The $1,000 Iris Reader (SRI Tablet) Examined

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Apr 19, 2016

Is this the breakthrough needed for iris?

The accuracy and resistance to change from age and wear are common claimed advantages of iris over other biometrics.

However, using irises as an access credential has been expensive typically costing $3,000+ per reader. Now, SRI's new IOM Access tablet aims to disrupt the market, costing just $1,000.

However, aside from low price, what other considerations like ADA compliance, access control system integration, and mounting location have an impact on unit use? We take a look at those factors, and how SRI's price compares to exiting iris readers inside.

** **** *** ************ ****** *** ****?

*** ******** *** ********** ** ****** **** *** *** **** are ****** ******* ********** ** **** **** ***** **********.

*******, ***** ****** ** ** ****** ********** *** **** ********* typically ******* $*,***+ *** ******. ***,***'* *** *** ****** ********** ** ******* *** ******, ******* **** $*,***.

*******, ***** **** *** *****, **** ***** ************** **** *** compliance, ****** ******* ****** ***********, *** ******** ******** **** ** impact ** **** ***? ** **** * **** ** ***** factors, *** *** ***'* ***** ******** ** ******* **** ******* inside.

[***************]

Iris ********** *** *************

**** ******** ** * ********* *** **** ********** **** ***** methods. *** ******* *** ** **** ****** ******** ** ****, a ******'* **** **** *** ****** **** ****. *** ******* of * ******'* **** ** *** **+ ** ********* ********* from *** *** ** *** *.

***** ************ ****** ** ******* ***** * - * *****, and **** ****** ******** ** ******* **** ****** **** **** be ******* ****** *******, ****** *** ****** ********** ********, *** many **** ******** *** **** ******* ********** ****** ** **********.

****,**** ****** ****** *********** *****. ******** ******** ** *** **** ****** ** *** degree **** **** ****** ***** **** ****** **** **** * minute *********, ** *** '***** ****' ** ******* **** ***** used ** ***** ******* ** ******* *** ********.

*******, ****** *** *** ****** **** ** **** ** *** people ******. *** *******, ***** **** ******* ** ******** **** could **** ****** ******** ****** **** *** **** ******* ** work *******. **** ********* ***** *** ******* * ****, *** may ************* **** **** *** ******* ******* *** *** ***** compared ** * *********** ** ****** ****.

SRI **** ****** ********

***'* **** ** *** **** (***) ****** ******* ****** ******** SRI's **** ****** *** ********* ********** ******** ***** **** * Samsung ******. ***** *** **** *** ** ******* **** * normal ******, *** ******** *** ****** ** ***** *** **** 2016 ***** ** * ********** ****** **** ** * ****.

*** ***** ***** ******** *** ******* **** ***** *****:

***** *** '****** *******' ****** ** ***, ***'* *** **** reader ********** ** ***, ** ** ***** ******* ** ****'******** ****** **** ********. **** **** ****** ***, *** ***** *****-****** ************** *** support *** ***-*** ***** ************* ******* *** ********. *** **** is ******** ** * ********** ******* **, *********** ******* ******* unit, ********* ~*"**".

** ***** ** *** **** *****, *** **** *** ** mounted ** * **** ** *** ****/*****, ** *** ** detached *** ****** ** *** *** ****** ******* *********** ******** mobile ********** *******.

*** ******** **** *********** ******* *** ****** *** ** ****** control ****** ** **** *** "* ******* ******* */* **** **** *** ** ******** ** offer ******* ********* ********* **** ** ******* ** *****", *** *** ****** ** *** ******** **** * **** by *******. *** ******** **** ***** *********** ******* *** **** between ********* *** **** **** ****** ** *** **** *** be ********* ** *********.

Key ******

*** ****** *** ** **** ******* **** **** ******* **************:

  • **** ***** ** * ******: ** ****, ***** **** ** ** **** ***** ** the ****** (** ***** ** *** ***** *****)
  • *****-****** **************:*** ****** ******** ******** ******* ** *** ****** *** ** Code ****** ** ******** ** **** ********. ***, ** ** all ***** ******* *** ** **** ** ****** *****.
  • **** **********: ***** **** ****** *** ** ********, **** *** ***** one **** *** ** **** ** *******. **** ****** *** not **** ** ****.
  • ********** *******: *** ****** ****** **** ** ********* ******** ************ ******-*** *********** ****.
  • ****** ****: *** ****** ****** ** *** ***** *** ******* *** or ******** ** ****. *******, **** ******* ************ ***** ** possible **** * ****** ***** ** ****.
  • ******* *******: **** **** ********* *** ****** ** *** ****** ******** with ** ** ** *******, ****** *** ********* ** *********.

*****

**** ****** ***** ** * **** **** ** $**** *** unit, ******** ****** ******** ******** ** ******** ********* ***** (******* or *****) **** ******** *** **** *****.

ADA ********** ********

******** *** ****** ** ** *** ** ******* *** **** properly ***** ** * ******* *** **** *****. ** ***** SRI ** ******* *** *** ****** ****** ** ******** ** ensure*** **********, *** *** ****** *** **** **** **** *** ****** could ** ********* - ** '****' *** '***' *********, ** if **** *** ****** *** **** * '******* *****' ****** be *********.

*******, ***** *** **** ** ** ****** ******* ******* *** the ******* (*********?) ********** **** *** ******* *** ******* ** a ********, ********** ******* ****** **** *****, ********* ******* *** accessibility ********** ****** ******.

*********

** ***** ** *******, *** **** *** ******** **** ******* card ******* *** **** **** ***** ********* ******* ** ***. SRI ********* **** ** **:

"*** ****** **** *** ****** *** ******* ******* *******, **** notifications, ************ ******** *** **** *** ********** ***********, ***** ***** applications. *** ********** ***-**** ****** *** ******* * ***** **** to * *** ******** *** **** ********** *** *********."

**** ** ***** ******** *** '********' **** ********** *********** *** not ** *******, ******* ******** ** * **** ****** *** tablet ****** ****** *** ********* ** ***** * ******* ******* sensor.

***** ** **** * ********. ***** ~$*,*** ** ** ** 10X **** **** * ******* **** ** **** *********** ******, SRI's *** ****** ****** ** ** *** *** *** ** iris ******* **** ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** 4X ****.

**********

*******, *** **** *** ******* **** ****** **** ***** ****** its ********** *******. ** *** **** *****, *** **** ** takes *** * **** ** **** *** **** ** *** read ** **** ** ***** **** ******** ** * ******* wait *** * ********** **** ** **** *********** ******. ***** a ***** ** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ** an ***** *** ***, ** ***** ****** * ****** ** frustration *** ****** *** *********** ** * *** ****** ***** to ******* ***** *******.

*** ****** **** ******** ******* ********* ********, ** ***** **** place ***** **** ****** *" **** *** ******. *** ***** range ** *** ****** *** ** **** ************ ** ***** users ** *** **** ***** *****. **** *** ****** ********** in **** ******, **** ***** **** **** ** ***** **** and ******* ***** *** ******** ** ***** *** ********** *** unit ** ** ****. ** ***** ** **** *****, *** process ** *** **** ********* ********** *** *** ****** *** use *** *** *********** ***** ** ***** *** ********** *********** beyond **** *********** **** ** *********** ******* **** *** ****** and ****** ** ***.

** ******** ** *****, *** ****'* ***** *********** ** *** constraints *** ******-**** *********** ***** ** ** **** ******** ************ in * ********, *** ** ****** ** ******* ** '******* purpose' ****** ******* ****.

***********

***'* *** ****** ****** ** ****** ** *** *** *** of *** ****** ** ******* **** *******, *********:

  • *******'***** ******, **** "***" ***** ******* ** $**** **** **** *******
  • ******'***************, ******* ~$**** **** *******
  • *********'***-*****, ******* ~$****, ***** *** ** ********* ** ***** ****** supported *** ****** ** ********** *******.

*** $**** **** ***** *** ***'* *** ****** ****** **** it * ******* ********* **** ***** ** *********** ****** ** bear *** ***** ************ ** *** ****.

Comments (14)

There seems to always be talk about biometric access control systems, and I see the theoretical benefits, but these all seem like a tough sell over cheap cards/badges.

I get the "no lost cards" benefit, but it seems like as your probability for lost cards scales up (more employees, more doors), the costs of biometric systems would scale up even faster.

I'm not sure if these biometric systems are solving real problems, or just giving manufacturers a method to convince users to upgrade/replace existing readers, which have a long life-cycle and probably don't get touched for 20 years after install.

Independently of biometric modality, the main benefit of biometrics for the access control is that this credential is "locked" to the user. It makes easier to control attendance. It is more convenient in case of temporary workers. It is more secure in case of large organisations or premises where employees do not not know each other personally. It is more secure to build the unified access control system (physical and logical) on the biometrics. But, of course, everything depends on customers' needs.

Full disclosure, I work for EyeLock. I just wanted to clarify two points as we were mentioned in the article.

#1 - Although at one time Stanley Security had exclusive distribution rights for EyeLock product in certain regions, that is no longer the case. EyeLock has setup their own sales channels around the world through distribution, oem and integrator partners.

#2 – MSRP for our nano NXT is $1650 USD and includes all hardware and software for interfacing to any access control panel via standard protocols (Wiegand, F2F, etc).

Thanks Dale! I updated the post.

While both irises can be enrolled, only the first one that can be read is matched.

What do you mean by read? Do you mean matched or just scanned regardless of whether it matches?

Authentication is performed on one iris, not two.

SRI tells us that users can enroll both eyes and present both eyes for a potential read, but the decision to grant/deny is based on whether the first recognized iris is a match.

In that case it sounds like you would pretty much need to enroll both eyes, otherwise you would risk getting denied half the time, no?

No, if you enroll your left eye and only present your left eye, you aren't going to be denied half the time because of it.

Enrolling two eyes may help matches be made sooner, but it doesn't increase accuracy rates.

Got it. I didn't realize the FOV of the reader was just one eye.

It isn't necessarily. If a user (think child or someone with close eyes) is able to present both within the 8" range, it only matches based on the first iris it can read.

I'll ask SRI for the FoV spec on the iris sensor and update here.

Ok, now I feel stupid again. :)

So if someone presents both eyes, the system might choose the left or the right, since it doesn't know which eye is enrolled. If it chose one that was not enrolled, I'm understanding you to say it would deny. But you're also saying it wouldn't help increase accuracy to enroll both eyes, which it would seem to in this case.

Accuracy has no bearing on whether an iris is enrolled or not. It affects how well/to what level of quality an iris is read. Of course - if an iris is not enrolled it will not be valid - but that isn't a function of reader performance.

More opportunities for a match is not the same as increasing accuracy of the read.

If a user only enrolls one eye, they should only attempt to verify on that one eye. The demo video in the post may help clear up how the user does this.

Ok, I think what you are saying is that if two eyes are presented it will read one and try to authenticate on the one eye. If it fails then it tries on the second eye.

It only uses one eye to "match" but it still may "read" both eyes if it needs to and both are in view. Is that right?

We've been using Eyelock for quite some time, still have some test units on our walls as well. I can't speak for the SRI solution but the biggest challenge with the iris scanners is securing them - no one really makes a good vandal resistant unit and most of your access control systems start at the perimeter.

In regard to false reads, we get about 1-2% false reads (no entry) but the bigger issue of positive false reads we are seeing less than 1 in 1000. If you enforce dual iris the chances of a false positive are.... I dunno, we have not had a false positive with dual iris yet.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Access Control

Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Start Up Safe Zone $150 Gunfire Detector Profile on Mar 06, 2019
While gunfire detectors have been around for years, typically they are limited to enterprise level or municipal deployments. Startup AVidea, makers...
Top ISC West 2019 Booth Moves on Mar 05, 2019
With ISC West just a month away, we examine the most notable exhibitor moves including big exhibitors who dropped out and a number of significant...
Prysm PSIM Profile on Mar 05, 2019
A decade ago, PSIM promised significant potential but has always suffered from significant problems. Now, a number of PSIMs have either gone out of...
Genetec Declares "Lead With Synergis" Access Control on Mar 04, 2019
Genetec started with and is best known for its video management software. However, the company is now imploring its partners to lead with Synergis,...
Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IBM / Genetec Surveillance System Investigated Over Philippines Human Rights Abuses on Mar 22, 2019
A lengthy investigation into an IBM video surveillance project in the Philippines, raising concerns IBM helped local police conduct a bloody...
Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact