Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined

By: Brian Karas, Published on May 25, 2016

State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids.

We review this RFP, and the problems that can arise when too many components are left to the bidder to specify.

***** *******, ** ****** an *** *** * ************ surveillance ****** **** ****** out **** *** ******* required ** ****** ********* bids.

** ****** **** ***, and *** ******** **** can ***** **** *** many ********** *** **** to *** ****** ** specify.

[***************]

RFP ********

************ ************ ************ ****** System *** ** ******* *** ******* to ** ********* ** observe ****** ***** ****** 7 ********** *************.

*** *** **** ******** "flexibility ** *****", ******** that ****** ******* *** be ***** ** *** system, ****** *** ****** of *********** *********** ** not *********.

Product ************** *** *****

***** **** ****** **** preference **** ** ***** to ********* **** ******* Genetec, ** ******** ******* requirements *** ****** ** the ***.

*** ********** *** ******* is **** ****** *** to *** ******** *** of *******'* ****** ****** for******* **********.  ******* *** **** **** ******** in ********* ************ ******* for *** ******* ** bring ******** ******* ******** through**********.

*** ************** *** *** system *** ********** **:

****** *** ****** ****** could **** *** ************ of **** *** ** outlined, ***** **** ****** result ** * **** variety ** ******* ***** proposed, ******* * ****** on *** ****** ** try *** ******** ******** competing ************ **********. 

Important ******* *******

*** *** ******** ** details ** *** ****** purpose ** *** ******. It *** ** ******** the ****** ** ** be **** ** ******** persons ** *** **** at *****, *** *** buyer ****** ******* ****** examples ** *** **** expect ** *** *** system.

******** ***********, **** ** details about ****** ******** (*** on/off *********), *****-**-*** ****** to ******** ******* *****, power ************ *** ********** network ************** *** *******.

Burden *** *******, **** *** ******

******* *** ********* *******, such ** ******* **************, places *** ****** ** bidders ** ****** ****** this *********** *** *************, or *** *** * costly "***** ****" ******** that ******* *** ************** items **** **** ** be ******** ***** **** the *******.

** *** ****** *** not ***** ** ***** potential ******, **** *** be ******** ** ****** a *****-**** *** ***** omitted ***** **************.  ** this **** *** ****** will ****** **** ** adjust ***** ***** ***** the ****, ** ***** be ****** ** **** the ******-**** **********, *********** resulting ** ** ******** overall ******.

Buyers **** ** ** ********

****** ********* ***'* ****** be ******** ***** ******** likely ** ** ********, if *** ** **** detail ** ***** ** the ****** **** *** differentiate ********* ********* **** impractical *********.

**** ***** ************* **** local ***** ****** ** rep ***** **** ***** welcome ** *********** ** demonstrate their ******* *** ********* to *** ****** ********* their ***** ********** ********.

 

 

 

Comments (2)

I realize that this would be a huge expense for a small municipality, but perhaps the local government should have done one or both of the following before issuing the RFP:

1. Issued an RFI that included the question "What information do you need to configure a system for this neighborhood?"

2. Issued a draft RFP and invited comment.

Perhaps one of the readers who participated in this bid would like to (anonymously) comment. I'd be interesting in knowing how many questions the city received on March 21, and if the city stuck to its April 4 proposal due date.

I went to the borough website. Vendor questions and answers to questions were never posted, no addendum to the RFP is listed, and as of now there is no list of bids received, or tabulation of the bid responses.

http://www.statecollegepa.us/2484/RFPIT092--Highlands-Neighborhood

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Course Winter 2020 on Jan 10, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
2020 Camera Book Released on Jan 10, 2020
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Security Sales Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 02, 2020
Notice: This is the last chance to register for the course. This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to...
2020 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 06, 2020
The new IP Networking Book 2020 is a 280 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security systems,...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Video Surveillance 101 Course Opened on Dec 12, 2019
IPVM is adding a Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important terms,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...