ShotSpotter IPOs, Facing Low Revenue and Losses

By Brian Karas, Published Jun 09, 2017, 11:14am EDT

A rare event for North American security manufacturers has happened.

ShotSpotter has IPOed on the NASDAQ, raising $30.8 million.

US IPOs, overall, have become much tougher since the dot com boom, with revenue and growth demands typically quite high for security manufacturers.

ShotSpotter has fairly low revenue, especially for being in business for more than 15 years.

In this note, we analyze ShotSpotter's IPO filing, issues, potential and competitors.

ShotSpotter *****

*********** *** * ****** *******, the **** ** ************** product/service **** ********* ****** find *********: ****** ******** with *********** ****** ********** a ****, *** **** use ********** ** **** police ** *** ******** of ***** ********. ** doing **, **** *** to **** ****** ******* shooters, *** *** ******* help ** ******* *******, and ** ********* ****** overall *****, *** *** cost ** ******* **** gunshot ******, *** ***** customers.

**** * ***** ********, *********** sells ***** ******* ** an ******* ******** **********, and **** * ******* subscription, ************* ********** * steady ****** ** ****-******* revenue, ******* ********** ******* for *********.

Current ******** ****

********* ** * ************ for ***********, *** ******* has ~** ***********, ********* in *** **, *** with **** ************* *********** as ****. ***** *** all ******/********* ********* ********* to ***********.

History ** ********* / *********

***** *** ******* ** gunshot ********* ** **** to **********, ************ ** with ******* ********** *** not **** ****. *********** has *** ******** ******* of *** ****** ******* to ******* ** *** promises, *********:

*** ******* *** ***** steps **** *** ***** to **** ******* ********, including ******** *** ***** own ********** ****** **** analyzes *** ***** **** suspected ******** ****** ********* police ** ******* ** reduce ***** ******.

*********** ** *** ******* success *******, ********* * recent **** ** ******, CA***** ****** ********** ***** ability ** ******* ******* to *** *********** ******.

Funding *** *********** ** ****

*********** *** ****** ~$*** since ** *** ******* in ****, *** ***** full ********** *** *** available *** *** ***** of *********, *** ******* has ****** ** *** never **** **********,  ******* losses ** $*.** ** 2016 *** $*.** ** 2015. *** ******* **** has ~$*.* ******* ** cash ** **** ** of ***** **, ****.

Revenue $**.* ******* / ***

***********'* **** ******* *** $15.5 ******* ***, ***** is ******* ********** ** a $*.** ******* *** business, ***** ***** ** solid *** ** *********** alarm ********** ******* *** not *** * ** backed **+ **** *******. As * ***** ** comparison,******** ***** ***, * ****** *******, smaller *******, *** ******* twice *** *** ** ShotSpotter.

Revenue ********** / ****** ********** **********

******* **** ************ *-* ********** * ******** ********* ***** **** the **** ****, **** a ~**% ******** ** revenue, ** $**.** ** 2016, ***** **** ********** operating ******** ~**%:

*******, ****** *** ***** quite ****, ** ~-**% of *******.

*********** *** ****** **** recent ******, **** ** indoor *** ********* *******, international *********, *** *** ability ** ****** *** markets/customers **** ** *********** campuses *** ******** ***** for *** ******* ** continue **** *****.

SaaS / *** ** *** *****

*********** ******** ***** ****** on * ************ *****, where ********* **** ******** to *** ******** ** order ** ******* *** product. ********* ** *** S-1 ******, *********** ****** renewal ***** ** ** high:

*** ********** *** ****, and ** ****** **** continue ** **, **** after *** ******* ************** of *** *********, ****** all ** *** *** customers ***** ***** ****** subscriptions, *** **** **** choose ** ****** ***** coverage ****.

***** ******** *********** ***** related ** ******* ******** deployment *** ************ *** ** ****, ** newer ********* *** ** satisfied ** *********** ******, it ** ****** **** will ******** ** ***** for * ****** ** more. **** ****-**** ************, and ******* *******, ** a *** ********* ** ShotSpotter's ***** ***********. 

Profitability *********

*********** ***** ************* ********* most ** *** ****** by ******* ***** *** ********* expenses, ******** *** ******* could ****** ********** ** they ******* ******** *** customers *** ****** ********* service ** ******** *********. While **** ** ******** (and *** *******), ** does ******** *** ********* *** profitability ** ********** *** bring ** **** *********, as *** *** ***** provides ****** ****** ******** from **** ********, **** little ********** *****/********* ****.

Company ********* ********

*** ******* *** *** yet ********* * *********, making ** ********** ** analyze *** $**.** ****** offering ******** ** *** company *******. ***** *** $70M ******** *******, ******* with ******* ******, ********* is ****** ** ** relatively ***.

Use ** *****

*** ********* ******** **** the ***** ***** ****** will ****** ** **** to ******** *****/********* *******, potentially ********* **** ***-*** enforcement *********, **** ** universities.

Challenging ******

*** ******* ********* ****** has *** **** ************ large, *********** *********** ** one ** *** **** well-known ********* ** **** space *** ***** ******** are ****** ** ****. The ******* ***** *********** from ********* **** ******* ********* ******* *** ****** ******** **** ********* ****** ******* detection, ** **** ******* ********* **** ** targeting ***** ******, *** ******* ***** companies **** ******. ************, ******** ** machine ********/** **** **** neural ******** *** ****** it ****** ** ** audio/video ******** *** **** extraction, ***** ***** ****** new ******* ********* ** target ***********'* ******, *********** reducing ************ ****** ** making ******* ********* ********** more ** * *********.

*********** ****** *** ******* more ***** ****** **** will ***** * ************* point, *** *** **** likely ** ********* **** challenges ***** *** *** to *************. *******, *** company **** **** *** benefit ** * ***** installed **** *** ************* of *** ****** **** their ****-**** *********** ** gunshot *********.

Update - ***

*********** ***** ** **** 7th ** $**, *** up **.*% ** *** first *** ** $**.** and ** *** *** of **** *** ******** modestly ** $**.**, ***** above *** *** *****, giving *** ******* * market ********* ** $*** *******.

Comments (14)

Avatar

Jerry Wilkins

05/17/17 03:50pm

What impact will the use of a Suppressor have on the Type 2 error rate?

Avatar

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Jerry Wilkins | 05/17/17 03:55pm

That is a good question, especially considering some of the current trends to position suppressors as hearing protection devices, making them much easier to obtain. 

At a minimum, it would likely require many more microphones in order to get a good sound capture, as you would lose the loud and distinctive 'bang' sound. 

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

05/17/17 06:56pm

Brian - does IPVM have any plans to do an independent test on any of the gunshot technology?

Avatar

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1 | 05/17/17 07:02pm

As much as Rhodes and myself would love to do a live outdoor gunshoot detection test, I am not sure that would be practical.

I think that to properly test the outdoor systems you would need to do it in a large metropolitan area to account for sound reflections, positioning accuracy, etc. 

 

Avatar

Skip Cusack

In reply to Brian Karas | 05/19/17 11:09am

And therein lies one of the challenges. The efficacy of this technology needs to be quantified in a credible way. Preferably with an ROC curve like a biometric system. But testing it thoroughly and scientifically is difficult. Sound waves disperse, ricochet and are a tricky signal - and very dependent on the environment. So we are left to take the manufacturer's word for their own product's performance. 

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1 | 05/17/17 07:06pm

We actually have talked about it internally, especially given the low cost/free offerings now available for simple detection (not location), like Louroe or those included on the Wisenet X line. 

But like Brian says, I'm not sure it would be totally representative of actual performance, since we'd likely do it a range, not an indoor or urban area. And we'd have to try any number of different guns, etc. So it's somewhat impractical. Not out of the question, though.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #2

05/17/17 11:09pm

Wait...  So "Samaritan" or "The Machine" hasn't covertly bought up the company in its bid for global awareness?  

 

Undisclosed #3

05/22/17 05:02pm

What is the cost for equipment per sq mile covered?

What is the recurring cost per year per sq mile covered?

Does the benefit of being alerted to gunfire outweigh the costs incurred?

i.e. could those same costs provide more value spent on other 'safety' technologies available to LE and/or muni?

Avatar

Brian Karas

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #3 | 05/22/17 05:18pm

I don't think it is priced based on raw area coverage, as different locations will need more/less equipment, depending on environmental factors.

It is probably more valuable in cities that have a lot of gun-related crimes vs. those where gun crimes/shootings are relatively low.

 

John Honovich

IPVM | 07/01/17 11:19am

Update: 

ShotSpotter IPOed on June 7th at $11, was up 30.7% on its first day to $14.38 and by the end of June had reverted modestly to $12.79, still above the IPO price, giving the company a market valuation of $116 million.

Undisclosed #3

07/28/17 05:50pm

Falls River, Massachusetts

2012:

Fall River’s new ShotSpotter device keeps an ear on crime

2017:

‘False alarms’ lead Fall River to ditch ShotSpotter system

Undisclosed #3

07/28/17 06:04pm

John Honovich

IPVM | 05/01/18 08:14pm

Update: ShotSpotter has more than doubled in market capitalization since they IPOed:

Though still reports of system problems recently: ShotSpotter CEO responds to end of Fall River agreement

Paul Shah

05/01/18 08:42pm

I see them as becoming more and more part of the toolkit that the Police use. Once that happens, it doesn't need empirical data or even work. Other agencies will blindly follow. If its good enough for NYPD & CPD, its good enough for everyone else

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,817 reports, 914 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports