Should You Trust Frost & Sullivan Awards?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 03, 2009

Frost & Sullivan awards are common in the security industry. In the last decade, Frost has named dozens of video surveillance companies award winners. Winners have marketed their awards heavily in press releases, presentations and marketing.

Awards are important. Awards should help us make better decisions and identify the best choices. Therefore, trust in the award granter is crucial. We need to be confident that awards are based on merit.

Frost & Sullivan Awards

Frost & Sullivan grants awards to video surveillance companies multiple times per year in a variety of categories. They describe their selection process:

"Frost & Sullivan analyst team tracks end-user requirements and market dynamics within the industry. The process includes interviews with suppliers, end-users and industry experts. The product lines are compared with customer base demands, and the top-ranking provider is then presented the award."

In a interview with Frost & Sullivan, I was told that award recipients did not pay for awards and that comparison/evaluation data is not released to ensure the confidentiality of manufacturers.

Problems with Frost & Sullivan Awards

After interviewing various award recipients and examining the public documents, I saw 4 critical problems:

  • Vendors tell me they pay to use the awards
  • No criteria or justification is ever provided
  • The award categories are often dubious
  • Frost & Sullivan stated goal is to help manufacturers

Pay to use the Awards

The consistent theme I hear from award recipients is that awards are granted at no cost but the manufacturers cannot publicly announce awards without paying thousands of dollars to Frost & Sullivan.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

No Criteria or Justification Provided

It is impossible to determine or understand how or why one manufacturer was selected over another. Accomplishments of the award winner are cited but nothing is shared on the comparative evaluation.

Dubious Award Categories

Frost awards have numerous categories that are often repetitive, narrow or vague.

Last year, direct competitors Vidsys and Orsus both won awards. Vidsys won the "2008 North American Award for Emerging Company of the Year in the Integrated Security Market" while Orsus won the "2008 North American Emerging Company of the Year Award for Situation Management". The awards are almost identical.

This is fairly typical with Frost awards. Recently, a manufacturer won for "European Megapixel Camera Product Line Strategy of the Year Award" and another for "Homeland Security Surveillance Product Differentiation." The first is very narrow and the second is so vague that it's hard to understand how the award is even judged.

Stated Goal is to Help Manufacturers

Frost' stated value proposition is to be a "Growth Partnership Company that helps clients accelerate their growth." They list their clients as "Global 1000 companies, emerging businesses and the investment community."

Frost's interest and revenue comes from helping manufacturers that they award. This is a conflict of interest.

For another discussion on Frost problems, read a series of comments from people who claim to be former Frost employees. They discuss how awards are 'licensed' and how award winners are 'targeted.'

Conclusion

Awards are important and trust is crucial. If we are going to have awards that claim to judge and identify the best companies or products in the industry, we need to be confident that the judges are doing so fairly and with the interest of the community.

Frost & Sullivan and the award recipients should be clear about their financial relationship and the process of selection so that industry professionals can assess these awards appropriately.

Frost & Sullivan Response

Frost posted this response to us:

"We at Frost & Sullivan respectfully disagree with John Honovich's conclusions.  Our Awards are the result of disciplined research that annually represent millions of hours of cumulative analysis, research intelligence, and contributions.

We follow a rigorous methodology for the production of our Awards.  OurAwards are intellectual property, and are part of a research deliverable available to paying clients.

Frost & Sullivan licenses the publication of our Awards, and we charge a fee for the recipient to leverage our research findings as it pertains to their company. The fee covers the cost of the research and represents a standard industry practice no different from that of other industry award producers.

We are more than happy to respond to all inquiries surrounding our Awardsprogram.  Please feel free to contact me directly at 210.247.3806 or jake.wengroff@frost.com to discuss.  Thank you."

UPDATE 2014:

Since publication of this article 5 years ago, there have been very few Frost awards in the physical security industry.

Related Reports on Awards

A New Low In Embarrassing Security Awards (OSPA) on Aug 03, 2016
The trade show stunts continue, though this one purports to be 'credible' and 'respectable'. The Outstanding Security Performance Awards (OSPAs)...
How Embarrassing - 28 Security 'MVPs' on Jun 03, 2015
Security industry awards are nonsense. This is not news. From pay to promote Frost awards to trade show fluff awards to trade mag awards, media...
People's Champion Revealed on Oct 04, 2013
For the first time, a physical security industry award has been chosen by the people. Rather than constrain voting to a closed group of insiders,...
Dumbest Awards We've Ever Seen on Dec 04, 2012
Just when you think awards couldn't get any stupider, a US trade magazine, GSN, steps up the plate with the most dumbfounding video...
BRS Labs Wins 'Most Desperate' Award on Nov 14, 2012
The least respected award in all of surveillance - BRS Labs has now bought won it. When struggling manufacturers need a shot of fake authenticity,...
Reverse Auctions: A Horrible Way To Buy Security on Apr 16, 2012
One of the hottest procurement trends is using a ‘reverse auction’. Unlike an RFP, which typically awards a project based on multiple criteria, a...
Best New Product Awards Investigated on Apr 03, 2012
The ISC best new product awards use a secretive process that lacks transparency, making it impossible to understand the rationale, fairness or...
"Best New Product" MorphoAccess VP Examined on Mar 31, 2012
Safran Morpho's MorphoAccess VP was voted best in show in the SIA New Product Showcase at ISC West 2012. This reader offers better accuracy and...
How to Make Award Programs Legitimate on Dec 21, 2011
Security industy awards today are a joke -- shallow attempts to reward manufacturers who buy ads, booths or research from the award...
Winners and Losers Fall 2011 on Sep 25, 2011
Now that the dust has settled from the new announcements of the last month, we can better understand the impact on the overall video surveillance...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis Door Station Tested (A8105-E) on Jul 19, 2017
Axis continues their push into niche markets, especially audio, with network speakers, an IP horn, and video door stations. We tested Axis'...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide on Jul 19, 2017
This 120 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It covers our 20 manufacturer favorability rankings and 20 manufacturer...
$8 Billion Utility Georgia Power Enters Surveillance Business Offering Avigilon And Genetec on Jul 19, 2017
Utilities are typically considered major customers of surveillance integrators but one utility, Georgia Power, with $8+ billion in annual revenue...
Knightscope Laughs off Robot Drowning on Jul 18, 2017
A day after a Knightscope robot drowned, Knightscope has issued an 'official statement' making fun of the issue: The implied message is that...
Microsoft Video AI Cloud Services Examined on Jul 18, 2017
Microsoft has released one of the most amazing video analytics marketing videos ever. In it, they detect oil spills, track individual people giving...
Hikvision USA Head of Cybersecurity Exits on Jul 18, 2017
Hikvision USA's Head of Cybersecurity has exited the company. In this note, we review the move, share Hikvision's feedback and examine the...
'Suicidal' Knightscope Robot Drowns on Jul 17, 2017
Knightscope continues its hyper growth, at least when it comes to controversy, this time with a 'suicidal' robot in Washington DC. And here is...
March Networks Company Profile on Jul 17, 2017
March Networks was one of the most well-known video surveillance manufacturers of the 2000s. In 2012, March was acquired by Chinese / American...
Milestone Beats OnSSI In Court on Jul 17, 2017
The litigation between former partners Milestone and OnSSI has finished, confirmed by both parties. In April 2016, OnSSI sued Milestone and in...
Power For Burglar Alarms on Jul 14, 2017
In order to operate, alarm panels require the high voltages found in electrical outlets be converted to the low voltages they run on. In this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact