Selecting the Right Electric Strike

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jan 22, 2013

Despite being one of the most common components of access control, specifying the right electric strike can be deceptively complex. Understanding the particulars of each device can be overwhelming. In this note we describe which characteristics of strikes are most important and how to select the right one.

Function Explained

Strikes are basically moveable portions of the door frame, consisting of 3 main components, shown to the left:

  • The Strike Box contains the internal components to the strike that sits inside the frame. Electric strikes are typically driven by one or more solenoids, either directly or via a simple geared carriage inside the box.
  • The Strike Plate affixes the device mechanism to the frame and is responsible for the proper alignment the device in relation to the door locking hardware.
  • The Keeper is the component of the strike that moves. When 'locked', the keeper is rigid and forms a positive stop - interfering with the latch to prevent opening of the door. When 'unlocked', the keeper swings out of the way of the latch and allows the door to open.

Unlike other types of hardware, strikes do not replace or improve the existing hardware mounted on a door. In fact, a strike totally relies on mechanical door locks for securing the door. The strike simply allows for the locking hardware to remain locked and still gain entry through the opening.

Fail Safe/Fail Secure: Unlike maglocks that 'fail safe' on power loss, strikes can be configured to 'fail secure' - meaning the keeper remains rigid regardless if they are powered or not. In order to preserve the life/safety compliance of the opening, the door hardware must accommodate free egress in an emergency. Whether through panic bars/exit devices, lever sets, or even latch sets, egress doors cannot be locked to prevent escape, and hardware must take no more than one, intuitive action to open the door.

AC or DC powered: Most modern strikes either allow selecting between AC and DC or available in AC or DC versions. All strikes are low-voltage, with either 12 or 24 volts standard. Final polarity and voltage selection depend on several design criteria:

        • Noisy vs. Quiet: Due to differences in the way solenoids handle power types, AC electric strikes make a characteristic 'buzzing' noise when operating, while a DC model is quieter (or even 'silent'). In the past, solenoid reliability was tied to polarity types, but modern strikes can be purchased to exceed 'Grade 1' reliability, leaving polarity choices subject to matching existing power supplies or tolerated noise.
        • Battery Backup vs. Low Current Draw: Since 12 VDC 'backup' batteries are common to many electronic systems, they are an inexpensive option for backup power compared to 24 volt cells. However, the current draw of 24 volt strikes is typically lower than 12 volt versions, so if multiple devices are to be powered from a single source or if overall energy consumption is a concern, 24 VDC devices are a popular choice.

Integrated Readers: A newer trend in strike design is integrating a proximity-style reader into the device and running both power and communication bus down a single cable. This integration allows a more streamlined installation and offers a less intrusive install by combining the reader and strike into a single unit. Variants exist that include 'read-in' and 'read-out' capability, with the unsecured side reader being connected through the frame or wall assembly via bluetooth.

Door/Latch Monitoring: A common option for many strikes is a latch monitor, or a simple contact switch that detects when a latch bolt is being contained inside the strike. This sensor also functions as a defacto 'door position' contact, since the door must be shut for the latch to be present. While not all strikes feature this switch, it usually does not add significant cost to the device but greatly enhances the reporting function of the device.

Strike Types

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Selecting the right type of strike includes considering the 'form factor' of the device. Strike are available in two common types:

Mortise: The most common type of strike is the mortise variety, which typically requires a cutout in the frame for install. Mortise Strikes are used when the door locking hardware is a mortise or cylindrical lock - or any other lock whose latch is retracted into the door leaf during operation. Since the bolt protrudes into the frame, a mortise strike's keeper replaces a portion of the reveal. As we will cover in the installation section, installing a mortise strike requires the strike to be installed deep into the frame, often requiring frame material to be precisely cut away for a clean fit.

Surface: These types of strikes are used when the companion locking hardware is a 'rim style' device, meaning it is mounted to the inside surface of the door rather than inside the door. Common 'rim' devices are 'exit devices' or surface deadbolts. Even though a portion of the device protrudes on the 'door rabbet', the strike box may still require an additional cutout in the frame for proper mounting.

Strikes Vs. Other Hardware

The relative value of strikes compared against other electrified hardware types

Pros

  • Inexpensive: Strikes are among the least costly electrified devices, with Grade 1 quality devices selling between $100 - $300. Compared to locks like maglocks that range between $400 - $ 1000 per unit. Even when considering the installation labor, the cost of a strike is between $175 and $375 per door.
  • Reuses Existing Hardware: Another benefit of strikes are they are specified to work with door hardware already in use. Not only does this reduce the 'hard cost' of buying more locks, it saves on the 'soft costs' attributed to re-keying, installation labor, and redistribution of mechanical keys.
  • Energy Efficient: Unlike maglocks that require a steady impulse of electricity to operate, a strike uses only intermittent impulses to operate. While the operational amperage is relatively small for either device, when multiplied over tens or even hundreds of doors, using strikes can cut hundreds of amps from a facility's electricity consumption.

Cons

  • Wear: Unlike maglocks, strikes cannot be installed once and operate for years without attention.Since electric strikes have moving parts, they can wear or break over time. Components like load springs and solenoids require periodic maintenance attention.
  • Adjustment is Vital: Since the strike is totally dependent on the door's locking hardware for security, the relationship between strike and latch is vital and the tolerances for movement are limited. Even during the course of normal operation, door hinges sag, door frames shift, and door latches fall out of throw range of the strike. Anywhere strikes are used, a companion door maintenance problem is vital to guarantee security.
  • Extra Hardware: In some cases, additional hardware is required to protect the strike. Take the example below, where an exposed exterior strike is vulnerable to outside tampering unless additional 'latch protectors' are installed on the door:

Installer Skill Required

Properly mounting a strike takes considerable skill in precision measurement and often requires cutting metal. While the overall installation process is typically straightforward, the installer's craftsmanship and trade skills determines more than cosmetic quality - the operation of the device is affected as well.

For example, while frame cuts are simplified by the use of mounting templates included with the device, the position of the template is subject to accurate measurements and assumptions that the frames, doors, and existing hardware are square and properly mounted.

Successfully mounting a strike free of problems like "preloading" (often caused by misalignment and warping of the door) requires the installer to apply a skillful eye to the door condition before beginning work, and be prepared to correct structural problems by shimming hinges or even replace a warped door leaf. Will will examine the problems, and their corrective actions in an upcoming report on "Maintaining Electrified Hardware".

6 reports cite this report:

Access Control Lock Guide on Sep 26, 2018
In this guide, we examine locks; critical elements of any security system and fundamental parts of every access control system. Two fundamental...
Assa's Lowest Power Draw Maglock: Securitron M680E Examined on Feb 14, 2018
Securitron produces some of the most extreme maglocks on the market, including massively strong maglocks and even ones with integrated CCTV cams...
Top Maglock Provider Warns Against Using Maglocks on Nov 21, 2017
Do not buy my company's product. It sounds strange indeed, but a senior Allegion consultant stated that maglocks should not be used in common...
Fail Safe vs. Fail Secure Tutorial on Sep 13, 2017
Few terms carry greater importance in access control than 'fail safe' and 'fail secure'. Access control professionals must know how these concepts...
Most Needed Improvement: Access Control Software on Feb 16, 2015
100 integrators answered IPVM's question: "Which aspect/element of access control system technology (ie: credentials, locks, controllers,...
Electric Strikes: Why They Are So Popular on Jul 31, 2014
Electric strikes are a mainstay part of access control, but how often do integrators use them? In our recent integrator insights survey, we asked...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...
Proxy Access Control Tested on May 09, 2019
Silicon Valley Access Startup Proxy raised $13.6 Million in May 2019, focusing on mobile physical access control. Beyond the fund raising, Proxy...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
Security Fail: ASISNYC Auto Emails Passwords In Plain Text on May 14, 2019
ASIS NYC automatically emails a user with the password the user just entered, in plain text, when one registers for the site / event, as the...
Hikvision VP On Muslim Oppression on May 14, 2019
Hikvision has won tens of millions of dollars, at least, in direct contracts with the Chinese government that oppresses Muslims, including a forced...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact