VMS Server Sizing

By: Sean Patton, Published on May 25, 2018

Specifying the right sized PC/server for VMS software is one of the most important yet difficult decisions in IP video surveillance. In the past manufacturers designed and certified that a specific appliance 'box' would support a specific number of cameras (e.g., 4, 8, 16, etc.). Of course, the simplicity came with limited flexibility for expansion.

With VMS software being widely deployed on 'regular' PCs/servers, integrators need to properly specify the right ones. If your machine is not powerful enough for your cameras, you can face all sorts of painful issues and difficult to troubleshoot problems.

The good news is, fundamental guidelines exist to help select the right hardware.

Inside, we explain many of the factors to consider, including:

  • New Technology Impact
  • Key hardware drivers (CPU, RAM)
  • Server Cost Differentials
  • Maximum Throughput
  • Throughput Calculations
  • Bits versus Bytes
  • Smart Codec Impact
  • H.265 Impact
  • GPU Processing
  • Multicast Support
  • Multiple NIC Support
  • Manufacturer Specifications

********** *** ***** ***** PC/server *** *** ******** is *** ** *** most ********* *** ********* decisions ** ** ***** surveillance. ** *** **** manufacturers ******** *** ********* that * ******** ********* 'box' ***** ******* * specific ****** ** ******* (e.g., *, *, **, etc.). ** ******, *** simplicity **** **** ******* flexibility *** *********.

**** *** ************* ****** ********** '*******' ***/*******, *********** need ** ******** ******* the ***** ****. ** your ******* ** *** powerful ****** *** **** cameras, *** *** **** all ***** ** ******* issues *** ********* ** troubleshoot ********.

*** **** **** **, fundamental ********** ***** ** help ****** *** ***** hardware.

******, ** ******* **** of *** ******* ** consider, *********:

  • *** ********** ******
  • *** ******** ******* (***, RAM)
  • ****** **** *************
  • ******* **********
  • ********** ************
  • **** ****** *****
  • ***** ***** ******
  • *.*** ******
  • *** **********
  • ********* *******
  • ******** *** *******
  • ************ **************

[***************]

New ********** ******

***** ********** ************ ** the **** * ***** will **** ** ****** on *********** *** ****** of ******* **** * server *** *******. ******* that ****** ** *** higher ********** *** ******** the ****** ** ******* required. ***** ******, *.*** streaming *******, *** *** offloading *** ******** *** channels *** ******.

Key ******** *******

*** ****** *********** ** most ********* ** *** and ***, ******** ********* how **** ***** *** be ********* *** ******* and *********. ******-***** ****** detection ***** **** ******** processor **** ************* *** needs ** ** ***** into ******* **** ******** server ********. ***** ************ vary ********* ** *** specific *** ****, *** the ********* ** * consensus ** **** ****** manufacturer **************:

  • ***** *******, ~*-** *******: Dual-core **********, **** ** Intel **** * *** e6850 ** **** **-*****, 4GB ***
  • ***-**** *******, ~**-** *******: Quad-core *********, **** ** Core **-*****, *** ***
  • ***** *******, ~**+ *******: 6-core ********** **** ** Xeon ** ****** ** Core **-*****, ** ** RAM

**** ********* *** *** configuration ******* *** ** restricted ** **** ****** in ***-***** ******* **** as **** ** **. For ********, **** * Duo *** ** ********** are ********* **** ***** in ******* ***, ***** Xeons *** ** ***** in ****-*** ************ *** servers.

Server *****

******* *** ********* *** available **** **** ****** and ********* ****** ** the ***-$*** *** *****, whereas ***/*** ********** ***. Small ******* *** ** run ** *****-******* *** lower **** *******, ***********, and **** ****-** ********, in *** ***** ** ~$500-1,000 ***. ***-***** ******* normally **** **** ****** workstations ** ***** **** servers, ~$*,***-*,***. ***** ******* may **** ******** ***** this *****, ********* ** configuration *** ******* ****. $6,000-10,000 ** **** ** common *** **** ****** counts, *** ** *** increase ** ***, *** speed, *** *** ******** of ****** ****** ** hard ***** ****, ********* power ********, *** ******** NICs ***** ******** ** this *****.

********** ********* ***** ** one ** *** ****** costs ******** ** ****** sizing. ********** ***** **** one ** *** **** generally **** ***** $*** USD ** *** **** of * ******. **** cost *********, *******, ** the ***** ****** ** processor ***** *** ******** cores *** *******, ** the **** **** * six **** *.** *** Xeon ********* ** ***** core *.** *** *** be $***-***.

Importance ** ******* **********

*** **** ** ********** what *** ********* ******* throughput ** *** ****** will **. ** *** calculate **** ***** **** based ** ******* ****** throughput, ** ***** ***** well ***** *** ******* for ***** ******* ** time, ********* ** ******* packets *** **** ** video. **** *********** **** oversize * ****** ** 10-20% ******* ** **** concern.

Total ******* ********** ************

**** ********** *******, ***** maximum ********** ******** ** the **** ******** ******. Throughput ** *** ***** amount ** ********* ****** into *** *** *** machine (*.*., ** **/*, 80Mb/s, ***.)

***** *** *** ******* which *** ****** ****:

  • *** ********** ** ********* cameras: *** ******** *** bitrate ** ******* ********* is ******** *** ******* component ** ***** **********. This *** ** ** simple ** *********** *** number ** ******* ** the ****** ****, *.*., twenty ***** ******* **** a ****** **** ** 4Mbps **** = ** Mbps *****. *******, **** using ******** *******, ***** must **** **** ******* each ******'****** ************* ***********, *** *******. If ******* ***** ***** 6-8 **/* ** *****, when ***** *********, **** may ****** ******** ** underspecified ******. *** *** to ****** **** ** using ******* **** ******* maximum *** ***** (*** *** ****** ** using ***).
  • *** ****** ** ********** clients: *** ****** ****** taken **** ******* ** throughput ************ ** ********** clients. **** ** *********** the ******** *********** ** perform, ***** ****** ******* which *** ***** ********, at *** ***** **** multiple ***** *** ******* to *** ****** *** view ******* ******* ** cameras. ** ****, ** budget ******, ********** ****** be ********** *** *** worst ****, **** *** largest ****** ** ******* connected ******* *** ******* simultaneously. ********** *** ** measured ** ******* ****, with *** ******** ***** via *** *** ******, if **'* *********, ** seen ** **** ******* from * *** ******:

client throughput

*** ******'* ***** ********** is *** *** ** these *** *******. ** a ****** **** (**) 1080p ******* **** * Mb/s *******, *** *** clients ******* *** ******* (80 **** *****) ****** be ********* ** ****** 120 ****. ***** ************ are ******** ** *** architecture. **** **** ******* the ****** ** ******** to *** ****** ******, without ******* *** ****** through *** ******, ****** nothing ** ********** ************. Others **** ********* ******* from ******* ** **** to ******* **** *** camera ** *** ****-******, i.e., ** * *****-****** view. ***** ****** ******* how ***** ******* ****** throughput **** ***** *** provider.

Bits ****** *****

** ******* ***** ********* bits *** *****. **** cameras ****** ***** ********** using **** *** ****** but **** *** ******* specify ***** ****** **** using ***** *** ******. 8 **** = * byte, ** ** * manufacturer ********** ****/* **********, that ** ***** ** 320 **/* ** ****** streams.

Smart ***** ******

** **** *****,***** ********** ******* ******** *************, from ~**% ** * minimum ** ****** ****** to **% ** **** in *** ****** ******. While ***** ********** ****** average ****** ****, ******: servers **** ***** ** sized ** **********************.

*** *******, ** *** average ******* ** ~** Kb/s *** ****** *** to ***** ******, *** bandwidth ****** ** ~*** Kb/s, **** ****** ********** should ** **** ** calculate ****** **** *** select **********. ******* ** account *** **** ********* bandwidth *** ****** ** systems ******** ****** ***** heavy ****.

H.265 ******

** ******** ** ***** codecs, *.*** ******* ******* compared ** *.*** *** modest, **** **-**% ********** common. *******, ***** ********** are ********* "**** ****", instead ** ******* ** motion/complexity ****** ** ** smart ******. ******* ** this, *** ******* ****** present **** ***** ***** codecs *** *** ******* when ***** ******* (***-*****) H.265.

***** ****** **** **** that *.*** ******* **** increase *** (***/** ***) load **** ***** ******-**** motion *********. ******* *.*** is **** ********* ********* to ****** **** *.***, with ******** ******** **** mature *** **** ******, using ***** ******* *** motion ********* *** ****** CPU ****. ***** ****** be ***** ** **** when ****** ******* *** consider ***** *.*** *** motion ********* ***** ********* (non-recording) ******* *** **** for ********.

GPU ********** *******

********** ******-***** ********* (*********** streams, ****** *********, ***** analytics, ***) ** *** resources ** ******* ** compared ** *** ******* for *** ********** ******* in ****** ********.

**** *** ******* ** this *********** ******** ********** ***** Motion *********** *** ******, ***** Intel ** ****** *** resources. *** ******* ****** a *********** ******** (**% - **%) ** *** load **** ********** ** the ******'* ******* ***** GPU.

** ********** *********** (**) or **** ******** ********* become **** ****** ** the ***** ******** ********, we ****** **** *** resource ************ **** ****** much **** ********.

Multicast ******* ******* ******

********* ******** ** * VMS ******** *** ****** the ************ ** *** total ********** ********* ** a ******.

* *** **** ******** multicasting, **** * ******** configured *******, **** ****** Client ******** ** ******* viewing ******* ******** **** the ******* ******* ******, instead ** **** *** server. *** ****** **** calculations **** **** **** to ******* *** *** incoming ******* **** *** camera, *** ******** ******* will **** ** *** the ***** **** *** recorded. **** *** *** potential ** **** *********** resources ** **** ******** client ************ *** **** have * ********** ****** on ******* ***** **** viewing ** *******.

Multiple *** *******

**** ************ **** ******* cameras ** ** ********* in *** ** **** isolated **** ******** **** viewing ****** ***. ** other ****-************ ************, * secondary *** *** ** required *** ********/****** *************. In **** ** ***** situations ******** * ******/*********** solution **** *** ******* expansion **** *** ******** support ******** ************* ****** the ****** ********* ****** and *** ********.

Manufacturer **************

**** ********** ** *****, the ****** **** ********* factor ** ************ ***************. Users ********** ******* ***** do *** **** *** minimum ************ *** ***** given ********** *** **** challenges **** ******* **** support ** ****** *****. If ** ********** ** willing ** ****** *** potential **** ** ***** an "************" (********* ** specifications) ****** *** *** configurations ***** ** ***** project ******* *** **********, they *** ** **** to **** **** **** from * ***** *******. For ***** ******* ** play ** ****, ******** strictly ** ************ *************** at * ******* ** recommended.

*** *** ***** *************** are ************ ****** ******* manufacturers. **** **** ***** some ** ***** *** specified ** ********** ****, others *** **** ******* to * ****** ** cameras *** ******. **** varies ** ************, *** users ****** ****** ***** these *******:

  • ********: ******** ***** *** configurations ** *********** ************ *******, **** *** ****** streaming *********** ******* ** to **** ****, *** ACC *********** ********** ** to *******.
  • *****: ***** ***** ****** (and ******) *************** ** the ***************** ***** *** ***** server ******** ********. ***** ****** *** listed ** 50-250 ****, *** ***-*** Mbps. *************** *** ***** for ******* *** ********* configurations.
  • *******: ****** ************ *** given *** *******, ***********, and ****-*********** ************** *********'* *************. ** ******** ***** are ***** *** **** Performance ***** ** **** supported ******* *** *** of ***** *********** ********** at ** ** *,******* read (**** ******* ************ output).
  • *********: ****** ************ *** listed *** *** *** High-End ******* *********** *************. ********** *********** ***** from ***-*** ******* ********** up ** ******* ***** / ******* ******, *** High-End ******* ********** ** to ******* ***** / 400Mbps ****** ******* ***********.
  • *********: ********* ******** ******** ***** ******* ******* hardware *************** **** ******* ******. No ********** *********** ** specifications *** ********* *** listed.

******* ***** *************** **** work *** * ***** configuration, **** **** ******** for ********* ****** ** variances, ************ ******** *********** may ** *************. *******, there ** ****** ****** to ****-****** ******** *************** to **** *** ***** project, ** ******* ** general *************** *** ******* throughput ******. ***** ****** also ******* ******* ***** recommendations *** **-**-****, ** call **** ******* *** pre-sales **********, ** **** any ******* ***********, ***** specs *** ****** ******** at *** ****, ******* notice.

Comments (16)

****,

**** ******* ** ****** sizing. **** ***** ******* we *** ** ******* the ***** ****** ********* (VMD) *** *** ****** and *** *** ******* do **** ******** *** send *** ****** ** the ********* ******. **** has * ******** ********* in *** ****** ** CPU ********** ***** (*** thus ****) *** **** need *** *** ******.

******* ***** ******-**** ***, the ****** ****** ** most ********** ** *** I/O *********. *** **** of **** ******, **** technology, *** **** ********** selection *** *********.

*** ****** ****** * received **** ********* ** server */* ********** ******** 15,000 *** *** **** drives. ***** *** *** available ** *** ** capacity. ** **** *** LSI **** ***** **** battery ****** ** *****. Milestone ********** ******* *** drives ** * **** 10 ***. **** **** our *** **** ********** does *** ***** **** than ** ****** ** a **** *** (** have * ** *** server). ***** *** ** other ******* (******* ****) not ** *** ****** RAID **** ******. **** all **** ****, * have **** *** ********* Husky ******* *** **** drives *** * ***** in * **** * configuration ** * ** a *** ********* :-).

* ***** ****** **** to **** ******'* ********** using ****** ** ****** hard ****** **** *** old *** **** ****** drives. ** ***** * performance ********* *** ** any ** *** ***** management ****** ******** ********* take ********* ** ****** 4K ****** ****** *** improved ****/***** ***********?

**** * ** **** for ***** ***** ********, but ****** * ******* 6 ******, ** ******* too *****, * ***** then ** ***** *** RAID *. **** ** is ***** (***********-****) *** more ******* *** **** to ********. * ***** recommend ****** ******** **** RAID * (*** **********, faster ******) **** ** use **** **. *** is ****? **** **** 10, *** *** **** half **** ****** *** your ***** ****, *** is **** ***, **. You *** **** *** of *** ***** **** of ****** *** **** bye ** *** **** data. **** * ****** on **** * *** has *** ******** ******* of ***. *** ****** of ****** ****** ******* is ** ****** ********* is **** ****** (**'* not ******) *** * think **'* ** *** late **'* ** ***** 30's ** ******.

** ****** ****** ** less ***** *********** *** more ***** *********. *********** could ** ***** *** it **** ** *****, SSD ***** ***** **** larger *****.

**** *********?

* ******* *** **** well ******* ******* ******** to ****** *****. **** sizing ******* ** ***** a ********** ** ***** camera ***** ***** ****** count? *.* *** **** a ****** ****** ***** fixed ****** *** * multi ****** ***** ******.

**** ** ***** **** by ***********, *** ** you ********* * ***** a *** **** ***** min ***** ******* **** or ***** ********** *** server ***/** *********** ****?

*** ****** *** ***** imager ******* ******* * different **** ** * server. *** ******* * use ** ******* **** is ** *******...

* ****** ****** ****** (NOT *********, *** ***..**** a ***** ******* ***) will ******* *** **** to * ****** **** like * ****** ** 'tractor-trailer-trucks' ********** ***** ***** to *** ***********. ** the ***********, *** ******* is ******** *** *** he ****.

*** *****-****** **** **** twist.... *** ***** ** now ***** **** ******** trailers ****** ******** **** a *****, ** **** it *******, *** ******** have ** ** ********* before **** *** ** unloaded. **** **** **** to *** ****** ******... CPU, ******, ******* ** when * *** ***** types ** ****, * suggest ** ***** ******** any ********* ********* *** each ***. ** ******** also **** **** **** category (**** **** *** type).

* **** ******* ****** based ** ****** ***** is **** ****** *** an ****** ***** ******.

** ** ****** ***** to **** **********, ***, scene **********, ***** ****** amount *** ****** ******* (compression) ** ** **** to **** * ****** at * ****** ************** based ** *********. *** IPVM **** ****** ********** doing **-**** ********* ************ with ****** ******* *** the **** ******** *******.

**** ** **** **** the ******* ****** *** RAID ** **** **********, followed ** *** ********* performance ******** (******** *** use ** ******** ****). RAID6 ** *** **** protection ******* **** ** typically ******* *** **** speed. ***** ** **** popular ******* ** ******** a ****** *** ** everything (**********, ********, **** Speed) ** **** ** you ***'* **** **** arrays *** ***** (*** to ******* ***** **** the ****** *** ***** so ****, *** **** to ******** *** ********* of * *** ***** going *** ***** *** array ** **********).

** **** ****** (**** a *** ** ******** details), *** **** ** be ********* **** *** number ** *******, *** mainly **** *** ********** and ********* ***** (***** is ********* * ******* of *** *******). *** you *** ** ** accurate ************ **** ****, and ** **** ******* out, ********* ** *** camera ****/***** *** *** VMS ******, ***** **** be ********** ******** ************.

**** **** ******** ****** up *** ** *** more ********* ***** ** creating * ******-******** *************. In **** ****, ** an **********, * *** minimum ************** ** ****** a ******** ***** ** see ** ***** ** a **** ** **** vendor * ******** ***** be ******* *******. *** server **** *** ******* should ********* ** **** to ******* *** ********** and ********* ** *** system *** ********** ** providing, **** ******** ********** of ****** *** *** want ** **** ***. I've *** ********* *** specifications **** ******* * 30 *** ****-************ ***** to ******* **** *** server *** ********* *** required *****, **** ******** percentage **** ***** ** the ******. ** ** integrator ** ****** ** with *** **** ** smart ***** *******, *** is ******** * *** amount ** ******, ****** another ********** **** ******** H264 *** ******** * higher ****** ** ******, with * ********* *** that ** ***** ** perform ****** **** *********/****** detection, **** *** *** integrators **** **** ******.

*** **** ***** ****** is ** ****** ************ what *** ************, ****** manufacturer, % ** ******, etc ** *** **** a ******** ****** ****** to *** *** *** bid.

***** *** **** *** Sean..

* ********** *** ****** you *** ******, ****** to ******* ******-******** ************** for *** ********* ** very **** **** ** can *** ******* * vms *********** ** ****** manufacture. **** * **** never ******* ** *** a ********* ****** *** to **** ** **** while ********* ***** ******** to **** *******.

*** ***** ** *** allowed ** ** ** present * ******* **** and **** * ******** vendor *** ***** **** the ***** ** *******. Even **** **** ****, usually **** * *** 10 ******* * ***** say, ******* **** * am ******* ** *** some ******. * **** your *********** **** *** specs *** **** *** feel **** **** ****** to ******** **** ******-******** SOW **** **** ****** the ***, **** ****** detail ** *** **** I ****.

* ***** ** ***** be * ***** ******* for **** ** ***** a ******* ******-******** ** vms/cctv *** **** * year *** *** **** sides (********* *** ***********) provide ************ ********. *** that ***** **** ** a *** ***** *** IPVM ** *****.

**** *** ***** * *** ******** ***** *** *** *******....**** and ***. **** *** ***** *** ***** *** '********'. ** of **** ****, ***** *** ** ** ****.

*** **** ** ***** exactly, **** *** **** important ** **** ***** of *** *****. *** as * *********** *** me ** ** *** user ****** ***** *** common ********, ******* ** is *** ** *** most *********** ******..

***...** *********** ** **** is... ** ***** *****'* completely ****** ********* * posed ****** *****.

******** ******** ***********(***** ** **********, ***, analytics ** ***) **** lists ** ******* *** and/or ***. ** ***** those ** ** *****://***.************.***/ to ***** **** ** other *** (****) ****** since **** **** ******* desktop ***'*.

* ***** * **** indication *** *** ** a *** ** *** light **** ****** **** wise.

* ********** ***** *** a *** ** ********* but ** *** ******

*** ****** *********** ** most ********* ** *** and ***

***

**** ********** *******, ***** maximum ********** ******** ** the **** ******** ******. Throughput ** *** ***** amount ** ********* ****** into *** *** *** machine (*.*., ** **/*, 80Mb/s, ***.)

*** ** *** *** rated *** *********?

* **** **** ******* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_bandwidth

*** ****** ** *** specs ** **** ********* https://ark.intel.com/products/126688/Intel-Core-i3-8100-Processor-6M-Cache-3-60-GHz-

**** * ********* ******** of **.***/* **** ***** 37,000Mbps *****?

**** ********* ** ** I *** *** ****** 4000 *** ******* ** 30 *** *** ***** not *** **** ********* out.

* ** * **** at **** *** * know ****** ** **** this **** *** *** up.

**** ** * *******?

*** * ** *** have *** ***** ** system ** ****, **** trying ** ********** *** to *** ***** ** specing *** ***** ****** for ****** ********.

** ***** *** * way ** ****** **** video *** ****** ** hardware *** ******, **** yes, *** ***** ******* 4000 ******* ** **** processor. =)

*************, ** **** *****, you *** ***** ******* in * ******* ** Linux ********* ****** ***** is ***** ** ******* the ******* *** ****** "bottlenecks".

**** ** *** ******** like*** ************** *** *** ** gaming ******. ************* (** fortunately) **'** *** *** trying ** **** ****** at ******, ** ************ would **** ******* ********** for ***** ************. **** best *** ** ** follow *** *** ************'* recommendations *** **** **** their *****/******* ** ****** server **************.

***** *****. ****** ****.

*** **** ** *** are ********* ** *** and *** ****** **** UI4 ******** *** ** is ********** *** *** statement "**** ********* ** DW * *** *** around **** *** ******* at ** *** *** still *** *** **** processor ***." ** ********** invalid, *** ****** ** servers ******** ** ***** on *** **** **** of ********** **********

**, **** ** * good ******** ** **** is ****** ** *****. And *** *** *********** are *******. *** **** to *** **** **** carefully. ** *** ** not ********** *** *********** you *** ****** * projection ***, *** *** well *** ***** **** use *** ******* ******** to ***** ***** ********, it ** ***** ** be *********.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
Network Optix / Hanwha Cloud Access Tested on Jul 02, 2019
Remote cloud access is becoming a bigger differentiator, as cybersecurity issues underscore the problems of port forwarding and many integrators...
2019 Mid-Year Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 01, 2019
IPVM's new 400+ page Mid-Year Industry Guide brings all of these issues and events together in a single resource to read and review. It can be...
FLIR Saros Visible / Thermal Analytic Camera Tested on Jun 26, 2019
FLIR's Saros claims "accurate, actionable alerts" with a combination of 1080p visible and dual thermal sensors along with IR and white light...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact