PRC SenseTime Uses Loophole To Avoid US Sanctions
SenseTime says US human rights sanctions have no "material adverse impacts" on its business, arguing a legal loophole lets the PRC AI giant obtain sensitive US technology.
SenseTime was added to the Commerce Department's Entity List in October 2019, which effectively prevents listed entities from obtaining many US tech items.
But thanks to a 2020 US update that singled out "Beijing SenseTime", the firm says it can "continue to source" items as long as it doesn't use its Beijing SenseTime subsidiary.
Prior to the sanctions, SenseTime was widely referred to as "Beijing SenseTime" and most of the firm's key patents and trademarks are still owned by Beijing SenseTime while Beijing has the most SenseTime workers listed on LinkedIn.
However, SenseTime's current ownership chart shows Beijing SenseTime to be an isolated subsidiary. SenseTime's website no longer lists Beijing SenseTime at the footer, but Shanghai SenseTime.
This raises questions about these sanctions' implementation. And while SenseTime is currently benefiting, it also risks that Commerce will add other SenseTime entities later down the line.
IPVM jointly covered this story with Axios which has published its own article.
SenseTime **********
********* ** *** ***'* ******* ****** recognition/AI **** **** **** ***** ** ~$534 *******,****** * ************ ****** ** *** ** *** Hong **** ***** ********.
********* ********** *** ****** **** ** ******* 2019 (***** ************* *** *****)****"***** ****** ********** *** ****** ** China’s ******** ********* *******":
********* ******* '****** ***********' **** ** PRC ****** ** ****** ******* ****** *** **** ********** ************* **** ***** ******** ******* **** ** quit ** ****, ****** ****** *** Entity ****, *** ***** ** ****************** ******** ************ *********.
*** ****** **** ***** ******** **** obtaining ** **** ******** ** ********* ************** ***********/'***'******* * *******, ***** ********* ******* under '*********** ** ******'.
2020 ****** **** ******
*********** ******* ************* **** ******** "***** ****" *** lists * ******* *******:
*******, ****** ****, *** ** *****"******* ***** ****" *** ****** **** "Sense ****" *** ** "*****" ** Beijing *********. **** *** ** **** in ********** ****** ****:
********* *** **** ******* ** *** time ** * ******* *** ** SenseTime; ** ******* ****, *** ******** Department *** ********** ****** ********** "*********", but ** **** **** **** *** replaced **** "******** ********* ******* ********** Co., ***" **** "*********" ****** ** an "*****":
** ****** *** ***** *** *** of *** *******.
Sanctions "** *** *****", ** "******** ******* *******"
***** ******************* ****** **** **** ******* ********* is ********** ** *** ********* "** not ***** ** ***** ******** ****** the *****":
********* **** **** ** *** ** has ******** ** "******** ******* *******" as "******** ***** ******** (********* ******* SenseTime) *** **** ** ******** ** source" *** ***** (** **** ** they *** *** ************ **** ** Beijing *********):
***** ********** ********** ****** **** ********* **** ***** to *** ******** ****** **********; **** do *** ***** ** "************, ****** companies, *** ****** *********" **** *** "legally ********" ** **** ** ***** are *** ****** ** "******", "******", etc.
********* **** ** *********** "******** ******* measures" ** ****** ******* ********* **** not ********* ********* *****.********* **** '*** *****' *** **** unable ** ****** **** ***** *** to ******* *********'* ******* ("******* ******, desktop *********, ** ******** *** ****** software") *** ***** **** "*** ******** to *** ******** **********".
********* ******** ** *** ********** ******* & ******* *** ********* ********.
SenseTime ********
* ********* ************ **** **** *** sanctions **** ***** ** ******* *********, citing "***** ***** ******":
*. *** ****** **** *********** **** applies ** ******* *********. ** ***.*, 2020, *** ******* *** ****** **** to ***** "******* ********* ********** *********** Co., ***." *** ** ********** *****, "Beijing ********* ********** *********** **., ***." to *** ****** **** *** ******* "SenseTime" ** ** ***** ** **** listed ******.
*. ** **** ***** ***** ****** that *** ******* *********** ********* ***** the ****** **** ******* ** ******* SenseTime **** *** **** *** ***** to *** ***** ******* ******** ********* entities.
Beijing ********* ********
***** ** *** *********, ******* *** sources ******** ** ********* (*** ******* as * *****) ** "******* *********", e.g. ***** ***** ****, * ***** **********************, *** ***-******** ********. ********* ** *********, *********'* **** ******* ****** "******* SenseTime" ** *** ******:
*******,*********, *** ******* ***** ******** ********* at *** ******:
**** ******* ****** ****** *** **** recently, ** **** ***** *********** *********** **** **** ****; *** ********** *** filed ** ****** **.
***************** *** ****** **** ******* ********* does ****** "***** ** ******** ******** and ********* ** ******* ********", *** same ** *** ***** ************. *** th* ********** ***** **** ******* ********* owns *** ******** ** *** ********* trademarks ********** "******** ** *** ********":
*** ********** **** ********* **** ******* SenseTime **** **** ** *** ********* patents ********** "********" ** ****:
***** ******** ********* ***** *** ******* number ** ********* ********* *** ***** in *******, ***:
********* *** *********** ************ ******* ** Beijing, **** *** ***** ** *** R&D ** ** ************* ****** ******* ** *&* ****** (**********) ** **********.
**** ***** ********* ***** *** ***** - ********* ********* ** ** "******** to ******** ***************" ***** *** ********** "is ***** ******** ** **********":
****** **** ****, ***** *** ** rules, ** *** ******** ** ******** confidentiality ** *** ******* *********** ***** it ** ***** ******** ** *** regulators. ** ********** **** *** ******* application, ** **** ********* * ***** application ***** ** *** **********, ***, under *** ** *****, *** ***** prospectus **** ** ************* ******** *** accuracy ** *** **** ** **********. Accordingly, *** ***** ********** ****** **** a **** ****** ** *********** ********* the ******* (********* ** *** ****** List ***********) *** ** ***** ******* that *** ***** ** **.
** ********* ** *** ***** *********** proof **********, ** **** *********** ** export ******* ********** ******* ** ****** compliance **** *** ******** ** ****** control ****.
Commerce ************** *********
*** ***** ****** *** ******** ** whether *** ******** ********** ********** ******* SenseTime ******** ** *** *********'* **** operating ******/****** **.
*** ********* *** *****, *** ******** Department************** *****' ****** ***-***** ************/****** (**** their ******** ************). **** ***** ** difficult *** *********/***** ** *** ***** subsidiaries ** *** ****** *** *********, since ***** ************ *** ********** ****** to *** ****** **** **** ******* being ********** "******", "******", ***.
*******, ******* ********* ** *** *********** SenseTime's ******. ************, *** ********** ***** Beijing ********* ** ******** **** *** other ********:
*** ******** ****** *** *************** * ****** ******* ******, * popular ******** *** *** ***** (*********):
Commerce ********** ********
**** ***** ******** ******* *** ****** is ** ******** ********* ** * Group, ** *** ******* ****** ****. Commerce ********* **** ********* ** *** Entity **** "*** *** **** **********" as ******* "** ******** ********/******* ******" and ***** **** "** *********** ****** the **** *** **** *********** ** necessary":
*** ********* ** *** ****** **** are *** **** ********** ** *****/** posing * **** ** ***** ******** in ********** ******** ** ** ******** security/foreign ****** ******** ** ***.**, *** for ***** *** ******* *********** ******* unless ***** ****** *** ****** ** fronts *** *** **** **’** ********** provided. ** *********** ****** *** **** and **** *********** ** *********. ***** you.
************ ********* ******* *********'* ********* "*** *** result ** *********** ********* ** *** Department ** ******** *** *** *** User ****** *********":
*** ********** ** ********, **** *** interagency ******** *********** ******* ********* ***********, including ******* ******* *** ********* ***** subject ** *** ***, ** ****** whether ******* ****** ** ***** ** the ****** ****. ******* *********’* ********* on *** ****** **** *** *** result ** *********** ********* ** *** Department ** ******** *** *** *** User ****** *********.
Raises ********* ***** **************
*** **** **** ********* ****** ****** these ********* **** *** ** ******** impact ****** ********* ***** ***** ************* and *** *** ******** ********** - specifically ********* ** ******** *** ******** (***), ***** *********** *** ****** **** - **** ******* **** ** **** case.
Risk *** *********
** ********* ****** ************ ** *************, *** ********* ******** ** ** risk ** ********/*** **** ******* ** add ***** ********* ******** ** *** List, ******* **** "*** ****** ** significant *************", "********** **************", *** "************ harm":
*** ********* ***** ******** ********* **** SenseTime ***** ** *** ** **** Kong ** ****-***.
********* ** **** | ********* *****
*********** ***** **** * ******** ******* relevant ** *******'* ******:
******* ********* ***** **** **** ** be **** ********** ** ********** [****** profiling] . . . *** **** would **** **** ******** ** *****.
**'* ***** ******** **** ******** ******* each *****'* *****. ****, *'** *** good *** *** ** **'* *** just *** *****. **** ***.
****, *****'* ******* ***** **** ****** entities. ****** ******** ******* *** ********** to **** *** ********, *** *** bad.
*********, **** ***. *********, ********.
** *** ** **** ** *** some ******** ********* ***** **** ** the **. ***** ** **, *******, New ****, *****, *******, *******, *******, Southern ******* (**** ******* ******** **** to ******). **** ***** ****** ****** China *** *** **** ********* ** what ** ***** ** ** ****. I ***** **** ****** **** * China-Based ******. *** ****** ** *** stories. *** ***** ** *** ******** (or ****) **** *** ************ ********. Now, *** ******** ** *** **** your ******* ***** ****** ********* *** new ***** ********? * **** * few *****.
*** *** *** *** **** ******* poster ***** ***********... ******* ** ** pretty **** ** **** *** *** are ***** ** *********-****** ******** **** you *** **** *** ****.
*** ** *** ** **** ***** sound **** *** *** ******** ** everyone ** *** ****?
*** ***** **** ** ******, **** mention *** ** *** ** *** hundreds ** ****** **** ** *** IPVM **** ************, ** ** *** points *** ****** ** ***** **** and *** *** ***** ***** *** counterpoints.
*******, *** **** ****** **** **** kind ** **** *****-***** **** ***** something ** ***** **** *** ******* to ** **** *** **, ********* that *** *** *****.
*** *** *** *** **** ******* poster ***** ***********...
**’* ** *****-**…
**'* ***.
*******, **** *********! **** ** **** able ****** **** ***** ** ******** ****.
*** ******* **** * *** **** looking ** *** ********* ********** ** a ***** (****** *****) ** **** the ********* ** *** ** ********** was ** ******** *** **** ********* business ** **** ***:
** **** ***, *** *** **** that ***** ** ******* ******** **** directly **** ********* *** ****** **** 'Beijing *********' *** *** **** ********* business, * ******* **** ********* ** acting ******* *** ********* ** *** US **********'* *******.
**** ** ******* **** ******** **********'* vague ********* ** **** ** *** Axios ** ****, ** ********, ******** plans ** ** *** **** ********* has ****** **** ** ***** ********. Otherwise, *****, *********, ***., *** *** do *** **** **** ** ********, they *** **-******** ****** ** ***** and *** ****** *********.