Should You Trust Frost & Sullivan Awards?

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 03, 2009

Frost & Sullivan awards are common in the security industry. In the last decade, Frost has named dozens of video surveillance companies award winners. Winners have marketed their awards heavily in press releases, presentations and marketing.

Awards are important. Awards should help us make better decisions and identify the best choices. Therefore, trust in the award granter is crucial. We need to be confident that awards are based on merit.

Frost & Sullivan Awards

Frost & Sullivan grants awards to video surveillance companies multiple times per year in a variety of categories. They describe their selection process:

"Frost & Sullivan analyst team tracks end-user requirements and market dynamics within the industry. The process includes interviews with suppliers, end-users and industry experts. The product lines are compared with customer base demands, and the top-ranking provider is then presented the award."

In a interview with Frost & Sullivan, I was told that award recipients did not pay for awards and that comparison/evaluation data is not released to ensure the confidentiality of manufacturers.

Problems with Frost & Sullivan Awards

After interviewing various award recipients and examining the public documents, I saw 4 critical problems:

  • Vendors tell me they pay to use the awards
  • No criteria or justification is ever provided
  • The award categories are often dubious
  • Frost & Sullivan stated goal is to help manufacturers

Pay to use the Awards

The consistent theme I hear from award recipients is that awards are granted at no cost but the manufacturers cannot publicly announce awards without paying thousands of dollars to Frost & Sullivan.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

No Criteria or Justification Provided

It is impossible to determine or understand how or why one manufacturer was selected over another. Accomplishments of the award winner are cited but nothing is shared on the comparative evaluation.

Dubious Award Categories

Frost awards have numerous categories that are often repetitive, narrow or vague.

Last year, direct competitors Vidsys and Orsus both won awards. Vidsys won the "2008 North American Award for Emerging Company of the Year in the Integrated Security Market" while Orsus won the "2008 North American Emerging Company of the Year Award for Situation Management". The awards are almost identical.

This is fairly typical with Frost awards. Recently, a manufacturer won for "European Megapixel Camera Product Line Strategy of the Year Award" and another for "Homeland Security Surveillance Product Differentiation." The first is very narrow and the second is so vague that it's hard to understand how the award is even judged.

Stated Goal is to Help Manufacturers

Frost' stated value proposition is to be a "Growth Partnership Company that helps clients accelerate their growth." They list their clients as "Global 1000 companies, emerging businesses and the investment community."

Frost's interest and revenue comes from helping manufacturers that they award. This is a conflict of interest.

For another discussion on Frost problems, read a series of comments from people who claim to be former Frost employees. They discuss how awards are 'licensed' and how award winners are 'targeted.'

Conclusion

Awards are important and trust is crucial. If we are going to have awards that claim to judge and identify the best companies or products in the industry, we need to be confident that the judges are doing so fairly and with the interest of the community.

Frost & Sullivan and the award recipients should be clear about their financial relationship and the process of selection so that industry professionals can assess these awards appropriately.

Frost & Sullivan Response

Frost posted this response to us:

"We at Frost & Sullivan respectfully disagree with John Honovich's conclusions.  Our Awards are the result of disciplined research that annually represent millions of hours of cumulative analysis, research intelligence, and contributions.

We follow a rigorous methodology for the production of our Awards.  OurAwards are intellectual property, and are part of a research deliverable available to paying clients.

Frost & Sullivan licenses the publication of our Awards, and we charge a fee for the recipient to leverage our research findings as it pertains to their company. The fee covers the cost of the research and represents a standard industry practice no different from that of other industry award producers.

We are more than happy to respond to all inquiries surrounding our Awardsprogram.  Please feel free to contact me directly at 210.247.3806 or jake.wengroff@frost.com to discuss.  Thank you."

UPDATE 2014:

Since publication of this article 5 years ago, there have been very few Frost awards in the physical security industry.

Related Reports on Awards

Troubles At Arecont Vision on Oct 03, 2017
Arecont is facing big problems. But Arecont says the future is 'bright'. In this note, we share feedback from Arecont and from sources close to...
The 3 Most Outstanding Security Manufacturers (OSPAs) Make No Sense on Sep 08, 2017
The Outstanding Security Manufacturer finalists (US edition) are here: And if you are wondering, "How did those 3 get chosen?" then you are...
A New Low In Embarrassing Security Awards (OSPA) on Aug 03, 2016
The trade show stunts continue, though this one purports to be 'credible' and 'respectable'. The Outstanding Security Performance Awards (OSPAs)...
How Embarrassing - 28 Security 'MVPs' on Jun 03, 2015
Security industry awards are nonsense. This is not news. From pay to promote Frost awards to trade show fluff awards to trade mag awards, media...
People's Champion Revealed on Oct 04, 2013
For the first time, a physical security industry award has been chosen by the people. Rather than constrain voting to a closed group of insiders,...
Dumbest Awards We've Ever Seen on Dec 04, 2012
Just when you think awards couldn't get any stupider, a US trade magazine, GSN, steps up the plate with the most dumbfounding video...
BRS Labs Wins 'Most Desperate' Award on Nov 14, 2012
The least respected award in all of surveillance - BRS Labs has now bought won it. When struggling manufacturers need a shot of fake authenticity,...
Reverse Auctions: A Horrible Way To Buy Security on Apr 16, 2012
One of the hottest procurement trends is using a ‘reverse auction’. Unlike an RFP, which typically awards a project based on multiple criteria, a...
Best New Product Awards Investigated on Apr 03, 2012
The ISC best new product awards use a secretive process that lacks transparency, making it impossible to understand the rationale, fairness or...
"Best New Product" MorphoAccess VP Examined on Mar 31, 2012
Safran Morpho's MorphoAccess VP was voted best in show in the SIA New Product Showcase at ISC West 2012. This reader offers better accuracy and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Why 3VR Failed on Feb 16, 2018
3VR destroyed transformed ~$65 million in VC funding into a $6.9 million exit. The reason they failed is simple. They bet on analytics. They...
"Fear Mongering": Hikvision USA Cybersecurity Director Dismisses Chinese Government Ownership Concerns on Feb 16, 2018
The facts are: The Chinese government created Hikvision and is Hikvision's controlling shareholder. Hikvision's Chairman, a Communist Party...
16:9 vs 4:3 Video Aspect Ratio Statistics on Feb 16, 2018
What aspect ratio do security integrators prefer? The 'standard' 4:3 or the 'wide' 16:9 one? 100+ integrators told us what they preferred, with...
Mercury Releases New Series 3 Redboard Access Panels on Feb 15, 2018
Mercury Security has their first major product release post-HID buyout, and things literally look different. The Series 3 SIO boards now are red...
Last Chance February 2018 Camera Course on Feb 15, 2018
This is the last chance to get into the Winter camera course, starts next Tuesday. Register now. IPVM provides the best education, live online...
Hikvision DeepInMind Tested Terribly on Feb 15, 2018
While Hikvision is heavily marketing deep learning and 'AI' as their next big thing, new IPVM test results of their DeepInMind NVR shows their deep...
Genetec CEO: You Cannot Buy Trust on Feb 14, 2018
Genetec's CEO, Pierre Racz, delivered a direct message at their channel partner conference: Racz has become a focal point in the industry debate...
Assa's Lowest Power Draw Maglock: Securitron M680E Examined on Feb 14, 2018
Securitron produces some of the most extreme maglocks on the market, including massively strong maglocks and even ones with integrated CCTV cams...
Hanwha Wisenet X 5MP Camera Tested (XNV-8080R) on Feb 13, 2018
Wisenet X is Hanwha's high-end camera line. We tested their Wisenet X 1080p camera last year. Now Hanwha is offering 5MP cameras listing super low...
Top Problems For Integrator Project Management on Feb 13, 2018
Security projects routinely encounter issues that jeopardize deadlines, create confusion, and shrink profits. Unfortunately, there are common...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact