Super Low Light HD Lens Tested

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 26, 2015

A smaller F-number can make a big difference in how much light reaches an imager.

For example, the difference even between a f/1.2 and f/1.0, which may seem very close, can be significant, as shown by our F-Stop Calculator:

However, almost all megapixel cameras use lenses of at least f/1.2, with many at f/1.4 and even some lower cost ones at f/1.8 or higher.

We recently bought a F/0.95 6MP rated lens from Hikvision (the HV0733D-6MP). This lens is huge, shown below in the middle surrounded by 'normal' size megapixel surveillance lenses:

We tested this lens on three cameras from Axis, Arecont, and Samsung, ranging from 720p to 5MP, to see what differences, if any, existed between this super low F number lens and typical megapixel lenses.

* ******* *-****** *** **** * *** ********** ** *** much ***** ******* ** ******.

*** *******, *** ********** **** ******* * */*.* *** */*.*, which *** **** **** *****, *** ** ***********, ** ***** by ****-**** **********:

*******, ****** *** ********* ******* *** ****** ** ** ***** */*.*, with **** ** */*.* *** **** **** ***** **** **** at */*.* ** ******.

** ******** ****** * */*.** *** ***** **** **** ********* (the *******-***). **** **** ** ****, ***** ***** ** *** middle ********** ** '******' **** ********* ************ ******:

** ****** **** **** ** ***** ******* **** ****, *******, and *******, ******* **** **** ** ***, ** *** **** differences, ** ***, ******* ******* **** ***** *** * ****** lens *** ******* ********* ******.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

  • *** */*.** **** ******** *** ***** *********** ** *** ******* tested, *******, *** ***** ** *********** *** ********* ******, ********** relative ** *** ***** ** *********** ********* ***** *******.
  • ** *** ***** *** *** ******* ******, ******* **** ******** at ***** ***** ****** ***** *** */*.** ******** ** ***** lenses.
  • ** *** ***** *** ***** **** ***** (**** */*.* ****), digital ***** *** *******, ********* ******* *********, ****** ***** ********** was **** ******** ********* ******* ******.
  • **** ****** ******** **** *** ** ** ***** *** ********** or ********* *********.

*******

*** *******-*** *** * ****** ***** ****** $***. **** ** significantly **** ********* **** ******* *-* ********* ***** ******, ********* in *** ***** **$***.

***************

** ******** **** *** ***** *********** ** ******** *** ****** is ** *****, *** */*.** *** ******* ******** *********** ** ****** at ***** ****** ***** * ***, ********** ** ******* ***** and **.

***** ****** ** ******* **** ********* ********** *** *** ******* using **** ****, ** *** ********* **** ******** ** ******** lenses *** ******* * ****** *******. 

Physical ****

*** ********* */*.** **** ** **** ****** **** ******* ********* rated ******, ****** ****** ** **** ******** *** ******. **** size *** ** * ********* ***** **** **** ****** ********, as *** **** *** ******** *** ****** *** ****** *** fit ** ******* **********. ************, ** **** *******, ********** *** be * *******.

Low ***** *********** ***********

** ****** *** */*.** ********* **** ** ***** ******* ** low ***** ****** ******* **** *.** ** *.* *** ** show *********** ******* ***** ****** *** *** *** ***** *****. We ****** * ***** ** *******, **** **** ** *** resolution ** *** *********** *** **** *****:

******* ****** ************

*****, ** ****** *** *******-*** **** * *** ******* ****** AV5115DNAIv1, * *********** **** *** ***** *********, **** * **** F/1.8 *-**** **** (*** *****-**). ***** *** * **** **********, ** *** *** *** ********* **** ****** *.** **** light **** *** ******* *****.

** ~*.** ***, *** ********** ******* *** *** ****** ** clear, **** *** ****** ********* ** ***** ***** *** */*.** lens, ***** ** ****** ****** *** ******** ***** *** ******* recommended *****-** **** (*/*.*). ** ~*.** ***, *********** *** **** clear, **** *** ****** **** ** ****** *** ***** ***** the */*.** ****, *** ** ******* *** ********. ** ~*.** lux, ***** ****** *** *** *** ** ******* * ****** image **** ****** ****.

**** *****

*** **** ***** ***** **** * *** ***** */*.* ****, able ** **** **** ***** **** *** ***** ** *** F/0.95.

** *** **** *****, *** ********** ** ***** ***** ** ~0.67 *** ~*.** *** ** *****, **** ****** ******* ** both ******* *** ***** ******** **** ***** *** */*.** ****. At **** *** ***** ******, *** */*.** **** ***** ******** better ***** **********, *** *** ***** ** *** **** *** noise ****** *** **** ** ******* ******* ** *** *******.

******* ***-****

*******, *** ******* ***-**** **** * ************ *********** */*.* *-**** lens.

** *** ******* ***-****, ******* *** **** ********** *** ** the ****** * ******* ** *** ******, ** **** ** the ******'* ********* *** ***** ***********. *** **** ********** **** at *** ***** ****** ** ******* ******* *****. ** ~*.** lux *** ~*.**, ******* ******* *** **** ****** ** ******* using *** */*.** ****

Comments (8)

It makes sense to evaluate it in night mode, but some cameras claim good low light performance in color (day mode) as well. Will you test these lenses in color as well?

Thanks Ethan. Could you clarify one thing? You said:

A smaller F-number can make a big difference in how low light reaches an imager.

...the difference even between a f/1.2 and f/1.0, which may seem very close, can be significant.

But this seems at odds with the information in the f-stop tutorial:

Small differences in F numbers (e.g., f/1.2 vs f/1.4) generally do not impact low light performance significantly.

Is there a subtle distinction I'm missing?

Yes, statement #1 talks about how much light reaches the imager. Statement #2 refers to how much it impacts performance. Two Different things.

Consider statement #3 inside the report, weighing both:

"The F/0.95 lens improved low light performance of all cameras tested, however, the level of improvement was typically modest, especially relative to the level of theoretical increased light passing."

Two Different things.

Let's just talk performance then.

This article says "modestly improving performance"

The tutorial says "not significantly impacting performance"

In this test, we tested F/0.95 vs lenses up to F/1.8, which is much larger than the example we gave in the tutorial, quote "f/1.2 vs f/1.4".

Would be interesting to see a depth of field comparison or calculation of the lenses as well.

John, does the fact that the Hik lens and the Computar lens have different formats have to be considered? The Computar is listed as a 1/2.7" and the Hik is listed as a larger 1 1/8" format.

This means the diameter of the image circle formed by the lenses is different. For the Computar looks to be around 6.6mm, whereas the Hik should be around 9mm. The 5004's sensor is a 1/3" or 6mm diagonal, so although using a lens with a 1 1/8" format lens is possible, it wastes much more of the light passed by the lens, than the 1/2.7" format:

I didn't look up the other sensor sizes, I just wanted to throw this out for discussion and see if it makes any sense first.

Correction: Format type should read 1/1.8", not 1 1/8".

Relative sizes and sizes in mm are unaffected.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Course Winter 2019 - Last Chance on Jan 24, 2019
Today, Thursday Jan 24th is the last chance to register for the Winter 2019 Camera Course. This is the only independent surveillance camera...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
Axis Tailgate Detection Tested on Jan 04, 2019
Axis is aiming to tackle tailgating, one of access control's biggest issues, with the Tailgating Detector ACAP application. This camera app claims...
Amazon Rekognition Facial Detection Tested on Dec 03, 2018
Amazon's Rekognition service has announced improvements, that if accurate, would be a significant advance over conventional facial detection. In...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Camera Course January 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...
Intersec 2019 Show Report on Jan 23, 2019
The 2019 Intersec show, held annually in Dubai, is now complete. IPVM attended for 3 days, interviewing numerous Chinese and Western video...
2019 Camera Book Released on Jan 22, 2019
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Milesight Company Profile on Jan 22, 2019
Milesight Technology, a Chinese company building an International branded business, says they are slowly building their presence through a series...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have become core features of video surveillance systems, as virtually all professional IP cameras integrate with...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact