Massively Strong Maglock (Securitron)

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 16, 2016

One of the market's strongest maglocks has a twist: the 4,000 pounds claimed bond power is not purely magnetic.

Securitron's hybrid MM15 maglock uses a combination of electromagnetism and mechanical latching to achieve its strength, using a novel hybrid action to lock the maglock shut when needed.

Inside we examine this lock, the design features that gives its great strength, pricing, vulnerabilities, and comparison to conventional maglocks.

*** ** *** ******'* strongest ******** *** * twist: *** *,*** ****** claimed **** ***** ** not ****** ********.

**********'* ****** **** *********** * *********** ** electromagnetism *** ********** ******** to ******* *** ********, using * ***** ****** action ** **** *** maglock **** **** ******.

****** ** ******* **** lock, *** ****** ******** that ***** *** ***** strength, *******, ***************, *** ********** to ************ ********.

[***************]

Product ********

*** ****** ******* **** ******* maglocks, ********* ***** *" X *" * *", and ***** * ******** magnetic **** ******** ***** is *** *****, *** unit's **** *** ************* small ******** **** (*** mA @** ***/ *** mA @** ***) *** more ******* ** * 600 ***** *******. *******, the **** ****** **** strength *.* ***** *******, at *,*** ******.  

*** ********** *** ** attributed ** *** *** the ******** ** ****** into the ****** **** *** lock ** ******:

**** *** **** ** normally ******, *** ****** alone ***** *** ******** secure ***** *************** *****.  However, ** *** **** is ****** ** ** opening ** ********* ******* unlocking *** *******, *** steel ********* ****** *** mechanically **** *** ******** into *****.

Locking ******** ******

*** **** ********* (***** from ************** ***** *****) ***** ***** *** action ** ***** ******** locking ****** *** ******** when ** ** ****** away **** *** ******:

*** ********** ******* ** the ******** ** **** gives *** **** *** bulk ** *** ***** strength, *** ****** ********** it ***** **** **** than *** **** ** force ** ***** *** armature **** **** *** mechanical *********.

MM15 *******

**********'* ****** ******* *** be********* *** ~$*** ********** ******** *********, ******** buying ******* ************, ** project **********, ** ******** a ********** ****** ***** result ** ****** *********. The **** *** * limited '********' ******* *********** warranty *** ** ****** available **** ******** *** door ******** ************.

Screw ******* **********

**** ********* ** ***** note ** ********* ********* vulnerability ** *** ********* unit:

** ********* *****, **** the ****** *** ******** need ** ** ******* to ****** ****** *** door ****** **** ******** sufficient ** ********* *** bond ***** **** ***** breakouts *** ******** ******** do *** ******.

*** ***** ***** ***** a **** ****** **** has ****** ** ******* fashion, ***** ****** *** strain **** *** *** less (*.* ~**%) ** the **** ***** ****** of *** ****:

** ** ***** ** our ******* ********* *****, **** ************* ********* applies ** *** ********, but ** **** ********** in *** ****-******** **** hybrid *******. **** ***** of *****, ********** ****** wood ** ***** **** wood ***** *** **** to *** ********** '*** *****' ** ******** ****** the ******** ** *** door.

Alignment **********

****** *** ***** ******* vulnerability, *** ****** ******** design ******** **** ******** be ******** ******* **** the ******. ** ***** in ******* *** ***** ********* Primer, ******* *** ***** alignment ******* *** **** leaf *** ***** ** generally ********* *** *** locks, *** ******* *** MM15's ******** **** ** surrounded ** *** ******, anything **** **** ***** bowing ** ******* ***** result ** ************* ******. However, *** ********** **** these ***** **** *** reveal **** ** ** a ****** ***** **** installed ** '******' *****.

Battery ****** **********

******* *********** *** ************* is *** ****'* '**** safe' ******, ******* **** when ***** *****, *** lock ** ********** ********. As ******* **** ********, electricity ** ****** ** create **** ******** *** to ****** *** ********** mandible, *** ** ** power ** *******, *** MM15 ****** ** ******** at ***. ************ ******* *** ******** are *** ********** ** code, *** ***** *** be ***** * ******** for **** ** ******.  For *** **** ** remain ****** ****** ** outage, ******* ******* ** backup ***** ** ******* will **** ** ** used.

Price ********** ** ************ ********

** *******, *** **** will ***** *** ** be **** ********* **** most ************ **** ******** maglocks. *** *******, **********'**** *********** * **** ****** of *,*** ****** ***** more ** ~$*** ******, while * *,*** ***** Dynalock **** ~$***.

***** ************ ******** *** often **** ******** ** terms ** ********* ******** and ******** ********, *** may ******* **** ********** higher ****** ** *********** from **********, **********, *** AHJs ***** ******** ** the **** ****** **** hybrid *****.

Comments (30)

If the force is applied quickly enough, it should be defeatable at the lowest bond rating, no?

The demo is a bit weak in that regard.

Do you mean explosive separation of the armature from the magnet before the mandibles engage?

sure, that would work.

but on the demo door video, i think a baseball bat could knock it out before it closed. do you?

maybe someone running at a door would do the same?

Well, I don't think a bat would impart enough force to break even the magnetic bond.

It would also be quite the physics problem to determine the exact speed, mass, and door width/deflection needed to move the leaf faster than the mandibles engage, but I assume it is possible if most unlikely.

I'll reach out to Securitron to get a response to the question/ potential vulnerbility here.

Thanks!

Keep in mind that this isn't like breaking the bond on a typical low holding force door. There, the armature moves and the magnet stays stationary, so you only have to break that bond.

In the MM15, the magnet also moves, while the rest of the lock, where the mandibles are, stays stationary. If you pull the door, the armature pulls the magnet with it, which is what pulls the mandibles closed. So you'd have to break that bond without moving the armature forward, and I don't see how you'd do that.

Ok, I get what you are saying.

Curious then, wouldn't it still work even if there was only ten pounds of magnetic holding force?

It seems like it would work with a much lower holding force, though that might cause customers to worry that the maglock portion was too "weak" (just speculation on my part).

This makes it seem like a more normal maglock, with an additional layer of security, instead of a weak maglock with an extra feature to compensate for that weakness.

No that isn't going to happen. Soon as you start to pull on the door the mandibles close on the armature plate. The harder to pull the more they grab the plate.

Here is a pic from one we installed. I am pushing the door open as you can see the hooks are grabbing the armature plate.

One cool feature is a dedicated output to know when mandibles close. So you could get an alert when someone pulls on the door if you wanted to.

Does having that extra feature of the locking mandible incur some extra risk of having another part that may break? If something like that did break, or become jammed, did Securitron mention any quick ways to rectify that?

The mechanical mandibles do not engage unless the door is attempted to be forced open, so I'd expect that if these parts broke, it would mean a weaker lock but not one that is a life/safety danger.

I'll ask Securitron about that aspect too.

you had me a sex bolts.

If you're puritan, there's always 'axial barrel bolts'...

AKA, a "Chicago Screw"...

I have a pile of about 190 of these up for grabs if anyone is interested. ;-)

They were becoming a service issue - those mandibles would stick and either not release the armature or not allow the armature to grab. We did away with all maglocks.

Yikes. What did Securitron say about this?

Also, when you mention 'stick', do you mean physically bind?

I'm not sure what they said.

The mandibles wouldn't move freely which would in turn cause the armature to bind. It seems like we were handing cans of Houdini out at every building so they could clean them on their own. I have taken a few apart and they use a thick grease to lubricate the mandible on the holding shaft - I wonder if that collects debris and gums up the operation.

Considering you have ~$40,000 in MM15s there, I'd assume Securitron would show more than casual interest in solving the issue?

...those mandibles would stick and either not release the armature or not allow the armature to grab...

Some failed-safe,
some failed-secure,
but all failed-for-sure.

Here's Securitron's feedback on the mandible sticking issue:

As you probably know this product was originally introduced into the market by Adams Rite. After Adams Rite joined the ASSA ABLOY family of companies the product was transferred to Securitron Magnalock Corporation as it was felt that this would be a better fit with a Magnalock manufacturer.
I am curious about the age of your MM15's. I recall that just after the transition of the product to Securitron we did experience on early units the sticking mandible problem that you have described. Securitron investigated the issue and did find that the lubricant was the problem. Engineering put through a change request to the builder for another type of grease and we have not been aware of any problem since. As noted this was years ago, so I wonder if the collection that you have are the old Adams Rite versions or perhaps the early Securitron versions.
--
So if these were early units, Securitron has said they addressed the issue some time ago. Does that sound correct, or is this a more recent issue?

Fascinating. Yes, I would say the majority of them were installed around the 2006-2009 time frame.

No one can say you didn't give it a fair shot...

Dibs on the sex bolts, unless Armando objects

Is this an inappropriate time to suggest sharing?

When reading the article I was....

Then I saw Tyler's post and I was....

We've standardized on these locks for the last couple of years. They're rock solid and easy to install. No complaints.

I quickly scanned through the discussion and I don't see any mention of fire code issues which don't allow the use of locks with moving parts that restrict the exit to be used on fire exits.  

Hello Paul:  which code would that be?  Is there a citation available?

Canada:

 

Sentence 3.4.7.12.(15) of the 1985 NBC and Sentence 3.4.6.15.(4) of the 1990 NBC permit the use of electromagnetic locks that do not incorporate latches, pins or other similar devices to keep the door in the closed position on exit doors other than doors leading directly from a Group F, Division 1 occupancy provided:

In reading that Canadian code, I believe the concern behind the exception is that whatever mechanical function of the lock used to bolster the bond may malfunction/break/ not release in emergency.

In areas where the code you cite is valid, I would say the Secuitron Maglock in this post is not allowed.

Note Tyler Graham's comment above.  He mentions tearing out many of these maglocks due to the very problem behind the one your citation addresses.

Thanks for sharing it!

You said "Massive"

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
ProdataKey (PDK) Access Company Profile on Aug 09, 2019
 Utah based ProdataKey touts low cost cloud access, wireless controllers, and no dealer required national distribution availability.  But how does...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Razberi Technologies Company Profile on Aug 06, 2019
Razberi says they have doubled their revenue in the first half of 2019, citing their proprietary camera hardening and cybersecurity capabilities...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Online Video Surveillance Sales Comparison - Amazon, B&H, CDW, LTS, Super Circuits, More on Jul 31, 2019
IPVM has uncovered the key trends and top options being offered across commonly used surveillance sellers. How has the market shifted since we...
Ionodes Company Profile on Jul 31, 2019
What happened to Ionodes? With seasoned leadership from Jean-Paul Saindon founder of SmartSight and Dr. Michael Gilge, founder of VCS, back in...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact