Sued For Not Having Enough Surveillance

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 05, 2013

When someone is attacked on private property, how responsible is the venue? In past US cases, decisions have varied. Sometimes the courts find owners responsible for failing to take basic precautions, in others they decided it is not a contributing factor to an attack

One prominent California court case is frequently used as a justification for why more surveillance is critical but the final outcome has never been reported. We investigated, talking to a lawyer involved about what happened when a woman sued a mall and its security company for insufficient surveillance after a violent attack.

**********

* ***** *** *******, *** *** ******** ********** ** ** attempted ********** ** * *** ***** **** ******* ****. *** then **** **** *** **** *** *** ******** ******* *** **********. * ****** ************ ****** ******** *** ********* *** ****** *** *** ******* *** ******* ********. * guard *** **** ** *** ****, ** **** ** *** 30 ****** ******, **** ** *** ******** ****. * *** was ******** *** *** ***** *** ********** ** ******** ************, but *** ****************** *** **** ** ********.

*******, *** ****** *** ****** *** *********** ***** ****** **** crimes. *** **** **** *** **** ****** **** ********* ******** cameras *** *******. *** ********** ****** ***** *** ** *** they ***** **** ******** *** ******* ****** *** *********** *** that *** ******** ** ***** *** ********** *** **** *** location *** *** ***** ** ****** ********* ** *** ****.

Court *******In 2009, a superior court judge ruled in favor of the defendants, agreeing that an attack was not foreseeable. However, in March 2011, an appeals court ***** *** **** ****** ** ******* ** *****. *** **** *** **** ***** ********** *** ** *** headlines.

Here’s **** ******** ***** **** ****** 

* ****** ****** ****** *** ***** *** **** ******* *** an *********** *** (* ********** *********). *** **** ******* *** ******** ******* *** ***** ** January **** *** **** *** ** ***** ***** *** * verdict, **** *** *********’* ******,**********

*********** ** ******* *** **** *** ******** ******* ***** ** found ********* ******* **** ** ****** *** ************ ****, *** jurors **** ******** ** *** ******** ******* ** *** ************ video. **** ***** *** ******* **** **** ***** *** ***** used ** ******* *** ****, ** ****. 

** *** ********, *** ********* **** ** * **-* ********. Only *** ****** **** *** ******** ******* *** *********.************ *********** *** ****** *** ***** **** **** *** * hard **** ********* **** **** ************ ******* ** *** ******* lot ***** **** **** *** ****** **** *********, ****** *** attack ******** ** * ******'* **** ** *****.

IPVM ********

**** **** ** ********** **** ***** ** ********* ** **** seen *** *** ****** ****** ************. *** *** ****** ***** is *** ********* **** **** ************ ***** **** ********* ** stopped *** *****.

** **** *** ******* ***** ** * ****** **********: ** * **** *******, * ******** ******** ****** ********** about *** *** ***** *******, *** ***** **** *** ********* liability ** ***** ******* *** *** ** ** **** ** that ** * ****** '****-***-****' ****** ** ***** ********** ***** ** ******* ** ********* ********. Indeed, **** ******* ** *** ****** ** *** '**** ***** a ***********'***** ******.

***** **** ***** ***** ********* *** * ******* ******** **** *** ***** ********** surveillance ******* ****** *** ************ ** ***. * ******** **** after *** ******* **** *** *********** *** *** ******* *** difference ************** ******* **** **** ************ ** ******* -- * ******* sum. ******* ** *** *** ***** **** *****, *** ***** did *** **** *** ************ ** ** * ***** ****** noting, "* ****** ***** *** **** ********* *** ***** ******* the ***** ******** **** ***** ****** ***** **** *******."

Comments (3)

Thanks for the articles on legal cases. Please post more as you find them, especially where most media coverage drops off.

Nice job on researching the information for this article. It's very useful to keep in mind the potential liability for not having sufficient security but as your article aptly points out, security cameras in and of themselves cannot actually prevent a crime from happening. They can however, be useful to assist law enforcement in solving crimes and for loss prevention and asset recovery, so it pays to keep a modern, well-maintained security camera system.

Of course visible CCTV cameras are likely to act as a detterrent. Therefore a crime maybe prevented before it is committed if the criminal fears detection after he has committed an offence. if premises have poor systems, this information can easily leak out and spur criminals to chance their luck I always think it's worth having a public monitor demonstrating the quality of the CCTV to ensure no one thinks it's a dummy system or significantly poor quality.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Nortek Sues SDS, Battle Over Unpaid Bill and Cancelled Lines on Aug 13, 2018
Nortek and SDS legal battle continues. As IPVM reported, SDS sued Nortek alleging bribery and antitrust violation. However, Wave fired back at SDS,...
Axis / Avigilon Legal Battle Rises on Aug 09, 2018
In what is shaping up to be high-powered, will-not-back-down battle, Axis and Avigilon are squaring off in multiple legal contests. In 2017, IPVM...
Struggling Ascent Hiding Under Brinks on Aug 07, 2018
The market cap of Brinks Home Security, Monitronics, MONI, Ascent Capital Group (whatever one calls them) is down 96% over the past 5 years as the...
US Congress Passes Bill Banning Dahua and Hikvision on Aug 02, 2018
The bill banning US government use of Dahua and Hikvision products has been passed by both chambers of Congress (House vote, Senate vote). The US...
Wave Retorts: SDS 'Desperate' And 'Defeated' on Aug 01, 2018
Distributor SDS has sued Nortek and distributor Wave Electronics alleging bribery, conspiracy, antitrust violations and violations of state laws...
Milestone / Canon Spinout Arcules Cloud Launch on Jul 30, 2018
Canon and Milestone's VSaaS Startup spinoff Arcules launched their platform at Google Cloud Next. IPVM spoke with CEO Andreas Pettersson about the...
Eagle Eye Networks Cloud VMS Tested on Jul 26, 2018
Eagle Eye has become one of the most significant players in the industry in the past few years: Eagle Eye's Owner Acquired Brivo Eagle Eye...

Most Recent Industry Reports

2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...
Hikvision IP Camera Critical Vulnerability 2018 Disclosed on Aug 16, 2018
The same day that the US government passed a prohibition on Hikvision cameras, Hikvision disclosed a critical vulnerability for its IP...
ISS VMS / Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 16, 2018
Who is ISS? In the past few months, they had one of the craziest ISC West promo items in years. Then, they hired industry veteran and ex-Dahua...
Chinese OEM Avycon Gets ADI Push on Aug 15, 2018
Who is Avycon? An American company? A Korean company? A couple of guys relabelling Chinese products? The latter is the best explanation. While...
Backboxes for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Aug 15, 2018
Backboxes are a necessity in surveillance, whether for managing cable whips, recessing cameras, adding wireless radios. But it can be confusing to...
Genetec Stratocast / Comcast 'Motion Insights' Examined on Aug 15, 2018
Comcast recently announced "SmartOffice Motion Insights", an extension to their Genetec OEMed cloud video service (covered by IPVM here). This...
SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Ban of Dahua and Hikvision Is Now US Gov Law on Aug 13, 2018
The US President has signed the 2019 NDAA into law, banning the use of Dahua and Hikvision (and their OEMs) for the US government, for US...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact