School VMS Upgrade - Ripoff or Deal?

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 18, 2013

A local US newspaper has questioned the need for a local school district to upgrade its VMS software just a few years after its initial install. Commenters have attacked the upgrade, claiming the school is getting ripped off. IPVM investigated, speaking with the school district and the manufacturer to understand what the reality of the situation is.

Portage's Systems

During its original installation in 2009, Portage Public Schools had a choice between two versions of management software. It chose the less expensive package because it fit the needs of it’s then 60-camera system. Fours years later, the number of cameras in its surveillance system has increased to more than five times that. 

How did the system get so big so fast? Portage originally planned only to add cameras to new construction projects coming out of $19 million in construction bonds that were approved in 2007. 

With $450,000 of that budgeted for surveillance, it realized that it had enough to cover surveillance for the whole district. That’s when Daniel Vomastek, Portage Public Schools Director of Information and Technology Systems, decided it was time for an upgrade.

The school installed cameras on all of its 15 buildings, increasing the number of cameras system-wide to 311. 

The cameras cover entryways and exits, playgrounds, hallways and bus pick-up and drop-off areas. Both the Portage Public School central office and individual schools can monitor cameras in real-time but their main purpose is to keep a record of events for playback. The most recent change is coming to Portage's management software.

"When we started, we didn't have a lot of cameras so we bought a lower grade version of OnSSI. But now that our system has grown, we need the ES package to support it,” Vomastek said.  

Upgrade Details

Portage upgraded from the CS version [link no longer available] of OnSSI's management software to the ES version [link no longer available]. ES removes the license cap of 64 cameras per server, and adds a number of notable features including centralized management, multi-stage storage, rules, multicasting and redundancy.

OnSSI said either version supported the total number of cameras but that the upgraded version improved manageability

Pricing

OnSSI credited Portage Public Schools 100 percent for it's original software and billed only $28,900 for the upgrade of 311 camera licenses. That's less than $100 per camera for the upgrade. In addition, the school district confirmed that they had not paid annual maintenance fees in the interim.

Given the going rates of those VMS software versions, that is not expensive at all.

Public Reaction

However, judging by the comments about the upgrade on Mlive.com, many see the $28,000 investment as a waste of money, despite the upgrade deal from OnSSI.

“$28,000 just for the software? They're getting ripped off,” said Ryan Cousins. Cousins said he recently installed an eight-camera system in a store for less than $300. 

Commenter Alexander Feldman says when organizations see bigger price tags, they usually think it means better software, saying $28,000 is "just abnormal, even for hundreds of cameras." He recommended webcam software from Xeoma instead.

Unfortunately, this demonstrates public misconceptions about surveillance. A $300 Costco kit lacks the features and scalability of what a school district needs. Plus, upgrading hundreds of cameras for less than $30,000 is abnormal, ironically, in that it is lower than industry average and a relatively good deal for real VMS software, not just a consumer webcam application.

Comments (17) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
Disruptive Free Lead Generation Added To IPVM on May 15, 2020
IPVM has added lead generation for sellers, for free, disrupting the...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
JCI / Tyco Security Products Layoffs on Jun 05, 2020
Johnson Controls / Tyco Security Products has confirmed COVID-19 related...
FDA "Does Not Intend to Object" To Unapproved Fever Detection Cameras If No 'Undue Risk' on Apr 17, 2020
The US FDA has declared it will not go after the many companies marketing...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...
IPVM For PR / Marketing People on Apr 29, 2020
Since IPVM does not accept advertising nor sponsorships, etc., PR / marketing...
Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
ZKTeco Presents SpeedFace Recognition + Body Temperature Detection on Apr 21, 2020
ZKTeco presented its SF1008+ reader with body temperature and face mask...
30 Million Criminal Face Database Tested (Captis Intelligence) on Apr 27, 2020
30 million criminal mugshots are now available for facial recognition...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...