Destroyed Surveillance Footage, Court Approves

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 02, 2014

All is not always lost if surveillance footage from a crime is unavailable for the trial. If enough people have seen the video before it goes missing then their testimony is admissible in lieu of having the actual tape in court ... at least that is what an appellate judge affirmed this week in Washington State. In this note, we examine the case and whether or not it should have been thrown out.

Background

Two men were charge and convicted of a 2009 burglary of a Toys R Us store. The state’s case against the two men centered around at surveillance video that purported to show the men committing the crime.

An employee was suspicious of one man when he came into the store on Nov 1, 2009 and told two other employees to keep an eye on him. The two were known for retail theft schemes. He watched him pace around in the electronics section then meet up with the other man who was pushing a cart with a box in it toward the exit. A second employee called for them to stop as they walked past the registers, but they continued past the cashiers and outside to a waiting Jaguar. The employee says he called 911 as they loaded the box into the trunk. The box was so heavy it took two of them to lift, and he saw the car’s suspension shift. The store says the box contained $5,800 worth of Nintendo DS systems.

The responding officer saw the car on his way to the store and pulled them over and detained them seven minutes after the initial 911 call. Another officer brought an employee to the scene to identify them, which he did. The Jaguar was impounded, and police got a warrant to search it. They found the box that was in the surveillance video, but it was empty.

What The Footage May Have Showed

Back at the store, the employee who first noticed the men was reviewing surveillance footage. He says several cameras showed that one man open a locked storeroom door, fill up and empty box with Nintendo video game systems, and set the box outside the door. Ballou came back with a cart, and they loaded the box and pushed it to the exit.

The Tape Disappears

When they Lynwood Police Department asked for a copy of the tape, a Toys R Us employee tried to make a copy, but “the machine did not work properly” and “the disk drive on the video recorder was stuck closed, so he could not burn a copy to disk.” A police officer reviewed the video. A week later an integrator came to look at the recorder and said the whole thing needed to be replaced, so they replaced the system, disposing of the video.

The store employee never offered for police to take the whole recorder and police never asked for it or got a court order to take it, the appeal says. There was no additional evidence like fingerprints or pry marks on the door.

After learning the video had ultimately been destroyed when the system was replaced, one filed a motion to dismiss the trial suggesting he was being denied due process. The motion was not granted. A judge said: “The fact that the video is not available the Court determines is a matter of weight, not admissibility, and the court will allow it.”

The Trial

The trial relied on recaps of the video from the responding officer and three employees who watched the video. One employee said he watched the video more than 30 times.

The defendants argued that a jury should have been able to watch the video to make a decision for themselves what it showed. For all anyone knows, they could have just stolen an empty box, which was going to get thrown in the trash anyway, the defense said. They also argued that the only thing he is guilty of based on actual evidence is accessing a locked storeroom.

A jury convicted him anyway, and he was sentenced to 51 months in prison. He appealed the case.

The Appeal

In December 2012, one man filed an appeal arguing that there was not enough evidence to convict him of anything other than unlawfully entering the store’s stockroom. The appeal further says the court was wrong to let witnesses testify they had seen him in the store security video.

“The trial court erred in failing to exclude the witnesses’ testimony about what they say on a videotape that had been destroyed well before trial and have never been available for the defendant or his counsel to review,” the appeal reads. It says there is no evidence he entered the room with the intent to commit a crime.

It also argues this violated the defendants’ right to due process saying “Fundamental fairness requires that the government preserve and disclose to the defense favorable evidence that is material to guilt or punishment ... In this case, the State allowed the loss or destruction of the only evidence that Pegs had committed a burglary.”

The appeal was denied. An appellate judge ruled that the 14th Amendment was not violated because the state was not responsible for the destruction of the video and the destruction was no “improperly motivated.”

The appellate judge further said that because the tape was destroyed, and it wasn’t the state’s fault, that the testimony, describing the contents of the tape, was admissible.

Additionally, “Those two men were the only African American customers in the store at that time and were wearing the same clothes that [employees saw them] wearing while they were in the store, when leaving the store, and at the show-up,” the ruling says.

Should this Case Have Been Thrown Out?

This case relied obviously relied heavily on evidence that was not there: surveillance video. There was no physical evidence and the Nintendos were never recovered. Should this case have been thrown out?

Comments (20)

***, *** ***** ******** *** ******* ********** ********, ******* **** weight *** ***** ********** ** *****.

*******

*** **** ** *** *** ********** ** "**********." ********** ******** usually ******* ** ********* **** * ****** ********* **********. **** a ****** *** ******* * ***** ** * ***** ** YouTube ****** * ******* **** *****-********** *********?

**** ***** ********* **** * ***** *** *** ******** ********* ****** * ***** ***** *** ********* ***** *** ** produced?

*** ***** ***** **** ********* ***** ** **********.

* ***** **** ********* ***** ** **** ************ ******* *** guard *** ******** ******** ********* ** ** ******** ** *********** an **********. *** ***** ***'* **** ******** ******* ***** *** fact.

***, * **** ** *** * ****** ** * ******* vehicle *** ** *********** *******.

*** ****** *************: *** ******** ***** "****** ** ******".

****, *** **** **** *****?

** **, * ***** *** ****** ** ***** **** ***** and ********** ** **** *********. ** *** ********** ** *** *** ***** ****.

*** ********* ***** ****** *** ********** **** ***** ** ******** and **** *********. ***** ** ******* **** **** ** *** don't **** ** ******** **** **** *** **** ****** ******* as ** **'* *********, *********** ** ******* ******** ******** ** it. ****, **'* *** ************* ****** ** ****** * ********** after ******** ******* ****** * ******** ********* *** ** **** case ******** ********* ****** *** ***** *** *** ******* ** what **** ******** ** **** ***** *** *** ************* ******* of **** *** ******** **** ******* **** ************, *** *******, the ***, ***.

** **** ***** *** *** ********** ** ******** *** ******** staffs. *** *********** ******* ***** **** **** **** *** ** was ********* **** *** *** **** *** ******** ** ** might **** *** ******* ********* ** **. ******....******...******.

****, ***** *** **** **** ****** **** *** ** *** preserved ****** **** **** *** ******** ****, ** *** ***********?

**** * ** ********* * ********* ****, * ************ **** the ****** **** *** **** **** ** **** *** ** back ** ********* **** *********** *** ***** ** ****. **** being ****, * ** **** *** ********* *** * *** weeks ****** ********** *** **** ***** **** ** ****, *** I ***** ** ****** ** *** ******* *** ** **** sure **** **** **** **** ****.

** *** ***** * ** ** *** *****?

**** **** *****,"*** ******* *** *** **** ********” *** “*** **** ***** on *** ***** ******** *** ***** ******".****** **** * **** ** **** ** **. ** "**** drive", ** ***** ** **** *** ********** **** *** ********* to * ** ********* *****. ******* * **** *** **** in *** ******** ** **** ** **** ** *** ****, but **** *** ****** ********* **** * ** ******** *** capable ** ***** *********, ** **** **** *** ***** ** back ** ** * ***** *****. ** **** *******, *** footage ***** **** **** ****** *** ** **** ****** ****** it, *** ****** **** ** *** **** **** ** ******** off ** **.

**** * ***'* ********** ** **** ** **** ** *** case, *** *** ****** **** ********* *** ********** ** ************ video ******? *.*., *** ***** *** *******, *** ***** *** missing ******** *******, ***.

** **** *************, *******'* **** **** ***** ***** *** **** **** ** destroyed ** ** *** *** ********* ****?

****, ***'** ***** ** **** **** ** * ******* *** consider *** * ****** * "***** ***********" ** * ******* moments ****** ******** **** "* *** ** ******* ***** **** clerk, *** * **** ** *** **** * ****'* **** him". *** ***'* *********** ******* ********* ** *** ********* ***** that ***** *********** *** ********* ** ***** *** *** *** died ***** ****** *** *********. **'* *** ***** ****** ********* from *** ******* ***** **** ** ******* ** ***, *** the ***** **** **** ****** **** ***** ****** *** **** inclined ** *** *** *** *********'* ********* ** **********.

**** ****** ******** *** ************ ***** ** *** ** ***** but ****'* **** ** *********** *** * ***** *****. ********** of *** **'** ***** ***** *.*., ****** *** **** ********** in **** ********, ********* **** ******* ********* ** * ****** act ** **** ** ********* ****** ********. *** *****(*) **** has *** **** ** **** ** ***. ****'* *** ** be *** **** ****!

****, ******. ** **** ******* ** *** **** ******** ** weight *** **** **** ******* ***** ** ********. ** ***'* say ** ************** ********** ********* ***** ************, ** ***** ********** **** ** would***** **** ****** **** ************ **** ***** ** ********, ****** and ********** ** *****. ** **, **'* *** **** ** a ******** ********** ** ****** * ******* ******* ** *****.

***** *************** ** ********* ** *** ******* **** *** ***** *** strict ************ *** **** **** ********* *** ** ****.

***** ********** ***** ** ********, * ***** *********** ** ********** ** *** ********* ** the ********* *** *********:

  1. ************** ** *** *********
  2. *** *********’* ********* ** ***** ******* ** * ******** *********** for ********, ** ** * ***** ******;
  3. *** *********’* ********* *** **** ***** ***** *** ****** **** his ***** *** ********; ***
  4. The *********’* ********* **** ****** ** *** ***** ** ************* ** **** ** ******** ** **

**** '** ******* **** *** *****' ******** ** *** ** instance ***** * ***** *********** *** ** **** - ****** it *** *** ***** ****** *** *********** ********** *** - *** *** ******* *** ********* *** ********.

*** ******* **** ** *** ***** *********** **** ***** **:

"***********, *** ********* **** ****** ** *** ************* ** ***cause ** *** *********'* *** *****. A counterexample is the dying declaration of Clifton Chambers in 1988, in which Chambers confessed that ten years earlier, he had helped his son bury a man named Russell Bean, whom the son had killed by accident. The statement was sufficient cause to justify a ********** * ****** ** *** ***'* ********; ****'* **** *** indeed *****, *** ***** *** ** ******** ******** ** * crime ***** *** *****, *** ***** ******** *** *** *** victim, *** ***** *********** *** *** ********** ** ********, *** the *** *** ***** ******* ** *****."

-----------------

I'm *** * ********* * ********** ** * ******* *** ******* **** *****, *** * tend ** ***** **** ***********#*******'* **** ***** **** ** **** thread (**** *** ******):

******* *** ***** ******** **** *** ***** *********, ******** **** people *** ****** *** **********(******* ** *** ***** ** ** ****** **** ** *** office) ****** ** *** ********* ****** ** ******* ** ********** testimony - **** *** *********** ********* *** ********** ********. (*.*. "I *** **** ****** - **** ** ********.")

*******, * ***** **** ********* **** ****** ************** *** ********* ***** ****** ********** ** ********************. (*.*. "* *** * ***** ******* **** ****** ***** the ****, *** *** ***** ** ****** ******.")

*****, ** ** *** **** *** **** ********* **** ******** who **** ********* ******* **** **********, ***** *** ** ******* ** *** actual **** ***** *** ** *****?

*******, * ***** **** ********* **** ****** ************** *** ********* ***** ****** ********** ** ********************. (*.*. "* *** * ***** ******* **** ****** ***** the ****, *** *** ***** ** ****** ******.")

***** ** ******* **** * ******** ** ** *** ******* of **** ****, *** ** ****'*. ****'* *********** ** **** in ********, ** ** **** **** *** ******* ******** **** cases ** **** **** *** *******, **** ***'* **** * case, ********** ** *** **** ****** *** **, **** * narcotics ******* ****. ** **** ** ** **'* *** ***** to *** * **** ** ******* **** *****'* ***** *******.

****, * ** ******** **** ******* **** ** ***** ***** for *** ****** ** **** ****** **** **** ******* **** penned * ******* **** **** **/*** ****, **** '****'?

** ********* **** **** **** *******, ******* *** ****** **** glee************* ***** ** ** *** **** ** ***** ********* ******* who ******** ** **** **** * ******* **** **** *******************, *** *** **** '******* ****' *****'* *****.

I'm *** * ******, *** **** ******** ******* ** ** ** ** ********-** hearsay - ** ** * ******* *********: '**** *** **** me '*'".

***,

* **** **** ***** **** ** ** *** **** *** years ** *** ********* *****. *** ************* *** ***** **** *** ***** **** ** *** **/*** drive ** ******. *** *** **** *****. ** **************** **** ** -** **** ******'**** * ******* *******. ******* *** **** * ** ***** did *** **** **** **** **** *****. ** ***** *** unit ** ** ******* **** *** **** ******* ** *** evidence ** **.

** ** *** ********** *** ****** ***'* ************** ** ** to ****** *** ********? ** ****** **** **** ** ******** a **** ** ***** *** **** *** * *** **** or ***** **** ******** **. **** ** ** ***********, ***** unit **** ** ******** ** **** ***** **** ***** ** have ************ *** *** **********, ** ****** *** **** ****** to **. ** **** ******** *** **** ****** *** ** days ** *** ***** ***** *** ** ******** ***** *********** on *** ***** ****** ** ***** *** *****. ** ** not ***** **** ** ** *** **********. ** ** *** his ******** ** ** ****.

** ** *** ********** *** ****** ***'* ************** ** ** to ****** *** ********? ** ****** **** **** ** ******** a **** ** ***** *** **** *** * *** **** or ***** **** ******** **. **** ** ** ***********, ***** unit **** ** ******** ** **** ***** **** ***** ** have ************ *** *** **********, ** ****** *** **** ****** to **. ** **** ******** *** **** ****** *** ** days ** *** ***** ***** *** ** ******** ***** *********** on *** ***** ****** ** ***** *** *****. ** ** not ***** **** ** ** *** **********. ** ** *** his ******** ** ** ****.

***** *** *** * ***** **********, ******* ** **** ***** * **** ** ** **********, the *** ***** ******* **** * **** ** **** ** do **** *** **** ***** ** * **** ** **** to ****. * ******* ** ******* * ****** *** *****, but ***** ** *** ****** ******? ****** ** ** ** job ** ** ********** ** ****** **** *** ***** ***** it **** ***** ***** *********, ** ****** ** ** *** end ***** ************** ** ****** **** *** *** ***** **** after ******** *********. ** ****, *** ***** *** ** ***** with ** ******, *** * ***** *'* ******* ** **** from ***** ***********/*** ***** ** **** ***** ******** *** ** this *******.

** **** ********** ****, ** * *** *** ********** *** I **** ***** *** ******** ******* **** **** ******, * would **** **** **** ****** ** ** **** ** ****** they *** ** (******** ******* *** ******** ***** **** **** the ******* ********). *** ** * ****** ******, ******* *** integrator, *** ******, *** *** *** **** ** **** ********** case, ** ***************** **** * ****.

** **** ******** ******* * *** **** ****** ** **** discussion **** *** ******** ***** ***** ********* ******** *** *** custody/retention ** *********' **'* ***** * *** ** *** ******* is ** ********* **********. ** ** ********** ********* * ******'* equipment, *** ** ****** ** **** ******** *** *** ***** on ** ******. **** **** ******* ** *** ****** **** ** ***** prudent ** **** * **** ** ***** ** ************ ****** the ****/** ** *** *****. ** ***** **** ****** ********* entanglements, *****'* **?

*********** ****... ** *** ** ** **** * ******** **** called '****** ** *******'. ** ******** ** ********* ****** ** is ******* **** * ******** ** ***** ** ** **** actions **** ***** ** ***** ** ****** **. ** ** could **** **** *******, *** ** ****'*, **** * ****** of ******* *** ** ********. ** * ***** ***** **** all *********** ******* *** **** ***** *** *** *********** *** down ** ** ********** ***** **** *** **** *** ** allowed ** ********.

**** ****:

****://**.************.***/*****/*************/*********

* **** ******* ***** **....

******* ****** ***** *** ******* *** *****. **** **** **** contemparaneous ***** ** *** **** *** ******** **** *** ***** shows. *** ** *** ***** ***** *** ******* *** ** export *** *****, *** ******* ********* **** *** ***** ****** it *** * * *** *********. * ******* ** **** for ******** ***** ********. ** ****** ****** ***** *** *** footage *** ******* ***********. ** *** *** * ****, ** was *****! ****** ** *******? **

**** ***** ****** ****** ** ** *** * ****, *** we ******** *** ******* ** *** *, *** *** *** attend ***** *** *, ***** ** *** ***********. ****** ** process......Maybe! ***** *** * ***** ** ******!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Introduction To Burglar Alarm Systems on Jan 04, 2017
While alarm systems are popular, balancing between the right level of protection, the appropriate components and an acceptable price can be very...
EAS Startup Queuehop Examined on Dec 15, 2016
Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) tags have been used for decades to reduce theft with companies like Tyco's Sensormatic and Checkpoint being...
FLIR Acquires Drone Manufacturer For $134M on Dec 01, 2016
FLIR has acquired Prox Dynamics, a Norwegian maker of small military-grade drones, for $134M.  FLIR president Andy Teich provided additional...
3VR Sales And Marketing Execs Out, Company Shifting on Nov 22, 2016
Two executives are out at 3VR, both after relatively short tenures at the company. 3VR's CEO says this is part of a shift to cover new markets....
Avigilon Stock Surges 40% On Strong Growth (Q3 2016) on Nov 15, 2016
The roller coaster continues. After a brutal Q2 heading down, Avigilon's Q3 growth is strongly up. Inside this note, we examine what powered...
'Legal Protection' From Eagle Eye Contract Vault Examined on Nov 02, 2016
"I was promised the high-end model for the entry level price." "Nobody said there would be a monthly service fee when I signed...
Dahua Says They Are Botnet Attack 'Victims' on Oct 26, 2016
'Victim' or 'accomplice'? Dahua has issued a new press release, referring to their products as 'victims' of the massive botnet attacks hitting the...
Chinese Company Xiongmai Threatens Legal Action Against Western Accusers on Oct 24, 2016
The Chinese video surveillance manufacturer, Xiongmai, whose equipment numerous sources blame for driving massive Internet attacks over the past...
Tagged RFID Object Search Recorded Video on Sep 20, 2016
Video analytics has gotten fairly good at tagging people in video, but it does not solve the problem of finding items like specific merchandise or...
Brickstream People Counting Sensors Acquired on Sep 07, 2016
Brickstream's sensors have been considered the market leader in retail store people counting applications, the company claims over 175,000 units...

Most Recent Industry Reports

'Dirty': Hikvision Attacks Genetec on Feb 20, 2017
Hikvision is angry at the growing public awareness that Hikvision is owned by the Chinese government. They took aim at Genetec,...
Directory of Alarm Company Brokers on Feb 20, 2017
Selling an RMR based business, such as alarm company, can be highly profitable, with acquisition prices of 36 to 48x RMR (equivalent to 3 to 4x...
Hikvision Hiring 50, Direct Out of College, Sales People on Feb 20, 2017
Hikvision is hiring 50, direct out of college, field sales people across the country. This is the next major expansion for the Chinese...
Simplisafe is 'Blowing The Doors Off' on Feb 17, 2017
The company alarm dealers love to hate, Simplisafe, is 'blowing the doors off' according to Michael Barnes, one of the top financial advisors in...
Hikvision OEM DDNS Devices To 'Lose Remote Access' on Feb 17, 2017
The fallout of Hikvision's DDNS discontinuation is expanding, this time hitting OEM partner Supercircuits, who reports that on June 30th: The...
Milestone: "Easy Money Days Are Over" on Feb 17, 2017
Contrary to IPVM's criticisms, Milestone has reaffirmed that glory days remain. But they admit that they 'easy money days are over': Are the...
Directory of Alarm Panel Manufacturers on Feb 16, 2017
Alarm panels are the central controller of intrusion systems. The following is a list of manufacturers of alarm panels. This directory only covers...
Panasonic Favorability Results on Feb 16, 2017
Panasonic is one of the largest brands in the world and a long term provider of both video surveillance imagers and cameras. But, like all...
Hikvision Silicon Valley and Canada R&D Expansion on Feb 15, 2017
After massive growth in their sales team, Hikvision is now planning to add two new R&D centers in North America. In this report we examine...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact