The $1,000 Iris Reader (SRI Tablet) Examined

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Apr 19, 2016

Is this the breakthrough needed for iris?

The accuracy and resistance to change from age and wear are common claimed advantages of iris over other biometrics.

However, using irises as an access credential has been expensive typically costing $3,000+ per reader. Now, SRI's new IOM Access tablet aims to disrupt the market, costing just $1,000.

However, aside from low price, what other considerations like ADA compliance, access control system integration, and mounting location have an impact on unit use? We take a look at those factors, and how SRI's price compares to exiting iris readers inside.

** **** *** ************ ****** *** ****?

*** ******** *** ********** ** ****** **** *** *** **** *** common ******* ********** ** **** **** ***** **********.

*******, ***** ****** ** ** ****** ********** *** **** ********* typically ******* $*,***+ *** ******. ***, ***'* *** *** ****** ********** ** ******* *** ******, ******* **** $*,***.

*******, ***** **** *** *****, **** ***** ************** **** *** compliance, ****** ******* ****** ***********, *** ******** ******** **** ** impact ** **** ***? ** **** * **** ** ***** factors, *** *** ***'* ***** ******** ** ******* **** ******* inside.

[***************]

Iris ********** *** *************

**** ******** ** * ********* *** **** ********** **** ***** methods. *** ******* *** ** **** ****** ******** ** ****, a ******'* **** **** *** ****** **** ****. *** ******* of * ******'* **** ** *** **+ ** ********* ********* from *** *** ** *** *.

***** ************ ****** ** ******* ***** * - * *****, and **** ****** ******** ** ******* **** ****** **** **** be ******* ****** *******, ****** *** ****** ********** ********, *** many **** ******** *** **** ******* ********** ****** ** **********.

****,**** ****** ****** *********** *****. ******** ******** ** *** **** ****** ** *** degree **** **** ****** ***** **** ****** **** **** * minute *********, ** *** '***** ****' ** ******* **** ***** used ** ***** ******* ** ******* *** ********.

*******, ****** *** *** ****** **** ** **** ** *** people ******. *** *******, ***** **** ******* ** ******** **** ***** **** issues ******** ****** **** *** **** ******* ** **** *******. This ********* ***** *** ******* * ****, *** *** ************* slow **** *** ******* ******* *** *** ***** ******** ** a *********** ** ****** ****.

SRI **** ****** ********

***'* **** ** *** **** (***) ****** ******* ****** ******** ***'* iris ****** *** ********* ********** ******** ***** **** * ******* tablet.  ***** *** **** *** ** ******* **** * ****** tablet, *** ******** *** ****** ** ***** *** **** **** booth ** * ********** ****** **** ** * ****.

*** ***** ***** ******** *** ******* **** ***** *****:

***** *** '****** *******' ****** ** ***, ***'* *** **** reader ********** ** ***, ** ** ***** ******* ** ****'* ******* ****** **** **** ****. **** **** ****** ***, *** ***** *****-****** ************** *** support *** ***-*** ***** ************* ******* *** ********.  *** **** is ******** ** * ********** ******* **, *********** ******* ******* ****, measuring ~*"**".

** ***** ** *** **** *****, *** **** *** ** mounted ** * **** ** *** ****/*****, ** *** ** detached *** ****** ** *** *** ****** ******* *********** ******** mobile ********** *******.

*** ******** **** *********** ******* *** ****** *** ** ****** control ****** ** **** *** "* ******* ******* */* **** **** *** ** ******** ** offer ******* ********* ********* **** ** ******* ** *****", *** *** ****** ** *** ******** **** * **** by *******. *** ******** **** ***** *********** ******* *** **** between ********* *** **** **** ****** ** *** **** *** be ********* ** *********.

Key ******

*** ****** *** ** **** ******* **** **** ******* **************:

  • **** ***** ** * ******: ** ****, ***** **** ** ** **** ***** ** the ****** (** ***** ** *** ***** *****)
  • *****-****** **************:*** ****** ******** ******** ******* ** *** ****** *** ** Code ****** ** ******** ** **** ********.  ***, ** ** all ***** ******* *** ** **** ** ****** *****.
  • **** **********: ***** **** ****** *** ** ********, **** *** ***** one **** *** ** **** ** *******. **** ****** *** not **** ** ****.
  • ********** *******: *** ****** ****** **** ** ********* ******** ************ ******-*** *********** ****. 
  • ****** ****: *** ****** ****** ** *** ***** *** ******* *** or ******** ** ****. *******, **** ******* ************ ***** ** possible **** * ****** ***** ** ****.
  • ******* *******: **** **** ********* *** ****** ** *** ****** ******** with ** ** ** *******, ****** *** ********* ** *********.

*****

**** ****** ***** ** * **** **** ** $**** *** unit, ******** ****** ******** ******** ** ******** ********* ***** (******* or *****) **** ******** *** **** *****.

ADA ********** ********

******** *** ****** ** ** *** ** ******* *** **** properly ***** ** * ******* *** **** *****. ** ***** SRI ** ******* *** *** ****** ****** ** ******** ** ensure*** **********, *** *** ****** *** **** **** **** *** ****** could ** ********* - ** '****' *** '***' *********, ** if **** *** ****** *** **** * '******* *****' ****** be *********.  

*******, ***** *** **** ** ** ****** ******* ******* *** the ******* (*********?) ********** **** *** ******* *** ******* ** a ********, ********** ******* ****** **** *****, ********* ******* *** accessibility ********** ****** ******.

*********

** ***** ** *******, *** **** *** ******** **** ******* card ******* *** **** **** ***** ********* ******* ** ***.  SRI ********* **** ** **:

"*** ****** **** *** ****** *** ******* ******* *******, **** *************, personalized ******** *** **** *** ********** ***********, ***** ***** ************. The ********** ***-**** ****** *** ******* * ***** **** ** * VMS ******** *** **** ********** *** *********."

**** ** ***** ******** *** '********' **** ********** *********** *** not ** *******, ******* ******** ** * **** ****** *** tablet ****** ****** *** ********* ** ***** * ******* ******* sensor.

***** ** **** * ********. ***** ~$*,*** ** ** ** 10X **** **** * ******* **** ** **** *********** ******, SRI's *** ****** ****** ** ** *** *** *** ** iris ******* **** ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** 4X ****.

**********

*******, *** **** *** ******* **** ****** **** ***** ****** its ********** *******. ** *** **** *****, *** **** ** takes *** * **** ** **** *** **** ** *** read ** **** ** ***** **** ******** ** * ******* wait *** * ********** **** ** **** *********** ******. ***** a ***** ** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ** an ***** *** ***, ** ***** ****** * ****** ** frustration *** ****** *** *********** ** * *** ****** ***** to ******* ***** *******.

*** ****** **** ******** ******* ********* ********, ** ***** **** place ***** **** ****** *" **** *** ******. *** ***** range ** *** ****** *** ** **** ************ ** ***** users ** *** **** ***** *****. **** *** ****** ********** in **** ******, **** ***** **** **** ** ***** **** and ******* ***** *** ******** ** ***** *** ********** *** unit ** ** ****. ** ***** ** **** *****, *** process ** *** **** ********* ********** *** *** ****** *** use *** *** *********** ***** ** ***** *** ********** *********** beyond **** *********** **** ** *********** ******* **** *** ****** and ****** ** ***.

** ******** ** *****, *** ****'* ***** *********** ** *** constraints *** ******-**** *********** ***** ** ** **** ******** ************ in * ********, *** ** ****** ** ******* ** '******* purpose' ****** ******* ****.

***********

***'* *** ****** ****** ** ****** ** *** *** *** of *** ****** ** ******* **** *******, *********:

  • *******'* **** ******, **** "***" ***** ******* ** $**** **** **** *******
  • ******'***************, ******* ~$**** **** *******
  • *********'***-*****, ******* ~$****, ***** *** ** ********* ** ***** ****** supported *** ****** ** ********** *******.

*** $**** **** ***** *** ***'* *** ****** ****** **** it * ******* ********* **** ***** ** *********** ****** ** bear *** ***** ************ ** *** ****.

Comments (14)

There seems to always be talk about biometric access control systems, and I see the theoretical benefits, but these all seem like a tough sell over cheap cards/badges.

I get the "no lost cards" benefit, but it seems like as your probability for lost cards scales up (more employees, more doors), the costs of biometric systems would scale up even faster.

I'm not sure if these biometric systems are solving real problems, or just giving manufacturers a method to convince users to upgrade/replace existing readers, which have a long life-cycle and probably don't get touched for 20 years after install.

Independently of biometric modality, the main benefit of biometrics for the access control is that this credential is "locked" to the user. It makes easier to control attendance. It is more convenient in case of temporary workers. It is more secure in case of large organisations or premises where employees do not not know each other personally. It is more secure to build the unified access control system (physical and logical) on the biometrics. But, of course, everything depends on customers' needs.

Full disclosure, I work for EyeLock. I just wanted to clarify two points as we were mentioned in the article.

#1 - Although at one time Stanley Security had exclusive distribution rights for EyeLock product in certain regions, that is no longer the case. EyeLock has setup their own sales channels around the world through distribution, oem and integrator partners.

#2 – MSRP for our nano NXT is $1650 USD and includes all hardware and software for interfacing to any access control panel via standard protocols (Wiegand, F2F, etc).

Thanks Dale! I updated the post.

While both irises can be enrolled, only the first one that can be read is matched.

What do you mean by read? Do you mean matched or just scanned regardless of whether it matches?

Authentication is performed on one iris, not two.

SRI tells us that users can enroll both eyes and present both eyes for a potential read, but the decision to grant/deny is based on whether the first recognized iris is a match.

In that case it sounds like you would pretty much need to enroll both eyes, otherwise you would risk getting denied half the time, no?

No, if you enroll your left eye and only present your left eye, you aren't going to be denied half the time because of it.

Enrolling two eyes may help matches be made sooner, but it doesn't increase accuracy rates.

Got it. I didn't realize the FOV of the reader was just one eye.

It isn't necessarily. If a user (think child or someone with close eyes) is able to present both within the 8" range, it only matches based on the first iris it can read.

I'll ask SRI for the FoV spec on the iris sensor and update here.

Ok, now I feel stupid again. :)

So if someone presents both eyes, the system might choose the left or the right, since it doesn't know which eye is enrolled. If it chose one that was not enrolled, I'm understanding you to say it would deny. But you're also saying it wouldn't help increase accuracy to enroll both eyes, which it would seem to in this case.

Accuracy has no bearing on whether an iris is enrolled or not. It affects how well/to what level of quality an iris is read. Of course - if an iris is not enrolled it will not be valid - but that isn't a function of reader performance.

More opportunities for a match is not the same as increasing accuracy of the read.

If a user only enrolls one eye, they should only attempt to verify on that one eye. The demo video in the post may help clear up how the user does this.

Ok, I think what you are saying is that if two eyes are presented it will read one and try to authenticate on the one eye. If it fails then it tries on the second eye.

It only uses one eye to "match" but it still may "read" both eyes if it needs to and both are in view. Is that right?

We've been using Eyelock for quite some time, still have some test units on our walls as well. I can't speak for the SRI solution but the biggest challenge with the iris scanners is securing them - no one really makes a good vandal resistant unit and most of your access control systems start at the perimeter.

In regard to false reads, we get about 1-2% false reads (no entry) but the bigger issue of positive false reads we are seeing less than 1 in 1000. If you enforce dual iris the chances of a false positive are.... I dunno, we have not had a false positive with dual iris yet.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Access Control

UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
Door Fundamentals For Access Control Guide on Sep 12, 2018
Assuming every door can be secured with either a maglock or an electric strike can be a painful assumption in the field. While those items can be...
Access Control Course Fall 2018 on Sep 06, 2018
Registration IS CLOSED ends this Thursday. Register now. If you are looking to strengthen your ability to design and deploy access systems or...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 04, 2018
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet it is commonly ignored. The drain wire offers protection for readers...
Directory Of 110+ Video Management Software (VMS) Suppliers on Aug 30, 2018
This directory provides a list of Video Management Software providers to help you see and research what options are available. Listing...
Exit Devices For Access Control Tutorial on Aug 28, 2018
Exit Devices, also called 'Panic Bars' or 'Crash Bars' are required by safety codes the world over, and become integral parts of electronic access...
Assa Aperio Wireless Access Reader R100 Tested on Aug 23, 2018
Wireless access control is frequently promoted by manufacturers as a way to cut installation costs. Perhaps the biggest proponent of this is mega...
Synology Surveillance Station VMS Tested on Aug 22, 2018
With so many low-cost NVRs and enterprise VMSes, is there any place in the market for NAS-based VMSes? Recently, IPVM bought a Synology NAS for...
Backup Power For Maglocks Guide on Aug 20, 2018
When the main power fails, many believe maglocks must leave doors unlocked. However, battery backed up maglocks are allowed according to IBC /...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Chinese Government Praises Hikvision Following Xi Jinping on Sep 17, 2018
The Chinese government council responsible for managing China's state-owned companies praised Hikvision’s obedience to China’s authoritarian leader...
Amazon Ring Spotlight Cam Tested on Sep 17, 2018
Amazon's Ring has released their latest camera entry, the Spotlight Cam, which we bought and tested in our Consumer IP Camera Analytics...
European Mega Security Firm Verisure Pushing Security Fog on Sep 17, 2018
The European mega security firm Verisure (Securitas Direct), with a reported 2 million customers, is pushing security fog, as shown in this BBC...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact