ***, ** even ****, ******* *** ******* ****** details *** ******* ***** ******* ** troublesome. **** **** ****** ********** ******* that ****** *** ***** *** ********** of ******* **********, ** *** ***** years **** **** ***** **** ** capture **** ******* ** ****** ***** spot ** ****** ********** **** *******.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports