Selling and Valuing Security Integrators

Author: Brian Karas, Published on May 12, 2017

This ia a tutorial in how to (1) determine your security integrator's value and (2) to sell your security integrator. If you own an integrator, want to buy one or even are thinking of starting your own one day, this is a must read.

We spoke with an M&A advisors Final Image and Reitman Consulting, both specializing in security integrator sales, about factors that impact the valuation of security integrator businesses.

This post covers:

  • How much an average security integrator is worth / can get in a sale
  • How much the sales price is driven by RMR
  • How to know when it might be time to sell your business
  • How long it takes to get a sale completed
  • How much it costs to hire an M&A advisor and prep for sale
  • What to expect after the sale

**** ** * ******** ** *** ** (*) ********* **** security **********'* ***** *** (*) ** **** **** ******** **********. If *** *** ** **********, **** ** *** *** ** even *** ******** ** ******** **** *** *** ***, **** is * **** ****.

** ***** **** ** *&* ************* *************** **********, **** ************ ** ******** ********** *****, ***** ******* **** impact *** ********* ** ******** ********** **********.

**** **** ******:

  • *** **** ** ******* ******** ********** ** ***** / *** get ** * ****
  • *** **** *** ***** ***** ** ****** ** ***
  • *** ** **** **** ** ***** ** **** ** **** your ********
  • *** **** ** ***** ** *** * **** *********
  • *** **** ** ***** ** **** ** *&* ******* *** prep *** ****
  • **** ** ****** ***** *** ****

[***************]

Valuing ** *********** ********

* ***** ******** ** ********** ***** ***** ** *.* ***** annual *****, ** ** ******, *** ** ******* *********** ********. For *******, ** ********** *****, ***, $** ******* ******** **** a **% ($*,***,***) ********* ****** ***** ******* * $* ******* sale (* ***** $*,***,*** ********* ******, ** *.* ***** $**,***,*** revenue).

* **** ******* *********, *** *** ****** ** ********* ******* would **** ** *** ***** ** ** *** * ******** of *** ********* ****** ** * ******** (** ******* *-** times) **** ****** ********* ****** ****** ***** **-**% ** *******.

******* **** ***** ***** ****** **********:

  • ****** ********* ******* ******* ********** (******* ** **** ****** *****)
  • ******** ******** **** ****
  • **** ****** ****
  • ****-*********** ****** ** ***** ** ******** *******

** *** ********, ***** ***** ****** *********:

  • ***** ** ********* *****/****** **** ** ***********
  • **** ** *** ********* (**** ** ******** ********* *** ********** annual *****)
  • ********* ** ******* ********** (** *** *** ** **** **** business ** * ****** ** *******)
  • ********** *** ******* (**** **** ~**% ***** *******)
  • **** ********** ** ******* **** * **** ***** ****** ** customers
  • ***** ******* ** *********

RMR ****** ** *****

*********** **** ****** *** *** **** *** *+ ***** **** of *********** **** ****** ***. *** ** ********** ****** ******* for *** ********, *** ** ** ****** **** ****** **** project ***** ***** **** ******* **** ** ****** ************, ***** customers *** *** ************* ********* ** *** *** ****** ********.

**%-**% ** ******* ** *** ** ********** * ******* **** in ***** ** ******** ********** ********* *** **** ******** ***** valuation. ******* ** *** *********** **** *** **** *% ** revenue **** *** *** ** **** ** * ******** ************** for *** ********.

******* ** $*,***,*** ** *** ******** ** **** **** ********* and ***** **** **** **** ******* $*,***,*** ** ******* *****, integrators *** ****** ** **** ***** ******** ** *** ****** need ** *********** ** ******** *** ***** ** *******.

*** ********** *** ********** *** *******, **** ***** *****, *** to ******* ******** ***** ** ******* ************.

*** *** *** ** ****** *******, *** *** ****-******/***-**** ********* like ***** ********** **** ** ****** ****** **** *** *** lower-margin ******** **** ******** *****, **** ** ******* **********.

Factors **** ***** *****

**** *******, **** ** ********* ***** ** *** ******* *** obvious *****-********, ******* ***** ****** **** ********** ****** ***** **** may *** ** ** ********.

** * ***** ******* ** *** *******'* ******* ***** ********* from * ***** ****** ** ********, **** ******* **** ********** be ********, ** *** **** ** ****** *** *** ** those ******** ***** **** * ***** ******** ****** ** *** business. **** ** * ******* **** **** ***** *********** *** have *** ** * *** ***** ******** **** ***** * significant, ** **** ****, *******.

********* ** ********* ****** ** ** *****, ******** ******* ****** that **** ********* ****** *** "**** ********" ** *** ********. This ** *** ** *** **** **** **** ********* ********* comes ******* ******* **** * ***** ******* ** **** ********* will ** *** ** ****, ***-**********, *******, ** ********* ***-********. It ***** **** ******** **** *** ********** ** *** **** to ******** **********, ** *** **** ******* ********* *** * project **** ***** **** *******. *** ***** ******* *********** ****** ensure **** **** *** *** ******** ****** ** *** ********* on ***** ***** ** **** *** ******** ** **** ***** company.

Individual ******** *** *** ******* ******

** ***** ***** *** ****** *********** **** ** *** ***** sold, *** ** ********** ******* ***** ** **** *** ***** shares ** ***** ** ****** ** ****** * ********* ****** that ********** **** ***** *** * ******* ***** *** ***** share, ********* ** *******. *** *******, ** *** ******* ** valued ** $*,***,*** *** ***** ** * ****** ******* *******, and *** ****** ***** *** ** *** ******** **** **** likely ******* * ***** *** **** **** $***,***. *** ******* for **** *** **** ***** ******* ****** **-**, ***** *********** ****** **** ********** **** *** "******* ****", and ** *** **** * **** ******** ****** *** ********** worth **** **** **** * ******** ** *** ******** ** sold ***. ** ***** *****, *** ********* **** ** *** a ******** ***** ** * ***** *******.

When ** *** ***** **** ** ****

** **** ******** ** ******** * ******* *******, ** *** be ** ********* **** *** **** ***** *** ******* ** far ** *** *** ** *** ******* *************. ****** ******* points ********* **** ****** * *** ******* *** *** ******* in ****** *****, ****** **** *** **** ** ****** ** other ******* **** ************* ** ********* *******.

* ******** ** ********* *****, ** ****** ********* **** *** significant *** **** **** **** **** ** ******** (>* ****) can **** ** ********** * ******** ********* **** *** *** a ********* ********* ** ** * **** **** ** **** a ****.

*********** *** **** ***** *** ******* ****** *** ******** **** indicates * **** **** ** *** ***** ******* ** *** sale. ** ***** ************ *** ***** ****, ****** ******* ** nationally, ** *** ** ********* **** ********* **** ****** ** capital *** ****** ************ ** **** ***** ** * ***** of ************** *********.

****** **** ** ***** ** *********** *** **** ******** ** is **** ** **** *** *******, *** ** **** **** more *** ******** ******* **** ******** ****. ** ******** *** see ********* ** ******* **** ******** **** ***** ************* ********** to ****** * ******** ******* *******. ****** ***** ********** ** this ****, ****** ** *** ** ********** ** ****** ****** the ******* ******* **** ** **** ** ******* ** **** afloat.

How **** ** ****

********** ** ********** **** **** *** ****** *******. ***** ***** recommended *********** **** * ***** *****, *** **** ** **** but ** *** *** ******** ** *** **** ******** ***** for ******* *********. ***** *** *** **** ******* ** *** company ** **** ******* *** *** ****** ** ******.

************ *** ******* *** ***** * **** ** ******* ** the *********** **** ** ******* *** ******* ** *** ******. Companies **** ***** ***** *** ** ***** ** **** ***** as *********** ** ** * ***-**** *** *********. **** **** identify ********* ******** **** *** ******** ***** ** *** **** time ** ******* **** ****** ******* ** ********* *********.

*** ******* ** ******* *** ******* ** *** ****** *** completing * **** *** **** *-** ******. **** ****** **** to **** **** ********* *********, **** **** **** ** ******** their *** *** ********* ******* ** ** ******* ********** *** come ** **** * *********, *** **** ********** *** ****** sale.

Advising / *********** ****

** ********** ***** *** ********* **** ***** ******** ** ***** own, ********* ** ***** ********* ********** *** ***** ****** ** prospective ******.

***** *** *&* ********, **** ***** ***** *** ******* **** help **** *** *******. ******** **** *****:

  • ***-**** *** ********* ******* **** ******* *** ******** *** **** up **** ******** *** *********** *** ********* ******* ***** **** typically **** $*,***-$**,***.
  • ********* ** "**** ****", ***** ** * ***** ***** **** on *** ******* ** **** ** ********* ********* ***** *** company. **** ******* *** ***** ******* $**,*** ** ***** ** complete.
  • ******* ******, ******* **** ************, ******* *** ****, ***. ********* is ******* ** * ********** ** ******* ***** ***** (******* from *-*% **** ***** ** **** ***** *** ****** ***********).
  • ************ *** ********* ******* ** ***** *** ********* ***** ** is ********* (*** ********, ********* ** *******).

Anyone *** ***** * ********

*********** ******* ** **** ***** ******** ****** ** ***** **** there ** ** ****** ********* *** *********** ** ************* **** provide ******* ********** ** **** *****. ***** *** *************, **** as *********** ******* ** ************ *********** ********* ** ******** *** ****** *********** ** ******* ********** *** ***** ******** in * ***** ****.

Post-Sale ************ / ****-**** / ***********

****** *** ********** ***** ** *********** ****** ****** ** ** required ** **** ** ***** *** ****. *** ********* *** considered ** ** * ***** **** ** *** ***** ** the *******, *** **** *** **** ** **** *** ******** is "******".

** **** ***** *** ******** *****(*) **** *** ** **** in **** **** *** **** ******, ******* ******* ** ****-*** over * *-* **** **** ****. ****** **** ****** *** owner(s) ***** *** * ****** **** *** ********* *******, **** their ****-*** ******* **** *** **** ** ************ **** **** agreed-upon ****. ****-**** *** ***** **** ** *********** ******* **** continued ****** ** ************* ** *** *******, *** ** ***** targets *** *** *** ***** ********* *** ******** **** ** adjusted **** ***********.

[****: **** *** ********** ********* ** **** *** ******* ** 2017 **** ******** ******* *** ********.]

Comments (10)

Thanks for the info. Half profit sounds low but of course it depends on the net Profit. Don't you think a more logical formula is net profit x X?

What would you say is the average net profit for a security company after management is paid?

Half profit sounds low but of course it depends on the net Profit. Don't you think a more logical formula is net profit x X?

To be clear, half revenue.

That's a good point though on profits. Final Image cited an average EBITDA range for integrators of 10-15% with an average valuation multiple of 4 - 6 times EBITDA, which is effectively 0.5x revenue. That is consistent with what we have seen as well.

EBITDA can vary more than revenue and also is impacted more by accounting choices (e.g., how much and how the owner and their family take payments / profits).

Also, a revenue multiple is easier for more people to understand than an EBITDA one. But, to your point, an acquirer will typically carefully check profits and adjust valuation accordingly.

"In many cases the business owner(s) will not be paid in full when the deal closes, instead getting an earn-out over a 2-3 year time span. During this period the owner(s) would get a salary from the acquiring company, plus their earn-out amounts from the sale in installments over some agreed-upon term"

That sounds like a bad deal. Let's say we have a company that does $10M in gross and nets 15% profit with a $200k owner salary.Company sells for 5X profit at $7.5M. owners stays with the deal for 3 years and gets paid $200K. After 3 years, the company would have made $4.5M to the owner if he didn't sell (that's if the company is not growing), leaving the owner with only 3M and no lumpsum advantage since he is getting his money in payment. What am I missing here? Would the owners salary be considered as $1.7M if he was asked to stay?

I sent your question to Final Image, and this was their reply regarding your scenario:

The part missing is that at the date of the sale - the owner would have realized on a base amount of the purchase price - say $5 million in this case - which he can use to generate another return. In additon - the decision to sell would be a function of wanting to exit - and he is crystalizing his value under this structure. Also 3 years would be a long earnout - we would typically see a shorter earnout period of 1 or 2 years which mitigates the risk.

Another way to look at it is that the earnout concept is generally used to bridge to a potential higher number for sellor. Ie - buyer feels company is worth 4 x = $6 million. Sellor wants 6 times = 9 million. Deal is structured as 6 million up front plus a 2 year earnout of $1.5 per year.

To add in case this is helpful:

One of the most common reasons why a seller will push for a higher EBITDA multiple is growth momentum (i.e., "Yes Mr. Buyer, but my company is worth more because the avg market growth rate is 'x' and we're growing at 'y'). To accommodate, they'll agree on a base value with an incremental earn out schedule based on mutually agreed upon future growth targets and duration.

However, these have become less popular in the last 10 yrs in certain circles, especially when the acquired company is to be integrated into another- the reason being lawsuits. Too often the seller will allege that the acquiring company negatively impacted the business (imposing different processes, changing sales people, etc..) and sue or go to arbitration. This can be expensive for both parties.

Buyer beware of earn outs.

Strategy Here , its about strategy

Items left out here are Projected Growth, Value, and Potential to multiply the figures over 5 years

sold Mine at Full Value , up Front, upon contractual signatures.

Combined with other company's it multiply's the figures.

Not always Value, But potential value , or to Just close down the competition and bring up the value of the other purchasing company

Nice Information, Thank you Brian!

I'm not complaining and I appreciate being quoted in the article, but I wasn't interviewed. Again, not complaining, but the quotes look like the substance of a presentation that I gave at PSA Tech on May 8, 2017. What I actually said was that an integrator with a significant amount of RMR should consider valuing the RMR at a multiple, then computing the EBITDA less the cash flow from RMR. The presentation was an hour long and much too complicated to explain here. The other issue is that the discounts are for lack of control and lack of marketability. The source for this is a US. Tax Court case (Holman v. Commissioner). The reference to Revenue Ruling 59-60 refers to the IRS' definition of value of a company or asset as "the price that a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller."

When using the income approach to value a company based upon cash flow or EBITDA there are two methods:

Capitalization of Earnings Method - used for a stable company, again complicated, but historical EBITDA or cash flow is discounted and a multiple is applied.

Discounted Future Benefits Method - projected earnings or cash flow are discounted back to determine a Net Present Value.

If a reader was a participant in the PSA Tec Conference he/she can download my slides from the web site.

Thanks for your interest in valuation of an integrator and feel free to email me off of this site with any questions.

3-5x ebitda is the rate is for acquisition or 32-48x monthly rmr. Most deals actually get done beween 34-40 monthly RMR. Other reasons for buyout are to pick up another manufacturer line-- however I will say that most integrators above 15mm+ have access to just about whatever line they want with a phone call and stocking order.

A company with a larger market share but smaller addressable market is generally worth more than a player in a larger metro with lower market share.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Ambarella on Computer Vision and US Hikua Ban on Sep 10, 2018
Ambarella, a widely-used video surveillance component supplier, is betting on the rise of computer vision and is already seeing a sales impact from...
Stanley Security Acquires 3xLogic, Kushner Becomes Product President on Sep 10, 2018
Stanley Security acquired 3xLogic a few months ago. However, the company has still not officially publicly announced it, leading many to wonder...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 04, 2018
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet it is commonly ignored. The drain wire offers protection for readers...
Sell Dahua or Hikvision At All, Banned From Selling to US Federal Government, Says US HASC on Aug 29, 2018
The US House Armed Services Committee (HASC) Communications Director has confirmed to IPVM that if a company sells Dahua or Hikvision at all, they...

Most Recent Industry Reports

BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...
Chinese Government Praises Hikvision For Following Xi Jinping on Sep 17, 2018
The Chinese government council responsible for managing China's state-owned companies praised Hikvision’s obedience to China’s authoritarian leader...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact