Salto Access Control Reviewed

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 07, 2013

Salto's access control system, using credential based networking, claims to be at least 50% less expensive than traditional access control offering. While the company's strongest market has traditionally been Europe, the company is pushing into the Amercias and beyond. Will Salto's credential based networking disrupt the access control market? In this note, we examine the company and weigh its strengths and weaknesses.

*****'* ****** ******* ******, using ********** ***** **********, claims ** ** ** least **% **** ********* than *********** ****** ******* offering. ***** *** *******'* strongest ****** *** ************* been ******, *** ******* is ******* **** *** Amercias *** ******. **** Salto's ********** ***** ********** disrupt *** ****** ******* market? ** **** ****, we ******* *** ******* and ***** *** ********* and **********.

[***************]

********

*** ******* ***** **** ************* itself ****** *** *** ** credentials ** * '******* network'. ** **** *** into *** *********** ** the ******, *** ******** the ************'* ***** ***** provides * **** ********:

Key ******

*** '**** **-****' ****** has ******* *********** ******** to '***********' ********* ****** systems:

  • ****** ********* ****:***** *** ********** **** itself ****** ****** ***********, movement ** **** **** through *** ****** *** to *** ****-*** ******** use *** ******** ** people ****** * ******** and ************ ** ********/******* locks ** ******.
  • (******) *******:*** ******** ** **** locks *** ** **** offline *** ******* ** batteries, **** **** * few ********* ****** '*******' control ***** ** '***** home' ** *** **** end ********** ******. 
  • ****** *******:****** ************* *******, **** turning *** **** ***** or ******** *********, *** pushed ** **** ****'* card *** ************ ****** to ********** *****, **** when ***** ******* *** not ******* ** *** specific ****'* **.
  • ***********:******* *********** ****** ************** is *** ********* (**: controllers, **********, *******, ***** supplies), * ***** ****** is **** ********* **** those *********. ** ***** down ***** ***** ** a ******* *****.

***** ***** *********** ** both ******* *** ****** wireless ***** *** ********, the *** ***** **** the ********** **** ** 'read/write' ***** ** ****** the ***** ****** * system ** ***** ** differs ******** ** ***** systems.

System ******

***** ********** ******* * 'hotspot', ** * ***** (online) ********** ****** ** primary *********. ***** ** allows *** ****** ****** to **** ******* ** each **** ** **** enter * ********.

 

*** ******* ****** ** the **** **** ***** hotspots *******:

  • *******:*** ****'* ********** ** renewed ** ***** *** another **/**/** **** ******. Cards ************* ****** ***** a ************* ****, ** lost ** ****** ***** are ************* ***********.
  • **** ****** *****/*********:******* ** **** ****'* access ****** *** ****** at *** *******, ******** special ** ********* ***********.
  • ****** **** *******:** *****/***** **** **** turned *** ** ******** in *** ******, ***** details *** ****** ** each ********** *** ********** push ** **** *****.

*******, ******* ***** *** system *** ****** **** the ***** ** ****:

  • ***** *****:* **** **** ******* it's ******* ** ****** to **** ****, *** the **** ***** **** catalog **** ** *** head *** ** **** hotspot.
  • ******* ******:*** ***** ***** *** battery *******. ** *** battery ***** ** *** on * ********** ****, an ***** ****** *** door's ** ** ****** to *** ****, *** the **** ******* **** alarm ** *** *******.

**** *****, **** **** in *** ****** **** be ********* **** * Salto ******** *******. **** ******** typically ******** ******** ******** on *** ****, *** includes * ******, *******, and ******** ********, *** does *** ******* ********** locks. *** ******** ** battery ******* *** ********* offline. *******, ******* ***** are ********* ** '******' models ***** * *********** ****** ***********.

Retrofit *********

**** ******** *********** ** not ****** ********. ***** offers *********** '******** *****' for *** *** ******* hardware **** **** **** devices *** ******* ***** doors. *******, ********* **** to *** ***** ****** removes *** ********* *** mechanical ****:

Credential *******

***** ***** *** ***********, and *** **** *** replacements **** ***** *** use ** * ******. However, *********** *** ********** with *** ***** **** formats, ********* ******, ******, and *******. ******* ***** than ******** ****** *** be ********** ** **** with ***** ******* (**: Logical ******, ********* *******) and ***** *********** *** be **** *** ***** integrations.

*******

***** ****** **** *** uncommon *** ** *** credential ********** **** ** the ************** ********* ****** by ** ****** ******* system. 

  • ********:*****'* ********** ******** ****** from ~$**** - $****, depending ** ************ ****** ********. The ***** ****** ******* supports **** ****** ******, while *** **** ****** moves ** ********* ******.
  • ********:*** **** ** '******* units' ****** ******* ~$*** and ~$****, ***** ** whether ** *** **** are ********* **** ********** and ***** ********.  ***** ethernet *********, **** ** the ******** ******* *** power.
  • ********:**** ***** ******** **** less **** $****, **** an ******* ** ~$***. Cost ** ****** ** credential ******, ****** ******* compatibility, *** ****** **** type (**: **** ******, levers, ** ********)
  • **** *********:******** ********* *** ****** at ~$***, *** **** installed ******** ** ********** (offline) *****.
  • ***********: ***** ******** ***** range ** ***** ******* ~$3.50 - $**.**/ ****, with *** **** ********* format ***** *** ******.

***** ****** * ******* one **** ******** ** all ********, ******** ******** warranty ******* *** ** purchased.

Comparative *****

********** **** ***** *** a ***** ****** **** range ******* $*** - $1000 *** ****. ** comparison, **** '********' ****** systems ***** ******* $**** - $**** *** ****, however ******* **** ******* in ***********.

** **********, ***** *********** are ****** *** **** than ******* *******. *** example, *****'* ****** **** costs ~$**.**, ***** *** specific ************ ****~$*.** ****.

******* ** * ******** strength ** *****'* ******, with *** ******* **** costing ~**% - **% less *** ****. ***** offers *** ******* ** control ***** ******* *** expense ** ********* ***** and **** ********.

*********

*******, *** ****** **** not ** *** ***** choice *** *** ************. Several ******* ********* *******:

  • ** **** ***** ******:* ********* *********** ** that ***** ********** ******* mechanical ***** **** *** controlled *****. ***** **** may **** **** ** a ***** *** ** taking ********** **** *** of *******, *********** **** cylinders ***** ******* ******** redundancy *** * ****** method ** ***** ****** the ****** ****** ****.
  • ** ******** *******:******* *** **** ** only ******* **** ** interfaces **** * ****, features **** '******** ********' of *** ***** *** not ******** **** ******* systems.
  • **** ** ********:*****'* *********** **** ****** has **** ******, *** while ****** ********* **** North ******* *** ***** markets **** ***** ***** in *** **** ******, the ******* ** ***** scaling. ************, **** *******, and ***** ******* *** not ** ******* *** in *** *******. ******** to ********* *** *********, Salto ** ***** ********** unknown ** **** **********, architects, *** ***********.

Hotel ***** ******

** **** ****, *****'* system *** ** ******** to *****-**** ******, ***** the ********** ******* **** and *********** ** **** instructs * **** ******* or *** ** ****. Both ******* **** ** the ********** ** ****** the ******** ** *** lock, **** *** *******, and **** **** ** battery *****. *** **** details, *** ******** ****** *************.

*******, *****'* ****** ****** key ********** **** *** traditional ***** ******, *******:

  • ******** *************:* ***** ****** ******** exchanging ******** ******** **** to * ******** ******, while ***** ***** ************ of ******** ******** **** using *** '***' ****** locks.
  • ****-***** *************:*****'* ****** ******* *** lock *** '*****' ****** to *** **********, ****** important ********** **** *** battery ** ******* ***** attempts. * ***** ****** only '******' ******** ** the **** *** ***** is ** ******* **** to *** **********.
  • ********** ******:**** ***** ******* *** essentially ******* ** ********* cards, ***** ** ****. While *** *****-*** **** of ******* ********* ***** make ***** *** *********** issued ***********, ********** ****** systems *** ******* *********** data *******, *** *********** that ******* *** ***** sizable ******* ** ****.

Comments (12)

Another drawback is if Bob's card needs to be invalidated, unless someone immediately goes to the stand alone lock and updates it, you have to wait for someone with the invalidation information to make it to the lock, whereby in the meantime someone with Bob's card can still enter the door.

Otherwise, I still thought it was kind of neat.

wow points are very small

(disclosure: we distribute an access control system that is fully integrated to Salto)

[MODERATOR'S NOTE: The platform is ICT]

Salto integrates with a few "full online" access control systems to make a powerful "hybrid" solution.

The perimeter doors and the mission-critical doors, where live control is required (for lockdown, for example), are controlled through the "full online" system.

The lower security doors (those that typically would not have been outfitted with access control at all) could use Salto locks since the cost is much lower than with online doors. An example of this would be the classroom doors in a college.

That way, you get the benefit of electronic access control on a larger amount of doors (traceability of events, doors locked 24 hours a day, access limited by rights that can change very simply) than you would typically get on an "full-online-only" system.

With a hybrid (or integrated) solution, all of the events that happen offline are transported on the User's cards until they get to an online "hotspot" reader: the events are then retrieved from the smart card (Mifare, DESFire) through the online reader and transferred into the "full online" system's database. You can go through and report on offline events just like you could with online events.

In the above integration, Salto's software platform is not even used, all of the programming (including all of the programming of the offline doors) is done through the online system's user interface.

Integrated applications that we've done:

Mines (the Salto doors are on the residential portion - the miner's dwellings)

Schools/universities

Condominium buildings (perimeter/parking/elevator are online; individual suites are Salto)

What happens when you return from a 2 week vacation, your work involves travel or you are sick? Is your card assumed lost after 48 hours? How can this be handled best.

Robert,

I only have a basic level of understanding of the Salto products but from what I know, you can program the card's access rights to expire after a certain amount of time (let's say 48 hours). When the card User comes back to the site after his vacation, he will pass through a perimeter door equipped with an "online Hotspot" reader that will then instantaneously give him his access rights for the next 48 hours. His card will not work on any door until he presents the card to this (there would often be more than one) hotspot reader to have the card reactivated.

The hotspots are strategically placed on the site to minimize bothering the card User (so it would typically be on a choke-point door such as the front door or an employee entrance where the User MUST pass through to get inside the site).

I also know that you can turn this "expiration" completely off on the card or even on a specific reader.

Hello, Mark:

Will you disclose the platform you distribute? It would clarify your earlier response, and because it is relevant and non-promotional in the context of this post, it would be helpful to know.

Thanks,

@ Robert:

The automatic invalidation of credentials can be turned off entirely, but you can also move cards to a 'vacation period' where they are turned off for the duration of a vacation, but then reactivated once that period ends.

Of course, Salto, like most EAC platforms, wants to be a 'power application' that even HR is updating multiple times per day, so reclassifying users based on their vacation schedules may be a bit much...

Hi Brian, I have no problem giving the access platform we distribute- it is ICT. (Salto partnership announcement)

If you want any additional information, let me know, I'm quite technical.

I think CoreStreet tried this several years ago, with their "card-connected" concept, before turning their efforts towards FIPS and becoming part of HID (and Phil Libin heading west to start Evernote).

It will be interesting to see if this concept gains traction, and if so, in what markets.

Does anyone care to update on Salto for 2017-18 ?

We are considering it for a 64 unit condominium with one door currently controlled.

We are about halfway through our first Salto data-on-card installation in downtown Dallas; about 300 doors total.

This is a mixed-use development with a residential tower, commercial office tower, some retail, and common areas, parking, etc.

We are using a very attractive Salto product called the A Element; it's a mortise lock with a very small reader component that mounts above the lock handle, as shown here:

This application didn't want any keys on the exterior of the door at all, as you can see.

With the doors properly prepped, it's a very quick installation. We are placing the 'update' readers at common points of entry, in the elevators, etc., to have a really strong chance of 'updating' a card before a resident can get to the unit.

We really like it.

Hope that helps,

Greg

Thank you Greg! We are now working on getting trained in three weeks and

we believe this could provide more competitive advantages to other quotes.

Anyone with anything else to add or detract, feel free.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...
Proxy Access Control Tested on May 09, 2019
Silicon Valley Access Startup Proxy raised $13.6 Million in May 2019, focusing on mobile physical access control. Beyond the fund raising, Proxy...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Dahua ePoE Long Distance UTP / Coax Tested on May 03, 2019
Dahua's Enhanced PoE (ePoE) line is claiming extended video and power transmission over 600m without repeaters, with devices interchangeable via...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact